User talk:Lehrling18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2025

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to TAI Anka when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:02, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

20th Army Corps (France) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 20th Army Corps (France). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. LuniZunie ツ(talk) 16:58, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

4th Division (Netherlands) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 4th Division (Netherlands). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. HurricaneZetaC 04:18, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4th Division (Netherlands) (December 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MediaKyle was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MediaKyle (talk) 23:40, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Lehrling18! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MediaKyle (talk) 23:40, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4th Division (Netherlands) (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Htanaungg was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Htanaungg (talk) 09:58, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4th Division (Netherlands) (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grumpylawnchair was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Grumpylawnchair (talk) 04:40, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not introduce links to draft articles in actual articles, as you did to 3rd Army Group (France). Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:22, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2nd Army Group (France) and 1st Army Group (France), you may be blocked from editing.
It was clearly explained, above, that you should not add links to draft articles, but you have continued doing so. Please stop - Arjayay (talk) 14:00, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

I apologize for my recent edits to the articles 1st Army Group (France) and 2nd Army Group (France). I misunderstood the rules regarding links to drafts and the mainspace. I thought that removing the "Draft:" prefix was the correct way to prepare the links for when the articles go live. I now understand that I must wait until the articles are officially reviewed and moved to the mainspace. I will stop adding these links immediately and wait for the official process. Thank you for the guidance. Lehrling18 (talk) 19:32, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2nd Army (France), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Reserve. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6th Army Corps (France) (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:13, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 24th Army Corps (France) (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:13, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 42nd Fortress Corps (France) (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:13, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Notability

I've just declined three of your drafts on military units. Two of them cited a single source, and the third cited none. Organisations are not inherently notable, and must establish notability by satisfying the WP:ORG guideline, which requires multiple (3+) reliable and independent secondary sources with significant coverage of the subject. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:17, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 42nd Fortress Corps (France) (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mikeycdiamond was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mikeycdiamond (talk) 15:09, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at I Corps (Belgium). Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. - Arjayay (talk) 15:17, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Problems with your recent pages

Hi there, thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I noticed some issues with the pages that you're creating, so I just wanted to let you know about them.

First off, per the Manual of Style, content should not be used to collapse content by default, because it can interfere with the readability and the ability to actually find the information (besides navbars, which i'll go into below)

Secondly, at the bottom of your pages you created tables with links to other articles. We call those navbars, and we have templates that you can use to create them. If you create a template, you can then embed it into an infinite number of pages and they will all update at once. This saves a ton of time and makes the bars uniform across the pages.

Thirdly, while not required, it would help editors a ton if the sources that you cite actually had URLs or other identification numbers in them so we can more easily identify whether the content you add is verifiable

Finally, probably the most important thing. Artificial intelligence should not be used to create articles from scratch without reasonable human review. Your user page, edit summaries, and the content of your pages has many of the signs that we have listed here. EatingCarBatteries (contributions, talk) 20:41, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 42nd Fortress Corps (France) (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EatingCarBatteries was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
EatingCarBatteries (contributions, talk) 20:48, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Lehrling18!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 06:46, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4th Division (Netherlands) has been accepted

4th Division (Netherlands), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jcgaylor (talk) 18:17, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6th Army Corps (France) (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Earth605 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft needs more sources
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Earth605talk 11:05, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Listing for discussion of Template:13th Army Corps (France) – Order of Battle (May 1940)

Template:13th Army Corps (France) – Order of Battle (May 1940) has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:50, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI