User talk:Pine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome. Newcomers: for help, click here to go to the Teahouse.
If you don't need help and want to talk to me, or if you have a question about my activities,
then please use the box below. It will take you to a page where you can leave me a message.




Pine twigs with cones and green needles
Pine twigs with cones and green needles

Motivations for editing Wikipedia

Hi Pine, you had asked about Motivations for editing Wikipedia. I have collected graphs about that at de:user:Atlasowa/editor motivation, because it's an important question and almost everyone thinks about this at some time. Here are some answers:

Q5a. Percent who started contributing to Wikipedia due to the following reasons. (n=4,930) meta:Editor_Survey_2011/Editing_Activities.
"Reasons for continuing to contribute", WP Editor Survey April 2011
"The motivations of highly active Wikipedians", Wikimania 2012 talk
Q7c. Percent who believe they might become less active due to the listed reasons (n=4,930) meta:Editor_Survey_2011/Editing_Activities.
(Q25. Below is a list of levels of engagement editors have with Wikipedia. Please select ALL that apply; (base = 5805) "Levels of engagement for Wikipedia editors", (WMF Blog: Highlights from the December 2011 Wikipedia Editors Survey, May 25, 2012)
"What might make you contribute more?" Arabic Wikipedia Reader Survey 2012
"What stopped you from editing Wikipedia?" Philippines Wikipedia Reader Survey January 2012 (see also )
QD3b. What prompted you to set up a user account? n=6378. (RETROACTIVE justification!) (WMF Blog: Highlights from the December 2011 Wikipedia Editors Survey, May 10, 2012)
"Why create an account on Wikipedia?" (IMMEDIATE survey on the page that new users "land" after they have created their new accounts.) Results of the account creation survey, January/February 2011. This data has been gathered as part of the Account Creation Improvement Project
60% of editors whose edits had been reverted without any explanation said that this made them less likely to edit, while only 9% of editors whose edits had been reverted with explanation felt less inclined to edit. (Video by Barry Newstead (WMF) watch )
41% is the mean number of test editors who contributed after being reverted and warned. 9% is the mean percent of test editors who contributed after being reverted with no message" (Wikimania 2012 talk "Welcome to Wikipedia, now please go away: improving how we communicate with new editors". Steven Walling and Maryana Pinchuk, commons:File:Template_A-B_testing_presentation_deck.pdf)
B3. Have you EVER edited Wikipedia (for instance, fixed a mistake or changed spelling)? (Base: 4000) Results of Readers Survey 2011 (Only 6% of Wikipedia readers overall indicate that they have ever edited Wikipedia content. In the US: 31%; Germany: 12%; UK: 9% ).
B5. Why don't you edit Wikipedia? (Base: 3461) Readers Survey 2011: Reasons for not editing
Global South User Survey 2014: WHAT FIRST MOTIVATED YOU TO EDIT WIKIPEDIA? page 235 and detailed on following pages
Global South User Survey 2014: WHAT FIRST MOTIVATED YOU TO EDIT WIKIPEDIA? per country
Global South User Survey 2014: WHAT THINGS MIGHT HELP YOU CONTRIBUTE MORE? page 214 and detailed on following pages

HTH, best --Atlasowa (talk) 09:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Missing

Hi. You are now listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:24, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Pine is on long wiki vacation. They announced their break before they left at Wikimedia affiliate meetings, and are following other interests. Bluerasberry (talk) 21:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Template:BOE logo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:53, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Now hear this (nautical command)

Notice

The article Now hear this (nautical command) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This phrase does not appear to be notable; no reliable sources describing the phrase could be found except the single source already cited. Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.EducatedRedneck (talk) 00:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Pine!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 06:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Welcome back!!

So good to see you—I don't think our peak times ever crossed, but I really appreciated the On The Bright Side columns in old Signpost editions. I imagine Clovermoss will be happy to see you are editing again :) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:58, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Hello HouseBlaster, thank you. I'm grateful that you remember that series. Clovermoss and I are in contact. You might like to preview User talk:Clovermoss#Canadian Rangers participate in Operation Enduring Encyclopedia, which I'm planning to include in the April issue of The Signpost. How are things on ENWP? Is everything going smoothly? ↠Pine () 00:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

    Things are going well on enwiki, though the backlogs are as backlogged as ever...

    Glad to hear you are in touch with Clover, and I look forward to seeing that column in the April edition :) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 07:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
@HouseBlaster: thanks for the comment and for introducing yourself.
If you have some suggestions about those which WMF could address, perhaps you'd like to comment on the meta:Wikimedia Foundation Annual Plan/2026-2027/Collaboration page.
May I ask if, from your perspective, anything has gotten better socially or technically in the past few years? ↠Pine () 02:44, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Great question. I'm not feeling amazing so I am limiting myself to Wikipedia matters which are relatively easy. I'll try to take a peak when I am feeling better (ideally by the weekend). Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:55, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
@HouseBlaster: that sounds good. In case you're interested in a realtime audio/video discussion about the annual plan, I'm planning to have such a discussion in an April session of the meta:Wikimedia Café. Also see meta:Wikimedia Foundation Annual Plan/2026-2027/Collaboration#Co-created Community spaces. ↠Pine () 02:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Here we go. Socially, I think the biggest change is the enwiki community is better at blocking the WP:UNBLOCKABLES, and that is a long time coming. I couldn't tell you why this is, but it seems to be a big culture shift. Technically, multiblocks (the ability to layer blocks, such as an indefinite partial block plus a three day site block) and temporary accounts are two great initiatives from the WMF. I am also super appreciative of the work they did on Special:SuggestedInvestigations, which catches tons of ban actors.

Regarding the WMF, I think we are in a better place because they are better at actually listening to the concerns of the unpaid volunteers. There's still more to do, but this is a great improvement from where we were. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 14:55, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
@HouseBlaster: thanks for the comments. I'm glad that things are improving. I too believe that WMF has gotten better at listening in the past few years, during Maryana's tenure as WMF CEO, and that this has reduced the frequency of clashes between WMF and non-WMF participants, although the time-intensive meta:Movement Charter process' outcome was disappointing. We'll see how things go with Maryana's successor Bernadette; I'm hopeful that Bernadette's professional background in international diplomacy will be an asset. Thanks again for the comments. ↠Pine () 15:14, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you

The Signpost Barnstar
Hello again, friend! Here's a small token of gratitude for contributing in the Newsroom, in a column, or both! Vol. 22 issue 4 turned out pretty great thanks to a team that was fortunate to include you. ☆ Bri (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Bri. The Signpost is a lot more work behind the scenes than may be commonly known. I'm glad that you keep the ball rolling. ↠Pine () 02:46, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI