User talk:Jfire
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jfire. |
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following as contentious topics:
|
|
Condemnation of Wikipedia editors
 |
The Original Barnstar |
| Thank you for your dedication to justice and morality. |
Quote:
- This page was deleted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gonzalo_Lira_(4th_nomination) in 2023, before Gonzalo Lira's death. Some of these editors who deleted the article are indirectly responsible for Lira's death, not legally but morally. The edits that volunteer Wikipedia edit warriors makes have real consequences, deleting other people's hard work and dedication can literally kill people. Lira is one of a multitude of examples of how Wikipedia edits have real world consequences.
Currently on the Gonzalo Lira talk page (October 8 2025), thanks for "!voting" to keep the article in 2024, you are a voice in the wilderness and should be honored. 2A00:1370:8186:3825:F8D8:A280:79A3:63F8 (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Reversion and “possible BLP issue or vandalism” tag on Bassnectar edits
Regarding your recent reversion of my edits to the Bassnectar article, accompanied by the tag “Reverted possible BLP issue or vandalism” on one of the three edit reversions. I’d like to understand the justification for this action. My edits were carefully made to improve both the accuracy and structure of the article.
More broadly, my edits addressed a much larger issue: the article’s lack of clear and proportionate coverage of the sexual misconduct allegations that have defined Bassnectar’s public reputation since 2020. These allegations, their fallout, and subsequent legal developments have been widely reported by major, reputable media outlets and have had direct, lasting effects on his career. Presenting this information prominently — particularly in the lead section — is necessary for an accurate and balanced summary of his notability.
The version you restored omits or minimizes this context in a way that misrepresents the subject’s public standing. Labeling my attempt to correct that imbalance as a “possible BLP issue or vandalism” is not only unsupported but unfair. Nothing in my edits was unsourced, defamatory, or in bad faith.
I’ve opened a detailed discussion on the article’s Talk page: Talk:Bassnectar#On Reversion of Lead Changes Regarding Sexual Misconduct Allegations
I’d appreciate if you could clarify what specific concern prompted such a tag, and on what basis you felt a wholesale reversion was warranted. OctaviusBCS (talk) 04:54, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Anniversary Jfire 🎉
Hey @Jfire. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 22 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 09:15, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Emil Knudsen
The article Emil Knudsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Tagged for Notability concerns for almost 15 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. Unsourced biography with a list of sketchy links. Fails the relevant notability guidelines.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) Bearian (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2026 (UTC)