User talk:Melicans
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please add your comments below this line!

| “ | We run like a river to the sea Tears like a river to the sea |
” |
| — U2, "One Tree Hill" | ||
| This page is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A barnstar for you!
| The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| For your hard work in general and especially on U2, one of my favorite bands. John (talk) 09:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC) |
- Oh wow! Thank you! Melicans (talk, contributions) 11:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Ellie Goulding & Vampire Weekend
Why do you keep replacing them with bands nobody cares about? 188.141.24.232 (talk) 15:14, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Because the truth beats lies. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a repository of make believe. Ellie Goulding or Vampire Weekend did not open any dates on the U2 360° Tour. You say they did. Prove it. Melicans (talk, contributions) 15:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Neither did The Fray or One Republic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperAlwaysRight (talk • contribs) 15:21, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, they did. Check U2.com, and newspaper articles from those dates. Now go bother someone else. I'm not interested in dealing with vandals and liars. Melicans (talk, contributions) 15:24, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Any further attempts to add these artists, who had nothing to do with the U2 360 tour, to the tour article will result in you being reported to an admin for continued vandalism. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 15:27, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Nothing to do with the tour? Yes they did. I was at a show in Zurich where Ellie Goulding played. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperAlwaysRight (talk • contribs) 15:31, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- As I said above, prove it. No RELIABLE source (hint: you aren't one) agrees with your claims. Melicans (talk, contributions) 15:33, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Prove it then! As far as I can tell, you are just making this all up. What reliable source says you are right? Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 15:34, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Ellie Goulding and Vampire Weekend's event listing on last.fm (2010 and 2011 respectively).
- We said reliable sources. Last.fm isn't one (and again, all of the other sources claim otherwise). Melicans (talk, contributions) 15:36, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- What are the odds of another sockpuppet account? We've SuperAlwaysRight and MegaAlwaysRight so far... I put $5 on UltraAlwaysRight being the next one! Melicans (talk, contributions) 15:49, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2011
- Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews
- News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content
- In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references
- WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: "Broadly construed" explained, voting begins on Senkaku Islands case, invitation to comment on CU/OS candidates
A barnstar for you!
| The Good Article Barnstar | ||
| Thanks Melicans for making One Tree Hill (song) a Good Article. Keep up your good work. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 03:27, 29 September 2011 (UTC) |
- Thank you! Melicans (talk, contributions) 03:30, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- No problems. Just remember to award those who do good deeds, no matter how insignificant or gnomish they are. You will make their day. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 10:00, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Help with Achtung Baby
Could you help me with finding a source to resolve an issue raised about the Legacy section of Achtung Baby? Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 17:38, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- I've made a suggestion. I doubt we'll ever find one individual citation to back up 'many' and 'numerous', but if we pick from the pile of refs we already have we might be able to cobble something together. Melicans (talk, contributions) 17:59, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Edit request from 4 Stars about bare links in U2 360° Tour
In U2 360° Tour, references 6, 7, 36, 48 are bare links. Can you fix this issue? ★★★★ 00:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Done. Melicans (talk, contributions) 00:58, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Re: No Line on the Horizon
That revision was reverted, but in another revision, I edited the last sentence of the second paragraph of the "Following section", which wasn't original research. How many copies No Line on the Horizon sell worldwide? ★★★★ 00:42, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- I know; that's why I didn't revert it ;-). The most recent figure we have (from last year) is 5 million units worldwide. These things aren't updated too often; we probably won't get a further update on that until the next album is announced. It's just the way it works I'm afraid. Melicans (talk, contributions) 00:58, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Exit (song)
| On 2 October 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Exit (song), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that U2's song "Exit" was used in the defence of Robert John Bardo at his trial for the murder of Rebecca Schaeffer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Exit (song).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Rehab
Hello Melicans. I got your advice and archived all the references from the "Rehab" article. Also I left note for the audio sample on the FAC page. Can you post any other issues? And is it everything okay with the archiving? Greetings :) ! — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 21:26, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- Archiving looks good. Let me know when the sound file rationale is sorted. Melicans (talk, contributions) 21:39, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- I removed the sample, cause I couldn't find a rationale caption for it. — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 19:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Halo
OK. Thanks for telling me that. My love is love (talk) 18:15, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hi my dear (best) FAC reviewer. Lol. Actually i already know that. But i think it is more logical (in this case) to use the one complied by Sweden since that version of "Halo" charted only there. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 18:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for understanding. May i ask form where are you? ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 18:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Oh my goodness, that was so silly of me. I just saw your banner. Obviously you are from Canada. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 18:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- How old are you? ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 18:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry if i asked something i should not have asked. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 18:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Wow, you do such amazing PRs at such a young age. I applaud you loud for this. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 18:51, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry if i asked something i should not have asked. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 18:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- How old are you? ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 18:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Oh my goodness, that was so silly of me. I just saw your banner. Obviously you are from Canada. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 18:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for understanding. May i ask form where are you? ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 18:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right but the difference is that you are very helpful and i mean it. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 18:57, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- And i really appreciate you for this. I have to go now. I loved the nice little chat. Goodnight. See you later. Take care. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 19:13, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Wikify invitation
| Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify. We're currently recruiting help to clear a massive backlog (20,843 articles), and we need your help! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 00:25, 6 October 2011 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 3 October 2011
- News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy
- In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts
- WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand
- Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan
- Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
I purchased the sheet music cited for Until the End of the World...
...and nowhere does the key signature change to G minor, with 2 flats. Hence I'm willing to let this argument rest and since the Gm assertion is incorrect and NOT verifiable. That's why I suggested deleting the verse key change section.
However, I must disagree with your assertion that I "say that the chord change is different than what the source does". That is false. I'm stating what the sheet music says = the sheet music clearly switches to a Bm chord at the verse in measure 13. I'm reading it right off the music! B F# B D F# = B minor chord. This is not merely my own assertion, but what the source shows. Unfortunately, they made a mistake in the sheet music and said Em above the Bm chord. But the chord is Bm.
I'm not trying to be a pain about this, but the evidence in the sheet music does not support a change to Gm. Anyhwere.
The Signpost: 10 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians
- News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised
- In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist
- WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People
- Featured content: The weird and the disgusting
- Arbitration report: Senkaku Islands closes; administrators authorized to place articles on discretionary sanctions
Love is Blindness
Here is an article with some good quotes by Bono and The Edge of various songs from U2's career, including "Love is Blindness": I would add it myself to your sandbox version of the LIB article, but I'd rather not edit there without your consent. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 13:20, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks! And don't worry about the sandbox; feel free to edit it (or any others) if you like. I only move them out of mainspace because of the massive restructuring they go through; it gives me more room to play around. Melicans (talk, contributions) 15:07, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 October 2011
- News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized
- In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out
- WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP
- Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic
- Arbitration report: Case requests on ethnic strife and a WikiProject declined, Abortion case stalls but topic bans look to be lightened on amendment
Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Melicans, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Melicans/MLP.
Sourcing for The Joshua Tree
I'd like to get The Joshua Tree promoted to Featured Article, but before I nominate it, I'd like to improve the references a little bit (specifically adding additional info to the citation templates). Just like you helped me with bolstering up the references for Zoo TV Tour, could you help me with spotchecking the article's references? Ideally, I'd like to have page/volume/issue numbers for any magazine articles, particularly those without a courtesy copy of the text online, as well as page numbers for any newspaper articles. Would you be able to help me with going through the article's references and making them all a little more comprehensive? Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 14:16, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll try and help with the references a bit. School's really picking up again (hence why I've stalled in my user page draft for TTTYAATW), but I'll try and get to what I can when I have a free moment over the next few days. Cheers, Melicans (talk, contributions) 17:14, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 October 2011
- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
Change/Delete of WP:KAREN Redirect
Hi Melicans; I see you created the redirect WP:KAREN which points to Wikipedia:Pokémon test#Karen Importance Test; there is a discussion regarding deletion of another Redirect which, similar to WP:KAREN, links to a bookmark within an essay article (although in that case the essay is in userspace). The issue is, because of the use of the bookmark, the redirect bypasses the tophat which indicates that the article is an essay; and in the case of the other article, it can be used to make it appear to an editor following the link as if the user page is actually a WP Policy page. Therefore, as WP:KAREN is being used as an example in that RfD that such redirects are acceptable, I was hoping that you would either a) speedy delete ({{ db-self }}) the redirect, b) repoint the redirect to the top of the Pokemon essay (i.e. remove the #bookmark), or c) add a second essay tophat at the '#Karen Importance Test' section level so that clicking the bookmark doesn't bypass the essay notification. Since the article is in the WPspace, rather than userspace, I can choose and make the change myself; but seeing as you were the one who created the redirect, it seemed more appropriate to offer you first opportunity to make the change that you thought move desirable in the circumstance. Alternatively, I can RfD the redirect or make of the change. Thanks in advance, eh. — Who R you? Talk 19:06, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Who R you. I've modified the redirect so it points to the top of the article, making the essay tophat visible. Thanks for letting me know, I didn't know it was a problem (though it makes sense now I think of it)! You learn something new every day, eh? Cheers, Melicans (talk, contributions) 19:44, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks dude! — Who R you? Talk 19:47, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- No problem at all, mate :-). Take care! Melicans (talk, contributions) 19:53, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks dude! — Who R you? Talk 19:47, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
Main page appearance: Achtung Baby
This is a note to let the main editors of Achtung Baby know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on November 19, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 19, 2011. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:
Achtung Baby is the seventh studio album by rock band U2. Released on 19 November 1991, it was produced by Daniel Lanois and Brian Eno. Stung by the criticism of their 1988 release Rattle and Hum, U2 shifted their musical direction to incorporate influences from alternative rock, industrial music, and electronic dance music into their sound. Thematically, the album is darker, more introspective, and more flippant than their previous work. Recording began at Berlin's Hansa Studios in October 1990, but the sessions were fraught with conflict, as the band argued over the direction and quality of their music. After nearly breaking up, they made a breakthrough with the improvisation of the song "One". With improved morale, they completed the album in Dublin in 1991. Achtung Baby received favourable reviews and went to number one in several countries. It spawned five hit singles, including "One", "Mysterious Ways", and "The Fly". The album has sold 18 million copies, and in 1993, it won the Grammy Award for Best Rock Performance by a Duo or Group with Vocal. The record and the multimedia-intensive Zoo TV Tour were central to U2's 1990s reinvention. Achtung Baby has regularly appeared on critics' lists of the greatest albums of all time. (more...)
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
Hello
Hi Melicans. How are you? Hope you remember me... I nominated "Rehab" for FA and you commented on its FAC. It was the first of three. Currently the third FAC of the article is running. I can say that the article improved a lot. Can you check it again and give your comment on the FAC. Thanks — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 19:09, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
U2 vandal
Next time you catch the IP in the act of meddling with the U2 articles, consider reporting at WP:AIV. Protecting the pages through WP:RFP may also be useful in cases of chronic IP vandalism. Dl2000 (talk) 03:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Will do, thanks. AIV might work, though as the vandal tends to strike every few days (and usually different articles at that) RFPP will probably determine that it is too infrequent or a simple editing dispute. Melicans (talk, contributions) 03:57, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Voting underway in the elections, finally a final decision on Abortion, scant movement on requests
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 07:04, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Invitation to the December Wikification Drive
| Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's December Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 1,000 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions, including a brand new one for the single largest wikified article! All you have to do is put an asterisk next to the largest article you've wikified, and coordinators will check its wordcount after the drive ends. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts December 1, and you can sign up today! |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:29, 2 December 2011 (UTC).
The Signpost: 05 December 2011
- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
- Arbitration report: Elections due to finish this week, little activity on Betacommand 3, Abortion case amended
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 19:00, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 December 2011
- Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
- News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community
- In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed
- WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia
- Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment
- Arbitration report: Betacommand 3 workshop revived, two cases set for acceptance and the ArbCom elections finish on a whimper
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 18:10, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Still remember me?
Hi. How are you? I have already addressed most of your concerns in the PR of "Halo". I will nominate it after "Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)" which is currently at FAC. Thanks for everything. You gave the best PR i have seen in years. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:32, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- It was my pleasure :-). I'm glad that I was able to provide some useable feedback; I know the frustration of waiting for some actionable comments all too well! Good luck when you nominate it at FAC. I'll try to keep an eye out for it if I'm not too swamped with the resumption of school! Melicans (talk, contributions) 05:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ohh thanks again for being so nice. Are you still at school? Lol, i thought you were like 30 years of age. Don't take it wrongly. I mean it in a sincere way... with regards to how you write and how polite you are. I am also still and school and I am 18. Melicans (if i may address you by this name), whenever you are free please have a look at the controversy section and tell me whether it will be better to convert the quotes into original prose? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Heh, 22 and still struggling through university. I try to be polite with everyone (not always successfully); it helps me keep an objective point of view, even from people I struggle to get along with. Usually there is a compromise being missed on both sides! I'll try to take a look at that section in the next few days. Melicans (talk, contributions) 05:52, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:19, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- I've finally had a chance to look at that section. I do think the first quote should be integrated into the prose; maybe shortened as well. The second one might work better as a boxed quote (see "One Tree Hill" for an example of what I mean). Melicans (talk, contributions) 14:39, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:19, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Heh, 22 and still struggling through university. I try to be polite with everyone (not always successfully); it helps me keep an objective point of view, even from people I struggle to get along with. Usually there is a compromise being missed on both sides! I'll try to take a look at that section in the next few days. Melicans (talk, contributions) 05:52, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ohh thanks again for being so nice. Are you still at school? Lol, i thought you were like 30 years of age. Don't take it wrongly. I mean it in a sincere way... with regards to how you write and how polite you are. I am also still and school and I am 18. Melicans (if i may address you by this name), whenever you are free please have a look at the controversy section and tell me whether it will be better to convert the quotes into original prose? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Bruh I don’t need this LolHeCame (talk) 22:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello
I see you around FAC and would like to say hello. I also see that you have written one of the most recent song featured articles, "Mothers of the Disappeared". If it is not too much to ask, could you have a look at an article I have been working on—"Love the Way You Lie"—and leave some comments on any issues the article has at its talk page? The article is noticeably long (126 KB), so I do not expect you to give a thorough review. Maybe a quick "Peer review" at the talk page regarding prose clarity or anything that especially stands out on the article? If you are busy at the moment, I have no problem at all. Your help will be heavily appreciated. Thank you, —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 18:55, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll try to take a look at it in the next few days. I have one more exam coming up that I'm trying to juggle with my editing, but I should be able to look it over. You've provided a lot of good feedback at the "Rehab" FAC. I currently have one underway myself, for "One Tree Hill". If you could take a look at it, I'd really appreciate it. Your points on "Rehab" have definitely helped to improve the article I think, and I'd love to have some more feedback at the FAC (the more, the better after all!) Melicans (talk, contributions) 21:34, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Of course, it's only fair I help you. I'll have a look soon! Thanks. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 21:43, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much :-). If I forget and haven't taken a look at it by Christmas I won't be able to get there until early January. I have a notoriously poor (almost goldfish) memory, so if I do forget to take a look, please don't hesitate to ping me on my talk page to remind me! Cheers, Melicans (talk, contributions) 21:48, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- No rush whatsoever. Hehe. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 23:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- It looks like I won't be able to get to that article until January. My last exam is tomorrow, but I have a few delayed papers to work on until Christmas, and then I will be heading to Mexico for a week or so with very limited internet access. I'll be able to get to your FAC comments within the next few days, but an in-depth look at another article is just out of my timescale until January. Melicans (talk, contributions) 20:31, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. Schoolwork rushes in for me at this time of year so I am not too active either. Happy holidays anyway. Best, —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 21:22, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- It looks like I won't be able to get to that article until January. My last exam is tomorrow, but I have a few delayed papers to work on until Christmas, and then I will be heading to Mexico for a week or so with very limited internet access. I'll be able to get to your FAC comments within the next few days, but an in-depth look at another article is just out of my timescale until January. Melicans (talk, contributions) 20:31, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- No rush whatsoever. Hehe. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 23:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much :-). If I forget and haven't taken a look at it by Christmas I won't be able to get there until early January. I have a notoriously poor (almost goldfish) memory, so if I do forget to take a look, please don't hesitate to ping me on my talk page to remind me! Cheers, Melicans (talk, contributions) 21:48, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Of course, it's only fair I help you. I'll have a look soon! Thanks. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 21:43, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Phew; a three hour exam followed by a six-hour drive home straight afterwards and immediately onto Wikipedia to get your comments because I don't know when I'll be on next. Hope I got everything you caught! :-) Cheers, Melicans (talk, contributions) 06:35, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Lol, I'm in no rush. Do take your time and enjoy your holiday. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:56, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
| The Special Barnstar | |
| I really had to give you this barnstar Melicans, cause you are so special and helped me a lot with "Rehab" from the first until the third nomination. I really appreciate that. T H A N K S. (: — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 21:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC) |
- It's been my pleasure. I'm glad that I have been able to assist you with some aspects of the FAC. I find that every FAC I initiate, the more I learn; not just in terms of the quality that is looked for in articles, but in templates, aspects of the MOS, and even research methods. I hope the same is true for you. Good luck with the rest of the "Rehab" FAC, and any nomination you do in the future! Cheers, Melicans (talk, contributions) 21:57, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sure Melicans, you helped me a lot, not just with the article nomination and its progress to a Featured article, but also with my knowledge, that I will probably use in future situations. I hope "Rehab" passes this FAC. But still, you have more experience with the FACs, when it will be closed and how will I know If it will pass or fail? — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 22:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- On average I have found that FACs I start usually last for just over a month. Of course, that varies wildly from FAC to FAC. It really depends on what condition the article is in before nomination, what issues and niggles are pointed out, and how quickly they are fixed. Some only last a few days, while others can be over two months. The "Rehab" FAC has received reviews for prose, media, and references; I think the last thing that is needed is for someone to give a spotcheck of the sources to ensure that there is no accidental copyright infringement. I would do it, but I do not have the tools for it. The FAC has four or five supports and only one oppose that I saw; but in the end, it comes down to the judgement of SandyGeorgia, Karanacs, or Ucucha. They don't count supports vs opposes, they look to see if the issues have been fixed and that the article meets the FAC criteria. Browsing FAC in the past I have seen some FACs with many supports get archived, and FACs with more than a few opposes get promoted. Simply put, the reasoning behind supporting and opposing is the factor taken into account most because it helps the FAC delegates judge.
- FAC is usually reviewed by them two or three times a week; I think the next check they will do will be on Saturday or Sunday. If you put WP:FAC on your watchlist, you can see the promotions and failures as they happen. Usually they will do it in groups (all the articles that did not pass FAC are removed in one edit, and all the articles that did pass in another one). They will also put a template on the FAC page; if it says "This review has been archived" it means the article did not pass and you will have to try again in two weeks. If it says "This review has been promoted" it means that "Rehab" will be an FA. I do not think it will be too much longer until "Rehab" is passed or archived. Since the last thing needed is a spotcheck, why not ask Nikkimaria if she can help out? I know that she has the tools, and she's very friendly and willing to help out. Melicans (talk, contributions) 22:20, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Really? So the supports or opposes sometimes means nothing... Ahhh okay so its up to their decision. I will ask Nikkimaria is she is interested in doing spotcheck, I hope she will be. Thanks Melicans — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 09:26, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, although the supports and opposes heavily influence their decisions. If there are five people who say "Support" and give no reason why, and three people who "Oppose" with lengthy details on why the article doesn't meet the criteria, it will probably be archived if those Opposes are not addressed. Sometimes the reviewer's don't even return; that's why the instructions say to leave a message on the user's talk page and post a diff to it on the FAC, so that the delegates can see you have made that effort to improve the article. Melicans (talk, contributions) 14:43, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- I can take a look, but...what tools are you talking about? AFAIK there aren't any tools for spotchecks, aside from the automated ones that everyone has access to. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:27, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oops, that is my mistake. I remember you did a spotcheck in an old FAC of mine, but I didn't know how it was done and I assumed you had some sort of special permission that allowed you to search for it. Melicans (talk, contributions) 23:33, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- I can take a look, but...what tools are you talking about? AFAIK there aren't any tools for spotchecks, aside from the automated ones that everyone has access to. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:27, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, although the supports and opposes heavily influence their decisions. If there are five people who say "Support" and give no reason why, and three people who "Oppose" with lengthy details on why the article doesn't meet the criteria, it will probably be archived if those Opposes are not addressed. Sometimes the reviewer's don't even return; that's why the instructions say to leave a message on the user's talk page and post a diff to it on the FAC, so that the delegates can see you have made that effort to improve the article. Melicans (talk, contributions) 14:43, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Really? So the supports or opposes sometimes means nothing... Ahhh okay so its up to their decision. I will ask Nikkimaria is she is interested in doing spotcheck, I hope she will be. Thanks Melicans — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 09:26, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sure Melicans, you helped me a lot, not just with the article nomination and its progress to a Featured article, but also with my knowledge, that I will probably use in future situations. I hope "Rehab" passes this FAC. But still, you have more experience with the FACs, when it will be closed and how will I know If it will pass or fail? — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 22:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Nikki for the spotcheck, I think I resolved all the issues. However, Melicans I want to ask you something. Can I upload a shot from the official music video, I mean Am I allowed when the article is nominated for FA, to self take a shot from the video? If that's possible, can you watch the official video and tell me if the frame at 31 second is suitable for taking. It would probably be with caption like "A shot from the music video featuring Rihanna in the desert. In the background, Timberlake is seen approaching her on a motorcycle". ? — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 20:07, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- You can certainly include a screenshot from the video, but it would depend on what it is being used for. Having a screenshot for the sake of it in the article doesn't work; it has to convey some level of understanding to the reader about the video that prose alone cannot do (the caption should also reflect that). It really depends what you want to include it for; and what you want the reader to take away from that. Melicans (talk, contributions) 23:33, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Since I believe you a lot when FA process is in question, can you watch the video and tell me if there is screenshot that could be included and conveys with the prose itself. 10X:) ! — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 00:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I would, but I just don't have the time to at the moment. Am going into my final exam in two days, and am travelling all day tomorrow to get there. Melicans (talk, contributions) 02:21, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- No problem, I am in same s*it, so I understand you. :) — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 11:32, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I would, but I just don't have the time to at the moment. Am going into my final exam in two days, and am travelling all day tomorrow to get there. Melicans (talk, contributions) 02:21, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Since I believe you a lot when FA process is in question, can you watch the video and tell me if there is screenshot that could be included and conveys with the prose itself. 10X:) ! — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 00:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- You can certainly include a screenshot from the video, but it would depend on what it is being used for. Having a screenshot for the sake of it in the article doesn't work; it has to convey some level of understanding to the reader about the video that prose alone cannot do (the caption should also reflect that). It really depends what you want to include it for; and what you want the reader to take away from that. Melicans (talk, contributions) 23:33, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
I am...
.. trying to stay calm. but it is not easy. But is it so difficult to read the whole FAC before posting. He is repeatedly posting the same things. And everyone is saying in my taste, in my opinion, in my... Am i expected to write the same article in 13 different ways to conform to their individual preferences? But anyway Melican, I appreciate your intentions and I will do what you told me... *stay calm*. :) Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ohh thanks a lot. You really consider me as your friend, don't you? You took so much time to write those two lengthy messages and you really cheered me up. You are a great person. Very kind and gentle. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have left some replies at the FAC. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- From today, I will try my best to do as you say. Melicans, have you ever written a music article? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm, your last sentence sums everything the best way. I love Beyonce the way you love U2. Well there is nothing like reception about the parody. Lol. It was jut a parody. Critics only commented about it but they did not say if it was bad or good. All I found was this and the choreographer not being happy about the parody. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:54, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- I may be asking for too much but can you please help me with this? In the meantime, I can search for some critical commentaries. Please do the prose only. Don't worry about the references. I will format them. Please. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:09, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks and best of luck for your exams. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. It looks impeccable. But I will move that to the parodies section. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- You are welcome. goodnight my friend. May God bless you. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. It looks impeccable. But I will move that to the parodies section. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
On their talk-page? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 16:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- No, on the FAC. For example, say I wrote Oppose and listed a string of things I thought needed to be changed. You make those changes, or say why you don't think they would be for the better. After two days, if I haven't replied, you leave a message on my talk page asking me to come back because it's quite reasonable to think I may have been busy or just forget. If after a few more days I still haven't returned or replied to your message, you leave that message on the FAC page under my most recent comments (not at the bottom of the page). For example. Melicans (talk, contributions) 16:43, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 16:47, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 December 2011
- News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics
- In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?
- Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions
- WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics
- Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content
- Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 04:18, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
My Sincere Wishes For This Festive Season
| ★*★*★*★*★*★*★*★* Merry Christmas And Happy New Year 2012 *★*★*★*★*★*★*★*★ | ||
| I Wish You And Your Family A Merry Christmas And A Happy New Year 2012. May The New Year Bring Much Happiness, Prosperity, Peace, And Success In Your Life. I Am Very Happy To be Part of Wikipedia And To Have Great Friends Like You. Cheers.
- From A Big Fan of |
- Thanks, and the same to you! Have a good holiday season! Melicans (talk, contributions) 18:25, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- You are welcome and thanks. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:34, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Re your statement at RFAR
Well said! The timestamps look a bit scary; I hope my silly fiddling with my own post didn't inconvenience you. Bishonen | talk 20:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC).
- Thank you; it honestly surprises me how often people claim that he is unblocked just because he is Malleus, and yet nobody seems to mention how it is always the same people that are trying to get him blocked. The timestamps weren't an issue; I began writing it... I think an hour or so ago, so I copied my content before saving (I figured there was a pretty good chance someone else would have replied; I think five or six people made statements as I was typing). Your post was also very well thought out. I will be interested to see what course of action the Arbs decide to take on this, and whether it will simply be against Malleus or a thorough investigation to see who else is truly at fault. I have my suspicions about which way it shall go, however... Melicans (talk, contributions) 20:21, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Me too. For a start, it's amazing that Jclemens doesn't recuse. Though, honestly, if the Malleus part is accepted — which I don't see how it can be, since they're always big on the previous dispute resolution angle — I'm pretty sure they'll involve quite a few users not listed by the nominator. But the more likely outcome is it's rejected and somebody starts an RFC to end all RFC's. OWWWWWWW... [/me howls like a wolf at the thought] Bishonen | talk 20:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC).
- I guess no matter which way it goes - Arbs take it on, or RFC opened, or no action whatsoever - it will just end up as a great big clusterfuck on all sides with nothing ultimately being achieved. It's a shame; I think people sometimes forget that we're here to build an enclopedia. This silly drama just turns everything into a mess. Melicans (talk, contributions) 22:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Me too. For a start, it's amazing that Jclemens doesn't recuse. Though, honestly, if the Malleus part is accepted — which I don't see how it can be, since they're always big on the previous dispute resolution angle — I'm pretty sure they'll involve quite a few users not listed by the nominator. But the more likely outcome is it's rejected and somebody starts an RFC to end all RFC's. OWWWWWWW... [/me howls like a wolf at the thought] Bishonen | talk 20:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC).
One Tree Hill (song)
I note that this has been promoted in time for Christmas. Congratulations and nicely done. Brianboulton (talk) 23:21, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! I'm really thrilled with the way this FAC went. There was lots of great feedback, and I think this is the smoothest FAC I've ever been involved in! It's definitely the perfect pick-me-up after a tough semester at school. Thank you again for your work in the FAC. You raised some good points early in the process, and I really appreciate your support (and the compliment)! I hope you have a wonderful holiday season! Melicans (talk, contributions) 00:45, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Congratulations Melicans! It was a pleasure reviewing your article. Happy Holidays! Regards, —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:53, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you as well! The changes you suggested definitely helped to improve the article, and your support is always a great thing to have. I hope that you have a happy holiday season as well; see you at that article in January! Melicans (talk, contributions) 17:33, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- De nada. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 17:44, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you as well! The changes you suggested definitely helped to improve the article, and your support is always a great thing to have. I hope that you have a happy holiday season as well; see you at that article in January! Melicans (talk, contributions) 17:33, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Congratulations Melicans! It was a pleasure reviewing your article. Happy Holidays! Regards, —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:53, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
My Heartfelt Thanks
I express you my heartfelt thanks. ""Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)" has passed. I am very happy. Your feedback and kind words helped me considerably. Thanks again. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 11:16, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Melicans, whenever you are free, please help me with this. Do you still remember? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:32, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Meli I am also grateful for your help. Thanks for everything! You are simply the best ! :) — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 14:18, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- You are both very welcome. I do remember, but I won't be able to get to that (or any) article until the New Year. Happy Holidays to you both! Melicans (talk, contributions) 15:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Take your time. And I wish you the same. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:07, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I did it, Yayyy. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 08:12, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Awesome. I'll still try to help out a bit when I get back to full Wiki strength in the New Year. Melicans (talk, contributions) 21:27, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sure. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:44, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Awesome. I'll still try to help out a bit when I get back to full Wiki strength in the New Year. Melicans (talk, contributions) 21:27, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- I did it, Yayyy. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 08:12, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Take your time. And I wish you the same. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:07, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- You are both very welcome. I do remember, but I won't be able to get to that (or any) article until the New Year. Happy Holidays to you both! Melicans (talk, contributions) 15:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Meli I am also grateful for your help. Thanks for everything! You are simply the best ! :) — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 14:18, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year !
| Merry Chrismats and Happy New Year ! | |
| Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! May you be surrounded by all the things that bring Christmas cheer. :D ! — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 20:43, 24 December 2011 (UTC) |
- Thanks, and the same to you! Melicans (talk, contributions) 21:41, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
| Season's greetings! | |
| I hope the holiday season is relaxing and fulfilling, and that 2012 will be fruitful for you. --John (talk) 00:26, 25 December 2011 (UTC) |
- Many thanks John; I wish the same. Good health go to you and your family! Melicans (talk, contributions) 05:28, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Talkback

Message added 22:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
A suggestion I have maybe? —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 22:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 December 2011
- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 03:47, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 January 2012
- Interview: The Gardner interview
- News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III
- Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future
- Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 15:53, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 January 2012
- Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
- News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang
- WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz
- Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 04:32, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2012
- Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18
- Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?
- News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer
- Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 06:24, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Re: Blackout a success before it is even underway
| The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| For being one of the lone voices who "get it". Viriditas (talk) 03:02, 18 January 2012 (UTC) |
- Thank you. I'm not entirely sure that my comment was worthy of a barnstar, but it is appreciated nonetheless. Many seem to have missed the point that the blackout is first and foremost to raise awareness of the issue. In that, it is already undoubtedly a success. Cheers, Melicans (talk, contributions) 03:15, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar
Are you back?
How are you Melicans? Are you free? Lol, no one is doing the spotchecks for "Halo" and Sandy is waiting for them. Please help if you are free or please suggest someone to me. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hey finally you are back. Welcome back. :D How are you? Lol, don't worry. It does not matter. I am so happy it passed and it was quick. :) Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:10, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- I am fine, thank you. You are searching for a job? May I know what job exactly? I am currently working on Broken-Hearted Girl for FAC and yesterday I published this for my Queen. :D Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:25, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- I have faith in God. He always helps good people. And that's why I know you will get a good job. :D Hey, can you please have a look at the article I mentionned above and tell me whether its length will be an issue at FAC? Someone told me that it is too short. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:59, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for re-assuring me. I will do everything you said except combining release and music video. It won't work because Beyonce can release a song today and release a video only two months later. She always does that. Concerning the remixes, only the one I wrote about received coverage (because it was produced by a famous DJ). So maybe, I can simply mention the others though there are no details about their composition. Thanks for the suggestions, they are really helpful. :) Getting on it right now. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- I have faith in God. He always helps good people. And that's why I know you will get a good job. :D Hey, can you please have a look at the article I mentionned above and tell me whether its length will be an issue at FAC? Someone told me that it is too short. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:59, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- I am fine, thank you. You are searching for a job? May I know what job exactly? I am currently working on Broken-Hearted Girl for FAC and yesterday I published this for my Queen. :D Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:25, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 18:37, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 03:40, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 February 2012
- News and notes: The Foundation visits Tunisia, analyzes donors
- In the news: Leading scholar hails Wikipedia, historians urged to contribute while PR pros remain shunned
- Discussion report: Discussion swarms around Templates for deletion and returning editors of colourful pasts
- WikiProject report: The Eye of the Storm: WikiProject Tropical Cyclones
- Featured content: Talking architecture with MrPanyGoff
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, final decision in Muhammad images, Betacommand 3 near closure
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 23:59, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 February 2012
- Special report: Fundraising proposals spark a furore among the chapters
- News and notes: Foundation launches Legal and Community Advocacy department
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Stub Sorting
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Betacommand 3 closed, proposed decision in Civility enforcement, AUSC candidates announced
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 03:37, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2012
- Special report: The plight of the new page patrollers
- News and notes: Fundraiser row continues, new director of engineering
- Discussion report: Discussion on copyrighted files from non-US relation states
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Poland
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Civility enforcement closed, proposed decision in TimidGuy, two cases remain open
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 23:23, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2012
- News and notes: Finance meeting fallout, Gardner recommendations forthcoming
- Recent research: Gender gap and conflict aversion; collaboration on breaking news; effects of leadership on participation; legacy of Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Focus on admin conduct and editor retention
- WikiProject report: Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject Science Fiction
- Arbitration report: Final decision in TimidGuy ban appeal, one case remains open
- Technology report: 1.19 deployment stress, Meta debates whether to enforce SUL
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history
- In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing
- Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion
- WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
- Featured content: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 16:27, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 12:09, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
CU Class Project - Personality Psyc
Hello, I am wondering if you could provide some technical advice. I just moved my sandbox article into a new article page called Epigenetics and Behaviour. It seemd to move OK, but at the top of the page is the following message: This sandbox is in the article namespace. Either move this page into your userspace, or remove the user sandbox template.
Any help or advice you could provide would be greatly appreciated.Owleye769 (talk) 19:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Hi Owleye, I've removed the sandbox template that was causing the error message. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 21:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Melicans; Hope all is well. I have been having difficulty over the last few days with a Wiki user/editor that has deleted vast amounts of text (around 40% of the article) from my class project article. I have not been able to engage in constructive discussion with the editor on the article talk page for epigenetics and behaviour. In addition, this user earlier today, deleted and/or changed my latest edits as I was making them - literally in real time - possibly in an attempt to block my contribution. I would be grateful for any advice you may have because I have already spent considerable time trying to engage in discussion with this person - which has eaten up my time that could be spent in contributing further to my article. Owleye769 (talk) 00:53, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 14:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 March 2012
- News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music
- Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed
- Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature
- Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:32, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Invitation to the April Wikification Drive
| Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's April Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 1,300 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions, including a brand new one for the single largest wikified article! All you have to do is put an asterisk next to the largest article you've wikified, and coordinators will check its wordcount after the drive ends. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive started April 1, and you can sign up anytime! |
The Signpost: 02 April 2012
- Interview: An introduction to movement roles
- Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal
- News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
- Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 07:15, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 April 2012
- News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
- WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut
- Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week
- Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:36, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 April 2012
- Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
- Discussion report: The future of pending changes
- WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera
- Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions begin in Rich Farmbrough case, proposed decision in R&I Review
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 22:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 April 2012
- Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"
- WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files
- Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review
- Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 11:40, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 April 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
- Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default
- WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps
- Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings
- Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 04:55, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Ultra Violet
You are wrong. On the 2011 edition, the track list lists it as „ULTRA violet”, while thye lirycs list it as „Ultra Violet”. There is NO „Ultraviolet” anywhere in the booklet or on the album cover. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A:-)Brunuś (talk • contribs) 16:37, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- The 2011 edition perhaps. In the original 1991 liner notes, that is not the case. And again, I point to the numerous other media. Melicans (talk, contributions) 22:13, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 May 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
- News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013
- WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages
- Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases
- Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:02, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
- WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse
- Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week
- Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 23:11, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 May 2012
- From the editor: New editor-in-chief
- WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....
- Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending
- Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 03:16, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 May 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends
- Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph
- WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology
- Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese
- Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits
- Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 08:39, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 June 2012
- Special report: WikiWomenCamp: From women, for women
- Discussion report: Watching Wikipedia change
- WikiProject report: Views of WikiProject Visual Arts
- Featured content: On the lochs
- Arbitration report: Two motions for procedural reform, three open cases, Rich Farmbrough risks block and ban
- Technology report: Report from the Berlin Hackathon
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 09:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 June 2012
- News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI
- WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit
- Featured content: The cake is a pi
- Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 22:16, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 June 2012
- Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?
- News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia
- Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 02:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 June 2012
- WikiProject report: Summer Sports Series: WikiProject Athletics
- Featured content: A good week for the Williams
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Second Visual Editor prototype launches
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 06:49, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 July 2012
- Analysis: Uncovering scientific plagiarism
- News and notes: RfC on joining lobby group; JSTOR accounts for Wikipedians and the article feedback tool
- In the news: Public relations on Wikipedia: friend or foe?
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: Burning rubber with WikiProject Motorsport
- Featured content: Heads up
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, motion for the removal of Carnildo's administrative tools
- Technology report: Initialisms abound: QA and HTML5
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 12:10, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 July 2012
- Special report: Reforming the education programs: lessons from Cairo
Wikipedia has a long history of collaborating with educational institutions. The Schools and universities program — international and in many languages, but dominated by US institutions — started in 2003 and evolved case by case with little system. However, that changed in 2009 as Wikimedia embarked on its formal strategic process, and outreach in higher education came to be seen in terms of achieving explicit goals — especially that of increasing editor participation.
- News and notes: Russian Wikipedia blackout; WMF tools; Wikitravel proposal revisited
The Russian Wikipedia has been blacked out for 24 hours, ending 20:00 UTC Tuesday, as a protest against Russian State Duma Bill 89417-6, a bill currently before the Duma (the Russian parliament). Visitors to the Russian Wikipedia are confronted by the sign above in protest at a draconian internet censorship bill before the Duma. The Russian word for Wikipedia is crossed out in this banner, and the text says: "Imagine a world without free knowledge. The State Duma is currently conducting the second reading of a bill to amend the "Law on Information", which has the potential to lead to the creation of extra-judicial censorship of the Internet in Russia, including the closure of access to the Russian Wikipedia. Today, the Wikipedia community protests against censorship as a threat to free knowledge that is open to all mankind. We ask that you oppose this bill."
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Football
This week, we spent some time with WikiProject Football, which focuses on the sport also known as association football or soccer. WikiProject Football is by far the largest sport project and one of the most active projects on Wikipedia in terms of the number of articles covered, edits to articles, and talk page watchers.
- Featured content: Keeps on chuggin'
Eight featured articles were promoted this week: ... Aries (constellation) by Keilana. Aries the Ram (symbol ♈) is one of the constellations of the Zodiac and one of 88 currently recognised constellations. Its area is 441 square degrees (1.1% of the celestial sphere). Although fairly dim, with only three bright stars, it is home to several deep-sky objects.
- Arbitration report: Three requests for arbitration
No cases were closed or opened, leaving the number of open cases at three. ... The case concerns alleged misconduct with regards to aggressive responses and harassment by Fæ toward users who question his actions.
- Technology report: Optimism over LastModified and MoodBar, but change in clock time causes downtime
The results from last month's trial of the LastModified extension were published this week on the Wikimedia blog. The first analyses have indicated a significant positive impact, suggesting that the extension – which makes the time since a page's last edit much more prominent in the interface – could eventually find its way onto Wikimedia wikis.
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 11:25, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 July 2012
- Special report: Chapters Association mired in controversy over new chair
User:Fæ was elected as the inaugural chair of the new Wikimedia Chapters Association, despite the controversies that have surrounded Fæ on the English Wikipedia and Commons, most recently aired in a live case before the Arbitration Committee. This is in marked contrast with unexciting movement, during the Wikimania meeting, on the most important issues facing the establishment of the association.
- News and notes: WMF enacts reforms at Wikimania; main page redesign; 4 millionth article milestone
During Wikimania (July 12-15), the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) board finalized and enacted long-discussed reforms of the movement's financial structures, and considered procedures for creating new ways for Wikimedians to organize themselves into offline communities. The board moved on the controversial image filter issue, approved the 2012–13 annual plan, and issued a statement on the wikitravel proposal. It also appointed the two new chapter-selected trustees and elected the four office-bearers.
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: French WikiProject Cycling
With the Tour de France in its final week, we traveled to the French Wikipedia for a chat with Projet Cyclisme (WikiProject Cycling). The French Wikipedia places a greater emphasis on portals than the English Wikipedia, which explains why WikiProject Cycling and its discussion page are actually extensions of the Cycling Portal. The project is home to two Article de Qualité (equivalent to Featured Articles) and eight Bon Article (Good Articles), primarily biographies of cyclists.
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
A brief overview of the current discussions on the English Wikipedia, including one regarding the purpose of the Community Portal. Started by Maryana, a Wikimedia Foundation employee, is this page for new users to be educated about the community, or is it for experienced users to find updates about the community?
- Wikimania: Young chapter shows experience beyond its years
Nearly 1400 Wikimedians and others from 87 countries descended on the capital of the United States, Washington, D.C., for Wikimania 2012. Even with an unprecedented number (1400) of conference attendees — the previous two Wikimanias, held in Gdańsk (Poland) and Haifa (Israel), were attended by fewer than 1100 people combined – Wikimania 2012 was a complete success, with attendees' reaction to the conference coming out as ecstatic and laudatory.
- Featured content: Taking flight
Eight featured articles were promoted this week, including Paul McCartney by GabeMc. McCartney (born 1942) is an English musician, singer, songwriter and composer. He gained worldwide fame as a member of the Beatles, and his collaboration with John Lennon is highly celebrated. After the band's break-up he pursued a solo career and formed the band Wings. McCartney has been described by Guinness World Records as the "most successful composer and recording artist of all time", and his song "Yesterday" has been covered more than any other song in history.
- Technology report: Tech talks at Wikimania amid news of a mixed June
As Wikimania, the annual conference targeted at Wikimedians and often well attended by those with a technical slant, draws to a close, comments have already begun to come in from attendees regarding the many tech-related features of the conference.
- Arbitration report: Fæ faces site-ban, proposed decisions posted
No cases were closed or opened, leaving the number of open cases at three. A new remedy in the Fæ case calls for him to be indefinitely banned from the site after his attempts to solicit intervention from the Foundation, claiming that publicly listing all his accounts would be too onerous due to "ongoing security risks." He was further criticised for attempting to dodge good-faith concerns; the committee believes that if Fæ's claims are valid then he must be removed from the community.
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 11:51, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
NEED SOME HELP...PLEASEee
first of all... thank u for being on wikipedia. I think it's kinda a gift I had found u. I'm - i think- the No. 1 U2 fan in Cuba. I've been following them since i'm 8 years old. So, i was looking for someone who knows about the matter. Please I need some help from you, if it's possible reply ASAP in my talk....Pleaseeeeee Sincerely and with a smile upon my face >>Ali Hewson_wish i was the real one<<
WikiProject Wikify: July Newsletter and August Drive
Your Wikification Newsletter – Volume II, Issue I, July 2012
|
| Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's August Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts August 1, and you can sign up anytime! |
- EdwardsBot (talk) 21:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 July 2012
- Recent research: Conflict dynamics, collaboration and emotions; digitization vs. copyright; WikiProject field notes; quality of medical articles; role of readers; Best Wiki Paper Award
From the modeling of social dynamics in a collaborative environment to why the number of Wikipedia readers rises while the number of editors doesn't.
- News and notes: Wikimedians and London 2012; WMF budget – staffing, engineering, editor retention effort, and the global South; Telegraph's cheap shot at WP
Wikimedia Foundation published its Annual Plan, focusing on technical improvements, editor retention, and structural reforms over the coming year. The movement's total revenue, including almost all chapter funding, is slated to rise by 35%, from $34.2 million to $46.1 million, and global spending to more than $42.1 million. The foundation's own core spending will grow by 15% to $30.2 million in 2012–13.
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Horse Racing
We continue our Summer Sports Series this week with WikiProject Horse Racing. Started in November 2005, the project has grown to include nearly 8,000 articles maintained by 34 active members. There are 10 Featured Articles and 19 Good Articles included in the project's scope. In addition to preparing articles for GA and FA status, the project attempts to create requested articles and locate requested images. We interviewed Redrose64, Montanabw, Tigerboy1966, Ealdgyth, and Cuddy Wifter.
- Featured content: One of a kind
Eight new featured articles, five new featured lists, and eight new featured pictures. The highlights include a new featured picture of Frank Sinatra, created by William P. Gottlieb and nominated by Tomer T. Sinatra (1915–98) was a highly successful American singer and film actor whose career spanned 60 years. This image dates from around 1947.
- Technology report: Talking performance with CT Woo and Green Semantic MediaWiki with Nischay Nahata
In the light of recent questions over the long-term reliability of Wikimedia wikis, the Signpost caught up with CT Woo, the Wikimedia Foundation's director of technical operations.
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
Arbitrator Kirill Lokshin proposed a motion requiring the alteration of any instances of an editor's previous username in arbitration decisions to reflect their name changes. The Devil's Advocate has initiated an amendment request for the controversial Race and intelligence case.
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 12:18, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 August 2012
- Op-ed: The Athena Project: being bold
At this year's Wikimania, I [Brandon Harris] gave a talk entitled The Athena Project: Wikipedia in 2015. The talk broadly outlined several ideas the foundation is exploring for planned features, user interface changes, and workflow improvements. We expect that many of these changes will be welcomed, while others will be controversial. During the question-and-answer period, I was asked whether people should think of Athena as a skin, a project, or something else. I responded, "You should think of Athena as a kick in the head" – because that's exactly what it's supposed to be: a radical and bold re-examination of some of our sacred cows when it comes to the interface.
- News and notes: FDC portal launched
On August 1, the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) portal was launched on Meta. The FDC will implement the Wikimedia movement's new grant-orientated finance structure in accordance with the WMF board's recent resolutions. As a volunteer committee, the FDC will make recommendations to the WMF board on a $11.4 million budget for 2012–13.
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
Arbitrator Kirill Lokshin proposed a motion for a procedure on the alteration of an editor's previous username(s) in arbitration decisions to reflect their name change(s). ... The Devil's Advocate initiated an amendment request for the controversial Race and intelligence case.
- Featured content: Casliber's words take root
This week the Signpost interviews Casliber, an editor who has written or contributed significantly to a startling 69 featured articles. We learn what makes him tick, why he edits, and why he can write on everything from vampires to dinosaurs, birds to plants. He also gives some advice to budding featured article writers.
- Technology report: Wikidata nears first deployment but wikis go down in fibre cut calamity
The Wikimedia Foundation's engineering report for July 2012 was published this week on the Wikimedia Techblog and on the MediaWiki wiki, giving an overview of all Foundation-sponsored technical operations in that month (as well as brief coverage of progress on Wikimedia Deutschland's Wikidata project). ... At least one fibre-optic cable was damaged at the WMF's Tampa site on August 6, leading to a sharp downwards spike in traffic lasting over an hour and almost three hours of disruption for readers around the globe.
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Martial Arts
This week, we spent some time with WikiProject Martial Arts. Since April 2004, the project has been the hub for discussion and improvement of martial arts articles, including all disciplines and national origins. The project maintains a variety of conventions for handling the names and descriptions of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Indian, Sikh, Filipino, Okinawan, and hybrid martial arts. WikiProject Martial Arts has spawned or absorbed several subprojects focusing on boxing, kickboxing, sumo, and mixed martial arts.
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 10:01, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Wikify and the future of wikification
Hi! There is an ongoing proposal at the project talkpage concerning the future of wikification, including possible deprecation of the {{wikify}} template which is being discussed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 10. Your input would be greatly appreciated!
You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of the wikify project. To update your status, go here.
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:47, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project Wikify
The Signpost: 13 August 2012
- Op-ed: Small Wikipedias' burden
In a certain way, writing Wikipedia is the same everywhere, in every language or culture. You have to stick to the facts, aiming for the most objective way of describing them, including everything relevant and leaving out all the everyday trivia that is not really necessary to understand the context. You have to use critical thinking, trying to be independent of your own preferences and biases. To some effect, that's all there is to it. Naturally, Wikipedians have their biases, some of which can never be cured. Most Wikipedians tend to like encyclopedias; but millions of people in the world don't share that bias, and we represent them rather poorly. I'm also quite sure that an overwhelming majority of Wikipedia co-authors are literate. Again, that's not true for everyone in this world. Yet we have other, less noticeable but barely less fundamental biases.
- News and notes: Bangla-language survey suggests the challenges for small Wikipedias
The Bangla language, also known as Bengali, is spoken by some 200 million people in Bangladesh and India. The Bangla Wikipedia has a very small active community of about ten to fifteen very active editors, with another 35–40 as less active editors. The project faces particular challenges in being a small Wikipedia, and Dhaka-based WMF community fellow User:Tanvir Rahman is working to understand these challenges and to develop strategies that can improve small wikis that have strong potential to expand their editing communities.
- Arbitration report: You really can request for arbitration
A request for arbitration was filed late last week, ending the three-week long absence of pending cases.
- Featured content: On the road again
Six featured articles were promoted this week, including Business US Highway 41, which was a state trunkline highway that served as a business loop in Marquette in the US state of Michigan.
- Technology report: "Phabricating" a serious alternative to Gerrit
Three weeks into a month-long evaluation of code review tool Gerrit, a serious alternative has finally gained traction in the review process: Facebook-developed but now independently operated Phabricator and its sister command-line tool Arcanist.
- WikiProject report: Dispute Resolution
This week, we interviewed the lively bunch at WikiProject Dispute Resolution. Started in November 2011 to study and discuss improvements to Wikipedia's resources for resolving disputes between editors, the young project has supplemented dispute resolution efforts currently handled at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard, Mediation Committee, and other venues. Over 40 editors have signed up to provide feedback, a variety of ideas have been proposed, and a manual for dispute resolution has been created.
- Discussion report: Image placeholders, machine translations, Mediation Committee, de-adminship
Current proposals and requests for comments include a competition to redesign the main page ...
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 11:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Rooks (Farthing Wood)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Rooks (Farthing Wood) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fortdj33 (talk) 18:12, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
I Left
Left another message on my talk
Heheh Sorry if I bother u too much. I would give u my email address but IDK if you would email me... please, check my question on my talk asap....Thanx a lot again Ali Hewson (talk) 19:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Satoshidp.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Satoshidp.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Wikify: November Newsletter and December Drive
Your Wikification Newsletter – Volume II, Issue I, November 2012 Hello, wikifiers! The November 2012 issue of the project newsletter is out, and the December Wikification Drive starts in a couple of days. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts 00:00, 1 December 2012 (UTC), and you can sign up anytime! |
- Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify, 22:38, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Information
I noticed your username commenting at an Arbcom discussion regarding civility. An effort is underway that would likely benifit if your views were included. I hope you will append regards at: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Civility enforcement/Questionnaire Thank you for considering this request.
As an aside, I am working on an effort to improve Canadian lititure. If you are at all interested in helping with that, it would be great. Thanks again, My76Strat (talk) 08:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
| Merry Christmas | |
| May your Christmas sparkle with moments of love, laughter and goodwill,
May the year ahead be full of contentment and joy, May the good times and treasures of the present become the golden memories of tomorrow, Merry Christmas To U & Ur Family. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:24, 24 December 2012 (UTC) |
Happy New Year!
| Best wishes for the New Year! | ||
| Wishing you and yours a joyous, healthful, and productive 2013! Please accept a belated thank you for the well wishes upon my retirement as FAC delegate this year, and apologies for the false alarm of my first—and hopefully last—retirement; the well wishes extended me were most kind, but I decided to return, re-committed, when another blocked sock was revealed as one of the factors aggravating the FA pages this year. Maintaining standards in featured content requires vigilance, dedication and knowledge of people like you, who are needed; reviews are always welcome at FAC, FAR and TFA requests. Somehow, somehow we never ever seem to do nothin' completely nice and easy, but here's hoping that 2013 will see a peaceful road ahead and a return to the quality and comaraderie that defines the FA process, with the help of many dedicated Wikipedians! |
February 2013 Wikification Drive
Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's February Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cry Me a River (Justin Timberlake song)/archive2
Hi Melicans. I hope you remember me, you helped me a lot with "Rehab" becoming FA. I have another nomination for "Cry Me a River" which is ongoing now. Can you please review the article and give me some opinions on the FAC? Thank you. — Tomíca(T2ME) 21:11, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject U2 needs your help!
Hello! This message is to inform you that Wikipedia:WikiProject U2 needs your input! Please join the discussion on the talk page!Miss Bono (talk) 12:35, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject U2 invitation
This is an open invitation to join Wikipedia:WikiProject U2! If you would like to collaborate on articles and under this projects scope, you are encouraged to participate!
You may add yourself to our meber list below by clicking here!
Project U2 member list |
|---|
|
WikiProject Wikify April Drive
Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's April Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!
-- Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:10, 31 March 2013 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify.
Join The Discussion
Please, feel free to join this discussion Miss Bono (zootalk) 17:54, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Message from WikiProject U2 (April 2013)
| Announcements and news for WikiProject U2 |
|---|
|
April 2013: Thanks for your help! |
You are receving this because your username is listed in Category:WikiProject U2 members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile and move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list.
Cheers.
–pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:11, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject U2 invitation
Hello! This message is to inform you that Wikipedia:WikiProject U2 needs your input! Please, join this discussion on this talk page!
You may add yourself to our member list below by clicking here!
Project U2 member list |
|---|
|
Slug ready for next FAC?
As you may have noticed, I've been doing a lot copyediting on Slug (song). I think the song may almost be ready for its next FAC. I want to know if you have any input to give. Thanks. –Dream out loud (talk) 00:49, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- If you think it's ready, for sure give it a try. I don't really have anything to add to it; all of my sources were exhausted long ago. I'd still love to see it promoted to FA one day, so if you think it'll pass I trust your judgment. I'd appreciate being added as a co-nominator if you put it up at FAC. Melicans (talk, contributions) 02:48, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
And we finally hear from you!!! How are you my friend? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 04:36, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- Not very well, sadly. I've been struggling with some health problems over the last year or so, hence my fairly lengthy absence from Wikipedia. I am hoping that I will one day have time and motivation to get back into it properly and pick up where I left off. Melicans (talk, contributions) 03:07, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- I am sorry. That's very sad to know. I hope it is not "serious", you get what I mean? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 04:01, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thankfully it isn't; just ongoing. Melicans (talk, contributions) 17:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry to hear about your personal issues. Just wanted to let you know what I've started the nomination and listed you as co-nominator. –Dream out loud (talk) 06:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Cheers, mate. Fingers crossed that something positive arises. Melicans (talk, contributions) 03:15, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry to hear about your personal issues. Just wanted to let you know what I've started the nomination and listed you as co-nominator. –Dream out loud (talk) 06:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thankfully it isn't; just ongoing. Melicans (talk, contributions) 17:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- I am sorry. That's very sad to know. I hope it is not "serious", you get what I mean? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 04:01, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
WP: U2 Newsletter
Hello, I need some of your help to add fresh information to the U2 News' section here Wikipedia:WikiProject_U2/Outreach/newslettermay13. Thanks! Miss Bono (zootalk) 17:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello and Thanks
Clean Up List for WP:U2
Hey, take a look at this User:Miss_Bono/Clean_Up. Thanks. Reply at my talk page Miss Bono (zootalk) 11:54, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
WP U2 Talk
WP U2 New barnstar
Take a look and give us your opinion on the WP U2 discussion. Thanks Miss Bono (zootalk) 14:23, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
WP U2 Important!
I think we need to ping the other members to discuss here Wikipedia:WikiProject_U2/collaborationofthefortnightdepartment. I think it helps people to focus on one especific task. Miss Bono (zootalk) 20:03, 2 May 2013 (UTC)








