User talk:LoganStylus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hi LoganStylus! I noticed your contributions to 2K resolution and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Orphaned non-free image File:PPC Square Logo.webp
Thanks for uploading File:PPC Square Logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:17, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Your vote
Your recent vote in the survey was formatted a bit strangely. You should do this as a separate paragraph/comment, not a reply to another comment.
Additionally, I suspect you may have made a mistake reading the survey options you filled in 2, but your vote might indicate a preference for 1. You should clarify this. Slomo666 (talk) 16:52, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- yeah i was trying to reply to the original post but there was no reply button, how do i format this? LoganStylus (talk) 14:54, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- You use the edit button and then do/don't indent as much as needed. You can use * to make a bullet if you want. ( I am also new to this and not exactly sure where to find the pages for this, but there are many manuals like WP:MOS and WP:help)Slomo666 (talk) 22:40, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- ah ok ill do that, its kinda annoying having to do everything by source without visual but its whatever LoganStylus (talk) 14:48, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah I agree. The visual editor not working on talk pages is a pain. Slomo666 (talk) 15:10, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- ah ok ill do that, its kinda annoying having to do everything by source without visual but its whatever LoganStylus (talk) 14:48, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- You use the edit button and then do/don't indent as much as needed. You can use * to make a bullet if you want. ( I am also new to this and not exactly sure where to find the pages for this, but there are many manuals like WP:MOS and WP:help)Slomo666 (talk) 22:40, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Green Party of Canada
Hello. You recently reverted my revert without an explanation. The source you provided doesn't provide evidence as to the party's ideology, because it is about the public perceptions of party positions, which is something worth including in the ideology section (the Progressive Slovakia page does something similar), but shouldn't be reflected in the infobox, where something like a news article or scholarly source is needed. Atriskofmistake (talk) 16:14, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
You have recently made edits related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles. This is a standard message to inform you that living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. User:Bluethricecreamman (Talk·Contribs) 05:07, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
CS1 error on 2026 Florida gubernatorial election
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2026 Florida gubernatorial election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:46, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
March 2026
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:X (social network) are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a search engine, a chatbot, or a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. GSK (talk • edits) 19:04, 7 March 2026 (UTC)