User talk:JJMC89
NULL
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JJMC89. |
Bot-related queries:
|
James Elliott
Concern about repeated disruptive edits on Lucky Bisht article
Hello,
I would like to bring to your attention repeated disruptive reverts on the Lucky Bisht article by User:Kingsmasher678. The removed content is supported by multiple reliable and independent news sources.
The repeated reverts are happening without properly addressing the reliability of the references, and this has created a disruptive editing situation. Earlier, my account was also affected during this dispute.
I have already opened a discussion on the article’s talk page to resolve the issue properly. I would appreciate it if an administrator could review the situation and help ensure that the article is improved according to Wikipedia’s sourcing policies.
Thank you. ~2026-16458-40 (talk) 21:18, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Concern about repeated disruptive edi
Hello, I am writing as an editor regarding ongoing issues on the Lucky Bisht article. It appears that certain edits and repeated reverts are removing or challenging sourced material without clearly addressing the reliability of the references cited in the article. The current version of the page includes several reliable sources, and the subject appears to have substantially broader coverage across independent news outlets. A basic search across widely available media sources indicates that there are numerous news reports discussing Lucky Bisht and related public activities. Despite this, some edits continue to revert sourced information rather than raising specific concerns about the reliability of individual references. This situation is creating instability on the article and making constructive editing more difficult. I have attempted to address the matter through discussion, but the repeated reverts continue. I would appreciate it if an administrator could review the article’s edit history and the recent reverts in order to determine whether the removals are justified or if the page is experiencing unnecessary disruption. Thank you for your time and consideration. Spider1217 (talk) 21:27, 15 March 2026 (UTC)