User talk:Nacho Gacía
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is Nacho Gacía's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Refine Technologies (April 22)
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Refine Technologies to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
 |
Hello, Nacho Gacía!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cmajorftw 11:45, 22 April 2026 (UTC) |
Welcome!
Hello, Nacho Gacía, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Mathglot and I've volunteered to be your Wikipedia mentor. I'm here for you whenever you need help with Wikipedia. It's great to have you on board to help create this online encyclopedia.
See your homepage for a brief tutorial. Here are a few links you might find helpful:
Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or the Task Center.
Help is available: as your Mentor, you can always find me listed in the "Get editing help" module bottom right on your homepage; there are also additional help links there. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or try the Wikipedia:Teahouse to get help designed especially for new users from a team of experienced volunteers. So go ahead and ask questions — we're here to help!
Once again, welcome to Wikipedia! Mathglot (talk) 04:19, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Refine Technologies connections
Hello again, Nacho Gacía. Can you please tell me what your connection is to Draft:Refine Technologies? If you are connected to the company in some capacity, or to its employees then you need to disclose that in order to remain an editor in good standing. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 06:39, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hello!
- I currently work there.
- I disclosed it in my profile and the talk of the draft page. Maybe I did something wrong? First time contributing :) Nacho Gacía (talk) 06:44, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- I just thought Refine was at a point worth including as it has some authoritative sources, but I'm guessing the company needs more coverage?
- All the academic papers mentioning it don't seem to meet the criteria.
- Any guidance is welcome Nacho Gacía (talk) 06:50, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- Oh cool, so you did. Apologies; I was so concentrated on the Talk page, didn't notice you had a user page as well. (I also messed up the link above, was red, now blue.) Yes, those are a valid declarations, you are in compliance. May I ask how you even knew to place those in the first place? Given your declarations, I assume you have already read WP:COI, but if not, that page lays out the details. Are you planning to contribute to Wikipedia in other ways, once your article is done? I hope so; lmk if you need help. (edit conflict) Mathglot (talk) 06:54, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- Yep, this was a way for me to start since I knew the subject, but would like to continue.
- I investigated the COI, and tried to disclose it. I was told if I didn't 'market' it and just laid out facts, as long as I disclosed it, could be fine.
- Seems the issue is not COI but WP:CORP Nacho Gacía (talk) 07:08, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- The main threshold you need to overcome is that of WP:Notability, which is a property of the topic (i.e., the company), and not of the state of the article or draft. The way to demonstrate notability is through citations to sources with significant coverage about the topic. A long article entirely about the company that is fully independent (i.e., not an interview with someone at the company, or published by the company or by anyone promoting the interests of the company) would be a start, and three such would probably be sufficient to demonstrate notability (five or six is better). Do you have three rock solid sources you can name? (edit conflict) Mathglot (talk) 07:18, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's very helpful.
- I have added more articles from Harvard, Financial Times and Princeton, but the only one fully dedicated to Refine is The Grumpy Economist by John H. Cochrane.
- Do you think it is enough, or should I add more sources? Not sure where exactly the bar is set Nacho Gacía (talk) 11:17, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- Oh cool, so you did. Apologies; I was so concentrated on the Talk page, didn't notice you had a user page as well. (I also messed up the link above, was red, now blue.) Yes, those are a valid declarations, you are in compliance. May I ask how you even knew to place those in the first place? Given your declarations, I assume you have already read WP:COI, but if not, that page lays out the details. Are you planning to contribute to Wikipedia in other ways, once your article is done? I hope so; lmk if you need help. (edit conflict) Mathglot (talk) 06:54, 23 April 2026 (UTC)