User talk:Personisinsterest

Hello Personisinsterest. I'm Quaerens-veritatem. Thank you very much for your contributions to Wikipedia, but please provide a summary of every edit you make. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Summaries help other editors by (a) providing a reason for the edit, (b) saving the time to open up the edit to find out what it's all about, and (c) providing information about the edit on diff pages and lists of changes (such as page histories and watchlists). For where to add them, see How to add an edit summary, and for help in adding them, see Help:Edit summary generally, and sections such as WP:FIES, WP:EDITSUMCITE, and WP:SUMMARYNO.

According to Wikipedia's consensus policy, all edits should be explained —either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page. Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit and a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. As a reminder: When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

If the edit is minor, the "This is a minor edit" box can be checked. See, Help:Minor_edit. A good rule of thumb is that only edits consisting solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of the content may be flagged as minor edits.
Many who are ignorant of the Wikipedia policy on edit summaries fail to add them. Some ignore this basic brief task; however, failure seems inconsiderate specially since summaries are so easy to add. According to Wikipedia's consensus policy, all edits should be explained —either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page. Kind regards, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 00:38, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

https://archive.ph/m9bBi NYT: ‘Revenge Is Not a Policy’: Israelis Voice Dissent Against the War in Gaza After a long silence, prominent Israelis and activists are increasingly raising alarms about potential war crimes being carried out by the government.

I'm not sure where it would the best and am not really active in this topic area.

Despite the desperate humanitarian crisis, a survey conducted in May by the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University found that 64.5 percent of the Israeli public was not at all, or not very, concerned about the humanitarian situation in Gaza. About three-quarters of Israeli Jews thought that Israel’s military planning should not take into account the suffering of the Palestinian civilian population in Gaza, or should do so only minimally, according to another recent survey by the Israel Democracy Institute, a nonpartisan research group in Jerusalem.

Two month old polls: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-06-10/ty-article/.premium/64-of-israelis-see-no-need-for-more-reporting-on-gazans-sufferings/00000197-59e8-deed-a9bf-5def9d770000

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-05-28/ty-article-magazine/.premium/yes-to-transfer-82-of-jewish-israelis-back-expelling-gazans/00000197-12a4-df22-a9d7-9ef6af930000Thank you. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/majority-israelis-support-expulsion-palestinians-gaza-poll

Theofunny (talk) 15:04, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for these polls. I will add them, probably into the Gaza genocide article. Personisinsterest (talk) 15:19, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

A meta analysis by Haaretz

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-06-03/ty-article/.premium/a-grim-poll-shows-most-jewish-israelis-support-expelling-gazans-its-brutal-and-true/00000197-3640-d9f1-abb7-7e742b300000 Theofunny (talk) 15:28, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Wouldn't it also be suited to the Famine or Humanitarian crisis article? Theofunny (talk) 15:30, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

The MEE report on the Gaza expulsion poll was already in the article, but I added the poll where Israelis say they see no more need for reporting into the Gaza humanitarian crisis and Gaza genocide articles. Personisinsterest (talk) 15:31, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-855689 This? Theofunny (talk) 15:32, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

I haven't seen this poll. I'll add it into the Gaza humanitarian crisis article. Personisinsterest (talk) 15:33, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

https://www.timesofisrael.com/plurality-of-jewish-israelis-want-to-expel-arabs-study-shows/

I don't know if it would be OR but this would be a good 2016 poll to compare the changes in attitude by 2025. Theofunny (talk) 15:45, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Just out!

https://www.jns.org/over-half-of-israelis-want-gaza-settlement/

https://www.timesofisrael.com/times-of-israel-poll-majority-of-israelis-oppose-annexation-of-gaza-territory/

https://www.israelhayom.com/2025/07/31/52-of-israelis-want-gaza-settlements-back/

Thank you. I'll not be bothering you now. Theofunny (talk) 16:38, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

I put the Israel Hayom poll into Proposed Israeli resettlement of the Gaza Strip. Personisinsterest (talk) 17:32, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your response.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/israels-jews-think-idf-tries-not-to-hurt-civilians-in-gaza-arabs-disagree-poll/

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-08-05/ty-article/.premium/large-majority-of-israeli-jews-untroubled-by-reports-of-famine-in-gaza-poll-finds/00000198-7ab3-d0ce-a5de-fbb374f30000

https://en.idi.org.il/media/28796/israeli-voice-index-july-2025-eng-data.pdf

Coverage of a poll out yesterday by the Israel Democracy Institute. Theofunny (talk) 13:05, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Mainstream media largely sidelined starvation story, until it couldn't | Responsible Statecraft

Would this relevant in any article here if I added it? @Personisinsterest Theofunny (talk) 09:24, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

And that a April 2024 Pew poll showed that only 4 percent of Jewish Israelis believe that Netanyahu had “gone too far” in Gaza, and 34 percent of Israelis (including Arab Israelis) saying he had “not gone far enough.”

Israel-Hamas war: Israelis’ views of the conflict | Pew Research Center Theofunny (talk) 09:26, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

It is not a terrible map. The American expansions are in red. Someone told me to add his preferred allies in green and preferred enemies in blue. Reed102 (talk) 19:13, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi: Thank you for starting Draft:New York City Democratic Socialists of America. You might benefit from some of the sources on Draft:History of the Democratic Socialists of America (and please feel free to edit that). SocDoneLeft (talk) 19:54, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't see this, thank you. I skimmed the draft and I hope you succeed with it, it seems really in depth. Personisinsterest (talk) 22:40, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Personisinsterest. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moderate-Progressive divide, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Personisinsterest. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Moderate-Progressive divide".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:32, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Incredible research and well-written narrative. Take this barnstar:

		The Workers' Barnstar
		This user has shown great editing skills in improving articles related to Communism or Socialism.
		this WikiAward was given to Personisinsterest by SilverStar54 (talk) on 06:24, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Glad that the article is getting attention! Personisinsterest (talk) 23:54, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Personisinsterest. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Democratic Tea Party, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

can you fix the polling in the democratic primary section since hypotheticals are now real and real hypothetical. Also in the hypothetical all matchups from the source are listed except the Crockett vs Talarico which is now real. Thank you for your work. ~2025-39468-34 (talk) 19:26, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Personisinsterest. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Reject AIPAC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:15, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New York City Democratic Socialists of America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Walden.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Can you please explain this edit? Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 04:45, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

To keep things in 1 place, please respond over at Talk:2025_Capital_Jewish_Museum_shooting#NPOV. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 05:36, 2 February 2026 (UTC)