User talk:Jq

The redirect Oklahoma (US State) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 21 § Oklahoma (US State) until a consensus is reached. --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 11:53, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

While having a U+202E RIGHT-TO-LEFT OVERRIDE in your signature isn't per se against the signature policy, it definitely makes it confusing since the reply tool box is displayed as [ylper] and at the beginning of your signature. I suggest removing it. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 01:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

i changed it. 77qq 💬 contributions 02:26, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

You remind me of User:Q28 so I wanted to ask if that was one of your previous accounts? -- Tavix ^(talk) 04:26, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

no. 77qq 💬 contributions 13:40, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Jq,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ^☎ 03:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ^☎ 03:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gaflei, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oberland. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

I don't know what you're using to find the MOS:GEOLINK edits you're making, but you can do this. In case you didn't know. Happy (late) new year. --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 09:52, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Nibok district indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:49, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Ok, the category is no longer empty. thank you for reminding me! Jq talk 💬 contributions 03:01, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Debipur, West Bengal

added a link pointing to Alipur

Fabian Ribauw

added a link pointing to Nauruan

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

The article Ibwenape has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NGEO, lacks any sources or references - draft exists at Draft:Ibwenape.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Dan arndt (talk) 01:30, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Alas, Israel is not like all the other countries. There are Israeli museums that are not in Israel, they are in territories under Israeli occupation, like East Jerusalem. That is probably why the article uses the term Israeli rather than 'in Israel', which is an NPOV violation. Sean.hoyland (talk) 17:39, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Ok. what about the page List of museums in Palestine? Some of those are in east jerusalem Jq talk 💬 contributions 18:18, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Good question, and I didn't even know that article existed. As you can see from East Jerusalem it is generally regarded as part of the occupied Palestinian territories, so it's not quite a symmetrical 'both-sides' situation. I would rather things in Jerusalem had their own Jerusalem specific articles, but even that would be problematic because of different spatial definitions. Either way, these kinds of page moves have a history of starting fires, as you can see here. Sean.hoyland (talk) 02:21, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Indrajai. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:09, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Debipur, West Bengal, a link pointing to the disambiguation page was Alipuradded.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Nrv requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Broken page. Self-redirect

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sixaxis^Yes 20:39, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi there. While reviewing new pages, I noticed that a page you created, Jasiškis, does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines as a standalone article. As an alternative to deletion, I've redirected it to Kupiškis District Municipality. If you disagree, feel free to revert my redirect and we can proceed to a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. (If you reply to me here, please ping me as I am not watching this page.) Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:40, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

@Dclemens1971 what makes it not notable? Jq talk 💬 contributions 22:02, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

If it as, is you said, a single-family homestead with two people, that's not an actual geographic place covered by WP:NGEO; it's a house. It needs to show significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass the general notability guideline. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:04, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Single-family homesteads are actually recognized and independent settlements in Lithuania. Jq talk 💬 contributions 22:20, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

@Dclemens1971 forgot to ping sorry Jq talk 💬 contributions 22:39, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Our article says that elderships are the smallest administrative division. This does not appear to be one of those. If you disagree with me, you're welcome to revert my BLAR and we can see what the consensus is at AfD. Thanks-- Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:46, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

@Dclemens1971 ok Jq talk 💬 contributions 23:19, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jasiškis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasiškis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:43, 26 January 2026 (UTC)