User talk:KnowMosaic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

🛠️ Getting Started with Wikipedia Editing

If you're new to editing Wikipedia, here's a quick starter kit:

👣 Tips for New Editors

  • Always cite reliable, verifiable sources (prefer academic or government sources).
  • Use the “Show Preview” button before saving edits.
  • Read Wikipedia:Five pillars to understand Wikipedia’s core principles.
  • Be bold, but not reckless—improve content, but respect existing consensus.
  • Use the Talk pages to collaborate and discuss with other editors.
  • Sign comments on talk pages with four tildes: KnowMosaic (talk) 07:10, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

February 2026

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Microsoft Quantum, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected to Microsoft Azure Quantum. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. HurricaneZetaC 18:35, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestions. I will review them thoroughly. Microsoft Azure Quantum and Microsoft Quantum are different entities: one is a research division, while the other is a platform for quantum-related work. I will look into more sources and then think about it further.
@HurricaneZeta
KnowMosaic (talk) 20:31, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ali Mortoza Polash

A tag has been placed on Ali Mortoza Polash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Zzz plant (talk) 21:00, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. This page is appropriate for deletion, as the article does not meet the criteria to be included on Wikipedia. @Zzz plant
KnowMosaic (talk) 21:04, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
I moved the page from main space to Draft. KnowMosaic (talk) 21:05, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Jain states moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jain states. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jain states has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jain states. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 14:39, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jain states (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You did not read fully the advice in the vomments. Please read WP:REF, WP:MOS and WP:LEAD

1. The lead in general has no sources. 2. All statements in the body of the tect must be supported by inline sources. This spplies to "History", "Filling factor.." etc.

3. The page must be more than a collection of statements. What is the relevance of "Flux attachment"? Read WP:SYNTH. The same goes for the rest of the page/other sections
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Ldm1954 (talk) 11:44, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, KnowMosaic! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ldm1954 (talk) 11:44, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestions.
KnowMosaic (talk) 12:20, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shantanu Desai has been accepted

Shantanu Desai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Junbeesh (talk) 10:41, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
Thank you! @Junbeesh
KnowMosaic (talk) 06:40, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aravind Srinivas (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
In addition, please do not add sources at seemingly random points in the text. Srinivas' name, for instance, has six sources (at three different places where his name is mentioned) – there is no actual need for verification of his name, and so those sources apparently don't fill any function at all.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 17:43, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashok Kumar Das (computer scientist) (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lynch44 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please read WP:INDEPENDENT.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Lynch44 12:58, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Omega Seiki Mobility

Hello KnowMosaic, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Omega Seiki Mobility, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Sources in the article are an assertion of importance and language is not promotional . You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:37, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Sri Satish Ambati

Greetings. I have expanded the article to include more secondary sources demonstrating notability, and I removed three references that could be considered self-published, low reliability, and/or promotional. Please take a look and let me know if you still have concerns with the article. Thanks! Btyner (talk) 00:35, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment.
  • The references you or someone else has provided do not meet the notability guidelines. For example:
Ref 1
from the IndiaAI platform. This is a showcase of projects and partnerships, including but not limited to the Government of India. It is not independent coverage.
Ref 2
This is not a known or reliable source, and others suffer from similar issues.
  • All other references just showcase or mention the subject's name, with no appropriate in-depth coverage of their contributions. I tried researching the subject. The person may be a bit notable, but we have to abide by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
KnowMosaic 16:20, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
I agree that primary sources alone are insufficient, though they can be used for basic biographical facts (such as where a person was born). To hopefully address your concern, I have added secondary sources in many sections, which I hope you will find to be an improvement. To highlight some of the independent sources I consider to be high quality:
  • Wall Street Journal: Startup Aims to Democratize AI; a dedicated article about his leaderhship at a company with over 300 employees.
  • The World Economic Forum: features Ambati as an expert contributor in their report The New Physics of Financial Services, demonstrating his influence at the highest levels of global economic policy.
  • He is a cited figure in the Springer textbook Internet of Things and Big Data Analytics, which documents (staring on page 59) his contributions in regard to the history of distributed machine learning software development.
Given the enduring record of his numerous contributions in academia, business, policy, and philanthropy, the subject clearly crosses the threshold for notability. But please do let me know if you see further opportunities for improvement to the article. Regards, Btyner (talk) 22:59, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uday Narang, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Founder was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Signature

Please remove the horizontal rule from your signature, it is prohibited by WP:SIGAPP. Tenshi! (Talk page) 17:57, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

You meant; <hr>. I put it after every comment. But I won't do it again. Thank you for your suggestions. KnowMosaic 18:20, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dr. Rajamani Vijayraghavan

Information icon Hello, KnowMosaic. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dr. Rajamani Vijayraghavan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:10, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

As of now, I don't have additional references to cite. So if it gets deleted, no objection from my side. KnowMosaic 20:24, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI