User talk:P199

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my talk page!

  • Please use the Reply button to reply to a message, or add topic (+) to start a new section.
  • If I have left a message on your talk page, please DO NOT post a reply here, instead, reply there.
    • Mention me using the "Mention a user" button in the Reply box or type out {{ping|P199}}.
    • I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
  • If you prefer to manually edit the page to post:
    • Use an accurate and appropriate heading.
    • Indent your comment by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
    • Sign your post with four tildes (~~~~) at the end.


Administrators' newsletter – January 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2025).

Administrator changes

added
readded Fathoms Below
removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2026

The Signpost: 29 January 2026

Administrators' newsletter – February 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2026).

Arbitration

  • Due to the result of a recent motion, a rough consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may impose an expanded topic ban on Israel, Israelis, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Palestinians, Islam, and/or Arabs, if an editor's Arab-Israeli conflict topic ban is determined to be insufficient to prevent disruption. At least one diff per area expanded into should be cited.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 February 2026

  • Disinformation report: Epstein's obsessions
    The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
  • Crossword: Pop quiz
    Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?

Thanks for starting the River list

Thanks for starting a merge discussion at Talk:List_of_rivers_by_discharge#Merge_Rivers_of_the_world_by_volume_flow_here.

I think the editor that built the 2nd article is brand-new. They put a lot of work into the duplicate article: it is really attractive & compact; and the sources/cites are much better. I think with a bit more work, we can get a merged article that has all the data and looks a lot cleaner.

Yes, the original title should be kept; but maybe we can get to that after the content merging is completed?

If the new editor finds the merge discussion too hostile or intimidating, they may go away forever, and we'll lose all the work they did improving the citations & formatting.

I remember my first couple of years here in WP: I made tons of huge mistakes and had no clue about the guidelines. This merger process could be a good way to help the new editor learn, and also recruit a new editor to help build the encyclopedia. Noleander (talk) 13:43, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

@Noleander: Good points. Thanks for encouraging the new editor. I won't hammer down the rules so hard anymore. -- P 1 9 9   16:57, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2026).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Ks0stm

Oversight changes

removed Ks0stm

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, remedy 9.1 of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been amended to limit TenPoundHammer to one XfD nomination or PROD per 24-hour period.
  • Following a motion, the Iskandar323 further POV pushing motion has been rescinded.
  • The Arbitration Committee has passed a housekeeping motion rescinding a number of outdated remedies and enforcement provisions across multiple legacy cases. In most instances, existing sanctions remain in force and continue to be appealable through the usual processes, while some case-specific remedies were amended or clarified.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:36, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 March 2026

  • Special report: What actually happened during the Wikimedia security incident?
    A horrifying exploit took place, which could have had catastrophic and far-reaching consequences if used maliciously; instead, it seems to have happened by accident and was used for childish vandalism. How did this happen, and what did the script actually do?

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI