User talk:Namelessposter

	The Original Barnstar
	Well done and thank you for getting Mario Andretti back to good article standards! SSSB (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much - I appreciate the kind words and your civility during our discussion earlier. Namelessposter (talk) 19:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

John Hogan (motorsport executive), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:25, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much! It’s so kind of you to review my first article. I really appreciate it. Namelessposter (talk) 14:13, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

		The NBA WikiProject Barnstar
		This is in recognition of all of your hard work improving the Luka Dončić–Anthony Davis trade article. Left guide (talk) 23:43, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! Namelessposter (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of John Hogan (motorsport executive) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Muboshgu (talk) 02:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

@Muboshgu, thanks for letting me know. I've made some edits - please let me know if they're to your liking. Thanks for reviewing! Namelessposter (talk) 04:39, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Hey again, just a heads-up the DYK nom ran into a roadblock due to the article having too many tweets. Is this something you might be willing/able to help fix? If not, the easy way out would be to simply gut the Twitter-cited content from the article. Please let me know either way. Best, Left guide (talk) 12:09, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. I found replacement sources for most of it, but had to take out two bits of info. If you can find sources to bring them back, that would be great. Namelessposter (talk) 14:51, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

I personally think those two bits are rather trivial, but spent some time searching anyways and came up empty. Thanks for helping, and for keeping me posted. Best, Left guide (talk) 13:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for trying, anyhow. Sorry nothing turned up. Take care! Namelessposter (talk) 15:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

On 6 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article François Guiter, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a former French secret-service agent was responsible for seven out of the 26 Formula One drivers qualifying for the 1980 South African Grand Prix being French? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/François Guiter. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, François Guiter), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

1=Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

On 10 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Hogan (motorsport executive), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that tobacco brands like Marlboro, led by John Hogan (pictured), turned Formula One into a global sport because F1 cars evaded European tobacco advertising restrictions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Hogan (motorsport executive). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John Hogan (motorsport executive)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Amazing work on the article! I haven't had the chance to read through the whole thing, but it looks really good. I've barely finished season 1, but I may watch the film regardless at some point in the near future. I won't promise to do a GA review, as I don't have much time or energy, but I do hope your nomination goes well and it doesn't take long for someone to pick it up. PanagiotisZois (talk) 13:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

I’m so glad you enjoyed the article! But oh dear oh dear - I really hope the article didn’t spoil the big reveal. No worries about the GA review, it will happen when it happens. Namelessposter (talk) 14:13, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Oh, don't worry it. XD I actually started the show a few months ago, but for a couple of reasons, ended up putting it on hold and then decided to spoil the big reveal for myself. Admittedly, not something I usually do, but meh. Just because you know how the story plays out doesn't mean you still can't enjoy it. And there is a difference between reading a recap of a story, versus actually watching it. If you don't mind, one small suggestion I have to offer is to go through the "Plot" section again. Having just a single sentence / line acting as its own paragraph is discouraged. I understand that given the somewhat confusing plot of Twin Peaks, it may be best to separate such things, but it may cause issue during the GAR; or FAC if you decide to go there. PanagiotisZois (talk) 16:27, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Hmm, I've heard that before (no one-sentence paragraphs) on a different review when I was saving an article from GAR. I'll see what I can do. I think there is only one such paragraph but you're saying it applies to one-line paragraphs too? That kind of depends on your screen size, no?

Candidly, I wonder whether FWWM is the version of Twin Peaks for people who don't especially love seasons 1/2, so if you think you'd prefer FWWM, you can probably skip episodes 10-21 in season 2 as they have minimal relevance to either FWWM or S3. (I watched all of S2 anyway, and the last six or so episodes have some nice moments, but in my mind it's like an extended Easter Egg or spin-off.) I do think episodes 1-7 from S2 have aged very well, probably better than S1. You also have to watch episodes 8, 9, and 22 to make FWWM comprehensible, but there's already a noticeable drop-off in quality after episode 7 that really begins to show once the plotlines from episodes 1-7 have run out. Namelessposter (talk) 16:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

The article Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me for comments about the article, and Talk:Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 07:43, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

On 20 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 33 years after The New York Times called David Lynch's film Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me "brain-dead" and seemingly "the worst movie ever made", it conceded that the film was now "revered"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

On 20 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Rector of Justin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Rector of Justin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Rector of Justin), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 13:28, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

@Mb2437: Hope you're doing well. Could you give me a second opinion on Special:Contributions/Messenger-boyy? They started an account in 2020 but the account was stuck at 5 edits until 11 days ago. Since then, they've made 400 edits, often in areas that indicate they already know their way around Wikipedia and are speedrunning to extended confirmed. (Like... what person with 400 edits has Twinkle installed?) They came to my attention after gutting the Mark Walter article, and while some of the modifications after I rewrote it have been less than ideal, I think a drive-by accusation of ChatGPT usage is a bit much. Could you kindly take a look and let me know what you think? Namelessposter (talk) 23:57, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

That is definitely an LLM. MB2437 02:51, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Strikes me as paid editing Namelessposter (talk) 03:53, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Messenger-boyy&diff=prev&oldid=1310844627 They admitted (under an IP) they have been editing on the wiki before, and a lot of their substantive revisions to other topics have been reverted. Namelessposter (talk) 12:54, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article The Rector of Justin has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 14:06, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Namelessposter. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

• You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
• Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

• When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
• Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
• Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP addresses (using the CIDR notation format).

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! – robertsky (talk) 02:58, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! I really appreciate it. Namelessposter (talk) 03:11, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article John Hogan (motorsport executive) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 20:25, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Many thanks! Namelessposter (talk) 20:50, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

On 4 December 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dixwell School, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Harvard's first modern feeder school cost twice as much as Harvard itself? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dixwell School. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dixwell School), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

JuniperChill (talk) 00:02, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article François Guiter has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Magnesium Cube -- Magnesium Cube (talk) 17:24, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Many thanks! I know it was a daunting article to review, which is why it lay unreviewed for so long. I appreciate you took this on. Namelessposter (talk) 17:35, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Dixwell School has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 15:05, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the review! It's so kind of you. Namelessposter (talk) 15:21, 14 February 2026 (UTC)