User talk:Neogoodwriter
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Warning
If you revert my edits to the Juest article again, I will report you as the obvious sockpuppet/meatpuppet you clearly are. I've been editing Wikipedia for almost as long as Juest has been alive, and I know what fake sources and bullshit look like. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
May 2025
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:20, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Your edits to Neo Hanzi
None of the information that you added to the page was properly sourced, so I have restored the original redirect at Neo Hanzi. You cite this to support that Neo Hanzi is also known as Hán tu and Mào-thèi-khà, however that page doesn't mention any of those names. You cited a user forum for Neo-Hanzi is closely related to Chinese in structure and has not similarity in vocabulary except tone
, but none of those names are mentioned on that site and user comments on a forum are not a reliable source. The Asian Absolute blog is not a reliable source, nor does it mention any of those names. You cite this blog to claim the language is spoken in Nigeria (which is never mentioned on that page). And so on.
Articles should summarize what reliable sources say about a topic. If you don't understand that, please ask questions. Schazjmd (talk) 23:44, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- given the evidence being submitted here, I doubt that Neogoodwriter is going to be in a position to ask questions any time soon. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:52, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.