User talk:MarketFruit

Hello, MarketFruit!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🪷 nahida 15:53, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, thanks. MarketFruit (talk) 15:54, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Saw you red link this article, so here is the draft if you'd like to help. Draft:Territory of the Congo River Alliance JaxsonR (talk) 19:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I will try to find more information. ~2025-34744-69 (talk) 02:09, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Idk why I can't ansewer with my Ip account. ~2025-34744-69 (talk) 02:10, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

. MarketFruit (talk) 02:10, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Now it works again, weird but okay. MarketFruit (talk) 02:11, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

I will create the Territory of the Nduma Defense of Congo-Renovated draft, however I think I will help you with the other draft firstly. MarketFruit (talk) 21:23, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Just letting you know, whenever you complete a page make the link for the group in these pages (Qausi state and Rebel groups that control territory) link to the "territory page" JaxsonR (talk) 02:15, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

with sources, alot of people forget that part. JaxsonR (talk) 02:16, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

I advise you to explore your sources better; it is very unlikely that both Maurice Kouandété and Jean-Baptiste Hachème served as Chairman of the Revolutionary Committee simultaneously on 20 – 21 December 1967. I really doubt that they served at the same time, even for just one day. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 23:47, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

I find it strange too, I will look for a clearer source. MarketFruit (talk) 13:24, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi! If you disagree with the close, you're welcome to file a Deletion Review. However a head count is not sufficient to make your case. Please let me know if you have any questions. Star Mississippi 15:27, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Also - I think there is some formatting issue with the deletion review you posted. On Wikipedia:Deletion review, looks like the previous days are subsections of Pascal. HappiestSisyphus (talk) 16:57, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Party of Honduras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Traditionalism. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

In the future, when you add a reference containing URL link to an article, make sure to avoid adding them as bare URLs, in order to avoid link rot. The proper way to add such references is by using a template like this one, or some other relevant template. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 07:33, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. MarketFruit (talk) 13:37, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Chavismo did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:20, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Party of Honduras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Traditionalism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Htanaungg was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Agree per EmeraldRange on their opinion about its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Republic of Kawthoolei and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Htanaungg (talk) 11:13, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Is there maybe a way to publish it and then to merge it with the article of the militia? MarketFruit (talk) 12:14, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, MarketFruit! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Htanaungg (talk) 11:13, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Ampera Cabinet when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:56, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Revised Ampera Cabinet did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:58, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of current heads of state and government. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TEMPO156 (talk) 17:40, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references, as you did to Societal breakdown in the Gaza Strip during the Gaza war! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources, including details such as title, author, date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations: try the Citer tool, or in the wikitext editor, try the reFill tool, and in the Visual Editor, the reference dialog can convert some bare urls into a full citation. I have tagged the bare URLs in the article for clean-up, so others can find them. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 21:07, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

The page you made (Liberated Areas) was mentioned on Youtube! Good job! JaxsonR (talk) 18:14, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, for sending me, the video. MarketFruit (talk) 18:24, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Sadly, New Sudan isn't mentioned. MarketFruit (talk) 18:26, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Leave a comment on the video and he might!! :D JaxsonR (talk) 18:28, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Maybe you are interested in this: https://securityjournalamericas.com/caribbean-latin-american-security-2026/ https://ocindex.net/country/haiti both talk about that the territories held by the Haitian gangs is a quasi-state. MarketFruit (talk) 18:33, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Intresting!! You could add it to the list if it specifies which gangs. JaxsonR (talk) 19:03, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

The sources doesn't say which sprcific but I think probably that they mean Viv Ansanm which is a union of almost all gangs included former former rivals. MarketFruit (talk) 19:08, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Yes but dont add that yet it could be 'Gran Grif gang' JaxsonR (talk) 19:10, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

There are part of them as I know. MarketFruit (talk) 19:12, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I also worked on some drafts of you, I hope it's okay. MarketFruit (talk) 19:13, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Its fine! Anyone can edit anyones draft. JaxsonR (talk) 00:03, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Do you know if the Caliph of the Islamic State is also the Commander-in-chief or maybe even the Supreme commander-in-chief? MarketFruit (talk) 00:20, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

No hes just the Caliph. JaxsonR (talk) 01:13, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

I would say he is technically the head of state and government though. MarketFruit (talk) 01:14, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Yes hes basically the top authority in the Islamic State. JaxsonR (talk) 01:15, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Similar to Iran's Supreme Leader JaxsonR (talk) 01:15, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Yea, I will try to expand the article. Will also add a list. MarketFruit (talk) 01:16, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

I know the information you added is true. Just make sure to add some sources ill help right now to JaxsonR (talk) 01:17, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

I dont know if you saw the recent events in Syria, but the DAANES has been dissolved and no longer exists. JaxsonR (talk) 23:08, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

i didn't know it, I just heard they took large areas. MarketFruit (talk) 23:16, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Seems like they will fall in the next day's. MarketFruit (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi MarketFruit! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Jay8g [V•T•E] 03:00, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

I know that the information you added is true, but you still need to provide sources and maybe add it to the prose. JaxsonR (talk) 18:11, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

I know, I will do ot in future, thanks for reminding me. MarketFruit (talk) 18:15, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

I've noticed that quite a few of your edits have been tagged as "minor", despite not being so. Per WP:ME a minor edit is a change in which no other user could disagree with. Any sort of edit that changes the meaning of the content is not a minor edit, such as these , , . If you are unsure if an edit should be tagged as minor or not simply don't tag it, as said at WP:ME, it is perfectly acceptable to never tag an edit as minor. DervotNum4 (talk) 15:31, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. MarketFruit (talk) 16:43, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ain Diwar, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rojava was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Conservative Party of Japan, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nuclear energy was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Your edit to Chehabism has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Please note that original text is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND which is incompatible with CC-BY-SA Dark-World25 (talk) 05:30, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Why have you been putting middle names in Right-libertarianism? I have never seen them used. —Antonissimo (talk) 04:45, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

I just thought it would be better. MarketFruit (talk) 11:36, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Well, I just think the names by which they are normally known would be better. —Antonissimo (talk) 04:56, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siamese occupation of Germany, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siamese was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:05, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

There were too many ideologies in New Party in Brazil. I humbly request if you can put my edits back ~2026-81618-8 (talk) 08:52, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Can do. MarketFruit (talk) 12:12, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks ~2026-81618-8 (talk) 19:09, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

I saw that you tagged this edit as minor despite adding content. As per WP:ME "Adding or removing content in an article" is something that should not be tagged as minor. As explained in WP:ME many editors choose to hide minor edits in their watchlist as they don't want to look through edits they don't have to look through. As I have previously told you "it is perfectly acceptable to never tag an edit as minor" and suggest that you do so if you are confused about what constitutes a minor edit. DervotNum4 (talk) 15:02, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

My bad. MarketFruit (talk) 12:51, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

All of the sources I found state that Alireza Arafi is leading the council.

See , , . They're quoting Iran's own state agencies. Linkin Prankster (talk) 12:24, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for adding them. MarketFruit (talk) 12:24, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Pipoin (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello,

You mentioned wanting to call a census on my recommended changes to the infobox and intro concerning Iran's supreme leader. This has already been discussed on the talk page and is frankly already settled in terms of available evidence. But if you want to convene interested parties to formally conclude this process, that can be done. Let me know.

This was my contribution to the discussion:

Many nations do not operationally define their preeminent constitutional officers as the head of state. This is especially true among states with older constitutions, those states where the prevailing system of government isn't a parliamentary democracy (e.g., presidential republics in the Americas), or regimes where the established constitutional order doesn't operate in the usual democratic paradigm occupied by contemporary sovereign states. In the case of Iran, the latter applies: it is constitutionally a theocracy, not a representative democracy. The president is Iran's head of state, not the supreme leader. But the presidency is ultimately subject to the oversight of the supreme leader, who take precedence over all other public officials domestically.

Remember, to be head of state is a function - not an actual office. Per Watts & Foakes (2023) in Oxford Public International Law, a head of state is merely the highest functionary of a sovereign state, with the exclusive right to represent their respective state internationally in all matters concerning international law. Thus, it falls to heads of state to accredit ambassadors abroad, receive the credentials of foreign diplomats, and both pay and accept state visits. Likewise, it also falls to heads of state to sign instruments of ratification, thereby giving full legal effect to treaties. All four of these responsibilities are explicitly conferred on the president by Articles 125 and 128 of the Iranian constitution. Likewise, the international community - including the United Nations and its affiliated organizations - recognizes the president as Iran's head of state.

So, I think we can settle this matter once and for all: the president is indeed Iran's head of government and de jure head of state. However, the supreme leader is the highest political and religious authority of the Iranian state, exercising plenary control and supervision over all aspects of public business, be they legislative, executive, or judicial. The supreme leader is conferred this absolute power by the Islamic Republic constitution in order to guarantee the continuity and stability of the established authoritarian regime. Both this Wikipedia article and the article concerning the Iranian presidency need to be updated to reflect this constitutional reality. Mcvayn (talk) 18:25, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

If there already was one than change it back.👍🏻 MarketFruit (talk) 18:26, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. The particular discussion is WP:AN/Edit warring#Edit warring over party ideologies at New Party (Brazil). guninvalid (talk) 17:33, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

The IDF confirmed that he was the de facto leader of Iran until his assassination. My apologies for doubting you. --Megiddo87 (talk) 11:59, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Didn't know that the IDF confirmed it. MarketFruit (talk) 12:01, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Confirmation here. https://x.com/IDF/status/2033861461596930479 https://www.ynetnews.com/article/s1t9tkiqwx

--Megiddo87 (talk) 12:14, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Setting an edit request to open because you disagree with it being closed is one thing, but deleting another person's comments is a fairly bright red line. I'm assuming good faith here and giving you an opportunity to self-revert the removal, and I strongly suggest you do so. ―Maltazarian ^{(talk${\displaystyle \lor }$investigate)} 12:22, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Which other message did I deleted? MarketFruit (talk) 12:24, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

mine, in a reply to an edit request, the removal is here: Special:Diff/1343957437

Perhaps it was an accident due to an edit conflict you didn't resolve? You dont have to literally revert and remove your comment, and if you want I can just add mine back myself. ―Maltazarian ^{(talk${\displaystyle \lor }$investigate)} 12:27, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Oh, yea my mistake I wanted to renove my comment and nor yours, yea please add your comment back yourself, thanks. MarketFruit (talk) 12:29, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to post-1978 Iranian politics, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:31, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MarketFruit reported by User:Tol (Result: ). Thank you. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:08, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

I urge you to read WP:OR (specifically the section on WP:SYNTH): Sources does not explicitly states that "Khamenei Jr." is his personal nickname. Also, might I add that the New York Post is generally unreliable. It would be accurate to describe these as terms used by opposition media rather than established nicknames. AsianStuff03 (talk) 23:53, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kawthoolei Army, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 26 March 2026 (UTC)