User talk:Mehdi ghaed

Copy the text that you wrote to your talk page and I'll discuss it with you tomorrow. Dougweller (talk) 21:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

14 August: Brochures urging Muslims to leave Britain and join ISIS were handed out to shoppers in Oxford Street in central London. Men were described as standing in front of posters declaring "the dawn of a new era has begun" and handing out pro-ISIS brochures. "The khilafah (Caliphate) has been established", one leaflet read, in reference to territories gained in Iraq and Syria after ISIS waged its lightning offensive in recent weeks. Another leaflet said: "We have been living in a constant state of ignorance, our lands separated, resources stolen, ummah disunited, honor humiliated and the laws of shirk established over us."^[1]

"Brochures urging Muslims to leave Britain and join the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) group were and handed out to Oxford Street shoppers in central London, The Daily Mail reported Wednesday." First sentence virtually identical. "The newspaper said men, who stood in front of posters declaring “the dawn of a new era has begun,” were handing out pro-ISIS brochures." Second sentence virtually identical. "The khilafah (Caliphate) has been established,” one leaflet read, in reference to territories gained in Iraq and Syria after ISIS waged its lightening offensive in recent weeks. Another leaflet said: “We have been living in a constant state of ignorance, our lands separated, resources stolen, ummah disunited, honor humiliated and the laws of shirk established over us.”

Obvious copyvio. Dougweller (talk) 20:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Mehdi ghaed. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Yousef Kolahdouz, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Yousef Kolahdouz to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Snowycats (talk) 12:44, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi Mehdi ghaed,

I'm interested in helping you work on your Inspire gender gap campaign idea to make the idea more clear to understand. You can answer here, on meta, or in the email I sent you. Sydney Poore/FloNight♥♥♥♥ 17:41, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

I am very happy for your notice and respectFloNight.I also think that we can communicate more better through email for clarification.. nice too meet you again..--m,sharaf (talk) 17:59, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

I'm happy to help. Did you get my email? If you did, you can reply to it. If you can't find it, look in your span folder because Wikipedia mail goes into spam sometimes. Sydney Poore/FloNight♥♥♥♥ 18:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

thanks. I wrote for youFloNight through email..--m,sharaf (talk) 18:17, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Second Battle of Tikrit (March 2015), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qods. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

thanks for your noticing DPL bot. I correct it again.--m,sharaf (talk) 16:08, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello Mehdi ghaed. I am contacting you regarding your recent changes to the Abdul-Malik al-Houthi article. With this edit you state that he was born the year 1982, citing source http://www.middleeasteye.net/in-depth/features/abdel-malek-al-houthi-shadow-rebel-leader-kingmaker-988988591 -- later, with this edit you cite a contradictory source of http://www.albawabaeg.com/52258 which states that he was born May 22, 1979. If the latter source is incorrect, why do you continue to utilize it as a source for additional content? Regards, Yamaguchi先生 17:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avicenna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Porphyry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sharaf Khorasani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. OluwaCurtis The King : talk to me 15:25, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your edits for this article were removed for 2 reasons: 1) they were not related to the specific criticism of the many similarities. The text didn't note that imamolgy shared similarities like divinity with christology so i'm not sure why you brought that up. 2) your wording was very poor. If English is not your native language then please either put more effort into your grammar and punctuation or get help from native speakers.--120.18.15.143 (talk) 01:11, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm PrinceSulaiman. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Al-Farabi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The bare link doesn't find any matching words you typed at Al-Farabi and use of an improper character. Prince Sulaiman ^{Talk to me} 15:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mulla Sadra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fars. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

You have already been told by multiple users that your grip of the English is well below what is acceptable on Wikipedia. Please either ask others for help before adding any more text to articles, or contribute to another Wikipedia in a language in which you are more proficient. Intelligibility is not optional when adding content to article space. If you keep adding content that is not comprehensible (such as this), you may have to be reported for vandalism per Wikipedia:Patent nonsense#Dealing with patent nonsense.--Anders Feder (talk) 03:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

@Anders Feder:: it is not comprehensible because you don't have any knowledge on medieval philosophy.you clearly accused me to vandalism. according to Wikipedia you just could alert me: don't bite the newbies by calling them vandals in this case.--m,sharaf (talk) 19:32, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

"you just could alert me" That is exactly what I did. You are not a newcomer, and I have not "accused you vandalism" - I have pointed out that your actions could be reported as such if you keep adding text that is nearly incomprehensible despite repeated notifications from other users that your English is too abstruse.--Anders Feder (talk) 19:45, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't think so.you speak such a way that my pages are wholly nonsense and there is no sense and comprehension in it. it is really unfairness. you insist that I am grip of English,abstruse and other abuses. i think if some one who edit grammar in Wikipedia could promote my pages then these pages would be better. in other hand i don't think that my created pages are in a level that at least they are not absurd and non sense.you don't observe the rules of Wikipedia. i even test my pages according to understandability by hemigwayapp:

http://www.hemingwayapp.com/ it shows my text is good.--m,sharaf (talk) 20:15, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

That website is just a computer program - it can't detect whether the text conveys any meaningful message, which is the same reason that machine translation often produces very low quality results. If you think others would be able to understand the meaning of your text well enough to improve it, then you can write a draft instead of just offloading it in article space. You can even request others to copy-edit your draft.--Anders Feder (talk) 20:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

there is no problem in this case. but before copy editing I have to alert you about the subject. according to [] It is unreasonable to expect a comprehensive article on such subjects to be understandable to all readers. but we try to make it more understandable , in other word , effort should still be made to make the article as understandable as possible, with particular emphasis on the lead section.besides Making articles more understandable does not necessarily mean that detailed technical content should be removed. see:WP:TECH-CONTENT.--m,sharaf (talk) 22:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Detailed is not the same as not being comprehensible. Writing an article that is not comprehensible is trivial, but writing a detailed article that most people can understand is the exact opposite—it takes a lot of effort. Part of that effort can be to either avoid writing in areas that are beyond one's means or at least seeking out others willing to assist in areas where one falls short.--Anders Feder (talk) 01:35, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

I think the problem concerned with the philosophical subject not English skillfully. I think your problem is former not latter. according to Lie-to-children we can not oversimplify the philosophical subject as you want. please see:[]--m,sharaf (talk) 08:52, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Please point me to a single other editor among the 26 million users on Wikipedia who thinks your English is "skillful". There is certainly nothing suggesting that your grip of the subject is very good either—someone with even a scant understanding of the subject would have known that linguistic ability is a prerequisite for discussing philosophy.--Anders Feder (talk) 19:19, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

I don't claim that my English is very good but at the same time my skill is not in such a state that could describe as you did. I put my created pages on copy editor page in Wikipedia but you insist that my understanding is weak. it seems that your intention is not improvement. this is a kind of abuse. you discourage me in editing therefore include in Wikipedia:Harassment--m,sharaf (talk) 07:11, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

A ridiculous charge—I am discouraging you from editing beyond your means. Editing Wikipedia is not a human right, it requires a willingness to respect the guidelines for content and quality. If you are not willing to follow the guidelines that apply to English Wikipedia, you can always try another language's Wikipedia.--Anders Feder (talk) 14:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

I try to observe ethics code according to guidelines. but some body like you permanently abused and behave with me like ethnic . your behaviour could be a sample of incivility:Wikipedia:Civility#Identifying_incivility--m,sharaf (talk) 16:40, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

No, I am just pointing out that your English skills are too bad to add content to mainspace. It is _your_ error to add content of such a low standard, not mine or anyone else's. Instead of trying to project the blame for your inabilities onto others, you should focus on listening to what others are telling you. Being in a state of denial is not helpful to anyone, including yourself.--Anders Feder (talk) 19:08, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

I told you many times that I accept my created page reviewed by editors. but you insist that my pages are nonsense. you repeatedly told me you are Iranian, you are Shiite. isn't it :Wikipedia:Civility#Identifying_incivility. besides you don't have any good faith on my pages. i try to reach a consensus with you but your speaking is biding.Wikipedia:Assume good faith--m,sharaf (talk) 19:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your message.

As with the previous edit on active intellect, I see no need for a separate article dealing with the same concept in its Islamic guise; anything there is to say should go in the article on passive intellect under a sub-heading "Passive intellect in Islamic philosophy" or something similar.

I'll look at your draft if I have time, but I don't promise to produce an edited version any time soon: apart from anything else, I probably don't have your detailed knowledge (I have a nodding acquaintance with Avicenna and Averroes, but that's about it). --Sir Myles na Gopaleen (the da) (talk) 10:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

@Sirmylesnagopaleentheda:.thanks for pay attention to the page. but I have problem with some users about the page. they claim that the page is nonsense. I explain for them about it but that's not enough. I need to help you to persuasive them about this philosophical term. they claim that my page is of defective grammar. how can I count on your help. with best.--m,sharaf (talk) 18:44, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Mehdi ghaed. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mulla Hamzah Gilani, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Mulla Hamzah Gilani to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Pixarh (talk) 13:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Pixarh. Mehdi ghaed, thanks for creating Mulla Hamzah Gilani!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N, WP:BIO). No references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Pixarh (talk) 16:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Pixarh. hi and thanks for attention to this page. but I think that there are some references to Corbin,Ashtiyyani refernces. I think according to "The word "source" when citing sources on Wikipedia has three related meanings:

• The piece of work itself (the article, book)
• The creator of the work (the writer, journalist) not only there is no contradiction with policies of notability but also there are some evidences verifying that
  Shortcut

  • WP:BKCRITWP:BKCRIT
  on the basis of which:

1. The book's author is so historically significant that any of the author's written works may be considered notable. This does not simply mean that the book's author is notable by Wikipedia's standards; rather, the book's author is of exceptional significance and the author's life and body of written work would be a common subject of academic study.--m,sharaf (talk) 18:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

No. References here at Wikipedia do not mean redirecting back to the same article. I have already explained that references mean providing third party sources and also reliable sources is very important but your article does not even meet the general notability criteria and cannot even be verified. You simply removed the tag without working on your article. No article can stand without references here at Wikipedia.Pixarh (talk) 13:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Pixarh. Mehdi ghaed, thanks for creating Mulla Hamzah Gilani!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Do not remove the tag unless you provide sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Pixarh (talk) 19:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pixarh (talk) 19:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

I have just mentioned my reason in above title. you repeated here again.--m,sharaf (talk) 20:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/floating man at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Mehdi ghaed. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mulla Hamzah Gilani, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Pixarh (talk) 13:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to. Pixarh (talk) 06:59, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.Pixarh (talk) 10:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minhaj al-karamah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minhaj al-karamah until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lfstevens (talk) 18:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jaroudiah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hasan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sayyed Ahmad Alavi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mirdamad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Mehdi ghaed. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Shams Addin Muhammad Gilani, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Pixarh (talk) 16:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Al-Nihayah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fakhr Razi and development of Kalam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fakhr Razi and development of Kalam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 12:42, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Hojjat Kouhkamare'i is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Hojjat Kouhkamare'i until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 12:49, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Instead of referencing via a link to a Google Books website (a so-called bare URL), consider using the Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books. Just copy and paste the link in the "Google Books URL" bar, press "Load" and the tool will show a {{cite book}}-style reference in section 3, which you can use in Wikipedia articles. - HyperGaruda (talk) 20:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup.--m,sharaf (talk) 20:37, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

De rien - HyperGaruda (talk) 20:39, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

@HyperGaruda:je vous en prie. but i can not access to it. show me this message:We're sorry, but this service is not available in your country.--m,sharaf (talk) 20:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry to hear that, but I can't help you with country-based restrictions. - HyperGaruda (talk) 07:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

no problem. just you assist me to correct the source this is sufficient.its kind of you besides.--m,sharaf (talk) 20:27, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Awail Al Maqalat, Mehdi ghaed!

Wikipedia editor Mhhossein just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

There are inconsistencies in Templates used for referencing.

To reply, leave a comment on Mhhossein's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

On 9 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Al-Shaykh Al-Mufid, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Al-Shaykh Al-Mufid, a 10th-century Shia jurist and theologian, was said to be so persuasive in debate that he could convince his opponents "that a wooden column was actually gold"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Al-Shaykh Al-Mufid. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Al-Hikma al-muta‘aliya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 10:23, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Al-Tafsir into Rezang La. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello Mehdi ghaed,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sayyed Muhammad Tabatabei Fesharaki for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vinod 09:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sallar Deylami is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sallar Deylami until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 20:13, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Operation Eagle Claw may have broken the syntax by modifying 6 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

I appreciate that you're trying to improve this article, but the syntax and grammar is such a mess that I don't even know where to begin in attempting to fix it. Perhaps if you could explain here what info you are trying to add, we can work together on it. Rockypedia (talk) 23:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

@Rockypedia:: thanks for your attention. i read an article in jstore and there i found out there is a analysis on this operation. of course this analysis needs some other information. for example the analyst knows the operation more as a security policy not as a operation.according to this , he follows from cluwsewits maxim in which war is a continuation of politics.m,sharaf (talk) 21:49, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Morteza Motahhari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khorasan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mahmoud Taleghani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Jafar Ishraghi. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Jafar Ishraghi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Suhrevardi and Illumination school. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Illuminationism. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Illuminationism – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. HyperGaruda (talk) 17:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

This is not ready to be an article, the translation makes it almost nonsensical. I have restored it to your userspace, please do not move it back again until it is more readable--Jac16888 ^Talk 16:48, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

@Jac16888:.This page is not translation but I wrote it myself.m,sharaf (talk) 07:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Either way, it is not of any value as an article in its current state--Jac16888 ^Talk 21:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi dear, it's International Day of Peace and i wanted to say happy peace day to you, so you may be interested in this association to join it , as you wish . happy editing. The Stray Dog Talk Page 18:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your addition to Shia Islam has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. – FenixFeather ^{(talk)(Contribs)} 02:00, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

I rewrite it.but it is not problem i try to rewrite it again.m,sharaf (talk) 08:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

To be honest, I'm not entirely sure what the point is. I don't see those chapters as providing any additional insight and I feel like you should hold off on contributing to English Wikipedia until your grasp of the language is a little more solid. – FenixFeather ^{(talk)(Contribs)} 13:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

certainly those chapters refers to valuable informations about shia.I promise you that these points are useful for insight and knowledge about the sect.But As you know there are many editors in the page who could judge on usefulness of the points.isnt it?m,sharaf (talk) 15:27, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Will you please learn to write titles and section headers correctly? Each title and section header starts with a capital letter. It is really not that difficult to remember. --HyperGaruda (talk) 18:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your Alert.I really forgot it or else as far as i could i try to observe it.m,sharaf (talk) 20:28, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi there! Wikipedia Asian Month is about to start. Here is some information about participating in the event:

1. Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
2. Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
3. Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
4. If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
5. If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Best Wishes, Addis Wang
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Mehdi -- I just wanted you to know that I am not finished copy-editing Shaikh Abdallah Mazandarani. I made quite a few copy-edits, then went back to read the article before I saved my edits. I decided to move the dates to after his name at the beginning of the article, but somehow I pasted the dates after the word "Persian" and the name in Persian letters. When I tried to highlight the dates so I could move them to after the name in Persian letters, I couldn't. Since I didn't want to lose all the work I had done, I saved my edits. Then I tried again, but to no avail. I have asked another editor for help on this. I may end up having to undo my edits and start again. Please wait until I hear from that other editor to make any copy-edits.

In the meantime, I might as well ask you a few questions:

1) In the title of the article and at the beginning of the article, you spell the name "Abdallah". Then, beginning in the "Early life" section, you spell it "Abdullah". Was his name really spelled "Abdullah" when he was young and "Abdallah" when he was an adult? Or shall we make the spelling consistent throughout the article?

2) If his complete name was "Molla Abdullah Langrudi", shouldn't that be given at the beginning of the article? I was thinking that, at the beginning of the "Early life" section, it would sound good to say, "Born Molla Abdullah Langrudi, his father...", but is "Molla" really part of his name or was it a title (like "Mullah")? If it was a title, then it wasn't really part of his name, was it? If that is true, then we can't say he was born with that name (i.e., given that name at birth). If "Molla" is a title rather than part of his name, we could say, "Born Abdullah Langrudi,...", and then say he was known as "Molla Abdullah Langrudi" in his early years. Let me know, so we can write this correctly.

3) In the "Early life" paragraph, you say, "Then he went to Najaf, the other important city, to continue his studies." I have two questions about this sentence:

(a) When you say, "the other important city", you are saying that there were only two important cities. If that is the case, then it is all right, but you should also indicate in what way it was important – important to whom or important for what reason? Maybe it would be enough just to add the word "Shia" before "city" – "the other important Shia city". What do you think about that? Would that be correct? If there were more than two important [Shia] cities, then it should be "another important Shia city".

(b) You said that he studied science: "took part in the scientific courses". That's all right, but since he was a religious leader, don't you want to say that he studied theology at some point?

4) In the lead and in the section "Political life" you mention "constitutional movement" and "constitutionalism". I think these need a little explanation. It might also be a good idea to link them to an article (in Wikipedia) that would enable a reader to read more about this movement.

5) In the middle of the "Political life" section, you have a sentence that begins (now):

• He had an important role both before and after the constitutional movement.

Since what you had written was a little unclear, I had to guess about what you meant here. I got it at least to be a grammatically correct sentence. However, I may not have gotten the facts exactly right. The problem with "before and after" is that it leaves out "during", which you may not want to do (but "before, during, and after" is a little wordy – too many words). Perhaps we can say, "He played an important role in the constitutional movement".

6) I see you have a section with the heading "Teachers". Were all those teachers science teachers? Or were some (or all) of them teachers of theology? Would it be possible to turn this list into a paragraph and say "Abdullah studied science under..... and theology under...." Or just "Abdullah studied theology under a, b, c, d, and e." Would it be possible (that is, do you know) where he studied with these teachers? Were they all in Najaf, or were some in Karbala and some in Najaf?  – Corinne (talk) 02:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Corinne, before anything it is necessary to appreciate of you for copy editing. I try to respond questions respectively

1) I observed both Abdallah and Abdullah. But according to Iranica which is phonologically valid at least in Arabic it is better to write Abdallah in all place.

2) The name and family name mentioned here is famous. However the shaikh Abdallah Mazandarani is more prevalent that Molla Abdullah langrudi though the latter is his original name but he is known by the former. Olla is just a title not anymore.

3) A: It is important city for Shia since that those cities considered as religious centers of shia in that period.

B: that’s right but I want to say that he participate in different courses in diverse places.

4) You are right. Surly I link it to the Wikipedia page.

5) Solely I want to say that during that movement he had eminent role.

6) I prefer that the section would be separated of the other side. But if you realize that it’s better for article according to framework of wiki then you could to change it.--m,sharaf (talk) 06:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

I don't know why, but I didn't see your responses until today. I've made a few more edits. I still think you need to do two more things to clear up some things for your readers:

1) Indicate why the name in the title and at the beginning of the article is different from his birth name. When, and/or why, did he take on a new name?

2) If he studied theology at any point in his life, I think that should be mentioned. Otherwise, it sounds like he only studied science.

I didn't change the instances of "Abdullah" to "Abdallah". (I think "Abdullah" is a more common spelling in English, if that matters.)  – Corinne (talk) 16:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

As a result of this discussion, your request has been declined. The GOCE's scope is article space, and copediting a talk page is a probable violation of WP:TPO. It sounds like you need dispute resolution rather than copyediting. Good luck and all the best, Miniapolis 20:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nuclear Fatwa under International Law is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear Fatwa under International Law until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
• updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Mehdi, I have been working on fixing dangling references that have no corresponding sources, and it appears you added a ref to Naeemi & Foqaha in this edit. Do you know the source? For now, I have hidden the ref. Let me know if you need any assistance if you do know the source! - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 00:28, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Also you added this. Do you know the source? I have hidden the ref. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 09:49, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

The article Ibn Jonayd Eskafi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Basically unsourced, lacking even CE dates, just junk - subject might be valid, but this is a TNT case

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Cosmological argument in Islamic philosophy and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 4 § Cosmological argument in Islamic philosophy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:26, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

The article Abdulkarim Zanjani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:NRV. There appear to be no verifiable sources. There's only one Google Scholar result, which references the subject only once with regard to another person attending one of his lectures. Regular Google search also does not uncover any additional reliable sources. There's no evidence that the subject meets the other criteria for academic notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. voorts (talk/contributions) 05:35, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

The article Hadith of neediness of all beings to Allah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to verify. No non-wikipedia search results for article name or the publication cited, author Javad Khorramiyyan isn't on Worldcat at all. No results on Google Scholar.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Here2rewrite (talk) 20:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

The article Makatib AL Rasoul has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 21:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sorure Ahle Iman, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorure Ahle Iman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmad Vaezi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Vaezi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Persia ☘ 20:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tafasir Al Quran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tafasir Al Quran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 11:22, 5 April 2025 (UTC)