User talk:Niaki101

Hello, Niaki101, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Btw Santhosh (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections before editing further. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 20:34, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

You have misunderstanding Niaki101 (talk) 20:59, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Dhurandhar controversies. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because Already covered in the film pages . I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 22:07, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi I like your userpage, can I copy your userpage stuff to mine? ITVStoryWeaver (talk) 14:08, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

but I’d prefer if you create your own instead of copying mine. Niaki101 (talk) 14:13, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

How to create it? Can you tell me? ITVStoryWeaver (talk) 14:14, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

You can create your own userpage by editing your user page and adding content like a short introduction, your interests, and your work on Wikipedia.You can also look at other userpages for ideas, but it’s better to write it in your own style instead of copying. Niaki101 (talk) 14:29, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Okk. Thank you so much ITVStoryWeaver (talk) 14:31, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, as you did at Shivam Khajuria. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:31, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

ooh i am very very sorry... i am not intrested in COI.. please unblock i never edit again Shivam Khajuria article Niaki101 (talk) 14:33, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

---

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue.

Can you please identify how you came to take the photo File:Shivam S Khajuria.jpg, which you have claimed as your "own work"? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:41, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

I would like to clarify regarding the file "File:Shivam S Khajuria.jpg". I created my account around 2–3 years ago and at that time I was not aware of copyright and licensing rules on Wikipedia. I had uploaded the image and mistakenly marked it as my own work even though I did not take the photograph myself..i sincerely apologise for this mistake. I now understand that this was incorrect and against policy. I have no intention of misrepresenting ownership and I am fine with the file being removed if required. Niaki101 (talk) 14:49, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Why did you ignore the prior warning left by Bonadea (Special:Diff/1323275770)? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:56, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Further, can you clarify where you got the image of Shivam Khajuria from? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:59, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

I explained you.. the prior warning that i did not intentionally ignore it. I may have misunderstood or not fully understood the notice at that time as i was not familiar with Wikipedia policies i apologise for that and i am now trying to follow all guidelines properly... I would like to continue editing in good faith and start fresh..Regarding the image of Shivam Khajuria i found it from a public source his Instagram. I took a screenshot and edited it slightly (quality/format) before uploading. I now understand that this does not make it my own work and that I should not have uploaded it as such. I sincerely apologise for this mistake and I am fine with the file being removed. Niaki101 (talk) 15:04, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Having gone through Khajuria’s Instagram profile, I do not see any images that resemble the pose and outfit in the image you uploaded. Can you identify the source image to substantiate your explanation? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:33, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

I think the image was from Shivam Khajuria’ls Instagram story (around October 2025). As it was a story, it disappeared after 24 hours and I no longer have the source link. Niaki101 (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Regrettably, that's not terribly persuasive, particularly given the hundreds of essentially equivalent (but distinct) images on the actor's instagram page. How convenient to have chosen the only ones that disappear. My sense is that the best routes back to editing for you are to either accept a conditional ban from working on new drafts/articles about active entertainment professionals, or go the standard offer route. That having been said, you can also choose keep your current appeal open and hope that a reviewing admin is more lenient. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:45, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Ok fine..i understand my mistakes and i am willing to accept a standard offer. I will avoid editing topics related to entertainment personalities and any areas where there may be a conflict of interest. I will focus only on neutral policy-compliant edits in other areas. Niaki101 (talk) 15:49, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

@Rosguill Please unblock me. I accept my mistakes and promise not to repeat this behaviour. I will follow all Wikipedia policies Niaki101 (talk) 16:06, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Your replies here indicate that you haven’t understood a significant chunk of what I have laid out here. For one thing, the standard offer requires you to take a 6 month break from editing English Wikipedia (including this page). Moreover, I suggested that as an alternative to a conditional unblock: if you accept the topic ban as an unblock condition, I don’t think waiting a full 6 months will be necessary. I suggest that you review what I’ve written and the included links more carefully, then indicate to the next admin to review your case how you wish to proceed. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:13, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please humble request 6 month its to long time for me, i understand now. I am willing to accept a topic ban from editing or creating articles related to entertainment personalities. I sincerely apologise for my mistakes and will ensure that I follow all Wikipedia policies going forward. I kindly request that my block be reconsidered. Niaki101 (talk) 16:17, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Now i accept ban topics and otherswise am mainly interested in editing topics related to history, global economics, and geography, and I am willing to completely avoid entertainment-related articles. I accept the topic ban and will strictly follow all Wikipedia policies. I kindly request that my block be reconsidered so I can contribute in these aareas Niaki101 (talk) 17:37, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Niaki101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I sincerely apologise for my mistakes. I confirm that I have now read and understood the Terms of Use including paid editing and copyright policies. I was not aware earlier and made errors in judgment. I am not being paid for my edits and had no intention to promote. I also acknowledge that I incorrectly uploaded an image and marked it as my own work which was a mistake. Going forward i will strictly follow Wikipedia policies avoid any conflict of interest and contribute only neutral properly sourced content. I kindly request reconsideration of my block

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:07, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Niaki101 (talk) 15:25, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

@331dot Please see my unblock request. I have accepted a topic ban and request that my block be lifted. Niaki101 (talk) 09:02, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

I don't speak for 331dot, but I for one would suggest waiting for the open SPI case to be determined first. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:08, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Ok sure ✔️ Niaki101 (talk) 09:09, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Please humble requesting it's been 2 days now, please consider unblocking me. Also, is there any specific time for when the SPI will be completed? I want to continue editing, please try to understand. Niaki101 (talk) 19:10, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Please understand that everybody here is a volunteer, doing this in their own spare time - that includes the administrators who investigate SPI's. They will get around to it, but you must be patient, ok? Blue Sonnet (talk) 19:21, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Dont mind that when it comes to blocking, everyone becomes fast very actively, but when it comes to unblocking why is there so much delay? I can see all the contributions — administrators and CheckUsers are active but it feels like they are just doing minor edits and passing time. It has been quite some time yet no one has taken my block seriously. I also want to edit and this is my free time. Later I will get busy with my work and won’t be able to find time to edit. I genuinely want to contribute. If in the future I am again accused of any mistakes, you can block me indefinitely — I don’t mind. But for now, please at least unblock me. Niaki101 (talk) 19:29, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

There's an SPI that needs investigation, but that needs special tools that few administrators have access to. They also need to perform a very careful investigation and analysis of the evidence, since they don't want to get things wrong when it comes to your private personal data.

Unfortunately, this means that SPI's take longer than block appeals, which any admin can deal with whenever they like. Blue Sonnet (talk) 20:30, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Well alright, I will wait for the SPI to be completed. Could you please let me know which SPI case I am involved in? Niaki101 (talk) 20:37, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Good point, I'm trying to find it myself - if/when I do I'll link it here. Blue Sonnet (talk) 21:03, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

That would be Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Btw Santhosh. You can look for these things at WP:SPI by entering the name in the search box. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:28, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! Mobile view takes internal page search functions as an instruction to search all of Wikipedia (a known issue, apparently), so I was stuck looking through them manually...

I should have suggested it to Niaki101 though, so thanks again! Blue Sonnet (talk) 21:35, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Regarding Kalpana Inamdar and similar pages also Shivam Khajuria. my edits were only to correct titles so that they matched the content properly. I have 100+ edit maybe its coincidence i edit previous sock pages but i am not involved in creating or coordinating those articles. @Jpgordon and i see your user group you have checkuser access then do it your self naa..?You can review my edit history to verify that my actions were limited to formatting and title corrections. I have also read about the CheckUser process and understand that it can verify whether accounts are related. I am confident it will show that I am not connected to any other accounts. I understand that investigations take time, but it has been a couple of days, so I wanted to respectfully ask if there has been any progress or update on the case. Niaki101 (talk) 21:40, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

User is very aware of which SPI case as they commented twice there two days ago.--CNMall41 (talk) 22:48, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

@Jpgordon Please delete both article i really dont want but please unblock this account🥲 Niaki101 (talk) 21:44, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

NO you are wrong, i am not very aware. I thought its just routing concepts ok... dont blame without any evidence Niaki101 (talk) 05:36, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Speaking of evidence, a Checkuser has been run on someone else that I've been speaking to & the results shocked me a little: Blue Sonnet (talk) 07:03, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Ooh..I really don't know about this Niaki101 (talk) 07:04, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

You've been found socking with multiple accounts, while your appeal is pending, and that's the best you can do, "I really don't know about this" – really? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:07, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Do you understand what enmity means? Let me tell you a short story. Once, a politician wanted to win an election, but the problem was that he didn’t have enough supporters. So he deliberately had people from his own religion attacked, so that it would look like the opposition had done it. People then blamed the opposition and supported him, which helped him win. So my point is — in real life, I have quite a few enemies. I am sure someone has done this deliberately to take revenge against me. Niaki101 (talk) 07:11, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

It's been confirmed by CheckUser technical evidence. So while it could of course still be a 'joe job' number (assuming that's what you're alluding to), the odds are rather against that. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:23, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

@Blue-Sonnet It must have matched for technical reasons. We live in a hostel and use the same internet service provider. However, creating this circle deliberately is only to weaken my case. Niaki101 (talk) 07:13, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

This wasn't deliberate, I don't think anyone thought these would come up as you - I certainly didn't. There are technical reasons for CU blocks but they're much more than just a matching IP. Blue Sonnet (talk) 07:23, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

For the same reason why admitting a patient to a hospital is a much more urgent matter than discharging a patient. Blocks are done for urgent reasons: to protect the encyclopedia from damage. Unblocks are not urgent; nobody is actually being harmed by a block other than temporarily being unable to edit a volunteer website. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Could i ask please why my edits were removed from the Lou Grant Season 2 page? I am rewatching and adding notable actors. Thanks ~2026-10333-91 (talk) 18:21, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Shivam Khajuria. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because Actually moving back to draft where it was declined. Needs check for notability and NPOV given the SOCK activity and UPE.. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 18:55, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

I will leave this topic for other editors and focus only on different areas of interest. Niaki101 (talk) 19:22, 15 April 2026 (UTC)