User talk:Mistipolis

Hello, Mistipolis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Sunrise Movement. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 13:52, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi Mistipolis! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 07:51, Saturday, August 31, 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saagar Enjeti, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rising and The Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

The article Saagar Enjeti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability criteria at WP:ANYBIO. Notability is reached by what reliable sources says about the subject, not what the subject says.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ifnord (talk) 23:08, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saagar Enjeti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saagar Enjeti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Laughter, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saagar Enjeti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mistipolis, regarding the quote for the Izzy Award (on The Lever), it seems relevant to me what the award was for. If you think the full quote is too much, I suggest something like:

In granting this award, the judges commented that The Lever is relentless "in exposing the corrupting influence of corporate power on government and both major parties."

I will defer to your judgement on this, because life is short. :)

But I think this info is warranted, especially because it reinforces the previous quote by Krystal Ball. It is part of the narrative.

Best regards, Dorje108 (talk) 22:51, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi Dorje, I think your edits have been great overall, and I appreciate the effort you've put in to making the article read well. As regards the Izzy Award quote, I worry that it feels biased to include for an article that is walking a tight rope and will likely face an AfD. It is a direct quote from a credible institution but there are a fair amount of independent media award organizations out there. You put more effort in than me so you deserve to make the final decision. I think your abbreviated version is better, but just bear in mind what people who have more institutional leverage than us on this site will think when reading it. Mistipolis (talk) 23:21, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi Mistipolis,

Thanks for the feedback. I understand your concerns. It is difficult to predict how other editors will react to the article. Regarding the quote, I am going to leave it alone for now (without the quote). I will just wait and see what develops. I appreciate your input. It helps to have another point of view. Cheers. Dorje108 (talk) 23:48, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

---

Hi Mistipolis, just wanted to add that I think it is very helpful to think through potential issues with the article before any type of potential review by other editors. So I appreciate the points you are raising. Cheers. Dorje108 (talk) 18:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

FYI, I have discussed the redirect here: User_talk:Red-tailed_hawk#"The_Lever"_article

I might follow up on that thread tomorrow with more questions. Dorje108 (talk) 03:26, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nil NZ was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Per WP:NALBUM, a standalone article about an album needs to demonstrate significant coverage (such as critical reviews). Articles that are little more that just a track listing are better off being merged into the artist's page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tormentor (album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nil🥝 22:05, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Mistipolis! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nil🥝 22:05, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback, Nil! I've looked for more critical reviews and haven't found a lot besides blogs / self reported sites. I think this is likely in part because the some of the anchor songs of the album were originally released as an EP called American Prayer in 2022. I was wondering in this case if it would make sense to combine the "Tormentor" article with the existing Wikipedia article for "American Prayer"? Mistipolis (talk) 02:23, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

No problem! Having a look at American Prayer (EP), I'd say that you could definitely add something along the lines of The tracks "American Prayer" and "Tormentor" were included on Tiny Viper's third full-length solo album Tormentor (2025).

I wouldn't combine them, however, for two main reasons;

• Although there's some cross-over in the tracklist, they are still two separate releases, so it would be out of scope of the article's topic (the EP) to have information about the album. Combining multiple releases into a single article is usually reserved for notable rereleases, remixes or cover versions etc.
• I'd also be concerned that American Prayer (EP) – in its current state – probably doesn't meet WP:NALBUM, as it has just a single review (with the other two sources being routine release announcements). If it were to be nominated at Articles for Deletion, I'd predict the outcome would be to merge/redirect the article back to Tiny Vipers.

Instead my recommendation would be to include the information at Tiny Vipers#Return and recent work, and in future if there's enough coverage for a standalone article, it can be split from there :) Nil🥝 03:08, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Really sound advice, thanks! Mistipolis (talk) 03:26, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Tormentor Tiny Vipers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:43, 30 January 2026 (UTC)