User talk:JaneFaeJohnson

Hello. Your recent edit to International Socialist Organization appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. tony 20:34, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm TonySt. An edit that you recently made to Occupy Dallas seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. tony 20:52, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello,

I wanted to clarify something regarding my recent edit. I am a disabled contributor and I rely on accessibility software that includes AI-assisted writing tools to help me compose text. These tools help me with drafting and formatting, but I still ensure that the information I add is supported by reliable sources and follows Wikipedia guidelines.

My intention is simply to contribute sourced information about Occupy Dallas based on reporting from outlets such as KERA, NBC DFW, Dallas Observer, Dallas Morning News, and Dallas Voice. If any part of the wording needs improvement to better match Wikipedia style, I’m very open to adjusting it.

I would appreciate guidance on how the sourced material could be phrased or placed in the article so it meets editorial standards. Thank you for taking the time to review the edits. JaneFaeJohnson (talk) 21:06, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Going forward it would probably be a good idea to discontinue using AI tools here, but especially when talking with other editors.

I noticed you adding Chaaz to Sherman High School (Texas), then adding them to International Socialist Organization, and then asking a LLM to recreate Occupy Dallas, seemingly in order to add Chaaz to the article (as you've done twice now). What is your relationship with Chaaz?

A favor to ask -- please do not use AI tools in your reply to me. If I want to talk to ChatGPT I can do that elsewhere ;) tony 22:39, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

My additions are on published sources about organizing in Dallas activist communities. The sources are reliable and accurately reflected in article. I’m not Chaaz. I have a list of notable Dallas activists and they are literally the first on the list made by someone else. I’m fulfilling the task.

Again, my accessibility software is AI assisted and so I had to struggle to verbally ask my mother to type this. ~2026-16496-84 (talk) 22:53, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

“ If I want to talk to ChatGPT I can do that elsewhere ;)” Commentary like this is ableist and shows you have little to no familiarity with relevant accessibility tools and how AI has been integrated. This places an undue barrier of inclusion upon disabled users. JaneFaeJohnson (talk) 22:56, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

My accessibility software integrates ChatGPT model 5.3 and if you don’t want to talk to ChatGPT that means you don’t want to talk to many people with disability who AI allows our independence easier than saying “Mom, please type this.” When she would rather be feeding our dogs. (I would indeed rather be feeding the dogs ;-) JaneFaeJohnson (talk) 23:01, 15 March 2026 (UTC)