User talk:Landplane123

An article you recently created, Richard Furch, does not appear to be written from a neutral point of view, and cannot remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Bradv🍁 04:34, 16 December 2018 (UTC) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bradv

@Bradv: Thank you for your feedback. I have deleted a couple of sections, product endorsements, and teaching and mentoring as their cite references contain material that is promotional. I would like to resubmit it but would appreciate you looking at my draft and advise me if it is enough editing to do that. Appreciate your assistance. Pennyframstad (talk) 17:33, 16 December 2018 (UTC)pennyframstad

@Bradv:

Hello Bradv, just wanted to make sure received my response to your message to me about placing my article for Richard Furch in the draftbox. Can you check out my edits and see if it is ready to be submitted again. Thank you so much, Pennyframstad (talk) 04:18, 18 December 2018 (UTC)pennyframstad

Hi Pennyframstad, thanks for the ping. I did a brief review through the sources of that article, but there are an awful lot and it's hard to tell which ones I should be checking to establish whether or not the subject is notable. Can you identify 2 or 3 sources that you would say are the best? A good source is reliable, and independent of the subject. Bradv🍁 04:25, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

@Bradv:

Here are a couple of cite references that are of notable importance. I can send you more if these are not sufficient. Thanks again for your assistance! I really appreciate your time and expertise. 1. | 2005 || Usher "Confessions" || Best Contemporary R&B Album || style="background: #9EFF9E; color: #000; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="yes table-yes2 notheme"|Won^[1]

| Usher || Confessions || Arista Records || Mixing || 2004^[2]

2. | 2007 || Chaka Khan "Funk This" || Best R&B Album || style="background: #9EFF9E; color: #000; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="yes table-yes2 notheme"|Won^[3]

3. ^[4]

Pennyframstad (talk) 04:58, 18 December 2018 (UTC)pennyframstad

The first three of those sources don't even mention the subject of the article. The fourth one provides some information, but it's not a reliable source as they're using the article to promote one of their own products.

Is there anything in the way of books or newspaper articles written about Furch? Anything that covers the subject in-depth, not just passing mention. Bradv🍁 05:03, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Richard Furch has mixed and engineered several albums that have won Grammy Awards. If I can provide sufficient and more accurate cite references would that suffice for notability? I am still researching more references but would his grammy award winning projects be enough for now? And, my apologies for not sending better links.

@Bradv: https://blog.landr.com/richard-furch-tips/

An article you recently created, Pennyframstad/sandbox2, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It is also not clear who the subject of the BLP is (Pennyframstad, Noelle Michelle, Madonna ?). When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 22:46, 12 January 2019 (UTC) Britishfinance I am creating another Wikipedia article in my main sandbox and I was advised that if I wanted to start another sandbox that I could go to my user name and add sandbox2 to create another article. I copied and pasted an infobox for Noelle Hampton's information and left Madonna's photo there as a placeholder. The cite references you listed in this message are for a draftspace article for Richard Furch. I was not going to submit Noelle Hampton's article until I had more content and cite references. Was I mistaken in that I can use a sandbox to work on an article before submitting? Thank you for your assistance, Pennyframstad (talk) 02:30, 13 January 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:11, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello User:RonBot I reduced the size of this photo and uploaded it. Please let me know if this is suffice. Thank you Pennyframstad (talk) 18:23, 28 January 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

User:RonBot Hi Ronbot, I reduced the made the file size reduction per your request. Thank you, Pennyframstad (talk) 19:19, 28 January 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad

Thanks for uploading File:Kelly Vint Castro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

B-bot

I uploaded a smaller file of this photo which I also cropped as it was too long in the infobox. However now I do not see an option for using this photo in Kelly Vint Castro's article. Where can I find it?

Thanks so much for your assistance, Pennyframstad (talk) 20:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad B-bot Please delete this photograph. Thank you for your help. Pennyframstad (talk) 16:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:This is a photograph of Kim Bullard performing with Elton John in Brazil.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:09, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Kelly Vint Castro in light blue top outsied.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:36, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Young Catherine Stargate Film 1994.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:38, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Thunder Alley ABC.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 16:39, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Thunder Alley Promotional Photo 1994.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

RonBot Thank you very much, I appreciate your assistance in reducing this file size. Pennyframstad (talk) 18:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:This is a photograph of Kim Bullard performing with Elton John in Brazil.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Black Kite (talk) 18:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Kelly Vint Castro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:00, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi,

You've uploaded several non-free images, and I wanted to provide a bit more information about non-free content and why I nominated them for deletion. The usage of non-free images on Wikipedia is very restrictive and must adhere to the non-free content guidelines. Their usage must meet all of the criteria outlined in the non-free content criteria. There are some key ones to be aware of that might get an image nominated for deletion.

point 1 (no free equivalent) is one which is often misinterpreted by editors unfamiliar with non-free content. It's not just that a free image cannot be found, but it must also be the case that once cannot expect to create one. This is particularly applicable to photos of living people as somebody could create a free photo of the person even if there isn't one now. The guidelines even state this explicitly "Non-free content should not be used when a freely licensed file that serves the same purpose can reasonably be expected to be uploaded, as is the case for almost all portraits of living people." File:This is a photograph of Kim Bullard performing with Elton John in Brazil.jpg is likely to be deleted as failing to satisfy this point.

respect for commercial opportunities. Images from commercial photo agencies are not acceptable due to this criteria. Commercial photo agencies earn their money from their photo library and usage of such images on Wikipedia is considered to fail on this point unless the image itself is the subject. In fact, it is subject to speedy deletion. See WP:F7. File:Thunder Alley ABC.jpg was sourced from Alamay.com which is a commercial photo agency and the photo was deleted for this reason.

contextual significance. This is probably the trickiest one. The expectation is that the photo must contribute significantly to the reader's understanding of the article. This usually means that the photo itself needs to have some significant sourced commentary about it and how it relates to the article subject. That is why I nominated File:Young Catherine Stargate Film 1994.jpg. We can understand that the actor played a certain role in Stargate through the text. The use of the image, although nice, does not significantly increase our understanding of the fact that she got that role.

Non-free content rules, and copyrights can get very confusing on Wikipedia. If you have questions, a good resource is Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 19:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:MUSICBIO, with just a few passing mentions, a very short review and no charting releases.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noëlle Michelle Hampton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Noëlle Michelle Hampton, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 08:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Clarityfiend I added two new cite references for newspaper articles focused entirely on Noelle Hampton per your request. Does this suffice? Pennyframstad (talk) 14:14, 26 March 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad

I only see the addition of one reference, a Marin Independent Journal article. It's a start, but per WP:MUSICBIO, "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself." (bolding mine) Clarityfiend (talk) 17:39, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

P.S. I'm not sure what the four references above below are for: none of them mention her even in passing as far as I can see. Clarityfiend (talk) 17:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Clarityfiend

https://www.marinij.com/2009/08/07/noelle-hampton-thin-line/

https://www.marinij.com/2009/07/31/paul-liberatore-mill-valley-singer-noelle-hampton-relights-her-fire-in-austin/

https://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/music/2013-04-30/the-belle-sounds/

https://patch.com/california/millvalley/the-belle-sounds-featuring-noelle-hampton--andre-moran

Will these four independent articles be suffice to add as cite references for Noelle Hampton?

Thanks so much for your help with this,

Pennyframstad (talk) 18:47, 26 March 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad

Clarityfiend This article is solely on Noelle Hampton. Perhaps I messed up on the original link. https://www.marinij.com/2009/07/31/paul-liberatore-mill-valley-singer-noelle-hampton-relights-her-fire-in-austin/ Thanks so much for taking the time to review all of thisPennyframstad (talk) 03:14, 27 March 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad

The first two, maybe, though I have reservations since they're from a local paper (albeit with a healthy circulation). The third is basically an interview, and there's not a lot you can take away from that. The fourth is not a reliable source by any means. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:46, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Clarityfiend here are several more articles focusing on Noelle Hampton as the front woman for the band, The Belle sounds. Noelle and her husband Andre Moran are the founders and permanent members of the band, the other musicians are interchangeable session players.

atwoodmagazine.com/bslv-belle-sounds-like-villian/

https://cbsaustin.com/features/we-are-austin/music-monday-thebelle-sounds

https://houstonmusicreview.com/wordpress/2018/07/24/the-belle-sounds-mcgonigels-mucky-duck-houston-tx-review/

Pennyframstad (talk) 19:14, 29 March 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad

The Atwood article is about The Belle Sounds, the CBS Austin one isn't an article (and is also about the duo), and a WordPress article is not a reliable source. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:08, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Dave Darling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mixer, Bass, Jack Johnson, BMG, Rusty Young and 58

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gigi Gonaway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gigi Gonaway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:16, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Regarding this edit to Linda Wolf... Thank you for your contribution. However if you are going to make a lot of changes to an article then please do so one logical piece at a time, rather than all at once. This way others who are following along, who are checking your work, can take on board the changes. Otherwise it is too much to decipher. With that edit, your lead section has a way too long opening line; and tries to indicate the subject's notability by those whose work has been published in the same books. This is not how we describe the summary of someone's life. It feels as though you are trying too hard to make a case for their notability. Your new lead section does not give me confidence that the rest of your many changes are going to have a neutral, encyclopedic tone. This is why I reverted your edits. -Lopifalko (talk) 19:35, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Lopifalko Thank you so much for clarifying. I will make the adjustments to the opening paragraph and edit according to your suggestions. Cheers, Pennyframstad (talk) 01:19, 27 June 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad

I haven't had time to go through your edits yet, other than to check that first sentence. I recommend you read MOS:LEADSENTENCE and then compare that to your first sentence. -Lopifalko (talk) 06:15, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

talk I did read through your suggested link and I made corrections to the first sentences. I hope this suffices. The article reads much better now I must agree. Thank you so much for pointing that out as it will help me in future edits with other Wikipedia notables. Cheers, Pennyframstad (talk) 13:39, 27 June 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rebecca Loebe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://argonautnews.com/photos-by-artists-in-1981-exhibit-featured-in-new-show-at-arena-1-gallery/, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:29, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

talk Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I will re-add the content written in my own words. Cheers, Pennyframstad (talk) 19:34, 29 June 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steve Rawlins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superbowl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

(talk) I corrected it by removing the Wikipedia link. Pennyframstad (talk) 00:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Pennyframstad, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pennyframstad|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Cwmhiraeth I am not a paid contibutor and will pay closer attention to the guidelines so as to not come across as promotional or too personal. Thank you for your feedback as I appreciate any tips and I take great pride in creating factual and informative articles for Wikipedia. Pennyframstad (talk) 15:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad

Thank you for your response. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:30, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Cwmhiraeth Thank you too. I saw some of your articles. Excellent job!

Hello, Pennyframstad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Noëlle Michelle Hampton".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 23:13, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

JMHamo

Thank you for the head's up. I created Noelle Hampton's page already so please feel free to delete the draft page. Pennyframstad (talk) 03:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)pennyframstad

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rumer (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Carpenter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Corrected as requested. Thank you. Pennyframstad (talk) 18:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)pennyframstad

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alissa Moreno, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Nye Gulick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SEAL Team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Pennyframstad, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Eddie891, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, John Nye Gulick, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Nye Gulick.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Eddie891}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Talk Hi and thank you for your feedback on my article, John Nye Gulick. I am researching more articles about him to improve his page for notability.

Thank you 21:38, 10 June 2020 (UTC)pennyframstad

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fred Mollin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calhoun High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Joel Jaffe, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:44, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

In particular, in the future, please put album titles in italics, and don't use unnecessary capital letters. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 22:44, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! I will make the changes you suggested. Pennyframstad (talk) 23:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Please don't alter references to Northern Ireland to read North Ireland as you did here. Northern Ireland is the name of a country, North Ireland isn't. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 19:15, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I corrected it. Pennyframstad (talk) 22:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)pennyframstad

Hello, Pennyframstad,

Thank you for creating Matt B.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add citations to unreferened lines and para.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Sonofstar}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Sonofstar (talk) 22:44, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

@Sonofstar:

I will remove or correct the unreferenced lines on Matt B's article.

Thank you Pennyframstad (talk)pennyframstad

@Sonofstar:

I am not sure why the categories are listed above the references on this page. I have never had this happen before. Looked on Wikipedia help and could not find any articles addressing this issue specifically. Can you suggest how to fix this?

Thank you so much Pennyframstad (talk)pennyframstad

A tag has been placed on Matt B requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.owlapps.net/owlapps_apps/articles?id=67825171&lang=en. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sonofstar (talk) 22:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

talk

I will most certainly re-write any content that was copied and pasted. I believe the quote is the one in which you are referencing.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention, Pennyframstad (talk) 01:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)pennyframstad

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Caryn Richman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Brady.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francesca Beghe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trust in Me.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

corrected disambiguation Pennyframstad (talk) 15:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)pennyframstad

An article you recently created, Professor Louie, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 01:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

DMySon Thank you for your feedback. I would like to create an article on Professor Louie & the Cromatix, as theyhave the most independent, reliable articles for citation references. Should I just delete Professor Louie's article and create the above mentioned name?

Thank you for your assistance Pennyframstad (talk) 04:27, 31 October 2021 (UTC)pennyframstad

Dear Pennyframstad, I can see you have updated the draft with many reliable references and submitted it for review. Now please have patience and let the other editors review it. DMySon (talk) 02:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi DMySon I would like to request the deletion of this article and proceed with "Professor Louie & the Crowmatix". Thank you Pennyframstad (talk) 23:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)pennyframstad

An article you recently created, Professor (Aaron L. Hurwitz) Louie, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Vexations (talk) 14:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello talk Would it be best to create an article for "Professor Louie & the Crowmatix" since the band has more citations and has had charting songs and the grammy nominations? Thanks so much Pennyframstad (talk) 20:26, 5 November 2021 (UTC)pennyframstad

There's some duplication of effort. We already have Draft:Professor Louie. I suggest don't add yet another article or draft, but add sources to one and leave an note on the talk page for the reviewer at AfC with the correct title. Request deletion for the other one, and explain that there's just one article you're working on for now. Vexations (talk) 21:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Ben Green (musician), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 23:27, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello Celestina007, thank you for your feedback on Ben Green's article. I have dug deeper and found more citations as requested. I resubmitted it and would love your feedback. Please let me know if these additions are sufficient. Best, Pennyframstad (talk) 21:39, 9 January 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ethel (string quartet), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Jackson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Pennyframstad . I noticed you added bodyheightweight.com as a reference to Francesca Beghe last year. . I've removed it as clearly unreliable and spammy. Please be much more careful in your choice of references. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. --Hipal (talk) 17:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Hipal, did not realize that. Pennyframstad (talk) 18:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

Hello, Pennyframstad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Professor (Aaron L. Hurwitz) Louie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, MPT Agency, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:40, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello Pennyframstad. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Pennyframstad. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pennyframstad|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Dear PRAXIDICAE💕

I am not a paid Wikipedia editor. I am retired musician and music teacher and thoroughly enjoy creating and editing articles as a hobby and as a way to share information on subjects who might not otherwise have an article created, even they meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. I do deep internet and old newspaper/magazine article research on subjects and pride myself on being somewhat of a music industry, literary, and encyclopedic historian.

I see that MPT Agency has moved to a draft space requesting more citations for the content which I created, which I am happy to do. When I have added more citations I will resubmit.

I appreciate the integrity of Wikipedia and thank you for your feedback.

Best Pennyframstad (talk) 19:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

So perhaps you can explain how single use accounts happen to upload photos of their "own work" the same day you create articles about those subjects? PRAXIDICAE💕 19:31, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

PRAXIDICAE💕 I don't always add photos to articles that I have just created. Sometimes it takes a while to find the find the person who took the photo. And the people who took the photos aren't usually professional photographers either. They are individuals who took a photo of the subject at an event or public gathering. And, I've never found professional photographer who has a Wikimedia Commons account and they aren't even aware of the site until I mention it to them and request for them to license the photo for use. They are usually flattered that I want to use their photo for a Wikipedia infobox because they get photo credit for it. To find photos I do deep dig searches and find them on websites, social media, online articles, and other peoples sites until I find the actual photographer. It's quite a task. I hope this clears up your concern. Pennyframstad (talk) 20:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RPSkokie were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MPT Agency and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MPT Agency, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 06:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Dear RPSkokie, Thank you for your feedback, I appreciate the guidance and I will continue searching for more citations that contain content from a more nuetral viewpoint. Best, Pennyframstad (talk) 18:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

An article you recently created, Tania Mara Botelho, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

PRAXIDICAE💕 I appreciate your feedback but am concerned that you are unfairly targeting my current article due to the creation of the last article I created, MPT Agency. As you can see from my past articles they have all been successfully added to Wikipedia except for my last 2 articles which you have moved to draftspace. I understood your concern with MPT but Tania Mara Botelho has multiple, independent, reliable citations. Are you suggesting that I remove certain citations? And, if so, which ones? Pennyframstad (talk) 19:17, 28 May 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

I patrol new pages as part of WP:NPP. I'm not singling you out, you're not a special case here. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

PRAXIDICAE💕 Okay. I will add more citations when they are available. Pennyframstad (talk) 19:22, 28 May 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

PRAXIDICAE💕 If I remove the citations that read like advertisements would the independent, reliable sources suffice? Pennyframstad (talk) 19:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Pennyframstad/sandbox49, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Singularity42 (talk) 17:59, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

I would have moved it to your userspace, as it appears that was your intention, but you already have an existing page there with the same title. Singularity42 (talk) 18:00, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

I moved it to User:Pennyframstad/sandbox28. ~Styyx^Talk? 18:17, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

~Styyx^Talk? thank you so much!!! Pennyframstad (talk) 18:35, 13 June 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

I have tagged the talk page you just created for deletion (don't create a talk page for a deleted page). But I'll answer your questions here:

1. To create a user page - include a sandbox, you need the prefix User at the beginning of the page.
2. You attempted to create a sandbox user page for User:Pennyframstad/sandbox49, but you instead created it as Pennyframstad/sandbox49. This means an article was created instead of a user sandbox page.
3. Normally, you or another editor could move it to User:Pennyframstad/sandbox49. But that sandbox had previously been created for you. So I tagged it for deletion as a test page (unless you decided to move the page somewhere else).
4. Styyx moved the page for you to User:Pennyframstad/sandbox28 as that page did not exist. You can now edit it there.
5. You then created a talk page at the now non-existant page of Pennyframstad/sandbox49, which I have tagged for deletion.

In the future, make sure you use the prefix User when created sandboxes in your user space. Singularity42 (talk) 18:29, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Pennyframstad/sandbox49. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Singularity42 (talk) 18:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

talk I responded to the contest speedy deletion page and am unclear what I am doing on my end that has resulted sandbox49 being nominated for speedy deletion. I have created a couple of others album pages that were successful. Please clarify.

Thank you Pennyframstad (talk) 18:22, 13 June 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

I think you intended to make the page "User:Pennyframstad/sandbox49", but accidentally made the page "Pennyframstad/sandbox49" in mainspace. The article content (I presume) is fine. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 18:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

thank you so much for clarifying and moving it to sandbox28! My bad!!!!

Pennyframstad (talk) 18:26, 13 June 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

That wasn't me, but you're welcome. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 18:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joel Marshall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Marshall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:47, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Alexandermcnabb Can you please help me regarding another page I created? I accidentally thought I was working in a sandbox and wiped out Bobby Sessions page!!!! Can you help me revert it to yesterdays date? It won't let me!!!!

thanks Pennyframstad (talk) 23:12, 30 August 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

Hi Penny! Sorry for late - LilianaUwU reverted the changes, so you're good! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:59, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

talk) Thank you so much for getting back to me! I was freaking out!!!! Lol Pennyframstad (talk) 14:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

A tag has been placed on File:Album cover of "Symphony of Sinners & Saints" features angel with wings holding cello with flames.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:04, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello Minorax,

I previously uploaded this image but it didn't give me the file information to add it to the Wikipedia article so I uploaded it again and it finally gave me the file information. I must have made an error on the first upload. Can the other image be deleted rather than this one? I can't locate it to delete it myself.

Thanks so much Pennyframstad (talk) 04:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

Both are the same image though. Same size, same quality. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Minorax I can't locate the duplicate upload. Can you direct me there or send me a link to it? Or can you delete it? My concern is that the first upload didn't have the file information to add to the Wikipedia article and that's why I uploaded it again. Thank you so much for your assistance Pennyframstad (talk) 04:59, 8 August 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

File:Symphony of Sinner & Saints album cover angel kneeling with cello in flames.jpg. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Minorax, Do I just go into to edit mode on the page and delete it? Pennyframstad (talk) 05:16, 8 August 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

I have no idea what you're asking. Like I've said, both files are the same and File:Symphony of Sinner & Saints album cover angel kneeling with cello in flames.jpg has enough information for it to not be deleted unless it gets removed from the article. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:18, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Minorax, My apologies for not being more clear. I was referencing this notification that stated that one of the images needed to be deleted due to a duplication issue. Is it ok to leave both as they are or does one of them need to be deleted?

A tag has been placed on File:Album cover of "Symphony of Sinners & Saints" features angel with wings holding cello with flames.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated. Thanks Pennyframstad (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

Yes, one of them needs to be deleted as WP:FU states that fair use files needs to be in use. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Minorax Thank you so much for clarifying that! So is the process of the duplicate image being deleted already in process and I don't have to do anything else? Pennyframstad (talk) 05:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

The duplicate has been deleted by an admin. So no further action(s) from you is required. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your assistance Minorax Pennyframstad (talk) 21:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roberta Donnay, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Riverdale and John Hammond.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Jay King, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

AngusW🐶🐶F I made the changes that you suggested and removed any language that could be perceived as promotional, removed the billboard chart, renamed the discographies, removed major labels from the infobox, and pared down the Club Nouveau section to a few sentences. Will this suffice? thank you Pennyframstad (talk) 04:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

pennyframstad, thanks, that should help. Also if you can identify WP:THREE of the best sources that make the person meet WP:GNG? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 05:57, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Will this suffice? Pennyframstad (talk) 16:40, 14 October 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

https://funknstuff.net/tir-jay-king/

https://en.calameo.com/read/001307351dd56b9532d6d

The Daily Sentinel, April 24, 1987, “Club Nouveau’s King-size Hit”, page 33, by Rob Hoerburger

(producing and independently releasing Timex Social Club’s ‘’Rumors” #1 billboard R&B chart, was the best selling independent single of 1986. Was the founder and leader of Club Nouveau.

https://www.grammy.com/artists/jay-king/3719

https://www.riaa.com/gold-platinum/?tab_active=default-award&se=club+nouveau#search_section

(artist, producer, and record label/King Jay Records for ‘’lean on me” grammy nominated and album “Life, Love, and Pain” sold over 1 million copies) Pennyframstad (talk) 16:40, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

pennyframstad, funknstuff.net article is a blog by a non-notable writer/website. Calameo seems to be a web magazine called Independent Artist Magazine. Not clear how well-circulated it is. Daily Sentinel is more about Club Nouveau than King. Can you find others news or magazine articles? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:29, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Perhaps these?

https://sfbayview.com/2011/05/veteran-producer-jay-king-becomes-an-open-book-with-intimate-new-release/

https://www.calbcc.org/president-and-ceo/

https://towerrecords.com/products/jay-king-helens-son Pennyframstad (talk) 21:32, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

AngusW🐶🐶F I did some more digging and found a few feature articles on Jay King and his career. Can you check it out and let me know if this suffices to publish the article? Thanks so much Pennyframstad (talk) 22:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This page appears to have been written to praise its subject rather than to describe the subject neutrally. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view.

If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.

See comments of previous reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jay King and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:36, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback. I will edit the language. Pennyframstad (talk) 15:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Robert McClenon, I have edited the language in a more encyclopedic tone. Can you review it and let me know if this will suffice to resubmit? If not, can you specifically point out the language that is in question. Thank you so much for your time and attention I really appreciate it! Pennyframstad (talk) 19:38, 22 October 2022 (UTC)pennyframstad

Hello, Pennyframstad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MPT Agency, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:45, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Pennyframstad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tania Mara Botelho, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:38, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Pennyframstad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MPT Agency".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:03, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Pennyframstad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tania Mara Botelho".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi Landplane123! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 13:32, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Kj cheetham thank you for your feedback. My bad, it was out of habit but I will pay closer attention to the details. Best, Landplane123 (talk) 19:27, 11 February 2023 (UTC)pennyframstad

Hi Landplane123. Again, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suzanne_Doucet&diff=prev&oldid=1141021538&diffmode=source is not a minor edit because you're adding a reference. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi Landplane123, I was made aware by Bradv that my page might have been subjected to vandalism. I see that you made some recent edits on my article and was wondering if you received any notifications about this. Please let me know as I was informed that my page could be in danger of being deleted.

Thank you for your immediate response Kwakeley (talk) 19:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC) Kwakeley

Kwakeley I created your Wikipedia article and removed some content as there was a notification that there was too much personal information that might be of interest to only a small audience. Perhaps this happened because I recently changed my username to Landplane123 from pennyframstad as I did not want to be using my personal name for Wikipedia edits. I will contact Bradv directly to get to the bottom of this. Sorry for any inconvenience.

Best, Landplane123 (talk) 20:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC) Landplane123

Hi Bradv,

Kwakeley reached out to me letting me know that he received a notification about possible vandalism to his Wikipedia article. I created Kitt's article and check on my edits frequently and saw a notification on his page that there was personal information that might only be of interest to a small audience so I removed a section from his page that elaborated on his adoption story and his sister finding him recently.

I recently changed my username to Landplane123 from pennyframstad as I did not want to be using my personal name for Wikipedia edits. Perhaps this might be the reason and you couldn't see my editing history? That is the only content that I planned on removing and will only be making additions from here on out.

Please let me know that you received this so I can move forward with adding content to Kitt's page.

Thank you so much, Landplane123 (talk) 20:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Landplane123

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colin Leonard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Leonard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 02:31, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello Oaktree b,

I understand your concerns about the legitimacy of creating an article for a mastering engineer. That's why I researched other mastering engineer's articles before creating Colin Leonard's. Here are some examples of several other mastering engineer's articles.

Here are a few examples that I checked out beforehand:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Gehringer
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_Lazar
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_Merrill
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Bozzi

Please respond. Thanks so much Landplane123 (talk) 03:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC)landplane321

Oaktree b, Just added an award and Colin making the top 50 mastering engineers in the world placing at #2 along with citations. Hopes this adds to his notability and having stronger citations.

Thanks so much, Landplane123 (talk) 06:36, 16 June 2023 (UTC)landplane321

Thanks for this article and all your other work! --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 04:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Landplane123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jay King, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

You're not normally supposed to have more than one at a time.

This is a big deal and you can get banned for violating this. There are exceptions but they come with certain requirements.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 05:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

A. B.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention.

Please advise as to how I can remove LGmojo.

thanks so much, Landplane123 (talk) 18:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Landplane123 (talk) 18:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing this to my attention.

Please advise as to how I can remove LGmojo.

thanks so much, Landplane123 (talk) 18:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8000:2B3F:FFFC:3CED:13FD:A842:8C67 (talk)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Keefus Ciancia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ben Taylor and Jonathan Wilson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sally Taylor (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabor Academy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

You've been editing Wikipedia for I'm guessing eight years under various user names, and your writing is still low quality after all this time. The recent discussion at Talk:Susanna Hoffs is about your poor writing in general, especially the emphasis on one particular concert, but I was also seeing a lot of basic mistakes that shouldn't be in the encyclopedia at all.

You removed the normal parenthetical statement "(born January 17, 1959)" from the Hoffs bio for no reason.

You substituted italics for song names when they should get single quotes in front and back. One song name didn't even get quotes or italics.

You capitalized "The Bangles" despite the style guideline MOS:THEMUSIC which says to use lower-case "the" for band names in running prose.

You put quoted text in italics, which is wrong.

Please read through Wikipedia:Manual of Style and work on your basics before contributing again. Binksternet (talk) 05:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback, I really appreciate you pointing those things out and correcting them. The reason I put The Bangles is because that's what their Wikipedia article is titled. I will use lower case lettering in future articles.

Best,

Landplane123 (talk) 05:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Landplane123

And, the reason I changed my username was because it had my last name in it and I wanted to keep that private. I was given approval to do that. Landplane123 (talk) 05:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Binksternet, I'm wondering if this user has a conflict of interest--I'm going over Jeff Broadbent and Lovari (musician). Drmies (talk) 01:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Paid editing is the conclusion I reach after looking at recent activity. Binksternet (talk) 02:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

I do not receive payments for my contributions on Wikipedia nor do I know Lovari. I just added more citations and content to his page that I hope will clear up your concerns. I am actually embarrassed that I launched his article without adding the proper citations and I can understand how it would appear that I had a relationship with the subject. Landplane123 (talk) 23:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Landplane123. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Lovari (musician), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your concern but I don't have external relationships with the subjects in my articles. Also, I don't receive payments for my contributions on Wikipedia. I am a retired music teacher and go down various rabbit holes on the internet and when I come across someone who I think is worthy of a page, I create one for them. Landplane123 (talk) 23:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Landplane123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jay King".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Brown in 1978.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ⟲ Three Sixty! ^Talk? _Work. 16:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for replacing it with one that meets the guidelines!

Landplane123 (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Landplane123

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Darlene Koldenhoven, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Back To Front.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lovari (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovari (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 03:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

I see that others have mentioned this as well, but I have to ask you to please brush up on the Manual of Style before contributing any more new content. Your contributions require a tremendous amount of cleanup work; see here, here, and here, among many others. I'm seeing a lot of confusion as to when to use italics vs quote marks. Please learn these guidelines. If I can help, just let me know. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 01:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback, I really appreciate it! In the past however it was suggested that I use quotation marks for quotes and example for titles. Landplane123 (talk) 14:16, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes, exact quotes do need to go in quote marks, and things such as book titles go in italics. However, your additions tend to put song titles in italics ("lesser works" like songs should be in quotes; "larger works" like album titles take italics), as well as various things like redord labels and organizations being in italics - those don't need any special treatment other than capital letters. This section of the MOS may help: MOS:ITALICTITLE. Thanks! Jessicapierce (talk) 23:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you!! Landplane123 (talk) 23:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Landplane123 (talk) 14:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Santa Cruz County Flag.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

The article Josh Parker (businessman) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails to meet the notability guidelines for living person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gene Norman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Josh Golden.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 13:30, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I will contact Quad.com to find out who the photographer was and ask them to license it for use on Wikimedia commons. Landplane123 (talk) 23:05, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Mythologies II album cover artwork.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Mythologies II album cover artwork.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 13:37, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, is there any reason why would you recreate an article on a subject ruled out to not be notable enough for an article at this discussion, under a different article title but with almost zero changes from the redirected version, let alone any sources that prove the subjects notability? You need to prove how the subject meets WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. You also put unsourced material in the article, which is a BLP. Unsourced material in BLPs in not acceptable - same with the excessive amounts of primary sourcing.

I've redirected the "new" article given that nothing new is presented from the version that was concluded as not notable. If needed, I will take it to AfD to get a broader consensus. But as it is now, all you did was try to recreate an article on a non-notable subject with barely any differences, under a new title to try and get around it. λ NegativeMP1 19:56, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

I understand. Landplane123 (talk) 20:05, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Would this be notable for Elena Siegman's article? I totally forgot to add it.

https://kworb.net/spotify/artist/6BlZkvGwQyo011poQEhQ1J_songs.html Landplane123 (talk) 16:25, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anaya Kunst, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anaya Kunst until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wendy Loomis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy Loomis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

duffbeerforme (talk) 05:50, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

The article Josie Music Awards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable awards. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josie Music Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josie Music Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

duffbeerforme (talk) 09:32, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Stars at the Crescendo Club.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ${\displaystyle 999}$REAL 💬 ⬆   19:50, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Lakeside Software logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Lakeside software logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dave Stroud, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:35, 22 March 2026 (UTC)