User talk:Pipe058

Hi Pipe058! I noticed your contributions to Wanda Maximoff (Marvel Cinematic Universe) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikipedialuva (talk) 02:33, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Burgan Bank, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

You beat me to reverting that vandalism at Ryan Day (American football), thank you for watching recent changes & taking care of vandalism! Happy holidays! Schrödinger's jellyfish (talk) 04:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! pipe058 04:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

where's my coffee? ~2026-17361-67 (talk) 02:36, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, the edits made were valid.

Precious Achiuwa’s hometown is The Bronx, New York as listed on recruiting websites. It’s where he lived from 8th grade on and as another previous source states he considers himself a New Yorker. Port Harcourt, Nigeria is his birth place.

Also, his high school Our Savior Lutheran is located in Centereach not the Bronx. It is stated later in the article his school was in Centereach and that should be consistent. 65.254.23.2 (talk) 02:11, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, while the information you have added may be correct you must make sure to provide a reliable citation. Thanks! pipe058 02:16, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

that user should be blocked, but one warning is probably sufficient :-) thanks Andre🚐 02:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

yeah, i just realized it was the same user :p pipe058 02:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

No worries, good work anyway! Thank you! Best wishes, and see ya around. Andre🚐 02:27, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Pipe058. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Run 3, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

God is Love Pentecostal Church (Diff ~1248864887)
The revert was in good faith, but the IP removed the content which was uncited and comes under WP:OR. Hence, when you are restoring, you added an uncited OR content. Thanks for the reverts and your patrolling, but please be mindful of these reverts. I have cleaned up the article for now. You may go through it and clean it further. Thanks and happy editing :) — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:52, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

I eliminated "=== Western theological ===" because its language was suggestive that the perspective it represented was correct. S1r Gawa1n 2004 (talk) 20:45, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for you work removing npov content but try to include a reason. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 20:49, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

No problem! S1r Gawa1n 2004 (talk) 21:07, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

This is new page with All LLM text being removed. Agnirmurdhadhiva (talk) 03:56, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Good job on your work removing this content, but you still cannot remove this tag until it has been approved. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 03:56, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Pls check in LLM checker and remove the tag as it took lot of effort from my end in recreating and adding correct sources. Agnirmurdhadhiva (talk) 03:57, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Whether you have removed or fixed the content, the Speedy deletion notice must stay up until it has been manually approved. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 04:01, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes correct but pls check in LLM checker Agnirmurdhadhiva (talk) 06:08, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Once again, it does not matter if the content has been fixed or not, do not remove the notice until your appeal has been approved. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 06:10, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I am not removing the notice. I am asking u to check in AI checker for LLM text if any after I updated. Just tagging the article as speedy deletion will not help, you need to see if after updating whether the issue is fixed or not assuming good faith. Agnirmurdhadhiva (talk) 06:13, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I've ran your text through an AI checker and much of the content on your page seems to be written using an LLM. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 06:24, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I rewrote the entire article in the past 1 hr each and every line. Again i will rewrite manually.Agnirmurdhadhiva (talk) 06:28, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Would you consider pulling back the edit warring notice you just left at User talk:~2026-16450-95? It's possible there was a misunderstanding about what they were trying to do. Joyous! Noise! 04:27, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank for letting me know. I've removed it. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 04:30, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Look at the edit history carefully: I did not violate the three revert rule since I've modified the wording each time for a better translation, and you were the one who reverted it thrice without explanations. ~2026-16450-95 (talk) 04:30, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I don’t understand why you just removed my contribution information for the Wikipedia page of the film in the summary section of Into the Spider-Verse. I felt that was unfair and frankly a bit rude to just erase my information like that, when I specifically put my reasonings and even said I was going to add a citation which I was about to until I saw that you removed my information which I’m unhappy about. Rj 8899 (talk) 06:11, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Using words like "widespread acclaim" and "innovative" fall under the category of words to avoid, in MOS:WTW, and generally don't hold a neutral point of view, as per WP:NPOV.

As per your claim that it was widely recognized as one of the greatest films of all time, this should be based on comments from multiple sources for which you can cite them. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 06:18, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I get where you’re coming from, but I have to beg to differ on that, because those are neutral, because they are actual facts to what the film received and the innovative part is especially a neutral thing too because it’s referring to the animation industry and there’s even information already said in the page that backs up that information saying words similar to innovative and widespread acclaim regarding the film and its success in the animation industry. Rj 8899 (talk) 06:23, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I see what you mean now by innovative, so as for now I will attach a citations needed tag until you can provide multiple sources to back up this claim.

Keep in mind that all information must have its own citations and cannot rely on information already in Wikipedia articles. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 06:31, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I recently noticed you undid my edits on Audacity and Ray Comfort. Could you explain why you did that, and the reasoning behind that? The Conservative Journalist (talk) 20:38, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I would tell you about NPOV violations in your content, but after reading your work, and seeing "Here is an expanded Wikipedia-style Early life section for Ray Comfort:" in your content, I've ran your work through an LLM detector and see most of your work is partially or completely written by an AI model. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 20:46, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

That was written by me, not AI. And AI detectors are not accurate. Now, you better make sure you are doing the right thing. The Conservative Journalist (talk) 21:23, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I'd like to believe you wrote it, but when multiple of your large edits trip multiple different detectors, it becomes hard to believe you wrote it.

Either way, your edits, such as to Audacity (audio editor) and Ray Comfort contain content that doesn't align with the neutral point of view Wikipedia articles should have. Consider reading WP:NPOV, MOS:WTW, WP:CITE, WP:V and WP:PROMO in order to ensure the neutrality and verifiability of your content. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 21:31, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I agree 100% with pipe058. It's patently obvious that these were LLM-written, without needing to consult an LLM detector. And that's before the fact that you left in a message from the LLM in one of your edits. If you stop using LLMs going forward, there probably won't be any issues. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 07:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

it was just released today as Melinda "Pip" Beardsley because she was identified by moxxy forensics I only added the name because Wikipedia is slow on adding identities of john/jane does even when mentioned by reliable sources if you won't add the name could you atleast delete the page Spongebobfan93 (talk) 18:04, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

@Spongebobfan93 I have already added the content back into the page with the proper citations.

Wikipedia isn't "slow" for requiring editors to take an extra few minutes finding sources for their claims. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 18:11, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I received your message regarding the edit I made on the Regulation. Thank you for your message. You obviously made a mistake. There was a missing definite article in the phrase "in economy." It makes no sense in standard English. I only added "the" to make it grammatically accurate. How is that not constructive?

If the phrase had been "in economics,"it would have been correct. But "in economy" is grammatically incorrect. I mean,isn't this obvious? Kasriski (talk) 07:32, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

@Kasriski Thanks for letting me know. While "in economy" isn't right, "the economy" also isn't right as it would refer to a specific economy, not the study/application of it. I have replaced it with in economics, per your suggestion. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 07:35, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello Pipe058! I am trying to bring it to your attention that there has been constant vandalism on the 2026 New York City bombing attempt page, with the newest vandal here removing the name of the suspects.

They're also trying to remove mentions of the new mayor Zohran Mamdani's condemnation of the peaceful anti-Islamist protest (which was the intended target of the bombing), calling it "a display of bigotry" and Mamdani emphasizing on the Islamophobia that him and over a million muslims living in New York City face which "isn't new to him", all of which is clearly sourced in the article.

I have reverted their attempts of vandalism here , but they are bound to attack the article again. Could you please intervene and lock the article? NYC Katua (talk) 04:01, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

what was deleted from the zun page I'm curious ~2026-17430-26 (talk) 16:33, 20 March 2026 (UTC)