User talk:Obsteve

Hi Obsteve, i took yr Thatcher football stuff out the Political Legacy section as it's not really part the "political" reaction or lasting legacy. It might find a place elsewhere in Thatcher though, but I won't add it personally. The code for yr entry is here:

The Football Premiere League and Football League rejected suggestions to hold a minute's silence around the country's football grounds, amid fears that any attempt to impose it would backfire. Their decision backed by the Football Supporters' Federation and the Hillsborough Familiy Support Group. ^[1]

Hillbillyholiday ^talk 16:06, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

I added this to yr page, in case you don't see it on mine. I'm not going to be adding anything to the Thatcher article for a bit. So far I've only kept a partial eye-out for Legacy related stuff. Your bit is notable IMO and touches upon the political (like most of the reactions) but it is not part of her lasting legacy, it is a one-off reaction. You should try adding it at the appropriate section here. Don't get into an edit-war, try bringing it up on the talkpage first. Hillbillyholiday ^talk 18:33, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cullercoats Bay, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 12:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello Obsteve. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Cullercoats Bay.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cullercoats Bay}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

I wish I could help you, but I haven't been editing very much for a very long time. I'm very rusty with deterring vandals. I would say that your best bet is to contact an administrator (that's your best bet either way since ultimately an administrator is the one that has the real power to block, not just your average editor like you or I). I'm positive that if you contact any administrator, they will walk you through the steps. It's almost guaranteed! Good luck on your endeavors! Lighthead ^þ 00:08, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Director steve.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:ACT 2 CAM screen acting classes.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:06, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Whitley Bay may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• by local film company [[ACT 2 CAM]], in which Charles Elderton tries to persuade the [Spanish City]] owners to let his troupe perform there, despite the Sunday licensing laws.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:20, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:ACT 2 CAM drama classes.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:ACT 2 CAM screen acting experience.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:ACT 2 CAM screen acting experience.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 153.205.19.189 (talk) 09:12, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Director steve.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 114.158.138.214 (talk) 06:25, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:ACT 2 CAM drama classes.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 114.158.138.214 (talk) 06:28, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:ACT 2 CAM screen acting classes.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 114.158.138.214 (talk) 06:31, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Act 2 cam company image.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 114.158.138.214 (talk) 06:36, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

I reverted your change; the term is a pejorative, offensive term, which references a stereotype. The term dates to when 3rd world country was the appropriate euphemism. If you feel it is necessary to update the euphemism to modern terms, the proper term would be Least developed country. I don't recommend that change, I believe the description should reflect the stereotypes in place at the time. Regards, Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 17:17, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ACT 2 CAM Film Camp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

• File:ACT 2 CAM young people screen acting .tiff

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Obsteve. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Act 2 Cam, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. IamNotU (talk) 17:51, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Obsteve, can you explain how it is that you are the owner of the copyright on the files you've been uploading? They appear to be the property of the school. If you do in fact work for the school in any capacity, I strongly suggest you disclose that information, as is required by Wikipedia. Not doing so generally ends up looking bad for the company involved, in the public's eye, for example if an investigation at WP:COIN needs to be opened, template banners added to the top of the article, or the offending editor blocked from editing. There could be even more serious consequences for the company, see especially WP:NOHIDDENADS. On the other hand, many companies have a great relationship with Wikipedia, and participate openly in guiding the articles about them, providing accurate information, photographs, etc., in line with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Just to be clear, you're never required to reveal your name, identity, or other personal information, only whether or not you are closely connected - see the links in the section above for the requirements and procedures. Thanks... --IamNotU (talk) 21:02, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

[Note: I'm copying the following replies from my talk page to here. Obsteve, it's generally more convenient to reply to a message on the same page, rather than splitting a conversation between two different pages. You can use Template:User link or one of the other templates listed there to generate a notification to the person you're messaging.]

I took the photos bts (behind the scenes) photos myself, during shoots. The participants have full authorisation for their images to be released. Yes, you are right, the stills from the film are the property of the company. However, I would still like to put them on Wiki commons somehow, but they keep getting removed, no matter what I do. I'm obviously doing something wrong for them to keep being removed. I have permission to post them, and I have tried uploading them several times using the uploading wizard, with different boxes ticked. Still, nothing sticks. Any help would be gratefully received.

I will declare my daughter attending classes as a potential conflict of interest, as you have recommended Obsteve (talk) 17:43, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

[End of copied reply] --IamNotU (talk) 18:11, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Fyi, there are easier ways to get the photos accepted, than RHaworth's suggestion to put them on the website first. For example you can simply have the company send an official e-mail with a release saying your account is authorized to upload its files under the appropriate license. See the OTRS page on Wikimedia. --IamNotU (talk) 17:02, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:43, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Obsteve, did you get a chance to read through the links that I left above earlier? As I mentioned, you need to disclose your paid contributions, as required by the Wikipedia Terms of Use. Wikipedia takes this very seriously, as it has legal implications for the Wikimedia foundation. Users who continue to make undisclosed paid contributions will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This is explained in the Paid-contribution disclosure policy. It's a policy, and is not optional, please read it, thanks.

It says in part: "Users who are compensated for any publicity efforts related to the subject of their Wikipedia contributions are deemed to be paid editors, regardless of whether they were compensated specifically to edit Wikipedia." This applies for example to people who carry out any duties of public relations, advertising, social media promotion, etc., in the course of doing their jobs or running their business.

Apart from the requirement to disclose your employer, and being blocked if you don't, it seems there's little if any difference between the general COI editing disclosure you already made, and paid editing disclosure, as you can see in the guideline starting at WP:COIEDIT. The former is "strongly discouraged from editing affected articles directly", while the latter is "very strongly discouraged"...

Thank-you for adding the COI template above. Unfortunately, it's not the right template, and not the right place, so you can remove it. It looks like RHaworth has taken the liberty of adding a template to your user page. However, it's also not the right template for disclosing paid contributions. In order to do that, edit your user page: User:Obsteve and replace:

{{userboxCOI|Act 2 Cam}}
with:
{{paid|employer=ACT 2 CAM|article=Act 2 Cam}}

Or choose one of the other options described in the Paid-contribution disclosure policy. I've taken the liberty of adding a paid contributor template to the article's talk page already, so you don't have to do anything about that. You're free to dispute any of this, but I think I mentioned that things tend to go badly for people who fail to disclose properly. Ending up being completely blocked from editing, with all their articles deleted, is not an unlikely outcome. I wanted to give you a heads up about it, and try to spare any unnecessary embarrassment for you and the school. --IamNotU (talk) 23:19, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi IamNotU Yes, I have read, and have found it very helpful, thank you. I am genuinely not being paid for updates I have been making. I am doing them in my spare time (take a look at the times of these edits) and out of genuine desire to be informative and encyclopaedic. What have since read, and I was heartened by, was the option instead to request edits. I wish I had known about this earlier, and I think this will be the best way forward from now on, in order to remove the COI beyond all doubt. In my defence, there were factual inaccuracies on the page (hence the flurry of edits I have been making recently), which I believe it was important to rectify, in order not to give false information. However, I am in complete agreement I am not the best placed person to make these amendments, and will submit any edits from now on, rather than tinkering as I have been doing. I am in discussions with RHaworth who has been very helpful and informative about best practice, and who also amended the COI disclosure I had put on my talk page following our own discussion. Obsteve (talk) 00:29, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

I can understand that it may not be clear to you, but as the owner/manager of a small business, who regularly carries out various online promotional activities, you fall under the "Paid contributions" definition, and must follow the "Paid-contribution disclosure" policy with respect to edits concerning the school. This is true even if you are not paid specifically to edit Wikipedia. If you think I've made a mistake about this, we can open a discussion at the COI noticeboard and ask them to weigh in on it. As I said, I don't think at this point that it makes much difference as far as you're concerned. Either way, there's a chance the article will be deleted, though if it is, it still might be possible to start over following the COI rules (which might be the best idea anyway). The paid-contribution disclosure requirement in the Terms of Use is more to protect Wikipedia itself from legal trouble. --IamNotU (talk) 16:52, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi IamNotU, you are not mistaken, I have read the article and can see how I fall into that bracket, now. There is currently an info-box message to that effect on the talk page, and I will follow the disclosure format as recommended. You have been extraordinarily helpful and, though it is a bitter pill for me to swallow, and I have nothing but positive regard for your contributions and for the Wiki values. If ACT 2 CAM gets deleted, that only means that it was not wiki-worthy at this time, and that is inspiration, not demotivation. Also, it is a lesson in neutrality, which can only be a good thing. That there is genuine notability in this project I have no doubt, though I now understand I am entirely the wrong person to be curating the article. Many thanks, Obsteve (talk) 19:46, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Obsteve, you probably noticed I made some notes on the article's talk page about the sources. I took some time to go through them all, and unfortunately it's not looking so good... I think the COI thing can be dealt with, but not much can be done if there isn't enough evidence of notability, as it won't survive the AfD process. If you can find any sources that discuss the organization itself in some depth, please put them on the article's talk page, and I can put them into the article if they're helpful. You'd need probably at least one regional-distribution article. I had a look around Google myself, and couldn't find much. There are a couple of articles in The Journal about Cullercoats Fishlass , , but they don't cover the school itself in any depth. Things like the Sky News link don't count if they're based on your own press releases. You mentioned The Stage and The Guardian? The first doesn't seem to be online, and as mainly an industry publication it's not enough on its own, but if there was some in-depth coverage it would be helpful. I don't think there was ever anything in The Guardian, but rather the local The News Guardian, right? --IamNotU (talk) 23:15, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi IamNotU, I see your point and agree, better citations are needed on this article. On inspection, 2 of the references now actually point to stuff which is totally unrelated, though they didn't at the time of editing. There are articles that discuss the organisation, including regional and national distribution, and one Guardian article (not local News Guardian), and I will spend some time next week collating them, and if ACT 2 CAM doesn't pass the notability test after that, I agree it will need to be deleted.

Ok, well maybe mention it if you need a bit more time, deletion discussions are normally closed after seven days, but can be extended. One article in the Guardian discussing the organization itself in significant detail would likely be enough, but I couldn't find anything when I searched. --IamNotU (talk) 15:59, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

HiIamNotU I hsaven't found the Guardian Article yet, but there is one. Also I have located an extract from BBC Look North, 6pm 13th June 2018, talking about a high profile film we made, about a boy with autism who was never invited to parties. I haven't got an online version, but I do have a movie file.

Hi Obsteve, in order to establish that ACT 2 CAM has the level of notability required, the sources would have to meet the criteria in WP:ORGCRITE. And they have to be about ACT 2 CAM, as a company/school, not just about one or more of your films. For example, Look North talking about a film you made doesn't help, unless it goes into depth about the company, its history, accomplishments, personnel, etc. - the story has to be about the school, and there should be enough material about it to form the basis of a substantial article. Even if one of your films was considered notable (according to the criteria in WP:NFILM), that doesn't make the company notable. See WP:NRVE and WP:NOTINHERITED. Secondly, you'd have to convince an independent editor to write an article. Such a person won't likely accept borderline sources, it would have to quite clearly meet the WP:ORGCRITE criteria. Maybe sometime in the future that will happen, but it doesn't seem like it to me at the moment. Good luck... --IamNotU (talk) 09:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Please don't make promotional edits like this, where you inserted the sentence "The ACT 2 CAM Way" promotes the core values of CONFIDENCE, COMMUNITY and CREATIVITY. Their motto, DRAMA SETS YOU FREE, underpins their belief in "the power of the arts to free us from our fears and transform our lives" or They encourage and guide young people to celebrate their individuality, and to develop their own unique understanding of life.. While organization/you may say and think so (and I'm not saying the organisation is not helping), Wikipedia is not an extension of an organisations website or a place for Wikipedia:Wikipuffery. Thanks Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:05, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:ACT 2 CAM Logo and Motto.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 27 October 2018 (UTC)