User talk:Pablothepenguin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cabal Declarations
General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.
Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
Sporran
I just looked up what a Sporran is. The article is not very well sourced, and I wondered if you would be interested in improving it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:37, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- I don’t think the sources are that bad Pablothepenguin (talk) 18:51, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- The quality of the sources may be fine, but I don't think there are enough of them. Sporran#Types contains almost 700 words and zero refs. Sporran#Typical types contains over 600 words and just one ref. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:55, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Topic ban relating to Scotland
I missed this whole discussion back in February, but I was under the impression that this indefinite topic ban was still in place. It's still listed at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Final_warnings / Unblock_conditions at any rate. That thread was in violation of the topic ban and you're lucky no one in the discussion was aware of it. But YOU should definitely still be aware of it. You already tried the "I forgot" excuse before, so that's not going to fly anymore. The thread is actually a great example of why you were topic banned in the first place. Don't do it again. Atlan (talk) 08:45, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 18 November 2025 (UTC)