User talk:Ludus56

I'm the one who made the edits in the Pooh's Grand Adventure: The Search for Christopher Robin page that you reverted. I'm sorry about the unconstructiveness. However, the reason why I edited them was because some of those parts didn't make sense. For one thing, the part about Owl "supplying them with a map" is unnecessary because there is no other part in the plot summary giving any details about the map (yes, I know it has more significant parts in the move itself but stating them in the plot summary would overcomplicate it). Also, the reason I cut out the part "and their scary appearances were all just illusions" because the part "finding the journey that they had taken to the Skull Cave less frightening" pretty much covers it. I won't say anything for the other parts I edited, though, because I do see your part and am willing to accept some criticism. However, I still think we can compromise with the two parts I just stated. 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:18D9:404:423:2432 (talk) 07:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

All good! That particular edit just seemed a bit… off to me. I think your edited edit is more than acceptable. Ludus56 (talk) 11:34, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Why, thank you! I'm so glad we could come to an understanding. 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:18D9:404:423:2432 (talk) 13:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello. You have restored material that was deleted pursuant to a clear and sufficient edit summary - indicating that the material was original research. In doing so, you also failed to provide an appropriate inline RS citation, pursuant to wp:burden. Kindly self-revert. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:11BE:F311:5CEB:6CE3 (talk) 01:49, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, please have a look at https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stella_Nyanzi&diff=prev&oldid=1312639777. My revert was explained, and another editor thinks I'm reasonable. 84.245.121.178 (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

No problem. I just saw the large amount of blanking, and the explanation wasn't that clear to me. Ludus56 (talk) 20:09, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

I really don't understand why you think the poorly written personal life section is worthy of inclusion. This is very sloppy work and actually offensive. 97.120.151.181 (talk) 23:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

I certainly would not consider that section of the page "poorly written"- I can't see any specific issue. If you desire to dispute the citations, feel free, but mentioning the neighborhood that she lives in is pretty standard for the wiki, and attempted arson is certainly Notable. I'll also warn you, if you have any personal connection to Candace (seeing as your IP is from Portland), that could be considered a Conflict of interest, which is taken somewhat seriously. Ludus56 (talk) 23:51, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:57, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Any specific articles you could mention? Ludus56 (talk) 20:33, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I've definitely added my reasoning for removing insufficiently sourced material to Talk:Deborah. Are you sure it's not visible to you? ~2026-40514-1 (talk) 15:17, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Reasoning looks solid- sorry that I didn't see it! Ludus56 (talk) 15:26, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Good day. In future, please do not revert the removal of false claims. Political outbursts have no place on good informative websites. Words have meanings, and making invalid claims is not conductive of a democratic environment. ~2026-40424-3 (talk) 23:56, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:NOTDEMOCRACY. Processes exist for a reason- use them. You can't just stroll up, make bold edits without talking to anyone, and expect them to stay up.

I'd suggest you take your political outburst elsewhere. Ludus56 (talk) 00:03, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

The shoddiness is inherent in your desire to retain disinformation on this website. There's no basis for it to be up, so there should not need to be a basis for it to be taken down.

Writing up false warnings over an edit war on my talk page is not conductive to the conversation. Use the talk page of the article. Labeling democratic groups as fascist without basis or inquiry is libel. Cease or desist. ~2026-40424-3 (talk) 17:58, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Calm down, there's more to life than kvetching about a single, obscure article. The only thing that lacks basis is your rude demeanor and attempts to bully other editors with vague legal threats. (TLDR: stop acting like you own the place!) I'm walking away from this BS, and you should too. Ludus56 (talk) 20:57, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Ludus56. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

• You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
• Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

• When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
• Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
• Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP addresses (using the CIDR notation format).

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:06, 21 January 2026 (UTC)