User talk:Jon Awbrey

The article Relative term has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary definition without sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —swpb^{T • go beyond • bad idea} 18:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

The redirect Normative Principle has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 20 § Normative Principle until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:29, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

The article Gnome (rhetoric) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTDICTIONARY. There is no clear redirect target and the disambiguator makes it an unlikely search term, so deletion seems the best option. Sojourner in the earth (talk) 18:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sojourner in the earth (talk) 18:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gnome (rhetoric) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gnome (rhetoric) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sojourner in the earth (talk) 05:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

The redirect Human trait has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 14 § Human trait until a consensus is reached. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:38, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

The article Sign relational complex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find anything this except pages copying WP. Gscholar+GBooks has max. 2 MA theses mentioning the word; it's also not mentioned in sign relation. Unsourced since creation in 2006.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:33, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

The article Relation construction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unverified since 2006. Seems to fail WP:DICDEF as well.4meter4 (talk) 04:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. 4meter4 (talk) 04:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Relation construction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relation construction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 22:17, 7 March 2026 (UTC)