User talk:JT0219

Hello, JT0219, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Clearfrienda ^💬 21:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I'm planning a GA/FA push for the episode, and since you worked on the plot summary, I just wanted to let you know in advance that I intend to create a draft page for the plot summary that's meant to find the "just right" amount of plot explanation, as well as ensure that it can be easily understood by someone who has never seen the show or read the manga. I'll let you know once it's ready so you can weigh in. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 14:01, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

It does seem to be resolved by a third party, as they have summarized some of the important plot points of the episode. I do appreciate you approaching me with this request. JT0219 (talk) 14:04, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Mate, I'd really want to thank you for updating the episode infos for the Blue Box anime. Up until the final episode's airing, the infos weren't revealed until now. For this, I must thank you. Aaron460 (talk) 17:02, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Please take a look at the recent edits to the article BanG Dream! It's MyGO!!!!!. Some user (from the Chinese section?) seems to be trying to erase Takeda Ayano's involvement in the writing of the show and present it as the studio's overall work "according to the director's plan," which they even repeats several times in the article. I consider this a potential conflict of interest, as the point in question is quoted from her interview, where she discusses her own writing, and at one point during the show's broadcast, Ayano was even subjected to harassment by Chinese users, who blamed her for the decline in the quality of the script and, speculatively, even forced her to leave the project. But if you think I'm wrong, you are free to undo my edit and/or rewrite the mentioned fragment. Solaire the knight (talk) 17:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Sorry for my poor English and formatting. However, my concern is not just about one director, but the entire production team. That's why I refer to it as a directing plan(演出プラン), not a director's plan(監督プラン). On many forums and SNS, the focus is often only on the screenwriter, who is mistakenly credited as the originator of many ideas. As an anime enthusiast, this worries me, because it not only downplays others' contributions but also puts undue pressure on the screenwriter. That's why I insist on restoring my edit. I also enjoy anime like Locodol that Ayana has participated in. By the way, Kakimoto and Sanzigen have received much more criticism here than Ayano, and are considered to have made no positive contribution to Mygo or Mujica.--秦百751984871 (talk) 18:38, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi there. I think this is the first time we talk. I've just tried expanding production and reception sections of Sanda. However, English is not my first language so I would like if you could revise the Sanda article. I look forward to the article being improved in the future. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 17:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi! So, what are your thoughts on SANDA so far? I still haven't watched the anime, but judging by the fan translation and the episode descriptions on the wiki itself, Ono's feelings are one-sided (Shiori's final chapter in the manga depicts her alone, but I don't know the context. The poster for the final chapter, however, shows Ono hugging her from behind), but Shiori still has some gender conflict? I was expecting you to change the text later, but did you really decide to wait until the anime's finale? Solaire the knight (talk) 14:30, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

It's very one-sided on Ono's part, and if I recall correctly, Fuyumura kinda wants to keep their relationship as friends. In regard to the gender conflict part, it seems that it's been a bit subdued but still present within Fuyumura's character arc. I did add those initial character info for the both of them back when it's just episodes 3 to 5, but I think it can be updated to reflect the current situation since it seems pretty definitive and with the finale possibly approaching in 2 week's time. JT0219 (talk) 15:40, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

So if Ono's case quite obviously fits within the framework of queer discourse, Shiori is on the edge and will require good research and finding the right sources? I was hoping that the anime would adapt the entire manga, since from what I understand from the discussions, a lot of the key moments remain in the second half of the story. Solaire the knight (talk) 15:52, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Template:Uma Musume Pretty Derby has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ConeKota (talk) 16:30, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

It looks like this Chinese user has again started deleting quotes and references to the show's writer from the article. A couple of months after he tried to do it last time, vaguely replacing this with complaints about "provoking attacks on the director," etc. I just don't know what to make of this. It seems like this echoes the harassment of Ayana on the Chinese internet, when users tried to attack Ayana to defend the director after criticizing the show. Solaire the knight (talk) 14:00, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• 我因你反复地误解感到极度悲伤并痛哭。我恳求你能尽快用一个正常的翻译工具认真翻译访谈，以证明我没有在恶意违规编辑。（I am extremely saddened and have cried because you repeatedly misunderstood me. I implore you to use a reliable translation tool as soon as possible to carefully translate the interview, to prove that I did not maliciously edit it.）
• 事实上包括我删掉的段落在内，Production这一目录完全是对中文维基百科的翻译。然而中文维基百科的这一条目实际上是对原访谈的劣化机械翻译。（In fact, including the paragraphs I deleted, the entire "Production" section is a direct translation of the zhWikipedia entry. However, the zhWikipedia entry itself is actually a poorly executed machine translation of the original interview.）
• 以下是我删除的段落——（Below is the paragraph I deleted—）
  • Given the lighter tone of previous BanG Dream! installments, Ayana initially struggled with balancing this direction with the desire to not alienate fans of earlier installments, but was told by series director Kōdai Kakimoto to commit fully to the heavier tone.
• 以下是中文维基百科的段落——（Below is the paragraph from zhWikipedia—）
  • 考量到《BanG Dream!》過往作品較為輕快的基調，綾奈起初考虑到「不想讓舊作粉絲疏離」，但導演柿本廣大勸她全力投入沉重基調的創作。
• 以下是日文访谈原文——（Below is the original Japanese interview—）
  • 綾奈　これまでのシリーズでは、ライブで気持ちが昇華されるとか物語がきれいに収まるといったある種のセオリーで作ってきたんですけど。
  • 武田　でも「It's MyGO!!!!!」は人間関係が主軸ですよね。
  • 綾奈　はい。ライブをやっても何も解決しないとか、むしろライブをやってこじれるとか。
  • 武田　「なんであの曲をやったの！」とか怒り出したり（笑）。「嘘!? ライブ成功したのにー」とびっくりしましたよ。
  • 綾奈　これまで「バンドリ！」を楽しんできてくださった方は特に驚かれたのでは。
  • ......
  • 綾奈　ただ、どこまでシリアスにしていいかは迷いました。そんなときに、柿本広大監督から、もっと振り切る方針が出たので、「本当に大丈夫？」なんて思いながらもどんどん突き進んで。それでも第9話の脚本が形になったときはみんながバラバラになり過ぎて、「これ、本当にバンドになるのかな？」という思いもあって。もちろん先にざっくりとした流れは作ってあるんですけど……。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 秦百751984871 (talk • contribs) 14:33, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Regarding what you referred to as "users tried to attack Ayana to defend the director", I have already addressed it in my previous response —Kakimoto and Sanzigen have received much more criticism here than Ayano, and are considered to have made no positive contribution to Mygo or Mujica. 秦百751984871 (talk) 14:38, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

A text match doesn't necessarily mean the English text was translated from Chinese. It could very well be the other way around. Especially if we are talking about one interview, not to mention the fact that you have not provided any arguments to support the thesis about the incorrect translation, only your statements about it. Secondly, as I've already told you, we don't care who received criticism or why. We write articles based on authoritative sources, not social media disputes or personal perceptions of fairness. Solaire the knight (talk) 14:44, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Sincerely please open Reference13 (authoritative sources) , as it makes no mention of "told by series director Kōdai Kakimoto to commit fully to the heavier tone" or "balancing this direction with the desire to not alienate fans of earlier installments".I am certain that I deleted it based on authoritative sources. 秦百751984871 (talk) 14:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

What do you mean? There's a whole paragraph about that, and Ayano mentions that she wasn't sure how seriously she could write the plot after the more wholesome previous story, but the director encouraged her to give it her all. Wait, you don't seem to realize that this is a summary of the paragraph, not a verbatim quote? Solaire the knight (talk) 14:59, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

After rechecking, I confirm that I mixed up the order of enwikipedia and zhwikipedia, and I sincerely apologize for this. However, in the corresponding Reference13, it is indeed true that "Given the lighter tone of previous BanG Dream! installments, Ayana initially struggled with balancing this direction with the desire to not alienate fans of earlier installments, but was told by series director Kōdai Kakimoto to commit fully to the heavier tone." is not mentioned anywhere, neither in the entire article nor in any specific section.--秦百751984871 (talk) 15:05, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

I still don't understand what you're trying to say. I found the passage you mentioned on the first page, and the only difference is that the text in the article summarizes everything said in that section. Are you really not confusing a verbatim quote with a general summary of the text? Because what you're looking for is literally in the source and isn't ambiguous. Solaire the knight (talk) 15:11, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

It is difficult to view "encouraged her to give it her all" and "told to commit fully to the heavier tone" as conveying the same meaning; in fact, this has even led to significant misunderstandings. 秦百751984871 (talk) 15:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

You're taking the phrase out of context and seem to be confusing a direct quote with a summary. In the full paragraph, Ayana writes about how she felt hesitant about developing the story in a heavier tone, but the director dispelled her doubts by asking her to continue in that vein. You're looking for a direct quote word for word, when this is a summary of the entire paragraph. Solaire the knight (talk) 15:14, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Okay... I hope that, at least, a better wording can be adopted to avoid more misunderstandings.

"Ayana initially struggled with balancing this direction with the desire to not alienate fans of earlier installments, but was told by series director Kōdai Kakimoto to commit fully to the heavier tone."→

"Ayana initially struggled with balancing this heavy-toned direction with the desire to not alienate fans of earlier installments, but series director Kōdai Kakimoto encouraged her to give it her all."

秦百751984871 (talk) 15:33, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

I won't be against it if other active authors of the article agree to this, since I didn't translate this text. Solaire the knight (talk) 15:39, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

@JT0219: Thank you very much for your edits, and I sincerely apologize for taking up so much of your time. However, I hope you can adopt my final suggestion and revise this sentence. Alternatively, if you have no further objections, I hope I can revise this sentence myself.--秦百751984871 (talk) 15:55, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

I suggest you first open a thread on the discussion page explaining why you think it's necessary to rephrase this. Solaire the knight (talk) 16:01, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Social media disputes andpersonal perceptions of fairness were merely the trigger for my edits, not the basis. My basis has always been authoritative sources. 秦百751984871 (talk) 15:07, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but your actions directly violate the project's conflict of interest rules, as you seem to directly acknowledge your attempts to reword the article, citing your own position in non-Wikipedia media conflicts. Formally, you do cite sources, but your claims of missing text in the source were not confirmed, and you also attempted to remove quotes from Ayana that were literally based on her interview. Solaire the knight (talk) 15:11, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, JT0219. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cultural impact of Umamusume: Pretty Derby, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 6 March 2026 (UTC)