User talk:JalenBarks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Happy Birthday!

P.S. I really hope you feel better soon. Please let me know if you need anything. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:26, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Happy birthday! Leijurv (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

23 of March, 2026

@JalenBarks, why on EARTH can I not use a page from the official website of a record label as the SOURCE for an edit on a Wikipedia article related to that record label. THAT MAKES NO SENSE! Giorgio Bicchiere (talk) 03:25, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia relies on neutral WP:THIRDPARTY coverage for inclusion of a music artist on a record label list. Simple verification alone is not enough; we need the reliable source. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:33, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Actually, that does kind of make sense @JalenBarks!
Thank you for informing me, and sorry for sound aggressive! I get frustrated when things confuse me. Giorgio Bicchiere (talk) 03:54, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2026).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Ks0stm

Oversight changes

removed Ks0stm

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, remedy 9.1 of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been amended to limit TenPoundHammer to one XfD nomination or PROD per 24-hour period.
  • Following a motion, the Iskandar323 further POV pushing motion has been rescinded.
  • The Arbitration Committee has passed a housekeeping motion rescinding a number of outdated remedies and enforcement provisions across multiple legacy cases. In most instances, existing sanctions remain in force and continue to be appealable through the usual processes, while some case-specific remedies were amended or clarified.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:36, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Suki Sandhu

Hello, I see you reverted some edits made by Masterartsconnect. I'm keen to remove the message on this page which says: This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information.

Since you've reverted the edits which were made, can you also remove the message above? Many thanks QueVee (talk) 14:57, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

I don't see why this is something you can't do yourself. Jalen Barks (Woof) 17:52, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
Ok, thank you, I shall. Thanks QueVee (talk) 12:49, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

John_Gregory_(governor)

Hi, letting you know I had completed the revdel on this report, but another editor contacted me and pointed out that source is in fact public domain. The site has has materials under various licenses but that specific paper was released by the UK crown in 1965 and is public domain (specifically says so at the top "This free content was digitised ... Public Domain". Accordinly I reverted the revdel and reverted the article to its pre-report state. Mfield (Oi!) 04:40, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Checkuser changes

removed Giraffer

Oversight changes

added Kj cheetham
removed Giraffer

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the GSCASTE extended-confirmed restriction in the Indian military history case has been narrowed. It now applies to caste-related topics in South Asia, and the preemptive protection remedy has been amended accordingly.
  • The arbitration case Pbsouthwood has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 7 April.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI