User talk:KoreanSentry

chinese immigrated into korea when it was under chinese control during the Han Dynasty, and divided into 4 commandaries, Lelang being one of them. Emperor Liu Bang forcibly transported 40,000 Chinese peasants to colonies in Lelang and other commandaries in Korea such as Luolang(Pyongyang).^[1] Emperor Han Wudi encouraged intermarriage with local peoples.^[2]

this is clearly way before the time of other people coming into northern china, and way past 100 years ago.Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (talk) 01:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (talk) 01:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

How can you describe Han Dynasty as Chinese when you don't accept parts of Han Empire as Korean? Korsentry 04:37, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello, KoreanSentry and thanks for the message. While I appreciate feedback on any/all of my edits, I do not agree with you 100%. Your claim that I do not have the right to revert your edits, is not strictly correct - that is the great/awful thing about wikipedia, everyone has the right to edit (well apart from those who are blocked or banned) - while I understand you feel strongly about the article in question, you might wish to obtain some form of consensus, rather than simply telling people what you think they do and do not have the right to do - but hey, it's nice to meet you, have a wonderful day. Sennen goroshi (talk) 16:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

This is a controversial move. There are correct procedures for all editors to follow in such circumstances - this applies to you, just as it applies to me. Cut and Paste moves are not encouraged. I understand your edits are made in good faith, however not every editor agrees with your opinion, as I imagined you noticed by the amount of people reverting you. Perhaps you should follow the correct procedures, rather than turning this into a revert war. Sennen goroshi (talk) 16:38, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your recent contributions to Korean cuisine. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Korea? It's a group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Korea-related articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Caspian blue 17:26, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello, KoreanSentry. I just closed a move request on Wei Man (in which you have not participated), and full-protected the redirect at Wiman of Gojoseon (which you have edited). The reason I'm telling you this is because you repeatedly copied the contents of Wei Man and pasted it into Wiman of Gojoseon; the reason this is a problem is because the terms of the GDFL require all editors be given credit for their work. This is accomplished through the edit history, which is lost when pages are improperly moved. If you think the article should be moved, please open a new discussion through Wikipedia:Requested moves, and provide reliable sources supporting your position. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, either here, or on my talk page. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 05:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Please note that your name has come up on 3rr board. FYI. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#Melonbarmonster2 Melonbarmonster2 (talk) 19:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Re . That is the wrong place for that question. You want WP:AN3 (or its talk page)or perhaps WP:ANI. In either case,more details are required William M. Connolley (talk) 07:16, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 09:02, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

QUOTE: "Editing any article without approvals is not allowed in Wikipedia unless you are reputable scholars." There is no such rule. Stop wikilawyering. Anyone is free to edit. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 07:30, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't have any problem as long as editor provided reputable source. But some editing users don't even provide reputable source.--Korsentry 07:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

I wrote my opinion about Baekje in TalkPage.

You wrote " Also complicating the matter is that in the Nihongi a Korean named Amenohiboko is supposed to be the maternal predecessor of Empress Jingū. "

However, Nohon shoki(Nihongi) writes the lineage of Empress like this. (Nihon Shoki Vol.9)
"気長足姫尊。稚日本根子彦大日日天皇之曾孫。気長宿禰王之女也。母曰葛城高顙媛"
(Empress Jingu is Emperor Kaika's grandchild, and her mother is Katuragi clan. )

Moreover, Nohonshoki explains Amehikohoiko like this.
"天日槍對曰　僕新羅國主之子也　然聞日本國有聖皇　則以己國授弟知古而化歸之" (Nihon Shoki, Vol.6)
(Amehiboko was said. "I am a prince in Korea. I heard that there was saint's king in Japan. To become a vassal of the king in Japan, I transferred the country to younger brother. ")
"故天日槍娶但馬出嶋人　太耳女麻多烏　生但馬諸助也　諸助生但馬日楢杵　日楢杵生清彦　清彦生田道間守也"
He married the woman who lived in Tajima Province in Japan, he lived in Tajima Province. He was called Amenohiboko. His descendant is Tajima mori.

KoreanSentry, Where of this book is "Amenohiboko is supposed to be the maternal predecessor of Empress Jingū." written?　--青鬼よし (talk) 14:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

青鬼よし = 219.101.251.98

He he has been screwing up the WikiSyntax, and completely pushing his own original research. What do you think should be done? recently, he want reinforcements from japanese adminstrator and chinese for keep his POV pushing.

I wrote my opinion about Baekje and Ancient_maritime_history in TalkPage. when you have spare time, Please write your opinion.Cherry Blossom OK (talk) 17:58, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, no serious scholar is considering any of the political people. Linguists only consider the data. The linguist situation of ancient Korea, Japan, and the surrounding areas is much more complicated than we fully know because simply very little data exists from this time. Although Korea is monolingual today, it wasn't in the past as is evidence by the remaining data. Today, there is still no consensus among linguists about the relationship between Korean, Japanese, Tungus, Turkic, Mongol, and Ainu. These languages may or may not be related. Azalea pomp (talk) 16:09, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Languages either are or are not related. If Korean and Japanese cannot be shown to be related than they are no more related to each other than they are to any other language family in the world. Azalea pomp (talk) 05:22, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

The strongest evidence to related two languages is by a regular sound correspondence in cognates. Similar grammatical forms or phonology may be due to areal features (Sprachbund). Azalea pomp (talk) 21:31, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

In 2018, Japanese is considered a part of a language group isolate (Japonic). Korean is considered a language isolate. This view is held by the overwhelming majority of linguists. The Altaic theory is now a dead fish. While culturally Japan benefited greatly from Korean and Chinese influences, they did not stem from shared languages.50.111.7.77 (talk) 00:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

What do you mean by that? I am no Brazilian. I am no sock puppet. Your reverting makes no sence.--Je suis tres fatigue (talk) 15:20, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Why are you keep reveting the page without discussing the matter? You show no efforts to avoid edit warring. It is you who are against the rules. Please discuss the matter before reverting.--Je suis tres fatigue (talk) 15:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Let me explain why I've been rewriting the section. Before answering me, please do not revert the page again. I've been to find a point of compromise, but you have had shown no effort.

Most historians know the close relations between Korea and Japan throughout history

The words "most historians" should not be used because you cannot tell who they are. Therfore it should be like "It is well known that Japan and Korea have had close relations throughout history."

with Korea transmitting major technological advances to Japan.

The relationship is not a one-way relationship. Both countries have had influence on each other. When you use the word "throughout history", talking as is the relationship were a one-way relationship is not proper.

In Japan this history is downplayed or omitted causing anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea.

There is no supporting source for this sentence. When did Japan downplayed what? This sentence should be removed.

Emperor Kammu's grandfather was recorded to be of Korean ancestry but this is disputed by some Japanese historians, citing the source as unreliable.

"Emperor Kammu's grandfather" is not accurate. Shoku Nihongi says that Emperor Kammu's mother was of Korean ancestory.

Accordingly, Imperial tombs are blocked from archeological studies by foreign archeologists^[1]

Emperor Kammu's mother has nothing to do with the bloking of the tombs. The source does not say anything about Emperor Kammu. Therefore, "accordingly" isn't properly used here.

and historical errors from the early 1900s are not updated.^[2]

Not only because the source is of DPRK, the early 1900s have nothing to do with the tombs or Emperor Kammu. This sentence is irrelevant.

The National geographics wrote Japan "has kept access to the tombs restricted, prompting rumors that officials fear excavation would reveal bloodline links between the "pure" imperial family and Korea"^[3]

Rumours are rumours.

Other historians have pointed to "Korean type pottery, crowns, earrings, and weapons are artifacts that are commonly found in fifth century Japanese tombs, and the stone-corridor-and-chambered tombs in northern Kyūshū are perhaps “the tombs of descendents of Koguryŏ immigrants from Korea." and "The importation of Korea-style jewelry at this time implies [that]…the techniques of inlaying and inscribing also entered Japan in the fifth century. Once again it seems apparent that peninsular master metalworkers taught the native of the island their important skills.” (Farris, 1996: 13)"^[4] Many of Japan's ancient artifacts are related to Korea, "Inariyama sword, as well as some other swords discovered in Japan, utilized the Korean “Idu” system of writing" the swords "originated in Paekche and that the kings named in their inscriptions represent Paekche kings rather than Japanese kings"^[5][6]

Actually I still can't see why you need these sentences. Why do you need them?

The denial of these facts in history was the beginning of the anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea.

There is no supporting source for this sentence. When did Japan deny the relationship between the two nations? It says the "facts" but what mentioned above have been disputed. They are not "facts" yet. Besides, there is no evidence that it was the beginning of the anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea. Therefore, this sentence has no source and should be removed.

As a compromise, I made the section below. I don't think you will find no reason to revert the page anymore. Please do not revert it before discussing. If you have anything to say, please discuss it.

It is well known that Japan and Korea have had close relations throughout history.

According to Shoku Nihongi, for example, Emperor Kammu's mother was recorded to be of Korean ancestry but this is disputed by some Japanese historians, citing the source as unreliable. Accordingly, the fact Imperial tombs are blocked from archeological studies by foreign studies has prompted rumors that officials fear excavation would reveal bloodline links between the "pure" imperial family and Korea"^[7]

William Wayne Farris, a professor of Traditional Japanese Culture and History, has pointed to "Korean type pottery, crowns, earrings, and weapons are artifacts that are commonly found in fifth century Japanese tombs, and the stone-corridor-and-chambered tombs in northern Kyūshū are perhaps “the tombs of descendents of Koguryŏ immigrants from Korea." and "The importation of Korea-style jewelry at this time implies [that]…the techniques of inlaying and inscribing also entered Japan in the fifth century. Once again it seems apparent that peninsular master metalworkers taught the native of the island their important skills.” (Farris, 1996: 13)"^[8] Many of Japan's ancient artifacts are related to Korea, "Inariyama sword, as well as some other swords discovered in Japan, utilized the Korean “Idu” system of writing" the swords "originated in Paekche and that the kings named in their inscriptions represent Paekche kings rather than Japanese kings"^[9][10]

However, the ancient relationship between the two nations still possesses much room to discuss and sometimes disputes cause anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea and anti-Korean sentiment in Japan.

I even used the word "accordingly" although I still it is not a good word there. I don't see the reason why you need the information aobut those pottery, crowns, etc., but I kept them.

I don't think we can have a better compromise. If you have anything to say, PLEASE come to the discussion page before reverting. Please show efforts to reach an agreement. Let's talk.--Je suis tres fatigue (talk) 16:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi, KoreanSentry, as you may know, I've filed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Michael Friedrich. Since you met Je suis tres fatigue (talk · contribs), your input would be greatly helpful for the sockpuppet investigation. Regards.--Caspian blue 00:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing, specifically EW|edit warring, refusing to discuss edits, pushing an agenda and failure to assume good faith. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Daniel Case (talk) 19:35, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Please note editing without valid sources or reference will result in reverting and it shows how unprofessional you are, don't be an idiot.--Korsentry 01:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanSentry (talk • contribs)

No, if you don't like my edits I suggest that you discuss it, instead of reverting me. Do not use terms such as "idiot" on my talk page again, or I will report you for personal attacks. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 07:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Again, please stop editing Goguryeo article without approvals, also you're helping Chinese/Japanese trolls? Why?--Korsentry 00:51, 26 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanSentry (talk • contribs)

Be careful, editing wikipedia required neutral point of view. Also cause conflict between East Asian people is irresponsible. Anything happened here won't do you much in Australia than Indonesia, but we living here, Chinese, Koreans or Japanese would be affected. Sammyy85 (talk) 14:14, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I removed that link to a personal blog because it's a PERSONAL blog, i.e. a blog with unproven, non-factual information. Don't understand why you are so keen to have it there. I'm not going to delete it again and have you revert it again because it seems like such a small issue to be quarreling over. Nuyos (talk) 07:13, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi~! This is just test --Korsentry [User talk:KoreanSentry|talk] 05:53, 16 June 2010 (UTC) Testing--talk 05:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC) testing 123--KSentrytalk 06:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC) testing again 1 --[[User:KoreanSentry |K-Sentry] (talk) 06:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC) 2 --[User:KoreanSentry |K-Sentry] (talk) 06:04, 16 June 2010 (UTC) 3 --K-Sentry (talk) 06:06, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Korean Cuisine.Melonbarmonster2 (talk) 00:38, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Do not refactor discussion pages that have already been closed and archived. There is a specific notice at the top of the page that requests you not to edit a finished discussion. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 05:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

It was at AFD 4 days ago and the consensus was clearly keep - there is no chance that article will be deleted (in the short-term). Moreover, there is no point asking at the AFD page, they cannot overrule the consensus of the community. --Cameron Scott (talk) 08:34, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Thx for letting me know, but did you know it contains wrong information and furthermore it was written by Chinese member.--KSentry(talk) 08:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edit to the page Joseon Dynasty appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. If the dynasty was a sovereign state, there would not have been the article one in the Treaty of Shimonoseki . See talk page, please. Oda Mari (talk) 05:10, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Joseon Dynasty. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 09:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Korea under Japanese rule, you may be blocked from editing. Please see page 125 of this UNESCO kr. pdf file. It uses the word "theives". And they were arrested by Korean police. This is the latest news on the matter. If you still think the word "removed" is appropriate. Please show me RS in English with using the word "removed". Oda Mari (talk) 09:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Please note my edits are all valid and was reverting your nationalistic edits--KSentry(talk) 01:30, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello, KoreanSentry. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —Bill Price (nyb) 14:40, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Joseon Dynasty was Korean, Qing Dynasty was Manchus, they're not Chinese dynasties, understand?--KSentry(talk) 08:02, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Nah. I don't understand. Please clarify. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 10:51, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

I don't need to explain, it's pretty much written statement from Qing's record. --KSentry(talk) 11:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

There is a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KoreanSentry. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 07:42, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Is there anything better than this? Because I would like take you to the court, good let admin to examine my wiki activity if they can get any. I've got nothing to hide.--KSentry(talk) 03:29, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits (such as this and this) could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Quigley (talk) 01:56, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Who do you think you are? All mu edits are valid and besides I don't edit without reputable sources and I don't waste time here at wiki creating useless articles.--KSentry(talk) 13:25, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Tsushima Island, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not remove the referenced information. There was no Miura-no-Ran? It was a simple reading mistake of kanji by the IP. Actually it is Sanbo-no-Ran. If you knew the history well, you'd have noticed it. Please read ko:삼포 왜란 ja:三浦の乱 or zh:三浦倭乱. "Tsushima wasn't part of Japan at that time"? Please read throughly. Korean did not win the Ōei Invasion. See . If you disagree with the IP edits, use talk page with RS. But stop your Korean POV pushing. BTW, please answer my questions on Talk:Joseon Dynasty#Request for comment. Oda Mari (talk) 06:33, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Distributive editing? where did I made edit? I merely reverted back Japanese nationalistic claims.--KSentry(talk) 00:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

You misunderstood my request and you didn't answer my questions. My questions are these. Please answer them. I didn't ask any question on Tsushima. and the Joseon Dynasty article talk page is not a place to talk about Tsushima. Why didn't you use the Tsushima article's talk page? Again you are wrong. "So Clan on Tsushima never was Samurai"? You don't understand the word "samurai" correctly. I guess you mean Daimyo. But So clan was Daymyo. . You talk this and that, but do not show any source. The IP's edit was well sourced. The source was Korean historical document. It's a Korean national treasure, isn't it? Why do you deny the source? There is nothing wrong with IP's edits. Please don't remove the correct information. Oda Mari (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for pointing that part out, I had left the old reference in there when I made that edit, it is now updated, citing the entry from 선조실록 on 5/29 1592

"【이때 변란이 창졸간에 발생하였으므로 와언(訛言)이 전파되었다. 요좌(僚佐)에서 ‘조선과 일본이 서로 짜고 침략당했다고 거짓말을 한 것이다. 국왕과 본국(本國)의 용맹한 병사들은 북도(北道)로 피해서 들어가 있고 다른 사람을 가짜왕으로 내세워서 침략을 받았다고 칭탁하지만 실은 일본을 위해서 향도(嚮導)가 된 것이다.’는 말이 일어났는데, 이 유언 비어가 중국에 들어간 것이다. 중국 조정에서는 반신 반의하다가 병부 상서(兵部尙書) 석성(石星)이 비밀히 요동(遼東)에 유시(諭示)하여 최세신(崔世臣)과 임세록(林世祿) 등을 파견시켰다. 그들은 명분상은 왜적의 실정을 살핀다고 하였지만 실은 평양으로 달려가서 우리의 국왕과 만나 그 사실 여부를 확인하고 돌아오려는 의도였다. 이때 우리는 중국에게 구원병을 요청하려 했었는데 대신들의 말이 요동·광동 사람들은 성품이 매우 포악하여 그들이 강을 건너와서 우리 나라를 유린한다면 적에게 함락되지 않은 패강(浿江) 이서(以西)의 여러 고을들도 모두 황폐화될 것이라고 주장했다. 이 두 의견이 서로 논쟁하느라 오랫동안 해결이 나지 않은 상태였는데 중국에서"

{{RollingWave (talk) 03:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)}}

Hello, KoreanSentry. You have new messages at Talk:Trot (music).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I was waiting for your response patiently. However your first edit was an irrelevant edit to our discussion. So I reverted your edit. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 10:57, 5 September 2011 (UTC)―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 10:51, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 08:17, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

The pertinent discussion has been moved to Wikipedia:WQA#Personal_attack_by_KoreanSentry. VanIsaac_WS 10:05, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Flag of South Korea. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Please don't characterize other editors in edit summaries. (e.g. "right wing Japanese" Gerardw (talk) 10:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

I was going to warn you for the edit summary you left on Korean cuisine, but then I looked at your history, and noted that you just reverted every one of Phoenix7777's reverts of an indefinitely blocked sockmaster. When someone is blocked, it means they can't edit. While their edits don't have to automatically be reverted (as would be the case if Philip126 were banned), they can be removed if they have any underlying problems. I don't know about all of the rest, but Philip126's edit to Korean cuisine violated NPOV, inserted unsourced, dubious information, and removed good, sourced information. I have blocked you because I am concerned that continuing to allow you to edit will cause further disruption to the project by, essentially, proxy-editing for an indefinitely blocked editor. When you are unblocked, do not continue the same disruptive behavior or I will seek approval for a significantly longer, or possibly indefinite block. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:47, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Kusunose 02:36, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Phoenix7777 is troll account who always edits Korean related topics based on biased sources. You know he's trolling right? He's been long time troll to Wikipedia and he's pest.KSentry(talk) 10:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Please note that 1) I'm not Chinese, and 2) calling good faith edits "trolling" is a violation of WP:NPA. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:08, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Northeast Asia. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Oda Mari (talk) 14:44, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

I was just coming here to say the same thing. Given your history of edit-warring and ridiculous claims that others are editing with a strong POV, if you persist in this behavior, your next block will be indefinite. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:12, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 06:54, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi! I was wondering if you could help me with some translations저 단근carrot하라버지임니다. 형님 기역하새요? 학교는 마무리햇구요. 우리짐 어디갓어요? 여기로 보내새요 florentiaecivitas@gmail.com. sorry for mistakes, i have just started taking korean class. It is the lyrics to a folk song and you were the only korean user i could find :). I tried google translate but it came out jumbled. if you have time no rush. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.147.88.48 (talk) 07:11, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 11:43, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jagello, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Spacecowboy420 (talk) 10:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

KoreanSentry alias hwanppa freak, typically oversea Korean in USA or Australia... Trolling really? The only trolls are from KoreanSentry.

If the skulls are not related to yemaek than yemaek are not one of our ancestors. We are not northern people. We are East Asian with more close genetic connections to southern people.

After 8000 years of living in the Korean peninsula we adopted to local climate.

You have to learn some respect you little hwanppa freak. Do you feel proud of KoreanSentry? You should be ashamed. Mostly all look down at your kind of people. You are worser than sinocentrists.

You actually get blocked several times and you called opposing users as Chinese. Do you think that this behavior is in favour for Korea? You better stop your rude behavior.

You are not better than crazy Turkish turanists. Also to inform you: The Altaic theory is obsolete/debunked. Korean is a isolated language. Maybe, only maybe related to Japanese. A Austronesian connection is very controversial but possible with long ago relations.

And if you are one of these blind Turkish lovers remember that the some cultural things we share with nomads and west Eurasians is original Indo-Iranian, Persian. Not Turkic. Even the founder clan of Turks, the ashena or ashina are mostly beloved to be of Iranian origin.

So change your behavior to serve Korea and not to make look it bad.

Greetings from another oversea Korean 212.95.7.149 (talk) 15:44, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Fyi, modern day Koreans are not related to ancient settlers lived in Korea more than 8,000 years ago. Modern Koreans might have been mixed after 5,000 years ago when new Neolithic invaders came to Korea. KSentry([[User

talk:KoreanSentry|talk]]) 10:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

No, the Turks did not originate from Iranian people. The proto-ancestors of both peoples lived in different parts of Asia, and their languages are completely unrelated (originally). Contamination between both led to shared loanwords. 50.111.24.29 (talk) 21:24, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you.

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 01:51, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

KoreanSentry, do you understand why comments like this and this are inappropriate?

Off-colour personal remarks like these Chinese and Japanese trollish accounts, Hijiri88, a fake Japanese account user and If I have all that time in the world, I would actually do something for improving lifestyle rather than being Keyboard behind anonymity of Internet world. Grow up and get a life Bro., groundless accusations like edits Korean related articles based on their biased cherry picked sources and You guys know this user is trolling, and especially unambiguous racism like he or she doesn't even shared blood or cultural background ties with Korea are completely inapproropriate, and are not tolerated on English Wikipedia.

Note that, since this has been going on for years, unless you explicitly state that you understand what you did wrong and will make efforts to improve, you can probably expect to be blocked for the above remarks. Your relative lack of activity (under this account) is not a defense, but rather counts against you, as your trolling and personal attacks will be weighed against your meaningful contributions to the encyclopedia.

Consider this your final warning.

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 21:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Well you started this personal attacks yourself and even accused me of sockpuppet, what do you think you are? You're just another angry Japanese troll. KSentry(talk) 04:09, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

I warned you, and you replied by insinuating that I am engaged in sockpuppetry and calling me an angry Japanese troll? I've now reported you on WP:ANI. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 22:49, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

• I've blocked your account indefinitely in response to the above. Regards, Swarm ♠ 02:51, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Repeated personal attacks from racist NOTHERE troll. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 00:25, 26 March 2018 (UTC)