User talk:Lil-unique1

Take care

Aemanops8135 has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!

---

Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} or {{subst:Peace dove 2}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Good faith

Please remember to WP:Assume good faith, you clearly didn't here . It was not "underhanded", I had no idea until I saw this that unused images are autodeleted, let alone that this image wasn't used elsewhere (I don't know why I thought it might've been, silly me). Anyways, I appreciate your fixing this. estar8806 (talk) ★ 22:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Estar8806:, thanks for responding. I can see how you think I didn't assume good faith and to be fair I probably leaned towards "this is deliberate sabotage". Given the number of files you're nominating, I thought you would have known that if a non-free cover art is not used in any article, it becomes "orphaned". orphaned media is automatically deleted after 7 days because remaining on Wikipedia servers but not in use is a violation of NFCC. I assumed you knew this as I've seen you nominating multiple files and it seems to be a space you're familiar acting in. However, next time, please don't remove files which have been nominated for deletion. It's good practice to post on a relevesnt page like the article talk page, user page of the person who uploaded, or the project page so that people can comment. There is a guide somwhere which mentions not removing files which are nominated for deletion. If a file is deleted then it appears as a red link in the article and will naturally be removed by process of normal editing.

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Anniversary Lil-unique1 🎉

Hey @Lil-unique1. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 17 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 15:23, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Album certifications

Hi Lil Unique, do you happen to know much about how album certifications work? If so can I ask you a question regarding them? Pillowdelight (talk) 15:43, 20 February 2026 (UTC) , I know a little, I can try and help. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 19:50, 21 February 2026 (UTC) So when an album certification has been let's say certified platinum and a month later an article is released stating the album has sold 300,000 pure sales so obviously we add that if it's available. But let's say a year later the album has now been certified 2X platinum. Do we keep the sales ref? I always believed we removed it if a new cert has been issued because it would make the sales ref considered "outdated". I opened a discussion regarding this issue 2 years ago and all parties pretty much came to an agreement regarding this. I tried opening up another one but on Taylor Swifts talk page because I removed a sales ref on several of her albums due to a newly issued cert but a user is saying it needs to stay because "pure sales are not as volatile as streaming-adjusted certification, and this pure sales figure (as of 2024) is unlikely to move up significantly any time soon". I'm just curious what you think of this? Pillowdelight (talk) 00:39, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

@Pillowdelight I don't have a specific answer without researching more. Some certifications are based on sales equivalent units, some on streaming some on a combination of sales etc. Where there's a specific note to a specific type of sale e.g. physical sales, streaming etc. it could be worth keeping the specific ref. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 01:15, 22 February 2026 (UTC)