User talk:JeBonSer/Archive 2

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For reviewing at least 25 articles during the drive.

Thank you for reviewing or re-reviewing 32 articles, which helped contribute to an overall 1276-article reduction in the backlog during the drive. (t · c) buidhe 12:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

@Buidhe: Thank you very much! 😇 JeBonSer ^{(talk | sign)} 13:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 14:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day! Hi JeBonSer! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 00:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 00:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Answer the Phone cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing my two articles Cultural depictions of Conrad II, Holy Roman Emperor and Cultural depictions of Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor.

Deamonpen (talk) 09:46, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you again for reviewing my article Cultural depictions of Theophanu. It's so quick!--Deamonpen (talk) 10:15, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, JeBonSer,

In a recent Village Pump RFC, the discussion consensus was that only recently created articles should be moved from main space to Draft space. List of military flags of Estonia was created in 2009 so it would not be considered to be recently created. "Recent" is loosely defined as anywhere from 3-6 months old (or less).

If you believe an article needs to be improved or deleted, you can either work on the article yourself or use one of Wikipedia's deletion processes. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

		The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award
		For over 360 article reviews during 2020. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:41, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2020. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are just getting caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi, thank you so much for doing the GA Review for Philippe I, Duke of Orléans. Your diligent work is much appreciated. I look forward to working with you again someday! Unlimitedlead (talk) 12:29, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

@Unlimitedlead: You're welcome! JeBonSer ^{(talk | sign)} 12:40, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2019. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:02, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are almost caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:02, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating it for DYK! hope it gets promoted. Amir Ghandi (talk) 13:51, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hey JeBonSer. I would like to thank you as well for creating that DYK. By the way; maybe you could write an ALT1 hook involving the war against the Russians? I think that skirmish is even less known than the one against the Mughals, and of even greater modern-day interest given how Russia and Iran are allies of convenience nowadays. In addition, that particular article has an image you could add as well. Best, - LouisAragon (talk) 20:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

On 10 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Assumption of the Virgin (Palma Vecchio), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Assumption of the Virgin (pictured) by Palma Vecchio depicts the legend of the Girdle of Thomas as part of the Assumption of Mary? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Assumption of the Virgin (Palma Vecchio). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Assumption of the Virgin (Palma Vecchio)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Precious

paintings

Thank you for quality articles about paintings such as Assumption of the Virgin (Palma Vecchio), Marie Antoinette and Her Children, Virgin and Child (Sirani) and The Angel with Golden Hair, for reviewing new pages, adding navboxes and creating article talk pages, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2759 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:34, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi @JeBonSer: I sent this article to draft, which you reviewed. The two references on the article are passing mentions, proving it exists, but not much else. They is also no inline citations in the article, no footnotes at all. Are you actually reviewing the article, or just pressing the button? scope_creep^Talk 09:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

On 20 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Abbas II of Persia, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the reign of Abbas II of Persia (pictured) was marked by peace with neighbouring nations, except for a war with the Mughal Empire in 1649 to recover the city of Kandahar? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abbas II of Persia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Abbas II of Persia), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 12,028 views (501.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 05:44, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Hey there. Congrats on being on the backlog drive leaderboard already. Off to a great start! If you want to hang out with other NPPs, consider joining us on the NPP Discord. Discord is live chat software that can be really fun. If not no worries. Thanks and see you around :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 00:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Adoration of the Magi with Saint Helena at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

A few days ago, new page patrollers got the backlog to zero. Due to the unprecedented success of the backlog drive, it will be ending early—at the end of 24 October, or in approximately two hours.

Barnstars will be awarded as soon as the coords can tally the results. Streak awards will be allocated based on the first three weeks of the drive, with the last three days being counted as part of week three.

Great work everyone! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

On 29 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Adoration of the Magi with Saint Helena, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Adoration of the Magi with Saint Helena was once the main altarpiece at Sant'Elena, a church dedicated to its namesake? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Adoration of the Magi with Saint Helena. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Adoration of the Magi with Saint Helena), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of The Virgin in Prayer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Umimmak (talk) 23:58, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:For the Loveless Lonely Nights EP cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:10, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bubblegum dance. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 18:59, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Women in Etruscan society at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi there, JeBonSer, and thanks for adding the Women in Red template to your user page. As you have created so many articles about women and their works, you certainly deserve to be a member of the project. I have added your name to our mailing list but you might also like to sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members where others will be able to see your interests. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Women in Etruscan society at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chidgk1 (talk) 07:28, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

JeBonSer, this is a final call for you to stop by your nomination again: you were pinged later that same day, but have not returned. The nomination will be three months old by the time you read this, and will be marked for closure in seven days if you do not address the issues raised. Thank you for your attention to this. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, JeBonSer. Thank you for your work on Retable of the Virgin of Montserrat. User:Alalch E., while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this page. There were some ambiguities and inadequacies with respect to word choice ("escape" instead of "seascape"), grammar and style, and the issue of who painted what exactly (as there are three painters), hopefully all resolved now.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alalch E.}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—Alalch E. 16:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing (and passing) Reichsgesetzblatt so quickly! Much appreciated!

WatkynBassett (talk) 09:23, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Quick facts One year! ...

Precious

One year!

Close

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

On 11 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Women in Etruscan society, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that frescoes, sarcophagi, urns, and trousseaux found in the tombs of Etruscan women (bust pictured) show the important roles they played in society? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Women in Etruscan society. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Women in Etruscan society), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Retable of the Virgin of Montserrat at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 00:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello JeBonSer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged PKS 1353–341 for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want PKS 1353–341 to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Seawolf35 (talk - email) 17:05, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

• Oops, didn't see from page move. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 17:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

I'm confused... shouldn't this be at PKS 1353-341, as in the article's introduction? SmartSE (talk) 17:43, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

On 15 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Retable of the Virgin of Montserrat, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Retable of the Virgin of Montserrat (pictured) was commissioned by a merchant, perhaps as a sign of gratitude for his safe return from a shipwrecked journey from Savona to Valencia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Retable of the Virgin of Montserrat. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Retable of the Virgin of Montserrat), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi there, JeBonSer, and welcome to Women in Red. With all your editing experience and your interest in religion and history, you should be able to make significant contributions to the project. I hope you will also be inspired to write women's biographies. If so, you should find it useful to look through our Primer. You might also like to sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members where others will be able to see your interest in the project. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Siege (Roman history) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:21, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

There are new issues with this nomination. Please stop by soon to address them. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

– robertsky (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

– robertsky (talk) 06:54, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Merry Christmas, JeBonSer! Wishing you Season's Greetings and a Happy Winter Solstice! As the year comes to a close, I want to express my appreciation for your dedicated efforts on Wikipedia and extend heartfelt thanks for your assistance throughout the years. May the holiday season bring you and your loved ones abundant joy, good health, and prosperity.

RV (talk) 10:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for participating in the June 2024 backlog drive! You scored 101 points while adding citations to articles during WikiProject Reliability's first {{citation needed}} backlog drive, earning you this cleanup barnstar. Thanks for helping out!

Pichpich (talk) 16:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Quick facts Two years! ...

Precious

Two years!

Close

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi JeBonSer. Thank you for your work on The gentle and pensive maiden has the power to tame the unicorn. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 18:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

You are invited to participate in The European Destubathon in April. Almost $3000 in Amazon voucher prizes which can be used to buy books for content, though it can also be treated as an editathon if you're not interested in competing! Minimum content to be added to each article just to ensure that they're over a stub. Entries at the end of the contest will be tipped into the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge and European Challenge. Previous contests were really enjoyable and I'm hoping this one will be too! Sign up if interested. Thanks! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:22, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, JeBonSer, and welcome to Women in Red. With all your experience, it's good to see you now intend to spend more of your editing time on creating articles about women. If you haven't already done so, you might find it useful to browse through our Primer. You can let others know about your interest in the project by signing up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red | April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336 Online events: New: Alphabet run G & H | Business Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements (Events facilitated by others): The European Destubathon – a stub improvement contest/editathon from 1–30 April 2025 Tip of the month: When creating biographies, don't forget to use Template:DEFAULTSORT. Accessible from "Wiki markup" at the foot of the page being edited, it allows categories to be listed under the subject's family name rather than their first or given name. Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool) 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,057,083, 412,857 women) 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red | May 2025, Vol 11, Issue 5, Nos. 326, 327, 337, 338 Online events: New: Revolutionary women | Alphabet run I & J Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements (events facilitated by others): WikiProject Women in Green - a Good Article editathon from 1-31 May 2025 Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,269 articles during this period! 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,061,363; 414,126 women) 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% (2,057,083 bios; 412,857 women) Tip of the month: Those of you who experience harassment while trying to create or improve articles about women are welcome to bring your problems to our attention on the Women in Red talk page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Hi! Thanks for participating in the Articles for Creation June Backlog Drive! We've done amazing work so far, dropping the backlog by more than 2000 drafts already. We have around 4300 drafts outstanding, and we need your help to get that down to zero in 5 days. We can do this, but we need all hands on deck to make this happen. A list of the pending drafts can be found at WP:AFCSORT, where you can select submissions in your area of interest. Thank you so much for your work so far, and happy reviewing! – DreamRimmer ■ 01:32, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Philippe I, Duke of Orléans has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:10, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

I have deleted the redirect that was holding up the move of Draft:Cohors equitata. Feel free to accept at your leisure. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 12:24, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

More information WikiProject Crusades, Hello! I'm here to reach out to you about WikiProject Crusades, a proposed revival and expansion of the Crusades Task Force. I've noticed your contributions to articles about the crusades and wanted to ask for your input regarding such a project and potential membership. For more information about the idea (and to sign up), please visit the page for the project. Thank you! ...

	WikiProject Crusades
	Hello! I'm here to reach out to you about WikiProject Crusades, a proposed revival and expansion of the Crusades Task Force. I've noticed your contributions to articles about the crusades and wanted to ask for your input regarding such a project and potential membership. For more information about the idea (and to sign up), please visit the page for the project. Thank you!

Close

🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 15:12, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Saturn in Ascension album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello JeBonSer,

I saw that you have accepted the article Nieuweschans dialect. I want to tell you that this article is almost certainly a hoax. There is also an article in the Dutch Wikipedia, and it has been nominated for deletion. The so called 'sources' in the articles are all complete nonsense, and though it is suggested that they have been published some years ago, they were actually uploaded only a few days ago.
F.i. the 'photo of an newspaper. Which newspaper? And why is it unreadable? The other so called sources, they have no name of an author at all, so that nobody can determine of this has been written by a relyable linguist or by someone who wants to make a joke.
I am an experienced contributor in NL-WP but I am not familiar with the procedure of nominating articles in EN-WP, so I hope you are willing to nominate this nonsense for deletion here.
Btw: all other contributions of this person are nonsense, too. So I think a cleaning / reverting operation will be necessary on several articles. Erik Wannee (talk) 08:39, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

@Erik Wannee:  Resolved: The user has now been indefinitely blocked and the hoax article has now been deleted. JeBonSer (talk) 12:45, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! Erik Wannee (talk) 12:46, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi JeBonSer, you've accepted an AfC submission for Danubian Wars, a supposed historiographical concept in Roman history which does in fact not exist in academia . None of the sources verify the existence of this concept, they simply list events the author deemed related enough for inclusion into a common article. Actually, all of the sources are of terrible quality, Wikipedia itself is cited twice out of 16 sources, and then there are sources vaguely dealing with related topics (an article by the UNESCO on the Danubian Limes, Encyclopaedia Britannica's article on the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest and another on the Danube River, an article by Oxford Bibliographies on the Roman-Germanic Wars) or even random websites which do not qualify as reliable sources (Warfare History Network, War History, Stories Preschool), none of which verify this "Danubian Wars" concept made up by the author of this Wikipedia article.

Respectfully, it was crystal clear that the article shouldn't have been approved, and it should be moved back to draft mainspace. Regards, Super Ψ Dro 00:38, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

@Super Dromaeosaurus:  Done. The page has now been pulled back to draft. JeBonSer (talk) 02:23, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

Excellent, thanks for understanding. Regards, Super Ψ Dro 10:41, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

Hia @JeBonSer

Just wanted to let you know that a draft you accepted, Draft:Danubian Wars, which you then drafitied, is subject of an ANI thread at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents - Wikipedia qcne (talk) 08:18, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi , i just added supported references at article Soda Forest , that you have tagged. Thank you Lanceloth345 (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Added +1 new source that support all article. Lanceloth345 (talk) 11:48, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

This isn’t a question I just wanted to thank you for accepting my page “The battle of Brecon”. Also all the topics you are interested in are highly interesting and diverse (it is excellent to see another history lover especially an Ancient history lover.) KeyolTranslater (talk) 08:18, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, and thank you for your help with NPP! I wanted to reach out because I noticed you recently draftified 63rd Airborne Brigade. Because this article was created more than 90 days ago, it is not eligible for draftification (see WP:DRAFTNO). The script you're using, MoveToDraft, should have a bright red notice stating when an article is not eligible for draftification, either due to age or active editing. Make sure you page attention to this! Additionally, you did not provide a rationale for deletion nor notify the article creator, both of which can be automated through the MoveToDraftScript. If you think I've missed something or made an error, please let me know. I'm open to feedback. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:55, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Cyrillization of Polish under the Russian Empire was also draftified without explanation, despite being over 90 days old. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:31, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade: Sorry for the inconvenience, but I would like you to know that the MoveToDraftScript that I am using doesn't have a bright red notice every time I encounter an article that has been created for more than 90 days. That's why I didn't know that it was not right to draftify an article that was created for more than 90 days. Maybe the script that I have used was an old script. JeBonSer (talk) 02:39, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply! I just noticed that you're using a different MoveToDraft script than I thought, so I apologize if my comment came across as harsh! I use User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js, whereas it looks like you're using User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js. Because the latter has not been updated since 2020, I would suggest switching over to the former. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:43, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Quick facts Three years! ...

Precious

Three years!

Close

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:23, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello there, and thank you for your help with NPP! I wanted to reach out because I noticed your recent draftication of Draft:Vila Praia de Âncora, which occurred three minutes after the article was created. Per NPPHOUR, articles shouldn't be draftified if they are actively being edited. In practice, this means articles shouldn't be draftified if they have been meaningfully edited in the past hour. Draftifying articles too quickly can come across as bitey -- especially considering that articles in mainspace do not need to be complete, and editors are allowed to develop articles in the mainspace.

Additionally, I noticed that you did not inform the editor that their article was draftified or provide rationale for the draftification. To help with some of these processes, I recommend switching your draftification script to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js. The Evad37 script hasn't been updated since 2020, and the MPGuy2824 does more automatically, including notifying editors and providing rationale for draftification. It also alerts you to articles that may not be eligible for draftification.

I hope this makes sense. Thank you again for all your help with NPP. It's definitely appreciated! Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:50, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi JeBonSer, thank you for reviewing the above-mentioned article. Q: why did you tag it as uncategorized when it is included in two relevant categories? Cheers רמרום (talk) 14:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

@רמרום: Error tagging because of the late refresh of the page during the time I tagged it with the "uncategorised" tag using the Page Curation Toolbar. JeBonSer (talk) 15:00, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and thanks again for your help with NPP! I wanted to reach out because I noticed you marked a couple unreferenced articles as reviewed this month (see List of mountains in Afghanistan and Draft:Bazirite). Looking at the logs, you marked the articles as reviewed, then tagged as unreferenced. Per the flowchart, unreferenced articles should not be marked as reviewed. If you have any questions about this, please let me know. Thanks again for all your work this past month! Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:08, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Welcome, welcome, welcome JeBonSer! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2025 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 06:35, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for accepting Coat of arms of Kaliningrad Oblast! Made my day when I logged in :D TovarishchYuri (talk) 15:33, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey, JeBonSer! I'm a little concerned about this article, which you accepted at AfC. The sources appear to be all blogs and simple recipes, nothing that looks to me like it qualifies as significant coverage in a reliable source. Valereee (talk) 12:46, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

It is now tag with "unreliable sources". JeBonSer (talk) 22:35, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

You tagged it for unreliable sources...why did you accept it in the first place? Valereee (talk) 01:38, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

It doesn't mean that if some sources are not reliable, it means the article isn't significant. JeBonSer (talk) 02:11, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

And its because the article is significant enough. It doesn't mean that if some sources are unreliable, the article isn't eligible enough to be in the mainspace. JeBonSer (talk) 02:24, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

But as far as I can tell, no sources are both reliable and significant coverage. We generally need three that are both as a basic minimum for a noncommercial food. Valereee (talk) 13:58, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

On 4 December 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Banquet of Cleopatra (Jordaens), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Banquet of Cleopatra (pictured) depicts Cleopatra drinking a dissolved pearl to impress Mark Antony? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Banquet of Cleopatra (Jordaens). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Banquet of Cleopatra (Jordaens)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

JuniperChill (talk) 00:02, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

On 1 January 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Birth of the Milky Way, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the face of the goddess Hera in The Birth of the Milky Way (pictured) was modelled after Peter Paul Rubens's wife? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Birth of the Milky Way. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Birth of the Milky Way), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

On 9 January 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pallas Athena (Rembrandt), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rembrandt's Pallas Athena (pictured) has sometimes been identified as a painting of Alexander the Great? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pallas Athena (Rembrandt). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pallas Athena (Rembrandt)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 9 January 2026 (UTC)