User talk:Musykhandelhi

Hello, Musykhandelhi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, which will be reviewed by other editors. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Best practices for editors with close associations
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:37, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page did not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

• an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
• a workspace for a draft article
• a personal website, blog, or social media site
• a space for self-promotion or other advertising
• a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. — ERcheck (talk) 00:07, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Trinity Institute of Professional Studies. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Your user page is not intended for articles or drafts of articles. — ERcheck (talk) 00:07, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit to List of schools in Delhi affiliated with CBSE appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:17, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

@Arjayay ok I will check Musykhandelhi (talk) 21:34, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Trinity Institute of Professional Studies. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 09:34, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

• an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
• a workspace for a draft article
• a personal website, blog, or social media site
• a space for self-promotion or other advertising
• a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 07:16, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello Musykhandelhi. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Musykhandelhi. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Musykhandelhi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. I note that you have made a WP:COI declaration here. Please clarify the nature of this conflict of interest with special reference to this formal notice 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 13:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

@Timtrent Dear Sir, I am not paid user, I working at Trinity Institute of Professional Studies. I make for my organisation. you can verify this url: https://www.tips.edu.in/administrative-staff Musykhandelhi (talk) 16:26, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

@Musykhandelhi - Please clarify. You say above, " I working at Trinity Institute of Professional Studies." Do you mean you are an employee, or intern, or a student at Trinity Institute of Professional Studies? — ERcheck (talk) 19:44, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

@ERcheck Sir, I am Employee as a IT Incharge. Musykhandelhi (talk) 19:50, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

As you are an employee, you will need to note that on your user page and on any pages related to Trinity Institute of Professional Studies, including those on any of their professors. Please see Wikipedia:Conflict-of-interest for full details. — ERcheck (talk) 20:45, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

@ERcheck Sir, can I add our college Director Musykhandelhi (talk) 05:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

@Musykhandelhi - You need to make paid contributor declaration on the draft page associated with the director:

{{Connected contributor (paid)|User1=Musykhandelhi |U1-employer=Trinity Institute of Professional Studies}}

Likewise on the talk page of articles related to Trinity Institute of Professional Studies.

— ERcheck (talk) 18:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

That is paid editing. Your salary covers the editing of Wikipedia. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 21:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

@Timtrent Sir, How can Do this Musykhandelhi (talk) 05:33, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

By reading the instruction in the final paragraph of the formal question I asked you. This is the paragraph which says:

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Musykhandelhi. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Musykhandelhi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message

It is important that you read, understand, and apply all instructions in this type of notice. I thank you for your honest and transparent answer. Please take it to the correct conclusion by following the instructions 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 07:56, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Trinity Institute of Professional Studies, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Musykhandelhi, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Musykhandelhi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. I see you made the attempt to declare your paid status but did it in the wrong place and at the wrong time. I have reverted your edits. This is not hard, but I may not do it for you on your user page without your permission. Do I have your permission? 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 10:57, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

@Timtrent Sir, can u share exact line add on my template.

Musykhandelhi, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Trinity institute of professional studies for their contributions to Wikipedia.

. but showing error, it is my humble request Musykhandelhi (talk) 11:13, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done thank you for asking. Please see your user page. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:40, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

@Timtrent Sir, When will my page be live? Musykhandelhi (talk) 11:46, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

That depends on many things. One is live and is being discussed for deletion, the other was returned to draft and requires work by you. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:51, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

@Timtrent Sir, this is my first work on Wikipedia, I humble request to you please help me by live my page. Musykhandelhi (talk) 11:57, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

If you wish it to be accepted then you have to do the work. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 12:06, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

@Timtrent Sir, I try my best, If you teach me step by step, I will be happy. Musykhandelhi (talk) 18:40, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

This essay will help you. It contains a step by step guide 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 18:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Dr R K Tandon. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and You have not used references to demonstrate nor verify notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:36, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trinity Institute of Professional Studies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity Institute of Professional Studies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 07:19, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Musykhandelhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dr R K Tandon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Musykhandelhi, I'm Bearcat. Please note that pages in draft space, such as Draft:Trinity Institute of Professional Studies are not allowed to be categorized alongside finished articles in mainspace, per WP:DRAFTNOCAT. The page must stay out of any categories so long as it is outside mainspace, and this is not an optional rule that you're free to disregard or ignore.

You can provisionally list categories in your draft without affecting content categories by using one of the methods described here.

As the page has had to be pulled out of categories three times in three days, do not readd it to categories again, because draft and sandbox pages are not allowed to be in content categories. Note as well that there can be consequences for disruption if it doesn't stop, such as page protection or deletion and/or the temporary or permanent suspension of your editing privileges. Bearcat (talk) 02:20, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello @Bearcat,

Thank you for your message and for explaining the requirement under WP:DRAFTNOCAT. I sincerely apologise for repeatedly adding categories to the draft page — I understand now that this is not permitted in draft space.

I will not add categories again while the page remains in draft and will follow the appropriate method for provisional categorisation if needed.

Thank you for your patience and guidance.

Regards,

Musykhandelhi Musykhandelhi (talk) 04:02, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Musykhandelhi, please do not use a LLM (large language model) to generate talk page messages like the one above. Here is the standard notice about this matter:

Hello, I'm Newslinger. A comment that you recently posted to User talk:Musykhandelhi seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Editors should not use LLMs to write comments generatively. Communication is at the root of Wikipedia's decision-making process, and it is presumed that editors possess the ability to come up with their own ideas. Your comment may have been collapsed per the relevant guideline. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

— Newslinger talk 20:55, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) caste-related topics in South Asia.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please note that WP:CT/BLP (living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles) is also a contentious topic. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 20:31, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Musykhandelhi, a recent sockpuppet investigation found that you have been using the accounts Musy.khan (talk · contribs · count) and Musykhandata (talk · contribs · count) alongside your current account, Musykhandelhi, to edit Draft:Trinity Institute of Professional Studies. As the Musy.khan and Musykhandata accounts were both undisclosed and did not comply with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement (WP:PAID), I have indefinitely blocked both of these accounts. Please ensure that your future edits comply with the policy on sockpuppetry (WP:SOCK) and WP:PAID. Thank you.

This is a warning for sockpuppetry and for not consistently adhering to WP:PAID in the South Asia contentious topic (WP:CT/SA), and has been recorded on the arbitration enforcement log. — Newslinger talk 20:51, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Musykhandelhi. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dr R K Tandon".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:26, 18 April 2026 (UTC)