User talk:NShehan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is NShehan's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Hello, NShehan, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asarum shuttleworthii (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notable subject but needs checking as appears to be LLM.AI slop. The wikidata item was for an Italian actor "Benito Artesi", and the POWO source is for "Carex mabilliana". Needs checking for more LLM hallucinations the source fix and sources used for the description section and the locations found in the lead section

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Asarum shuttleworthii and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:23, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, the same with this one. I have moved Hexastylis shuttleworthii to Asarum shuttleworthii so if you would like to update now please do. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 11:28, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

This one has also been merged now, thanks again to UtherSRG. KylieTastic (talk) 17:07, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, NShehan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:23, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asarum rhombiformis (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Hexastylis rhombiformis instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hexastylis rhombiformis exists as the Homotypic Synonyms for this so the correct action would be to more Hexastylis rhombiformis to Asarum rhombiformis. We normally use POWO as the key source and they use Asarum rhombiformis for the accepted name. Pinging UtherSRG and Plantdrew to check they agree we should move Hexastylis rhombiformis per POWO?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Asarum rhombiformis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 08:40, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi NShehan, thanks for your work to correct and update these to the correct name. I have moved Hexastylis rhombiformis to Asarum rhombiformis to keep the history/attribution, but it should be updated to your better version. As I'm not an administrator I can not do the move over and history merge as UtherSRG suggested, but as the history of the draft main content just comes down to the one first creation I suggest you just do a copy-paste update. I would have done it but thought I would leave to you for correct attribution of your work. Any questions just ask. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 11:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Note that this has been merged now, thanks to UtherSRG. KylieTastic (talk) 16:50, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asarum rollinsiae has been accepted

Asarum rollinsiae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 09:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Pityopsis aspera

added a link pointing to Morphological

Scutellaria parvula

added a link pointing to Development

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles