User talk:Knuelz - Wikiwand

January 2026

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Association of American Physicians and Surgeons have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Association of American Physicians and Surgeons was changed by Knuelz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.922806 on 2026-01-18T09:16:32+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:16, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Association of American Physicians and Surgeons and Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 11:54, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Knuelz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

There is false and offensive information the the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_American_Physicians_and_Surgeons_(AAPS). It has to be corrected. The true goal of AAPS is here: https://aapsonline.org/about-aaps/.

They do NOT promote conspiracy theories and certainly no Pseudoscience/Misinformation. If this part (and many other on Wikipedia) is not being corrected I would assume that rather Wikipedia - not AAPS - is a source of Misinformation and Pseudoscience. Knuelz (talk) 14:22, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is not a reason to unblock you. You are close to sitewide block and losing access to this user talk page. PhilKnight (talk) 15:07, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Knuelz (talk) 14:22, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Request to the admin who denies this spurious unblock request:

Please can you extend this to a full indef block? This editor is clearly only here for low effort trolling and half-hearted disinformation. This utter idiocy is quite enough to justify preventing them from wasting any more of anybody's time here. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:37, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

If you only allow radical left lunatic to edit Wiki pages, Wikipedia will go down in history as what it is:

A radical left disinformation & pseudoscience indoctrination shithole. Knuelz (talk) 14:42, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Request to the admin who denies this spurious unblock request:

Please can we yank this guy's TPA too? He's clearly enjoying his soapbox a little too much. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:46, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

I mean his unblock request definitely was spurious. The block on the other hand seems to be warranted. Insanityclown1 (talk) 03:53, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Love the fact that you think fascists are left wing. A lot of people think Trump Is a fascist, are they really calling him left wing? Doug Weller talk 15:39, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Sitewide block

AAPS does indeed state on their webpage that their goal is "medical freedom" and other fine things. That's not relevant to Wikipedia, which does not go by what organizations say about themselves, but by "reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy", see Wikipedia:Verifiability. Note especially the word independent. What AAPS says about itself is not independent of AAPS. You have ignored our policies and trolled User:Doug Weller here with accusations replete with personal attacks. I have changed the block to a sitewide indefinite block, since I can't see any sign that you're here to help create an encyclopedia. Bishonen | tålk 15:12, 18 January 2026 (UTC).

Related Articles