User talk:MoonJet

I quoted the source ^[1]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sum 41 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [Jon Marshall  – lead vocals, rhythm guitar (1997–1998)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.angelfire.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:48, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anklebiters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hipster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Green Day shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. STATic message me! 18:58, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ling Xiaoyu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schoolgirl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sonic the Hedgehog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi there. When working on articles, please try to adhere to WP:BRD - you "Boldly" added the info to the article, I Reverted those changes, and so next is to Discuss on the talk page. This is how issues are supposed to be solved, not through continually re-adding it into the article (you've added it 3 times now).

This is actually how we're always supposed to do it, but its even worse when there's clear discussion on the talk page that goes against your edits. Please join in this discussion rather than continually reverting and arguing through edit summaries, and change it only if there's consensus to do so. Thanks! Sergecross73 msg me 20:13, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Its common for bands that either span many genre, or have many disputes on their genre, to list only one genre in the infobox, and then list out a bunch more in the "musical style" section. (See something like Smashing Pumpkins, which does this well, or Breaking Benjamin, which is a bit sloppier/more direct example of it.) Pretty certain that's what we were working towards Shinedown's talk page, because people are continually tinkering with adding removing all sorts of genre, some more right/wrong than others. That's why we're telling you to talk it out on the discussion page. Two editors object to your changes, so its definitely necessary to discuss. Sergecross73 msg me 19:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Look, any time there's anything in contention, you discuss it, so stop complaining about how there's nothing to talk about. Wikipedia is a combination of what reliable sources say and what consensus dictates - its a two part, joint thing. You've only got one of those under wraps. Thus, there's something to discuss.

That being said, maybe you could have a point. But bring it to the article's talk page, so there can be discussion between more people than just me and you. Also, focus more on why exactly its so important that alt metal is included. Like I said, maybe you have a point, but you still really haven't even explained why, you just keep on giving "why not?" arguments. Sergecross73 msg me 20:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ling Xiaoyu you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 15:00, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

The article Ling Xiaoyu you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ling Xiaoyu for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 16:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

That's almost certainly a TJK sock you identified. I commented on the SPI report. The odd Tekken and Bollywood combination of interests is a dead giveaway. I've requested semi-protection for some of his most common targets, including the Feng Wei article. Ravensfire (talk) 13:03, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I particularly hate how fickle WP:VG's opinions on notability seem to be because that keeps us from setting precedents. I mean, hell, even if an article I've poured my very being into gets redirected, I want to at least be able to keep a very clear bijective standard that can be referenced later because of it, i.e. "If you have this, this, and this, it's notable. If you don't, it isn't." With as little ambiguity as possible.

Regardless, thanks for keeping an eye on the discussions. I don't edit music articles as much as I have, but I can still check that out later. Tezero (talk) 22:53, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

I don't notice anything major other than some short paragraphs in Background through Singles. Tezero (talk) 17:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

I'll try to take a look at some point. I'd recommend making sure you have a good sense of the GA criteria before reviewing Underground, though. Tezero (talk) 02:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Underground is at GAN now. If you think you're ready to review it, go ahead, and if you don't, don't. It's your call. Tezero (talk) 22:21, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Yeah, the Tony Hawk series is overlooked among WP:VG considering how popular it is outside (which was actually a lot of why I got into Sonic, Digimon, and Lego Star Wars II here), and Underground is likely my favorite game of all time, so I had immense motivation to work. Actually, since these discussions I'm waiting on aren't going anywhere at the moment, I may pick up another hopeful GA. Tezero (talk) 02:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

I own Pro Skater 1, 3, and HD and American Wasteland as well as Underground, but I too largely hopped off the train at Proving Ground (which I sold, in late '08 or so) because of the abysmal Wii controls. I'd like to try the others sometime, but as for actually buying the ones with peripherals, I don't think so.

Anyway, it disappoints me, but the more general discussions aren't going anywhere; I bang my head proverbially against the wall every time someone says "just look at the GNG". As for the specifics, it looks like Shadow and Rouge are staying, Big will probably close as no consensus (maybe merge), and Silver's as good as gone. But yes, I still will be leaving for a while as soon as the discussions I'm involved in all close - at least a week, maybe much longer. Tezero (talk) 19:08, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, it's too bad, really; it just teaches the project that the rest of Wikipedia doesn't care what it does - which frustrates me specifically because it encourages them to keep up double standards and such. I guess there's nothing I can do without drawing anger for not just "letting it die", though. So it goes.

Anyway, I hadn't looked since you first asked me, but I think I'll take up the GA review. I see a couple of minor issues, but nothing too serious yet. Tezero (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Please try to contribute, then. czar's starting to act like it's me alone wasting everyone else's time, and maybe you'll come up with powerful arguments I haven't. Oh, and I'll take a look at Paramore now. Tezero (talk) 23:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Would it be appropriate for me to pass the GAN if the other reviewer who jumped in hasn't given approval? Tezero (talk) 22:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

That's fine. I'll pass it if he hasn't responded to your ping or mine by tomorrow. Tezero (talk) 00:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Re this: -- I'm an idiot! Thanks for the explanation. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paramore (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tezero -- Tezero (talk) 20:01, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

The article Paramore (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paramore (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tezero -- Tezero (talk) 20:21, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

—Dark 03:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Please see the discussion page of The Hunting Party. I'd like to resolve this issue so that information is consistent with other sources. --Jimv1983 (talk) 20:55, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

We shouldn't start an edit war over those genres. But the fact is that pop rock is the only genre included in the sheet music, all the other genres are opinions of the critics. However, if you do insist in including them, just add new jack swing, which is missing. — prism △ 15:45, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

I really dont understand how saying and proving that the Green Day album American Idiot has a parental advisory label should be removed for the reason of being "Trivial"

Im not blind man! I can see the sticker on the the back of the album right here! I can here them say the F word multiple times on the album. Please explain the "trivial" part about that because im obviously missing something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonic4fan (talk • contribs) 17:26, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 23:53, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

I'll take you up on your offer from earlier. Since no one else has, would you mind reviewing Tony Hawk's Underground? (Or Sonic X, for that matter.) Tezero (talk) 00:34, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

That's fine; I understand if you were busy. Sonic X still doesn't have anyone, but... again, if you're still busy with other stuff, that's okay. Tezero (talk) 03:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Still Into You may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• <ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OblL026SvD4 |title=Paramore: Still Into You [OFFICIAL VIDEO |publisher=YouTube |date=2013-04-08 |accessdate=2014-06-28}}</ref> The video

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

On 2 July 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paramore (album), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 2013 album Paramore topped the charts in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Ireland, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paramore (album). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 18:44, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

There is a discussion regarding genres in the infobox for the article Unapologetic. You are welcome to weigh in. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 17:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Sure man, you can have "Back to the Shack"! I'll gladly help you with that one, if you like. And yeah, I was planning on making EWBAITE a good article later on too. -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 22:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Back to the Shack you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CyrockingSmiler -- CyrockingSmiler (talk) 19:02, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

I'm really confused. Because iTunes says that the song is released as a single. Then why is it promotional single in the article. Please tell me the reason behind this. Thank you. Mike:Golu · ^{[ Confidential message ]} 05:32, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

The article Back to the Shack you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Back to the Shack for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CyrockingSmiler -- CyrockingSmiler (talk) 11:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for changing things for the acapella and instrumental versions of Living Things and The Hunting Party, as it is a digital downloadable album, not a studio album, even though it was recorded at NRG Studios. If anybody changes those two as Studio Albums, keep reverting them. You are doing great with it. Keep it up. Skylar3214 2:46, 24 August 2014

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lonely Girl (Weezer song)

added a link pointing to Cleopatra (song)

The British Are Coming (song)

added a link pointing to Cleopatra (song)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi. I've nominated My Name is Jonas for deletion for a second time, as the previous discussion didn't get enough comments to find a consensus. You're invited to go and make your case for keeping the article again - it's totally possible I'm wrong on this, as ever. Popcornduff (talk) 18:23, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

To be honest - I'm less certain of my nomination this time, I think there's a chance the article is worth keeping; but I'm a big fan of getting rid of anything Wikipedia doesn't need, so I'd like to get a consensus to just make sure. Popcornduff (talk) 00:49, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hate to See Your Heart Break

added a link pointing to Joy Williams

Paramore (album)

added a link pointing to Joy Williams

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Sektor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 12:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Cyrax.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:58, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Next time take it to WP:RFPP. Right now I've fully protected it for a week so that it will need to be discussed on the talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Still Into You you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 12:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

The article Still Into You you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Still Into You for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 07:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

The article Still Into You you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Still Into You for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 14:41, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, MoonJet. You have new messages at Yash!'s talk page.
Message added 02:47, 24 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Yash! 02:47, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, MoonJet. You have new messages at Yash!'s talk page.
Message added 02:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Yash! 02:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the edits! English is not really my forte. I cannot figure out how to mention something about that section in the lead except for the Dookie and Insomniac relevance. A sentence briefing about the theme is required. Perhaps can you help? Yash! 13:34, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

That should do it. Thank you Kokoro20! — Yash! ^[talk] 01:10, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Would you agree that this song has way too many references for nu metal? I think you would. Anyway, which ones should I trim off and which ones should I keep? I'm trying to think about how to have both genres fit neatly in one line. DannyMusicEditor (talk) 19:10, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello. I don't actually have any plans on taking any articles to GA at the moment (the 'to-do' list on my talk is around a year old). That being said, I do love Clarity (and JEW) and I wouldn't be against taking it (and the other JEW albums) to GA. Yeepsi (talk) 22:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Hunting Party (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yash! -- Yash! (talk) 21:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Jin Tekken 6 BR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

The article The Hunting Party (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Hunting Party (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yash! -- Yash! (talk) 02:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

May I ask for a little help, friend?

I assume it was you who nominated the Hunting Party for GA, right? Can you tell me how to do that? I know a particular article that just might classify. DannyMusicEditor (talk) 17:42, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Hey Kokoro, I've recently nominated Kill 'Em All for featured article. You may leave comments/vote at the nomination page. Appreciate your time.--Retrohead (talk) 10:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi - instead of semi-protecting the Simple Plan song you requested at RFPP, I put pending changes on it because it's not that heavily edited. I see you don't have the reviewer user right; if you'd like that granted to you, I've reviewed your contributions and I feel comfortable granting it to you. If you'd like me to do that, let me know. If not, just ignore this message. :-) KrakatoaKatie 21:51, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. KrakatoaKatie 23:31, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paramore (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idolator. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week for your long-term efforts to help new editors. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

Editor Yash! submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I am pleased to nominate Kokoro20 to be Editor of the Week. Kokoro20 has been editing Wikipedia since December of 2007, though his active contributions began only after April, 2011. So they have been working majorly during the last four years with their edits focusing on punk rock and alternative rock articles. Despite having a low edit count, they have helped promote at least three GAs and have been silently contributing to a great many other GAs. Their work focuses on updating and keeping the facts right on a vast number of articles. It looks simple, but it really isn't if you do that to as many articles as Kokoro20 has been doing for this span of years. As far as I see, they have never been awarded a barnstar so let's not make all that work go unappreciated.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Kokoro20

Musical Clef

Editor of the Week for the week beginning September 7, 2015

focusing on keeping the facts on punk rock and alternative rock articles updated.

Recognized for

"Just the facts, Jack!"

Notable work(s)

Three GAs and contributing to a great many other GAs

Nomination page

Thanks again for your efforts! . Buster Seven Talk 14:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

One of the benefits of facilitating the Eddy award is that I get to meet quality editors like you. Too many veteran editors spend too much time at the various drama-laden pages of Wikipedia. They rarely take the time to see the hard working editors that fly under the radar of contention and strife and they begin to look at WP as one argument after another. Editors like you are the heartbeat of Wikipedia. Thanks for all you do. Happy New Year. Buster Seven Talk 17:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Mike:Golu · ^{[ Confidential message ]} 06:16, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ¡Tré!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, sir. With all the alternative/hard rock music articles I've seen you at lately, I was wondering if you (or someone else you know that has this skill) could help me work on the lead section to this article. It is the only huge problem I see right now; and I would love to take this to GA-level next year. But leads are not my forte. dannymusiceditor ^{~talk to me!~} 13:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Well, in that case, we have a problem. Whatever prose there was no longer reads as such in the source given. I'm sorry, I never actually looked at the citation myself, I just thought that it was okay to list. I will fix the issue in the coming hours. dannymusiceditor ^{~talk to me!~} 15:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Yesterday I nominated Evanescence (Evanescence album) for GA status, but it just won't show up on the nominations page. When I nominated my last article it showed up almost immediately, but it's been over 12 hours now. Could you check its talk page to see if something's wrong? I don't know what to do - it's only my second nomination. dannymusiceditor ^{~talk to me!~} 15:32, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Nevermind. (Took it long enough!) dannymusiceditor ^{~talk to me!~} 19:59, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Ling Xiaoyu.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:06, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

I recently nominated this article for GA. Given all your hard work and evident interest in Linkin Park, I was wondering if you'd like to give input about the live version of the album on the article's talk page. Someone placed a maintenance tag on the article and I'm a little confused about how to resolve this specific part. dannymusiceditor ^{~talk to me!~} 23:01, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

The source that I had there (I thought) only said experimental in the prose of the review; did I miss it? Last I checked, it only said "experimental rock" in the source right under the release date, i.e., the following situation:

Released: September 8, 2010 Genre: Experimental Rock

That's what I recall being there...but your additional source is good. In any case, if my understanding is in fact true, I was just going to remove that reference altogether. dannymusiceditor ^{~talk to me!~} 01:36, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

A writer from Anime News Network made a big article about disliking the article here. Use it if you want. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 01:25, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Wow, R. Mika sure has a lot of sources discussing her. I'll see about adding that source to the article later. Kokoro20 (talk) 10:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Kokoro20. I've just nominated Allen Walker to peer review here since I plan to nominate the article to GA. Even you haven't read the series your comments would help to see if it well written. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:03, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, old friend. If you have time, would you mind taking a look at an Evanescence PR for me (this time the discography)? I know in the past you were working on a list article. I've had this PR open a month with no response. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 16:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

@DannyMusicEditor: Hey, sorry for the late response. I don't think I'll be able to do this. I've been a bit busy elsewhere to do a lot on Wikipedia (hence why most of my edits lately have been reverts). Kokoro20 (talk) 15:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

It should be included on that page, the only way to fight him is to use Rage Attacks (Art or Drive) on last round. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.192.118.153 (talk) 08:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article R. Mika you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

The article R. Mika you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:R. Mika for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

The article R. Mika you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:R. Mika for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 19:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Dead Rising Antagonist already are in the List of Characters article, no need to be on the main article, also people who play Sulivan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosvel92 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

It has been a while, how are you Kokoro20? They are back in town! Yash! 05:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

@Yash!: Hey there. I'm doing okay. Yeah, I've heard about this new Green Day single (I can't wait to hear the song itself). I will try and see what I can do for its article soon.

To be honest, I need to do more actual work on articles again. Most of my edits lately have been reverts. Kokoro20 (talk) 05:41, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

"Bang Bang" and Revolution Radio are in need of expansion. There are a lot of sources which can be used and I am planning on getting around it tonight. Perhaps you can start with them. Yash! 10:36, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

@Yash!: I've already expanded "Bang Bang" some". I'm planning to do some work on Revolution Radio soon too. Kokoro20 (talk) 20:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, MoonJet. You have new messages at Beemer69's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I'd be glad to help out on those articles. The "appearance" sections look like they could use some work, and anything else in particular you'd like done? sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 02:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

I've cleaned up both Lili and Ling's articles; hopefully they're what you had in mind. For good measure I included Lee, for which I gladly accept the egg on my face. :') sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 02:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

In response to your question: Who messed this up, the answer is "you". The timeline does not need its own heading and each line is a single studio album, not multiple studio albums. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hard Times (Paramore song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blondie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I'm reaching to you regarding this article as you have submitted it to a GA review.

I would appreciate if you withdraw such nomination as the song has just been released and is still topping charts, more reviews will be made...overall, more information will become available that can be used to expand and improve the article. I know there is no policy against nominating recent songs. But what's the rush?

Thank you for your time. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:12, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

@MarioSoulTruthFan:, it's fine. The song has been out for nearly a month now. The album itself comes out in just two days, and surely, they'll be a bit more written about the song in those album reviews too. It'll probably still be some time before someone decides to review the article anyway. Kokoro20 (talk) 22:27, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

I came here with the same concern. I'd suggest you withdraw it because a lot more will probably be written about it. The "Music" section, particularly the "Songs", generally are responded to quickly in the GA nominations, so there is nothing to worry about there. I'd suggest you wait a bit more and then renominate, as I see it is still climbing on the charts in the United States. Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 04:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC).

Well, the album After Laughter is out now, so there's more info about "Hard Times" that can be added from album reviews and stuff, which I plan to add some soon. Kokoro20 (talk) 07:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Please open a talk page on the matter. I went through the merging process as described by WP:MERGE. Technically you were supposed to reopen the discussion, before reverting the edits.  Kyoushu~  ►Talk Page  21:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

@DarkKyoushu: No need for me to re-open the discussion. My edit was in line of WP:BRD, as you boldly merged without consensus, and I challenged it. So now it's on you to re-open any discussions on the matter. Kokoro20 (talk) 11:13, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:311 Prisoner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Ling Xiaoyu.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hard Times (Paramore song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:01, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:King Tekken 6.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

The article Hard Times (Paramore song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hard Times (Paramore song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:02, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Curious, is there a discussion anywhere about all the changes to articles you're making ? - FlightTime (open channel) 14:10, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

What do you mean? If you're talking about the Meteora article, I was just restoring the genres, while citing sources, since they were challenged by another editor, since they were uncited before. Kokoro20 (talk) 19:54, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello. I noted that you have been editing the Tekken character articles. Nice work. I tried expanding Lars (which became a GA thanks to user:uker) as well as Jin and Heihachi. I couldn't find material about Heihachi's and Kazuya's creation though even though they are the most notable Tekken characters. Anyways, keep up the good work.Tintor2 (talk) 16:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

I'm not an expert in the topic but User:ProtoDrake‎ has taken a lot of articles to GA status so he might have advices to give. I guess in order to take it to GA you need some need good reception information, creation and a good prose. Since English is not my native language I always send the articles to GA to the guild of copyeditors. Meanwhile, I don't know if you added it, but Tekken Hybrid contains an interview where writer Dai Sato explains why she chose Xiaoyu and Alisa to be the film's protagonists. You can find that video in Youtube. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

I forgot. How about about taking a peer review to get more comments by other editors? It might help to fix the issues for a GA nomination.Tintor2 (talk) 13:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Lili Tekken Render.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Alisa Bosconovitch TTT2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Lucky Chloe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Hey! Stop revert my edits on this page! This song is a gothic rock song, just listen to it! You’re just annoying me! If you revert my edit one more time, I have the rights to tell it to an administrator, and you risk getting blocked for disruptive behavior (edit war)! Karamellpudding1999 (talk) 08:11, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Can't Knock the Hustle (Weezer song).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Thank you for creating the page. Much appreciated is the inclusion of reliable sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 14:58, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

In the "Britpop" section on Ash's talk page, you said that they are Britpop according to Allmusic. That website is unreliable when it comes to sourcing music genres. I plan to find a better source for them being Britpop. Dean12065 (talk) 07:07, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

@Dean12065: Only the sidebar on AllMusic is unreliable. If the genres are stated elsewhere there, like Britpop was, then it's reliable. I would suggest having the AllMusic source restored, if a "musical style" section was made. Kokoro20 (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Do you have any sense of where I might take this conversation next? I still feel strongly that a change needs to be made, but I'm not sure WikiProject Songs is the right space for getting anything done. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:29, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Mortal Kombat - Skarlet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:43, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:311 Love Song.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:MK9 Stryker.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Next time, if you need to properly editing a cite, here is a great place to start Template:Cite web.

{{cite web |url= |title= |last= |first= |date= |work= |access-date=}}

183.171.123.139 (talk) 07:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

I have marked the article as failing WP:GNG. Please note that WP:SIGCOV is different from a trivial mention, and that numerous trivial mentions together do not create significant coverage where there is none. That is known as WP:REFBOMBing and is very common in fictional character articles. There is a reason it was redirected. The easiest way to tell if the coverage is significant is if the source is entirely about the character, and there are no reception sources that are solely about Coco Bandicoot, so it is liable to be re-redirected or deleted. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:47, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

I should clarify that there are the two TheGamer articles that are indeed entirely about her, but one is solely about a design change and not her characterization, while the other is largely a showcase/gallery of fan-created works, so neither indicates serious discussion. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:49, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

@Zxcvbnm: I have noticed you had marked the article as such. However, I disagree with this assessment. And besides the two sources from TheGamer, there's also these two other sources in the article solely about Coco:

https://www.ign.com/articles/2017/06/15/e3-2017-why-coco-is-playable-in-crash-bandicoot-n-sane-trilogy

https://gamerant.com/crash-bandicoot-n-sane-trilogy-coco-playable/

While the second source from TheGamer is a showcase of fan-art, it does also discuss her character, and one of the initial criticisms from Cat's Tuxedo was the lack of such.

I've been a regular editor on Wikipedia for 11 years now. I know what significant coverage and GNG are. Besides, GNG also says and I quote "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." So even if there weren't any sources solely about Coco, it could have still potentially passed GNG.

Keep in mind that the initial redirect was years before such coverage of Coco was published. MoonJet (talk) 10:16, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Also, I just found this source. While I can't get full access to it, it talks about Coco some too. MoonJet (talk) 10:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Seniority really has nothing to do with knowing how Wikipedia policy works, there are plenty of users who have taken an extended hiatus and are not familiar at all with current policy. All I have to say is that if you were an active editor for all that time you should probably know better. I can't speak to the journal article since I can't access it, but the IGN and GameRant sources are extremely short; I am pretty confident that this article would fail an AfD with a redirect decision and Cat's Tuxedo seems to think the same as well. It is still almost entirely trivial coverage or primary sources. At this juncture, it certainly merits a mention in a list of characters but not a standalone article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

@Zxcvbnm: As short as they are (and I wouldn't call them "extremely short"), they are still important discussion pieces, such as explanation why Coco is playable, hence not "trivial." It's not so much that I should "know better," it's just I disagree with your viewpoint on character notability. I'm not alone, as your Megatron AFD ended in a snow keep. MoonJet (talk) 10:49, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

If you believe that is my "opinion" then I definitely invite you to gather consensus on the issue from other editors. I am not approaching this from a point of WP:BADFAITH or wanting to "get" the article deleted so I would be glad to be proven wrong. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

@Zxcvbnm: I would be sure to participate in any such discussion. I also want to discuss Amy Rose again sometime too, now that I've gathered up more sourcing for her since the last discussion. MoonJet (talk) 16:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines: "Large talk pages are difficult to read and load slowly over slow connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." – this talk page is 135.4 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:51, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Coco Bandicoot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi. I noticed that you recently split Josie Rizal out of List of Tekken characters, specifically from Special:PermanentLink/1088102318#Josie Rizal. Your edit summary includes the source article title, but WP:Copying within Wikipedia#Proper attribution (guideline, shortcut WP:PATT) requires that it be linked. Please let me know if you would like assistance with WP:Copying within Wikipedia#Repairing insufficient attribution (shortcut WP:RIA). Special:Diff/1082252851 is an example of the format that I prefer. Thanks. Flatscan (talk) 04:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article After Laughter you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Realmaxxver -- Realmaxxver (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Please read WP:CANVASS. Edits like this blatantly violate it. You literally went out of your way to selectively contact someone you know would be sympathetic to your argument, and made comments that were clearly meant to persuade them into supporting you, which they did. Don't do that. Sergecross73 msg me 18:57, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

@Sergecross73 This was done merely on the basis on if my draft needed more improvements, rather than canvassing. In fact, I never told him to vote in the discussion, nor did I even want him to. He chose to do that himself. That being said, I will be more careful in the future. Sorry that this came across as canvassing. MoonJet (talk) 18:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Kwarantined Krab.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

The article After Laughter you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:After Laughter for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Realmaxxver -- Realmaxxver (talk) 13:41, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

The article After Laughter you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:After Laughter for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Realmaxxver -- Realmaxxver (talk) 22:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Amy Rose.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

The AfD for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willoughby Kipling has ended, and thanks for your reply! Of course, I disagree with your point again (per WP:NBOOK, articles only with plot summaries are discouraged upon, the four refs could only be used to write a summary/overview, IMHO, "short" is subjective, IMO 100 words + in a ref could be SIGCOV, provided that it's not just a summary, otherwise, pretty much all films have characters that are covered in reviews describing plots, that way, they could all be articles. Screen Rant is generally reliable for entertainment topics but less so for uncontroversial ones here, so it's probably okay to use here, but I'm unsure if it's RS enough to be considered notable.) IMO, as the AfD has ended, there might still be time to discuss a suitable redirect target, however, I like your arguments as well, compared to Jclemens, IMHO your one is far better written and makes sense (despite my personal POV). Thanks again, and have a nice day (or night)! :) VickKiang (talk) 21:27, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Can u create a padge for Amy Rose as she one of the main? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ethan169 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

@Ethan169: I have a draft for Amy Rose here. I've tried getting her de-merge twice in recent times. However, consensus has been against me both times. It's a shame too, because I really think she deserves an article and she clearly passes notability in my book. However, this doesn't mean she won't ever get an article, as new sources do pop up and consensus can change. MoonJet (talk) 03:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello We need an info box for Amy game appearances it easier for people to know what she appears in — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ethan169 (talk • contribs) 07:08, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Could you edit the Heavy Metal template to look more like this?

24.178.76.27 (talk) 21:35, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Please don't. The suggested layout isn't at all better. Binksternet (talk) 00:10, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Template:Sonic the Hedgehog characters has been nominated for merging with Template:Sonic the Hedgehog. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 04:11, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi - you may be interested in the WT:WikiProject Songs#Cover_songs_that_should_be_split discussion - would appreciate your thoughts. -- DarylKayes (talk) 07:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stryker (Mortal Kombat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stryker (Mortal Kombat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 17:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kunimitsu (Tekken), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunimitsu (Tekken) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julia Chang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

If you're willing to save more articles, you could give Alisa Bosconovitch and Christie Monteiro a shot. They can be barely notable or probably not, but it's worth a try. I wouldn't be touching them yet but will recheck soon. Look at how popular Anna Williams (Tekken) is, yet they sadly lack any coverage. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 12:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

GlatorNator: I've actually been intending to do that for Christie Monteiro. I just haven't gotten around to it yet, since I have a life outside of Wikipedia. As for Alisa, I think she has enough, but I'll look for more on her as well. MoonJet (talk) 20:15, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Alisa appeared in Project x zone 2. When writing X (Mega Man), I found that one source focused on every character appearing there.

Thank you for uploading File:NightwolfMK11.webp. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 13:00, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Kunimitsu (T7).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Laura Matsuda.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Mileena has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:07, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

- Cukie Gherkin (talk) 13:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

The article Alisa Bosconovitch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article lacks notable reception discussing them as a character to satisfy SIGCOV or notability, and trying to find sources per WP:BEFORE proved fruitless in turn. At most she gets light mentions, but little actual discussion and more passing reactions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:15, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Small correction, meant to do an AfD and selected the wrong script. The discussion can be found here.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alisa Bosconovitch, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alisa Bosconovitch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Characters of the Tekken series into Leo Kliesen. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:09, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi there, man. First of all, I wish you Happy New Year 2024 and all the best in this year and in your future contributions. I saw that you contributed to many Tekken-related pages and even uploaded several pictures in their characters infoboxes. So I wanted to ask you, if its not a problem, since I'm not really good at uploading pictures and they usually get deleted and I saw that you changed Leo's Tekken 7 image to Tekken 8 image in infobox, would it be possible for you to upload Tekken 8 Yoshimitsu image in his infobox since I and many others believe that his latest depiction is a better choice than his Tekken 7 picture and I've seen that several other Tekken characters who have their Wikipedia article that will return in Tekken 8 have their Tekken 8 image in their infoboxes including Nina Williams, Ling Xiaoyu, Leo Kliesen and King. All the best and thanks in advance. Disturbedasylum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Disturbedasylum (my user talk page)

Hi, just to preempt a merge discussion, I was wondering if you could identify the three sources in the article, AfD, or undiscussed sources that serve to show Pit's notability. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 07:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Leo Kliesen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucky Chloe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky Chloe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 20:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josie Rizal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josie Rizal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Josie Rizal (T7).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

can you use this source and add it to Christie Monteiro, just this one cause I think this source is pretty useful. 114.175.238.132 (talk) 08:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi. When adding sources, as you've done to Jade, don't forget to include the access dates as well. Thanks. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 22:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Jade Mortal Kombat 11.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Hey, MJ. I'll tell you one thing: you've got the patience of a monk. :) After a turbulent two weeks (sigh), I've finally writing back about Goro. Unfortunately — and I realize in advance I'm going to sound like a jerk — I don't think he yet has the horses to regain his article. The preexisting reception has the same issues that got it merged, and I had added all of the movie content beforehand and that wasn't enough to save it. The Screen Rant piece has a clickbaity title and meaningless answer three paragraphs down that he's a Shokan, which everyone already knows. (I've noticed SR starting to creep back into some articles despite its validity having been questioned in past character AfDs.) Nice work on digging up that character study, but it just briefly covers his design changes and states that he's a fan favorite before moving on. He's rightly renowned for his status in the first game but that was three decades ago and he's been a virtual nonentity in the series since. You're probably telling me to go jump in a lake right now, but this is just my opinion on the character and sources, not the draft. It might be a good idea to also pick KungFuMan's brain about this, if you haven't already. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 23:52, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Actually, I added some of the sources pertaining to to the movies too, and after I did, you and Greenish thought his reception section focused too much on his movie portrayals. Hence, I went to search for more that discuss Goro outside the films, and I do feel that concern about the reception focusing too much on his movie appearances have been addressed. But since you don't seem to agree, maybe I'll ask KFM like you suggested. MoonJet (talk) 15:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Africa (Weezer cover), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Africa (Weezer cover) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Mortal Kombat 11 Sindel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Seems this fansite https://blondebombmag.blogspot.com/2012/09/street-fighter-x-tekken-artbook-nina.html?m=1 provides some creation info about Nina alongside the original material. Hope it helps. Tintor2 (talk) 18:25, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Thank you. I will see about trying to fit that into the article later on. MoonJet (talk) 23:25, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Found something else. The official Tekken artbook is available in Google Books and writing Nina's name on it leads to commentary about her.Tintor2 (talk) 16:50, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Happy new year. After some research I made two Sega character articles: Akira Yuki and Ryo Hazuki. I'm not exactly sure what should be the infobox image since Akira has several martial arts uniforms while Ryo's design is always the same but in 3D in the games and 2D in Project x Zone and the anime. Feel free to revise them. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 23:04, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Thank you. Though, I haven't been editing much lately. I hope that changes soon. Nice job with getting Akira Yuki back into the mainspace. I knew he was notable. I wonder if we could get Pai Chan and Wolf Hawkfield their own articles too.

I've been trying to get Goro from Mortal Kombat back into the mainspace too. Do you have any good sources not listed there?

MoonJet (talk) 06:14, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Hey @MoonJet. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 18 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey.

And wishing you a joyful Merry Christmas and a wonderful, happy 2026. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 20:06, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi MoonJet. Thank you for your work on Shaheen (Tekken). Another editor, 11WB, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

NicheGamer is not reliable.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11WB}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 04:42, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi MoonJet. Thank you for your work on Miary Zo. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:53, 16 March 2026 (UTC)