User talk:MarioProtIV

Your recent editing history at Hurricane Melissa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

I have a ton of SWIO tracks I've been working on this week that I will get uploaded tomorrow and Sunday. Noah, BSBA^Talk 04:38, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Hurricane Maria. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. FourNoddlers (talk) 18:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to 2025 Atlantic hurricane season. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Jasper Deng (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, MarioProtIV. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2025 Fifty-Six–Larkin tornado, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Your talk page is now excessively long. You should set up archiving. Let any of us know if you need help doing so. Jasper Deng (talk) 18:58, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Mario, ignoring this message, and countless others, is not appreciated, and this pattern has continued despite your having had years since the last time I called you out on this. This is not acceptable. Jasper Deng (talk) 05:43, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Honestly I’ve been pretty lazy not having archived this sooner lmao. I would always have the thought then ended up forgetting about it. I’ll set up archiving either tonight or tomorrow because 300 sections on my talk page does not bode well at all.

edit: saw that recent message as I typed this out and yeah I’ve had a bad habit of doing that which isn’t healthy. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 05:45, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

With that idea in mind I manually archived up to last month. Tedious yes, and I am gonna have to get a bot to do that going forward most likely, so I will definitely reach out to you guys soon regarding auto-archiving by bots since I haven't really done that yet. --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 05:57, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Got you, will do that then. DartsF4 (talk) 19:46, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Yeah. Not worth spending energy on them when the very fabric of their "supposed" request comes from a deprecated fake news source. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 20:14, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

With how much you deal with LTAs you should consider getting this permission. It helps a lot with sockpuppets. Cutlass^Ciera 17:05, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Just came here to say the same. I'm not allowed to grant it without you asking for it (or I definitely would). Simply ping me here or make a request at WP:PERM/TAIV. Toadspike [Talk] 11:45, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

@Toadspike:  Done, filed a request. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 14:34, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Giving Mario TAIV is a very bad idea. User has been topic banned from weather for 16 months, still can’t close discussions (and violated his topic ban) and is a very likely candidate to abuse this tool. ~2026-34808 (talk) 16:56, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Both restrictions were lifted. This message is a series of personal attacks. Toadspike [Talk] 17:40, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Andrew5, nice to see you’re still socking! What a shame. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 17:59, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Having dealt with a bit of Andrew5's sockpuppetry with Hurricane Chris (2018) earlier today, we all could use the help. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:41, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Just WP:DENY and quietly revert, report, and ignore, that’s what I’ve been doing every time I’ve gotten fake block messages pretending to be from an administrator (usually one with CheckUser or oversight). Though I’ve also been quietly reporting it to the administrator they were impersonating in most cases. I’ve told at least one global sysop about it. Just ignore it. When Andrew5 (or whoever else is behind it) gets tired enough, they’ll quit. I learned that the last time I got trolled over A5. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 01:20, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Hey @MarioProtIV. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 12 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey and a blessed New Year. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 15:30, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

In case you didn't know, you aren't in WP:WPTC since your T-BAN. GiftedIceCream 01:20, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Fixed. I’ve been de facto in the community since my TBAN ended in September 2023 but seeing since I never re-added my name it wasn’t de jure until now. Thanks for the heads up! MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 05:25, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding claims that the article's body doesn't state, as per MOS:INTRO. As the lead section is a summary of the most important content of the article body, also per MOS:INTRO, any information in the lead section must be stated somewhere in the article body and attributed to a reliable source. Since the added material is not verified, the burden is on you and Animebrad to cite it. It doesn't matter whether similar material is mentioned in other articles; if it lacks a source, don't mention it. FourNoddlers (talk) 14:46, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Talk:January 2026 North American winter storm#Winter Storm Fern mention in lead Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 23:19, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:2011 Smithville tornado Darnell Collums.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Hey Mario,

Thank you for closing the discussion on the X men talk page. However, I do have a mention to make.

I have reasonable evidence that user @ ~2026-66670-9 is a sockpuppet of @Jinnifer.

I have recorded this evidence on the sockpuppet and ANI discussion boards

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jinnifer#Suspected sockpuppets 2

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Sockpuppets of Jinnifer

Alien456 (talk) 17:45, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Just make sure you don’t clog up discussions like that because it became very long for no reason other then the back and forth which is not helpful at all. Next time when dealing with suspected socks, you should ignore them and simply report them as they will only serve to cause disruption. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 17:48, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Okay, thank you! Alien456 (talk) 17:49, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page February 2026 North American blizzard, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:39, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025–26 North American winter, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:36, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025–26 North American winter, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:45, 5 March 2026 (UTC)