User talk:PersonFromPoland

Hello, PersonFromPoland, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Wrocław did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  Moxy🍁 19:35, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

um its not some controversial info, its literally shops and companies, I live in Wrocław and all this is true, and don't delete it. please. PersonFromPoland (talk) 19:38, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

The best, the biggest, the most etc all need to be sourced. Descriptions in general need to be sourced. WP:Verifiability. Moxy🍁 19:40, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Okay I understand, sorry PersonFromPoland (talk) 19:47, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Find your sources..... and stick the url(web address) in the tool web page below to fill them out for you.... Use the bottom format at one.

• https://citer.toolforge.org/

Moxy🍁 19:56, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Honestly, all the sources are from google maps (I just went through different comments for each mall, so all the sources are google maps (+ my knowledge which is obv not a source)) PersonFromPoland (talk) 20:29, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Please stop spamming users with barnstars for little to no reason. This devalues the award and honor. There are many other ways you can share WikiLove, like thanks, goats, etc. GoldRomean (talk) 20:47, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

what PersonFromPoland (talk) 19:43, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

? GoldRomean (talk) 20:23, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

? PersonFromPoland (talk) 18:09, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, PersonFromPoland, I don't want to start an edit war, so I won't be reverting your edit again. However, I would like to discuss why you believe the image of Spamton is relevant enough to be placed on the article Marionette. I don't believe a character who happens to be a puppet should be in the gallery of the article; the article is about actual physical marionettes themselves, so in my opinion Spamton is not relevant enough to the contents of the article. This is why, per MOS:IMAGEREL, I think the Spamton image should not be in the gallery.

On top of this, per WP:GALLERY, "Gallery images must collectively add to the reader's understanding of the subject". I fail to see how the Spamton image adds anything to this article that the other images do not already. Fieldbox (talk) 00:29, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

You can revert my edit, but I can explain. The character I added is from a very popular game, and in that game, he mentions many times how he's just a puppet with "silly strings". And yes the character is not mine, it's from this game, Deltarune, but the creator doesn't mind if under his work you put the original creator (him). I also thought it was a bit humorous, since that character in the game is very tragic actually. PersonFromPoland (talk) 07:07, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Deltarune's popularity or the humour of the situation are irrelevant. We are an encyclopaedia; not the place for humour.

I am familiar with Deltarune myself, however I don't think this article needs to include every character who happens to be a marionette in its gallery. Why Spamton and not, e.g. the Marionette from FNAF? Deltarune isn't any more special than any other property with a marionette in it.

On top of that, do you have a source for Toby giving permission to include his intellectual property on Wikipedia with credit? Even with that permission though, Wikimedia Commons is not the place for those files; Commons is for work in the public domain, and since it is not your work you do not have the rights to release it into the public domain. Fieldbox (talk) 09:54, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

I understand, I won't be bothering with it again PersonFromPoland (talk) 10:35, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

but isn't it sometimes good to... chill down your spine? PersonFromPoland (talk) 10:36, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

? Fieldbox (talk) 10:39, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

nothing, thanks for your messages on my talk page ;) PersonFromPoland (talk) 10:43, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

The reason I removed the marital status of Asgore and Toriel is because nothing in the plot summary actually deals with their divorce after that. Perhaps once chapter 5 comes out it can be mentioned, but Wikipedia guidelines advise against having a plot summary of more than 700 words. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 21:59, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Edits such as [Congregation: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia are inappropriate according to Wikipedia guidelines for disambiguation pages. External links are not permitted on disambiguation pages. There must be an existing Wikipedia article that supports any claimed usage. Continuing to revert edits as you have been doing may result in being blocked from further editing. older ≠ wiser 12:17, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

buddy, you stop reverting, I won't. PersonFromPoland (talk) 13:22, 20 October 2025 (UTC)