User talk:PanoptikEU

Hello, PanoptikEU, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Sven-Erik Soosaar. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to avoid a conflict of interest

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Help is available: check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask your mentor via your user homepage, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! The Kora Person (come say hi!) 09:19, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello PanoptikEU, and thank you for your edits to Wikipedia! On reviewing the page you created for Marek Tamm, I had some concerns about whether your subject was notable enough for inclusion. It would help if you could provide non-primary references (from a national newspaper or news outlet, for example). If you are not able to provide these, the page may be nominated for deletion. All the best, ArthurTheGardener (talk) 09:48, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Hey! Thanks for the heads up and I apologize for the thin sourcing. I am rereading the notability section to make sure I am following the policies. I am updating the page now to add independent coverage (ERR/Vikerraadio, Sirp) and a couple of third party scholarly book reviews, I will keep adding more independent refs as I find them. I believe he meets notability given his elected senior role as Vice President of the Estonian Academy of Sciences and the fact that his work receives independent coverage/reviews, I hope the sources I add will clear the issue :) PanoptikEU (talk) 10:18, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, PanoptikEU,

Thank you for creating Marek Tamm.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your work on this, but please don't remove tags until notability has been established by consensus.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ArthurTheGardener}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ArthurTheGardener (talk) 14:19, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi PanoptikEU. Thank you for your work on Marek Tamm. Another editor, ArthurTheGardener, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for hanging fire on the notability issue: I've now reviewed your article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ArthurTheGardener}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ArthurTheGardener (talk) 09:54, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi PanoptikEU. Thank you for your work on Ago Luberg. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:PROF. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:39, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Arno Vihalemm, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 10:46, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

@Dan arndt: Thanks for the note and for moving the page to draftspace.

I have revised the draft to address the sourcing/verifiability concerns by adding several independent reliable sources with substantive coverage (e.g., Andres Ehin in Keel ja Kirjandus, Tiina Saluvere in Tuna, and Maia Tammjärv in Sirp), alongside institutional reference/collection records (EWOD/University of Tartu, EKABL, KIRMuS, and EKM digikogu). I also tightened the wording and removed and rewrote any statements that were not originally directly supported by citations.

I have now resubmitted the draft for review. Any further guidance is very welcome.

PanoptikEU (talk) 17:55, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi PanoptikEU. Thank you for your work on Raimo Pullat. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 10:15, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi PanoptikEU. Thank you for your work on Aija Sakova. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:PROF. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:10, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

@Mariamnei: Thank you for the review, I have now added independent reliable secondary coverage discussing Sakova’s work, it now includes a review in Keel ja Kirjandus by Hasselblatt and an ERR review of her 2020 monograph by Talviste, as well as ERR coverage of her 2016 German monograph. These sources provide significant commentary beyond just institutional listings, supporting notability under WP:GNG / WP:AUTHOR as the subject is an academic/writer, but the articles notability is now evidenced through independent reviews of her scholarly books. PanoptikEU (talk) 12:12, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! I have removed the notability template. Mariamnei (talk) 08:06, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, PanoptikEU. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Sam McCandlish, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MightyRanger (talk) 07:35, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

@MightyRanger: Hello, thank you for letting me know. I understand the COI & paid-editing rules. I am not Sam McCandlish, and I don't have any personal nor professional relationship with him, neither am I editing for pay or at anyone's request. I will make sure anything I add is supported by independent reliable sources, and I will avoid promotional language. If there is anything specific on Draft:Sam McCandlish that caused this, please point me to it and would like to address it. PanoptikEU (talk) 13:29, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much for my first ever award! I am honored. :) PanoptikEU (talk) 20:59, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

		The Estonian Award of National Merit
		For your many well-sourced, neutral articles about notable Estonian academics and professors! Zzz plant (talk) 19:43, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
		this WikiAward was given to PanoptikEU by Zzz plant (talk) on 19:43, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi PanoptikEU. Thank you for your work on Andres Uibo. Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this artist bio

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 15:48, 12 March 2026 (UTC)