User talk:Link20XX

Hi @Link20XX if you have a time can you recreate List of Hell Teacher: Jigoku Sensei Nube characters? Because unfortunately this page is outdated and very mess (like character information errors, reboot voice actors missing, missing sources, characters that never added yet and more)

I know that will take more time but because franchise is very popular (until now) sometimes we have no choice but fix those errors.

Japanese link about characters that never added if you can: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%9C%B0%E7%8D%84%E5%85%88%E7%94%9F%E3%81%AC%E3%80%9C%E3%81%B9%E3%80%9C%E3%81%AE%E7%99%BB%E5%A0%B4%E4%BA%BA%E7%89%A9 Venom5122 (talk) 21:56, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm not interested in re-creating the character list article. By the way, I saw your other message that you deleted; the reason I didn't respond to it was because I was busy and only had time for minor edits and not enough to write a proper response. I'll consider updating Chiruran: Shinsengumi Requiem when I get some time. Link20XX (talk) 06:51, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

@Link20XX i know you're not interest about re-creating the character list article, but to be honest this is only character list page that i want you to fix it because people (especially me) are waiting to read informations, just this list will first and only you can fix it. And about some characters that never added from Japanese page yet i can add them myself. What do you think? if you refused, the page will be in problem and if you accepted the case will done. And i promise if you finished it, i won't request any character list recreation after that.Venom5122 (talk) 07:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Let me make this clear: what I choose to do is my choice, and if I say no, then I mean it. I'm not trying to sound rude, but I'm just not interested in that list. If you want it done so badly, my advice is to just do it yourself. While the page is a problem, Wikipedia is a volunteer service; I don't have to do anything. Link20XX (talk) 22:50, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

@Link20XX ok but did you add sources about live action series adaptation of Chiruran: Shinsengumi Requiem or not yet? Venom5122 (talk) 23:48, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I haven't done it yet. I'll look into it when I feel like it. Link20XX (talk) 00:54, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Link20XX how are you, i want to tell that I just finished the fixing of List of Hell Teacher: Jigoku Sensei Nube characters in my workspace page and i want to help me for the last touch.

Here User:Venom5122/workspace Venom5122 (talk) 16:00, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Alright. What exactly do you want me to do? Link20XX (talk) 19:14, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

@Link20XX delete the outdated page and recreate article just like what you did for other manga magazines (like Comic Beam you are working on)and old manga before, that what i want you to do, and thank you for everything Venom5122 (talk) 19:29, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

You don't have to "delete" the page, all you have to do is replace the old content with the new content. Also, I am not able to delete articles. Link20XX (talk) 19:31, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

@Link20XX ok thank you again Venom5122 (talk) 19:34, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi again @Link20XX if you have a time can you work on the new content of voice actress Tomiko Suzuki? Because she is popular and need to research of sources Venom5122 (talk) 04:44, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm not interested in working on that article. Link20XX (talk) 05:21, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi again @Link20XX if have a time can you rewrite Young King (magazine)? Because manga titles list is messing Venom5122 (talk) 09:41, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm not interested in working on that article. Link20XX (talk) 15:39, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi again @Link20XX if you have a time can you edit and fix draft of manhwa series Draft:Batman: Wayne Family Adventures? because i found this by chance and this one most popular manhwa in DC Comics Venom5122 (talk) 19:08, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

I have no interest in working on that article. I know very little about the subject. Link20XX (talk) 23:30, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

On 3 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Comic Beam, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Comic Beam has published manga making fun of its low sales? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Comic Beam. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Comic Beam), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:04, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Link20XX, if you have a time can you recreate manga artist Takeshi Okano? Because lot of sources are missing and most informations are outdated Venom5122 (talk) 16:38, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

I'll take a look when I get a chance, though it may be awhile. Link20XX (talk) 16:51, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

thank you Venom5122 (talk) 16:59, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done. I hope you're satisfied with it. Link20XX (talk) 03:59, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

thank you Venom5122 (talk) 05:46, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi again, @Link20XX if you have a time can you add biography of Baku Yumemakura with the creation of template about his works? Because the informations are missing and has a lot of works need to knowledge

Category of this works for template: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Baku_Yumemakura Venom5122 (talk) 16:27, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm not interested in working on that article. Plus, I'm not going to be editing much over the next few days due to personal reasons. Link20XX (talk) 16:30, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep an eye on the vandal who will be targeting Crunchyroll Studios, but please help me expand the production list from the ANN databases of Gen Fukunaga, Funimation, Crunchyroll LLC, etc... for their in house studio. AbbaszaGoat (talk) 20:44, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Link20XX if you have a time will you work on Shō Makura? Because some of his works has connections with Hell Teacher: Jigoku Sensei Nube franchise alongside Takeshi Okano and will be not complete without this article Venom5122 (talk) 08:15, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Unfortunately, due to personal circumstances, I will not have the time to write an article for awhile. Link20XX (talk) 01:13, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Link20XX. I wanted to let you know that I removed the CSD tag you placed on Ouran High School Host Club (TV series). While it meets the letter of G5, I think this is a plausible search term a reader who's looking for the anime could use. Just because a page was created by a sockpuppet doesn't mean we're required to delete it. Feel free to nominate it at RFD if you disagree. Chess enjoyer (talk) 04:38, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

If that's how it is, I won't push it. I was just going through and reverting their edits because they were found to be a sockpuppet. Link20XX (talk) 04:40, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

There's nothing wrong with that, but sometimes socks make constructive edits, and it doesn't make sense to revert them just because they're socks. Would you have reverted this edit if the editor who made it wasn't a sockpuppet? It looks like an improvement to me, because it retargets a wikilink to the anime the VA voiced in from the manga that anime was adapted from. Chess enjoyer (talk) 04:53, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

I admit that I would not have reverted that edit if the user was not a sockpuppet. I apologize for reverting good edits by mistake, but they had edits on a large amount of pages, so I deferred to WP:BANREVERT, which states the presumption in ambiguous cases should be to revert. I realize that is not a great excuse, so I will try to do better in the future. Link20XX (talk) 05:05, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

No need to apologize, I know you were just trying to clean up after they got blocked (thanks for opening that SPI, by the way :)). Chess enjoyer (talk) 05:17, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the understanding. There's just been quite a few socks lately. In addition to that user, this report I filed lead to three sock accounts in the animanga topic area being confirmed and I also filed this one not too long ago. Unfortunately, there are not a lot of active animanga editors, so dealing with these sock users is taxing. Link20XX (talk) 05:27, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

I agree with @Chess enjoyer here. The user has made of the constructive edits like this edit here and here because the name has its own article despite being disruptive but very resourceful. These edits (1 and 2) need to be reverted as well since there was a discussion about that last year because the editor already made improvements to switch the infobox template; though the article that warrants its own page was also created because the it is already linked to the Japanese Wikipedia but needs to be copy-translated into English. Please forgive me if you agree. ~2026-21126-81 (talk) 02:58, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I will not restore any of those edits. Here is why: and relate to anime licensors, which is a common behavior for this user's socks. I did not make and has multiple pieces in its infobox, which is an exception to the discussion above. For the article KonoSuba (TV series), this is very clearly not a minor edit. There would be no point in issuing blocks if someone could just create another account to get around them. Link20XX (talk) 03:12, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Though I am very disappointed with your decision not restoring the edits, number 2 seems to be fine because one of the shows that the user edited has retargeted a wikilink to the anime adapted from the manga while edit number 1 already has a Japanese language logo from the Wikimedia Commons while keeping the English logo on the international section. Those edits seems to look fine to me. Why wasn't exhibits 3 and 4 cannot be restored because the infobox television already qualifies for that though 3 is adapted from a video game. And another thing, since you reverted the 100 Girlfriends and KonoSuba edits, these articles should be autoconfirmed protected so no sock would re-create them (I could still see the older edits unless these are hidden from public view per WP:REVDEL). ~2026-21224-45 (talk) 03:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

The policy says the presumption in ambiguous cases should be to revert and since there is some disagreement, they were reverted. I will not discuss that point any further. Regarding the article creations, protection is unnecessary with just one sock and there's no harm in keeping the history publicly available. This is also not a criteria for redacting the history. Link20XX (talk) 04:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)