User talk:JoshuaParadeGuy

@The Bushranger: Hi, I wasn’t able to post on your talk page, so I’m writing here. I wanted to ask about your recent edit. Thanks! JoshuaParadeGuy (talk) 03:09, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

This is about a recent edit you made on a page “Rana Clan”.

I’ve provided official govt documents and state gazette stating the correct information about what I’ve typed on the page did even checked it out?

No

But you went ahead and reverted without even going through the sources I’ve mention and reverted it to a page without any sources!!!! JoshuaParadeGuy (talk) 03:11, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

As you've been repeatedly told you are not allowed to be editing in this topic area what-so-ever. (Removing a comment from your user talk page is considered as you having read it.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 15:41, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:24, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for repeated violations of editing restrictions per WP:CT/CASTE, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

EvergreenFir (talk) 19:36, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes"). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JoshuaParadeGuy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Please copy my appeal to the admins I’ll try to provide contemporary sources even though I’ve provided state gazette sources (from 1890’s to 1931) but I guess you guys want to do partiality here and I get it.arbitration enforcement noticeboard JoshuaParadeGuy (talk) 21:15, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is incoherent. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:39, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Your block isn't because of the sources provided. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 22:47, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Please carefully read WP:CT/CASTE. You're not going to be unblocked to continue editing those topics. Furthermore, as noted in an earlier earning, Raj-era sources generally do not meet WP:RS guidelines for anything caste related. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:46, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

@Ohnoitsjamie - please look at Special:Contributions/~2026-82965-6, plus the filter logs for that temp account. Ravensfire (talk) 05:22, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, blocked. @JoshuaParadeGuy: evading your block makes it increasingly unlikely that anyone will unblock you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 11:46, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

I won’t edit anything related to caste but I won’t let anyone let steal history moreover I’ve provided a source of 2020 of the state govt gazette on Jundla.

also please check why https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rana_clan&redirect=no is being redirected to Gurjar page there is no information or any reliable source that it belong to them even though I’ve provided sources latest 2026-2020-2016 era which is not considered as raj era source I think but you’ll be doing partiality.

I’ll keep my word unblock this and delete this account if you can but why are these pages being edited in the first place check even the Rana clan is being edited even though it’s been same throughout 2009 but recently so much history distortion and what sources has this raven guy provided some books of unrecognised author I can state 100’s of such book but are these reliable.@Ohnoitsjamie JoshuaParadeGuy (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2026 (UTC)