User talk:Juddhasumsher

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Prithvi Narayan Shah, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. ~~ Please do not add unsourced or poorly sourced information to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Prithvi Narayan Shah. Adding content without citing reliable sources harms the credibility of the encyclopedia. Continued disruption may result in a block. If you have reliable sources, please provide them. Thank you. – Cognifex (talk • contribs) 08:21, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Prithvi Narayan Shah. Cognifex (talk • contribs) 08:21, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm R0paire-wiki. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Dipendra of Nepal seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please avoid things like 'tragic' and "which shook the nation and the world" unless sourced as such. Please also do not add content not found in a source per WP:OR, source did not state "allegedly". R0paire 04:44, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dipendra of Nepal. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dipendra of Nepal was changed by Juddhasumsher (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863986 on 2025-07-07T13:13:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:13, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Dipendra of Nepal, you may be blocked from editing. R0paire 04:36, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Exo. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:32, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Sennecaster (Chat) 15:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm PEPSI697. I noticed that you recently removed content from Devyani Rana without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PEPSI697 (💬) (📝) 07:06, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gurkha without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gurkha, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to The Buddha, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 20:02, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Licchavis of Nepal. Ixudi (talk) 12:03, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Gurkha. - Arjayay (talk) 12:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bhutan. Diff: Special:Diff/1338149404/1338603814. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 08:36, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 08:37, 16 February 2026 (UTC)