User talk:Manick22
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Parasakthi (2025)
Have you seen this film? @Gowthamaprabu: Tbh, I'm surprised that Potti Sreeramulu never had his own film despite going through a lot. Couldn't get over Jayam Ravi's hairstyle. They always try to add a love track but never make a heroine character full and full. Also, if Prithvi Rajan's character didn't exist nothing would change. Surprised how the censor allowed this film when it is anti-Hindi. Other than Prince and Mr. Local (both of which I haven't seen fully), this seems to be good acting from Sivakarthikeyan but a miss from Sudha Kongara (imagine how good Soorarai Pottru was). Her being Telugu is peak irony (even her debut film is, which she safely credited herself as Sudha). DareshMohan (talk) 07:30, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
- I have seen this film. It's better compared to TTT and Vaa Vaathiyaar, but Vijay fans targeted Parasakthi because it was supported by DMK. It's like a revenge game between DMK and TVK. Manick22 (talk) 07:43, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
- No... Yet to see! Gowthamaprabu (talk) 18:19, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
- Have you seen Jithan, relatable hero character @Gowthamaprabu:? DareshMohan (talk) 07:00, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
So bad it's good: Lucky The Superstar @Gowthamaprabu:. In the world of AI, surprised they made the voice actors wear headsets and even dots on their faces. DareshMohan (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Poster
Jai (2004 Telugu film) put Telugu poster. DareshMohan (talk) 01:28, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Chutti TV.png

Thanks for uploading File:Chutti TV.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Seeking support for standardizing the use of posters instead of title cards for miniseries articles
I saw that you uploaded the poster for the Dying For Sex miniseries. I’m reaching out to get your thoughts on a proposal I’ve made regarding the visual standards for miniseries and limited series articles. Currently, MOS:TVIMAGE allows for either a title card or a promotional poster, but common practice has leaned toward title cards by default. This has led to many miniseries articles only using title cards instead of posters.
I am proposing we standardize the use of promotional posters for miniseries articles. The logic is two-fold:
- Unlike ongoing series, miniseries have no "Season" articles to house their posters. The poster is the only asset that identifies the cast, setting, and genre at a glance—context a text-based title card lacks.
- By standardizing this for miniseries, we remove the need for future "Title Card vs. Poster" discussions like this one.
I’m trying to build consensus to make the guidelines more definitive so editors don't have to keep re-litigating this for other miniseries. If you're interested in supporting this cause, voice out your opinions here. TheVoicelessWriter (talk) 04:26, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- TheVoicelessWriter, I support the idea of posters for miniseries, especially those which premiered in their entirety on the same day. Because they are essentially serial films which could not have been a single film due to length constraints, but still deserve the benefits that films get, even if they didn't release in theatres. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:57, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for the support. TheVoicelessWriter (talk) 05:05, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
File:1921 (1988 film).jpg
Hi, please de-watermark if you have time. At least before the bot reduces the image. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:43, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Koodothram.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Koodothram.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Christina (2026 film).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Christina (2026 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Hey Balwanth.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hey Balwanth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Na Jaane Kaun Aa Gaya
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Na Jaane Kaun Aa Gaya, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:24, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Request
merge Ranjitha filmography. DareshMohan (talk) 06:59, 8 March 2026 (UTC)