User talk:Magnesium Cube

Hello Magnesium Cube,

I saw your recent decision to withdraw the GA nomination for Judgement. It was a brave move to admit it needs more work, especially in the religion section. It shows real integrity.

In that same spirit, I have a small request. Would you be willing to leave a brief note on the Hooshmand Dehghan talk page? It would mean a lot if you could mention that the article deserves a fresh look.

As you know, the internet blackout prevented me from responding to your concerns earlier. A quick note from you would help the next reviewer start with a fair perspective.

Thanks in advance. Best regards. Mojgoon ^talk 21:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello Mojgoon,

I deeply apologize for the misconception that I possessed. I recently logged back into Wikipedia and read your messages, and I forgot about the unrest in Iran, and the internet outage there. I do hope you are safe. I believed you had used AI or an LLM to write parts of the article, which I see I was wrong about.

I will leave a message on the talk page for Hooshmand Dehghan explaining any previous conflicts to future reviewers. Unfortunately, I don't think I can review the article again in a short amount of time, as I will probably not be active that much on the site for a month or two due to real-world obligations. I wish you the best and luck in the future.

Thanks, MagnesiumCube (talk) 20:19, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi MagnesiumCube,

Thank you very much for your honesty, humility, and cooperation. I truly appreciate your note on the talk page.

I wish you could continue the review yourself. Since we have already gone through most of the process together, I don't think it would take much of your time. I have even rewritten those two paragraphs we discussed to address the previous concerns.

Thank you again for your kindness and support Mojgoon ^talk 21:01, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

If you could finish the review, it would be truly valuable to me, especially given the difficult situation with the internet in my country. Mojgoon ^talk 22:07, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello Magnesium Cube and thanks for your GA review of the article Cognition a while back. I was wondering whether you may be interested in reviewing the article Rule of inference at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rule of inference/archive1. I've nominated it for FA status, but it hasn't received enough reviews so far. Thank you for taking a look and please feel under no obligation if now is not a good time. Phlsph7 (talk) 17:47, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello Phlsph7, thank you for the invitation! I would love to help out with the article, as it's a fascinating topic (Modus ponens has always been a personal favorite of mine). However, unfortunately, I’m currently tied down with real-world obligations and won't be active enough on-site to give it a deserving review. Apologies, and I wish you the best of luck with the nomination! MagnesiumCube (talk) 20:32, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Sure, I understand. Maybe another time. Phlsph7 (talk) 10:33, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi! Great copyedit of Kwaito. As a really minor point, avoid removing quotation marks like you did here unless you effectively re-word the text; otherwise, this can be considered plagarism/close paraphrasing. (I've restored the text, but for what it's worth I do agree that the quote is clunky.) I'll also mention that (as you were probably aware) only a few sections of the article had the c/e tag, but you did some much-needed work on the whole thing and that would be a real stupid thing to quibble about ;). Thanks for all you do here and for your participation in the drive! GoldRomean (talk) 15:37, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the correction! I enjoyed the drive to the fullest extent and will participate in the next.

Best, MagnesiumCube (talk) 15:46, 31 January 2026 (UTC)