User talk:Npac2025
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is Npac2025's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Samina Miya has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
nirmal (talk) 02:35, 1 April 2026 (UTC)- @Nirmaljoshi: You need to be more careful when accepting articles for creation. This article (which I have moved back to Draft:Samina Miya) is full of errors and has no business being in the article space. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:52, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
April 2026
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Samina Miya when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:38, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
Samina Miya moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Samina Miya. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:39, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
- Please stop simply recreating the page that is full of errors. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:50, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hello @Zackmann08, seems you are unaware that all MPs are notable by default. You should revisit GNG. Best ! nirmal (talk) 04:07, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
- User:Nirmaljoshi the fact that the page passes GNG is not the issue here. The issue is that the page was so poorly created it doesn't even pass basic requirements of a BLP. Did you even look at the page before you accepted it at AFC? Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:58, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Zackmann08, did you put effort to improve instead of wasting time on reverting and draftifying? nirmal (talk) 05:18, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
- User:Nirmaljoshi It is the responsibility of the person who accepts a draft at AFC to ensure it meets the basic requirements for an article. If you are not going to do that, stop accepting articles for creation as you clearly never even read the page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 13:44, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Zackmann08 I found this while looking through recently accepted drafts, and I am also a bit confused why you draftified it twice. You stated that it doesn't establish notability and consists of machine-generated text, neither of which are true (the original draft's formatting issues could have been introduced by an LLM but not the second draft). You also claimed on User talk:Nirmaljoshi that it is promotional, which isn't true either. Then you stated the drafts are "full of errors" and fail "basic requirements" without specifying what those errors and requirements are. When draftifying, can you state what needs to be fixed instead of selecting reasons that obviously don't apply? Helpful Raccoon (talk) 00:40, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Helpful Raccoon: if you look at that very short page and cannot see the errors present, then I cannot really help you... Hint: look at the non-existent references, which IS an indication of LLM use... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:30, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
- The first two references exist; the last link doesn't work but only because it ends with .htm instead of .html, which is likely human error. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 04:36, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Helpful Raccoon: And you think having
{{cite web |title=Samina Miya |url=display in the text of the article is a properly formatted reference? Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:39, 8 April 2026 (UTC)- That formatting error was present in the first draft but not Draft:Samina Miya2. I agree the second attempt also has some formatting problems but it is not clear what caused it to fail "basic requirements". If you were concerned about the broken reference link for example, it would have been best to explicitly point that out. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 05:04, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Helpful Raccoon: And you think having
- The first two references exist; the last link doesn't work but only because it ends with .htm instead of .html, which is likely human error. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 04:36, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Helpful Raccoon: if you look at that very short page and cannot see the errors present, then I cannot really help you... Hint: look at the non-existent references, which IS an indication of LLM use... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:30, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Zackmann08 I found this while looking through recently accepted drafts, and I am also a bit confused why you draftified it twice. You stated that it doesn't establish notability and consists of machine-generated text, neither of which are true (the original draft's formatting issues could have been introduced by an LLM but not the second draft). You also claimed on User talk:Nirmaljoshi that it is promotional, which isn't true either. Then you stated the drafts are "full of errors" and fail "basic requirements" without specifying what those errors and requirements are. When draftifying, can you state what needs to be fixed instead of selecting reasons that obviously don't apply? Helpful Raccoon (talk) 00:40, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
- User:Nirmaljoshi It is the responsibility of the person who accepts a draft at AFC to ensure it meets the basic requirements for an article. If you are not going to do that, stop accepting articles for creation as you clearly never even read the page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 13:44, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Zackmann08, did you put effort to improve instead of wasting time on reverting and draftifying? nirmal (talk) 05:18, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
- User:Nirmaljoshi the fact that the page passes GNG is not the issue here. The issue is that the page was so poorly created it doesn't even pass basic requirements of a BLP. Did you even look at the page before you accepted it at AFC? Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:58, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hello @Zackmann08, seems you are unaware that all MPs are notable by default. You should revisit GNG. Best ! nirmal (talk) 04:07, 1 April 2026 (UTC)