User talk:Jsmentkol

Thanks for your contributions to Bela (film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Not WP:NFILM yet. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaCore talk 16:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page SBI Card, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:42, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page SBI Card, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:01, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to SBI Card. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Yuvaank (talk) 04:54, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Yuvaank, we have not added any promotional materials on the Wikipedia Page. We have only added information on the page along with proper citation Links. Reverting the entire edit is a wrong thing you are doing. You are misusing your Wikipedia Editing power. Not a single Promotional or advertisement tone was used while updating information on the page. News sources were used as citations. Citations were also non promotional. You are blindly removing the entire information. This is ethically wrong. I am requesting @Ekabhishek, @Swdandap, @Drmies to kindly help on this matter. Thanks and Rgards. Jsmentkol (talk) 07:35, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to SBI Card. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. MSWS (talk) 08:02, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

I am requesting @Ekabhishek, @Swdandap, @Drmies to kindly help on this matter. Jsmentkol (talk) 08:08, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Balanced Reporting: It accurately mentions the 20% decline in net profit (FY25) alongside the 7% revenue increase. This "warts-and-all" reporting is exactly what Wikipedia editors look for to prove a page isn't just a corporate advertisement. The page is fully compliant with Wikipedia norms. It has moved from being a "risky" promotional draft a few years ago to a high-quality, stable encyclopedic entry today. Information given are non promotional. Advertisement tones were not used. Properly cited. Citations are also non promotional in nature. Jsmentkol (talk) 08:09, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Edit war was not started from my side. I have given information on the page which are purely non promotional in nature. Given proper citations which are non promotional in nature. Someone coming and reverting the entire edits is completely unethical. Jsmentkol (talk) 08:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

The vast majority of your contribution(s) have focused on the positive. The single 'wart' that you are referring to is the net income which is in an infobox. There is no other mention of issues that the company has faced; The rest of the article mentions the company's awards, credit cards, products, and social aspects.

"The three-revert rule applies per person, not per account". You reverted the article to your preferred version three times; overriding three separate editors each time. MSWS (talk) 08:24, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello Jsmentkol. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to SBI Card, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jsmentkol. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jsmentkol|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Jay8g [V•T•E] 07:42, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

The edits are not paid. Edits were made based on information available on different news sources. Jsmentkol (talk) 07:44, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

You are insisting on adding promotional content. What is your connection to SBI Card? Jay8g [V•T•E] 07:45, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Not a single content was promotional. Not a single Promotional or advertisement tone was used while updating information on the page. News sources were used as citations. Citations were also non promotional. Jsmentkol (talk) 07:46, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Stop avoiding the question. Also, your edits absolutely are highly promotional, no matter how many times you claim otherwise. And by the way, see also WP:NEWSORGINDIA -- many of the sources you have used appear to be paid articles. Jay8g [V•T•E] 07:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Questions were not avoided. The page is fully compliant with Wikipedia norms. It has moved from being a "risky" promotional draft a few years ago to a high-quality, stable encyclopedic entry today.

Norms and Policies Audit

A. Neutral Point of View (NPOV) — Pass

The page has significantly improved. Historically, it was flagged for "promotional content," but recent edits have neutralized the tone:

• Balanced Reporting: It accurately mentions the 20% decline in net profit (FY25) alongside the 7% revenue increase. This "warts-and-all" reporting is exactly what Wikipedia editors look for to prove a page isn't just a corporate advertisement.
• Removal of Puffery: Subjective words like "unmatched," "visionary," or "leading" have been replaced with factual data and specific market share percentages (18.9%).

B. Verifiability & Citations — Strong

The page is now supported by 54+ citations.

• Source Quality: Most references are from high-tier "Reliable Secondary Sources" such as The Economic Times, Mint, and Business Standard.
• Data Integrity: All 2025–2026 milestones (Salila Pande's appointment, the ESG Leader rating, and the ₹18,637 crore revenue) are cited with active, third-party links.

C. Structure & Style — Pass

• Infobox: The infobox is fully updated with FY25 audited data.
• Sections: The "Awards" and "CSR" sections are now formatted as concise, factual lists/paragraphs, which is the preferred style for corporate pages.

----

3. Detailed Evaluation Summary

Criteria

Rating

Observations

Notability

🟢 High

Significant coverage in national and international financial media.

Neutrality

🟢 Stable

No active "Promotional" or "POV" tags; tone is encyclopedic.

Verification

🟢 Strong

Relies on news archives and stock exchange filings.

Formatting

🟢 Correct

Follows the standard Company Manual of Style (MoS). Jsmentkol (talk) 07:59, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Please don't use AI garbage to communicate on Wikipedia either. You still haven't answered what your connection is to this company. Jay8g [V•T•E] 08:01, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your point is illogical. Not a single citation links were promotional. All those are significant news coverages. Not a single line of promotional tones were used in the information provided in the Wikipedia page. Jsmentkol (talk) 08:03, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Balanced Reporting: It accurately mentions the 20% decline in net profit (FY25) alongside the 7% revenue increase. This "warts-and-all" reporting is exactly what Wikipedia editors look for to prove a page isn't just a corporate advertisement. The page is fully compliant with Wikipedia norms. It has moved from being a "risky" promotional draft a few years ago to a high-quality, stable encyclopedic entry today. Information given are non promotional. Advertisement tones were not used. Properly cited. Citations are also non promotional in nature. Jsmentkol (talk) 08:04, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Jay8g [V•T•E] 08:13, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Balanced Reporting: It accurately mentions the 20% decline in net profit (FY25) alongside the 7% revenue increase. This "warts-and-all" reporting is exactly what Wikipedia editors look for to prove a page isn't just a corporate advertisement. The page is fully compliant with Wikipedia norms. It has moved from being a "risky" promotional draft a few years ago to a high-quality, stable encyclopedic entry today. Information given are non promotional. Advertisement tones were not used. Properly cited. Citations are also non promotional in nature. Jsmentkol (talk) 08:18, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

You've been warned for edit warring at ANI. To avoid action by admins, you should wait to get agreement on the article talk page before attempting to restore your material again. EdJohnston (talk) 16:28, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

This is silly. You're warned about edit warring and you keep arguing that you are right. You also keep saying "it is fully compliant" in some bland, likely AI-generated passage, and you are obviously incorrect since so many editors are telling you. In addition you are speaking in the plural, suggesting this is a COI/paid editing account. Drmies (talk) 14:57, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

SBI Cards and Payment Services Limited is a separate company and have enough notability to be on Wikipedia. Jsmentkol (talk) 19:12, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

That's exactly what I mean. This is about your behavior, not about some company. Shouting it in bold does not make your claim any more valid or appropriate. Drmies (talk) 13:50, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Vaibhav Singh Yadav, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:29, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Fixed the referencing errors. Thanks. Jsmentkol (talk) 05:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Firdausul Hasan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:54, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Firdausul Hasan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:58, 15 March 2026 (UTC)