User talk:Liptink0

Hi Liptink0! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 00:26, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi Liptink0. Thank you for your work on Alezheriyeqo Kushiku. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:16, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Liptink0. Thank you for your work on Grand Prince of Kabardia. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:06, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Besleney, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Russian, Circassian and Turkish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Inal the Great did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:37, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Kanzhal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crimean Tatar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

htt //wwwojtowi zip @~ sandra ~2025-43438-86 (talk) 01:04, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Circassian Revolution, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nogai and Crimean Tatar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	I've seen your edits, and you are doing an amazing job. Keep up the good work! Looking forward to collaborate. Angel Eyes ● 💬 21:29, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, I appreciate the award. Happy editing! Liptink0 (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

As the very few people who work on Caucasus/Circassian articles, I'm suggesting cooperating more closely, so we can divert our efforts efficiently, correct each other's mistakes, etc. How can I contact you? You are invited if we manage to establish such a team. Angel Eyes ● 💬 09:44, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Okay, feel free to contact me via email. Liptink0 (talk) 15:16, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Liptink0. Thank you for your work on Samir Khotko. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Since it falls under WP:BLP, please add sources and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Please also establish notability as per WP:BIO. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 06:49, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

{{Re|Mariamnei}} Hi, I added the sources in the draft page. And I think Samir Khotko meets Academic Notability criteria as a highly infleuntial scholar in Circassian and Mamluk history for following reasons: specifically criterion 1, due to his significant impact on the study of Circassian history and ethnology. As a Doctor of Historical Sciences and author of over ten monographs, his extensive research on the Circassian Mamluks and regional ethnogenesis is widely published and serves as a foundational source in Caucasian studies. Also his work as a scriptwriter and compiler of historical documents shows a prominent impact both within and outside academia (criterion 7). Even inside of Wikipedia, he can be interlinked, especially for his Inal theory. Additionaly, Russian Wikipedia already has his page. Liptink0 (talk) 11:29, 10 March 2026 (UTC)