User talk:Pkeets

Hi, Pkeets, as always I need your help with the promotional video part of the song "This Is Love (George Harrison song)", here's the Vid! ^[2]. Hey, This reminds me of the good old days (Me mucking up, and you saving me with your legendary typing skills :), I think that you and me as gun slinging partners on Wikipedia are like those of the partnership of Lennon - McCartney, I'm rubbish without ya (I'm "McCartney"), but don't worry I'll make sure nobody shoots you this time, unless you want me too. And as always I bid you my best wishes and my sincerest kind regards, Ha ho. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:02, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Yikes. Who's shooting? Pkeets (talk) 03:24, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Harry Callahan, so watch your back. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:33, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Pkeets, as you have already noticed, I have expanded the article about Mademoiselle Beaumesnil that you had created. I thank you again for copyediting my poor English and I would suggest that the title of the article should be modified too. Sources are at variance with one another about the musician's name: The New Grove Dictionary of Opera reports "Henriette Adélaïde Villard de Beaumesnil"; Campardon and Pitou state "Henriette-Adélaïde de Villars" (called Beaumesnil). Considering that Campardon reproduces here both the pension patent (brevet de pension) and the certificate of baptism of the musician, where "Henriette-Adélaïde de Villars", as the true name, and "Beaumesnil" as a stage name, are stated, I think that the article should be renamed "Mademoiselle Beaumesnil" and "Henriette-Adélaïde de Villars" should be given as a redirect; or, at least, the article should be renamed "Henriette-Adélaïde de Villars". In both cases a reference to the question Villars/Villard should be made in footnote. Since I don't feel up to making the necessary changes myself in the English Wikipedia, I hope that you will deal with the matter as you think best. Cheers. --Jeanambr (talk) 16:24, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for stopping by to handle the edit request. The statement and Voo source on Adams' ancestry that was removed from the article was fine. You can find it in the history. It was properly sourced and there are also additional sources to support the statement. Please add the information back. In addition, please add the Politics of Desire source as additional support for the statement on her ancestry as African American. I believe it's already used in the article, so it would be helpful if you named it. See here: Racialized Politics of Desire in Personal Ads, retrieved 4 June 2014 According to an editor in the discussion, the duplicate birth date and place info was fairly standard, so please add that back, too. I'd also be in favor of adding the information presented by another editor on her ownership of two companies. Do you want a paragraph written up on that? Pkeets (talk) 15:16, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marion Dix Sullivan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=84199194|title=Marion Dix Sullivan}accessdate=27 June 2014}}</ref> Little is known about her background,<ref>{{cite book |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:53, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

I think your concerns are addressed. I didn't realise at first that you hadn't read the article before asking for the inclusion of what was already there, but errare humanum est. Best wishes, Tim riley talk 20:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Hey, Pkeets could you please help me with editing the Glenn Frey, page it's a right mess. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:05, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Great work!, thanks. Best wishes and kind regards Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:11, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

P.S, I've done over 140 edits to the page Bête Noire, could you please check my edits this page, to make sure there're all right (not half left). Best wishes and kind regards as always Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Pkeets do you think that "Bête Noire (album)" would be a good article?. Best wishes and kind regards Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:22, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

I don't know much about the criteria for good articles. I start a lot of new articles, but I don't spend that much time trying to make them into "good articles." Is there a description of what's required for album articles? The other option would be to recommend it and see what other editors think about it. 166.147.117.188 (talk) 03:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Dear Pkeets, I'm formerly messaging you on behalf of the United States of America, Joe Vitale 5 needs you to help him with the page "Nik Kershaw", And if your work is good enough you will be promoted to vice-president. As our great president Richard Nixon always says "Remember, always give your best."^[1]

Regards,
Joe Vitale 5
PA to Richard Nixon, the 37th President of the United States.Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:40, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Just to let you know, just to be kind I've added at least 10 citations to the page "Roger Daltrey". Maybe you'd like to see if they're good enough. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:14, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Could you please write about "Wouldn't It Be Good"'s music video please, I don't know where to start (Here's a link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qH4CT4f7fk). thanking you in advance. Best wishes and kind regards Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:00, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Pkeets could you please help me with the page "Human Racing". Thanking you in advance. All the best wishes and kind regards. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Do I deserve a Minor Barnstar yet?. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:41, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

That's a bit more than a minor barnstar, lol. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:52, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Have you bought Roger Daltrey's new album, Going Back Home. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:30, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

No. I've been busy with my own stuff just lately and haven't been listening to music much. I did hear one of the tracks. Sounds good. Pkeets (talk) 14:42, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

As a fellow Who fan I warn you, the album is a pile of ca-ca poo. Daltrey's vocals are hidden in the mix and I don't even think you'd wanna hear his terrible blues growl, it makes him sound like he's in his 90's. One song "Turned 21", vocally is the the best track (It sounds like The Who's "One Life's Enough"), but the lyrics as for the whole album, are terrible and are not worthy of a Rock God. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the info. I'm glad it did well for them, regardless. What I've heard of it is the live shows on Youtube. Pkeets (talk) 17:06, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

To be honest, it's worse than Rocks in the Head. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:18, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi, could you please help me with the page, "Allan Schwartzberg". He's an amazing drummer who worked with Roger on his epic solo album, "Parting Should Be Painless". Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 08:46, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International Rock Awards, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Palmer and BFI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

The page "Parting Should Be Painless", is in a right mess, I don't know what to do with it. Could you please help me, many thanks. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:09, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Yoshukai Yudansha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Yoshukai Yudansha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yunshui ^雲_水 13:08, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi, as always I need your much appreciated help, with the new Who song article "Be Lucky". And don't forget to Be Lucky. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:29, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Okay, I had a look. Pkeets (talk) 15:45, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Pkeets I found this these facts on the page (http://www.thewho.info/propk45.htm) about the album Parting Should Be Painless, could you add them I don't know what to do with them. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 08:42, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, we are once again having problems with this page. Charlie Siem's personal manager, Mvedel , continues to add concert dates and irrelevant (and biased) information to the article. I already explained him why the info isn't relevant, and that no other violinist on Wikipedia has that kind of concert schedule on their page or promotional material, but he just undoes the edit and puts it all back. After so many edits and him not cooperating, I'd like to request for the page to be temporary locked or maybe issue him a temporary block? Warnings have been left on his Talk page but he doesn't reply to anything there and just pumps stuff into the article. What can we actually do? John40332 (talk) 10:28, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

I'm not an administrator, so I can't do it, but the usual solution is to lock the article except for autoconfimed users. If you block him, he will likely just establish a different account. Another solution is to just let him trash the article up. It doesn't reflect well on Charlie to have an article that looks so messy and unencyclopedic. Pkeets (talk) 14:52, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I've done loads of edits to the article, Joe Walsh. Could you please check them to see that they are alright. Many thanks Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 09:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Could you please check the article, Joe Walsh again. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 10:25, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Pkeets, could you please write about the music video for the Madness song "Uncle Sam", as you did so greatly to for the article Wouldn't It Be Good (see I remember your much appreciated work). Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Also I've created the article, "Henry Small (singer)" and I think it needs your magic touch. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 10:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi Pkeets could you please help me with the articles Beat Street (album), Small Change (Prism album), and Richie Zito.

Hi there.

I removed that information because I have read other sources that strongly imply that that source is incorrect - it wasn't Anna Johansson who was forced into early retirement due to burn injuries, it was Maria Anderson. (DarkDancer06 (talk) 23:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC))

No problem, always happy to help. :) (DarkDancer06 (talk) 01:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC))

Hey Pkeets, I was wondering if you'd be able to help me promote "Alexander O'Neal" to at least GA, I've created like four or five articles for his albums some minor work on his actual page etc. and I was wondering if you'd like to help. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Judy Clemens requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JBH (talk) 01:05, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Well it's been sometime before I've asked you for something but could you please write about the music video for the Sting song, "We'll Be Together", it makes no sense to me. Many thanks Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 09:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Done. Pkeets (talk) 16:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

And could you please also write about the music video for Thompson Twins single Doctor! Doctor!.

All the Best
For Being the Best!
'Stay Up' & don't forget to...
Keep Rocking!
Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 08:09, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I need your help yet again, but this time I need your help with the biography of Tom Bailey.

I don't usually ask you to help with football biographies but could you please help me with the article, David Lucas. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:20, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Joe. I went through it and tidied up a few sentences, but I'm wondering about the amount of detail in the beginning summary. I'm thinking it pretty much repeats what's below and should be cut down. What do you think? Pkeets (talk) 14:27, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

I hate to feel that I'm asking for too much, while giving so little (though I am). However, could you please give your undivided attention to the article, The Style Council. All the best, for being the best Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 18:25, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

A lot more than a little help with the article Stockport County would sure be appreciated partner. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 18:09, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Hey Pkeets! do you follow soccer/football? If so who do ya support? Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

I don't. My mom is a big sports fan, though. Pkeets (talk) 01:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Well, a lot more than a little help with the article Stockport County would sure be appreciated partner. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:31, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm on vacation right now, but if I don't get to it in a couple of weeks, please remind me. Pkeets (talk) 16:57, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

If you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the articles Every Sperm Is Sacred and Galaxy Song? Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:55, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Me again! (sigh), if you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the articles Mark Mothersbaugh and Devo. Thanks! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 10:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

I've ran out of conversation openers, so could you please help me with the article Josh Mancell, thanks. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:35, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

I asked you to help with this article (Josh Mancell), because I was talking to him not long ago and he seems like a real nice dude, he even said he'll post out his autograph out to me at the end of this week too! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

I've tidied up a little. Still haven't finished Devo, though. Pkeets (talk) 15:54, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

If you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the article Mim Grey. Thanks! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Again, if you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the article John Perry. And remember that I always highly appreciate your edits :) Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Again, if you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the article Andy Pratt. Blessings always :) Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:46, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Me again, again, again, if you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the article Mike Kellie. I trust you'll drum up something good :) Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 09:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Me again, again, again, again, again, if you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the article Rikk Agnew. Once again thanking you in advance Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:05, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Me again, again, again, again, again, again. again, if you've still got any spare time, could you please help me with the article Henry Small. Can I thank you enough? Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 10:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Me again, again, again, again, again, again. again, again, again, if you've got any spare time left at all, could you please help me with the article Ruby Turner. As always I'ma most a grateful Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Me again, again, again, again, again, again. again, again, again, again, again, if you've got any spare time left at all, could you please help me with the article Dan Woodgate. Is this annoying yet? Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Me again, again, again, again, again, again. again, again, again, again, again, again, again, if you've still got any spare time left at all, could you please help me with the article Chas Smash. Still annoying? Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Me again, again, again, again, again, again. again, again, again, again, again, again, again, again, again, again, again, please help with the article Jayne County. It's all I can ask.... Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:56, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Please help me!!!! with the articles Peter Perrett and The Only Ones; you shall be knighted! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Please help me!!!! with the articles Casey Royer and D.I.; sadly, it turns out that I can't knight you. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 19:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Ello a ickle elp wit da art-e-culs Marilyn Martin and This Is Serious, wood be mucha appreciated. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm a guy who needs help with the article Guy Pratt. Many thanks as usual Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 09:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Help with Pina Kollars, please Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:57, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

S'more help, but with Steve Nieve. Many thanks Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:01, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

An ickel elp vit Suggs und Madness vlease. Vanking you Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Out of town for a few days. Back soon. Pkeets (talk) 03:33, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Well when you get back I'll also need help with my new article Brigitte Zarie, thank you Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 07:03, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Greetings from the Dutch Wikipedia. I saw that you made this article in the past. You noted that her debut was in 1898, but that's not true. In Aftenposten of march 1890 there is an ad about a concert she gave in Christiania. The link: Aftenposten. The ad is in the middle of page 3. I will give a sign to the Norwegian Wiki also.Ceescamel (talk) 13:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I made the change. Pkeets (talk) 14:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

	The Surreal Barnstar
	All your work on Mim Grey; is breathtaking thank you so much!  :) Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:02, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Pkeets (talk) 14:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Johnny Weir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sundance Channel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

I removed the American karateka category for her because there's no evidence she meets the definition of a martial artist as described at . This definition was based on the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Martial arts/archive 20#Martial artist category. If you have sources that show she meets the definition please feel free to add them to the article and add the karateka category back. Papaursa (talk) 03:10, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

I added a reference in Background to verify involvement in Yoshukai karate. This is from 1991 and doesn't describe her current rank, but other sources around the Internet suggest she is 6th dan. The article isn't based on her notability as a martial artist. Her rank in Yoshukai is a side note that adds further to her general notability, so doesn't apply as it would if martial arts were her only reason for notability. Pkeets (talk) 03:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

As evidenced by the discussion, merely doing karate does not meet the conditions. I should also mention that it's a long standing policy of the martial arts project that rank does not show notability. That's because there are no standards--many so called 10th dans have had their articles deleted. I'm not saying Lela Buis is not notable, nor do I have a problem with mentioning that she practices karate, I'm just saying she doesn't appear to meet the consensus WP definition of a martial artist. The aforementioned discussion mentions the parallels with acting and playing basketball. When people look up basketball players they don't want to see guys who play in a league at the local Y and when they look up actors they're not looking for people who do community theater. So it's reasonable to think when they look up martial artists they're looking to find people significant in that field. Papaursa (talk) 03:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

The martial arts group needs to find some designation for people who practice "do" (the way). You're referring to "professional" martial artists in the modern sense in your definition, which is not the traditional designation. Notice mention in your discussion that many of the old masters wouldn't have met your requirements. Plus many owners of mixed martial arts schools would, without any real respectability in the traditional arts.Pkeets (talk) 04:13, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Actually, that's not true. For example, Gichin Funakoshi would meet WP:MANOTE even though his profession was teaching school. MANOTE is met by founding a significant style, authoring significant books, or being the subject of a documentary on the martial arts--as well as by competitive success. By your reasoning it's OK to list someone who plays some pick-up basketball to be on the same level as Michael Jordan, or that anyone who does community theater is a peer of Robert DeNiro. Those fields don't distinguish (except for notable or not), why should martial arts? If you're not notable as a martial artist and not earning a living as a martial artist why should you be considered the same as Bruce Lee? No martial artist would consider a 4 year old white belt and a master of 50 years to be equivalent, even though they both may be following the same way. I do my taxes every year but I wouldn't call myself an accountant, although by logical extension of your reasoning I could. I took piano lessons but would not call myself a musician. Not sure why you're bucking consensus or insist that martial arts is different from other fields. Again, there's no objection to mentioning it in the article. Papaursa (talk) 04:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

The problem is that you've taken over the term "karateka" which is any practitioner of the way and limited it to mean high-profile or professional martial artists. The martial arts group should find some other designation. Pkeets (talk) 04:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Are there other designations for actors, basketball players, or musicians? By your definition we could go through and label almost everyone as a musician since most have played an instrument or sang at some point in their lives. Papaursa (talk) 04:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

I wouldn't say that, but someone who has played semi-professionally over a career of 30-40 years might qualify. By your definition, an accompanist with a day job who plays for church choirs over a 40 year career wouldn't be considered a musician. Pkeets (talk) 05:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

The point is that it's not my definition, it was the consensus of the wiki project. Would you ignore what the WP project on music defined as a musician or would you accept their consensus? Given the nature of WP, I'd use the consensus definition--even if I disagreed with it. That's what I've done with the notability criteria of various SNG--I speak my piece and accept the consensus whether I agree with it or not. Papaursa (talk) 05:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

I don't have a very high opinion of the martial arts wiki project. Pkeets (talk) 05:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Beatstalkers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ronnie Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Ohio Theatre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Lyons. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Please help me with the article David Gilmour, thanks! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 10:29, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Could you please help me with the articles Sam Brown and Pauline Murray. Cheers! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:07, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

And could you please help me with the articles Tony Hadley, Gary Kemp, and Spandau Ballet. Thank you for everything Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Could you please help me with the articles Glenn Gregory and Heaven 17. Cheers my dears Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 19:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Please help with the articles Mike Barson, Lee Thompson, Mark Bedford, and Chris Foreman. Have fun! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Could you please help me with the article Colin Blunstone? Thanking you Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:00, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Could you please help me with the articles Rod Argent and The Zombies. Thank you. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:20, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Help would be greatly appreciated (as always) with the articles Richard James Burgess and Landscape. Thank you Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:24, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for everything and please help me with the article Chris White (musician). Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:20, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

I'm ahead of you. I already went over it. Pkeets (talk) 16:00, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Could you please help me with the articles Gerald Casale and Bob Casale. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:14, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

I'm vacationing right now. Will have a look when I get back.166.172.186.101 (talk) 13:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Ok, and my final request this year would be to help me with the new article that I've created Alfie Agnew. Many thanks and happy new year! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Could you please help me with the articles Shèna and Bob Mothersbaugh? thank you. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 21:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Could you please help me with the articles Harpdog Brown and Joe Vitale? thank you again, always appreciated highly Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Could you please help me with the articles Michael McDonald and Ralph Carney? As always a super big fat thank you Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Could you please help me with the articles Fred Schneider and The B-52's? Cheers! :) Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 19:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Could you please help me with the article Martin Fry? Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 19:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

And Alan Myers (drummer)? Thank you so much and have a great weekend! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 09:04, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Could you please help me with the articles John Ashton, Richard Butler, and the Psychedelic Furs please? Thank you Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for all of your hard and well appreciated work. Could you please help me with the article Juice Newton? Thank you Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:48, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank for all of your contributions. Could you please help me with articles Jimmy Helms and Lindsay Mitchell? Thank you once more.

Ok. I seem to have messed up the Mark Mothersbaugh article, I need help from a more intelligent and experienced mutant (yourself), please help soon! thank you. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:00, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Could you please help me with the article Evie Sands and please check over my edits to the articles Gerald Casale and Mark Mothersbaugh. Thank you! And as always very grateful Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:55, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm thinking the Mothersbaugh article has a bit too much on Devo's new album now--it makes the article seem more about Devo than him. I'd like to cut out a couple of paragraphs. Did you add that part? Do you have an opinion about it? Pkeets (talk) 05:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

You can cut it if you think that's necessary. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:40, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

ok Pkeets (talk) 16:37, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

And I've added some additional information to Alan Myers that might need tidying up. Thanks Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Okay, had a look. You may notice I really like having more sections. If you look at the articles with a smartphone, then it formats with the section headings like a table of contents. You can choose what to read and avoid having huge blocks of text. Pkeets (talk) 18:04, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

I see. Well, you may need to check over my edits to Alan Myers (yes once more, sorry), Bob Casale, and Bob Mothersbaugh. As always much appreciated Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 07:49, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Please help me with the article Bob Lewis. Thank you! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:50, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Hey Pkeets, thanks for all of your hard work and could you please help me with my new article Margo Buchanan? Thank you. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Ello, could you please help me with the articles Britta Phillips and Terry Manning, cheers JV Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 10:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Isn't it unusual me asking for help? hehe. Could you please help me with the article Georgia Byng? thanks again for everything! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Please help me with the article Nik Kershaw. Cheers! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Could you please help me with the article Miriam Stockley? Thanks! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 21:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Could you please help me a lot with the article Andy Qunta please? I fear that it will become a redirect again! Thanks!! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Could you please help me with the article Martyn Ware? Many thanks as always! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:09, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry to be such a pest! But could you please help me a lot with my new article Sheri Kershaw? Thanks a bunch and best wishes, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Pkeets, your number one pest here haha! Could you please help me with this article Rock Goddess please? This time it isn't under threat from being deleted! Very Best Wishes and Many Thanks, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:30, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Someone needs to stop me from asking for your help! But could you please help me with the article Mary-Jess Leaverland? And I promise to leave you alone for the rest of the week! Many Thanks and Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:25, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Oh, No! It's Joe! Could you please help me with the articles Samantha Newark and Jem? Many thanks, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Pkeets, I hope that you're well. Could you please help me with the article Joan Jett? Special thanks, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:20, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Have been very busy with other things lately. I'll eventually get to this. Pkeets (talk) 04:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

I see. Well, when you eventually get to that article... could you please also help with the Amy Holland please? Many thanks, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Could you please help me tremendously with the article, Chaz Jankel please? I should very hopefully be meeting him next month! Thanks and ATB, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:43, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Hiyo! Could you please help me quite a bit with the articles Norman Watt-Roy and Mick Gallagher please? I'll be meeting them and the rest of the Blockheads next week!! I can't wait!!!! Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 19:47, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I hope that you're doin' good... I got to see the Blockheads perform on Saturday at Band on the Wall... And got to meet Derek Hussey, Chaz Jankel, Norman Watt-Roy, Mick Gallagher, and Gilad Atzmon... Derek was very nice, and talkative... Chaz was a very lovely, and down-to-earth man, and I even sort of sang his song "Little Eva" with him, he mingled with the crowd after the show, but most people didn't know who he was!!.. Norman was a wonderful man... He could tell stories forever, and called me "amazing" because I knew his discography better than himself haha, Mick seemed ok, but I didn't get good vibes from Gilad... Oh, and I've done some edits to the Chaz article... Maybe check over them? Unless someone beats you to it haha. All the best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 08:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Great to hear your experience. Love those artist meet and greets. I'll have a look. Pkeets (talk) 12:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Hiyo, I hope that you're doing well! Could you please help me with the article Durga McBroom? Thanking you in advance, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:42, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Durga's husband didn't die from cancer, and she was a little bit offended that that information was added... But don't worry I removed that information, and hopefully the world has been saved! Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

She fell out with me, and took to Facebook to slag us off just because we edited her article... The petty fool... But fuck all that! Could you please help me with the article, Paul Carrack? Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:02, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Do you think that meant she wrote it herself? I couldn't find much in the way of sources to use. Apparently some of what I found was in error, as she objected. Hm. I'm pretty busy right now, but I'll have a look at Carrack when I can. Pkeets (talk) 19:21, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for my belated response but I dunno but I hope that you enjoyed your holidays, and had a good New Year. If you get a chance could you please help me with the article Iva Davies? Thank you, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I hope that you're well. Could you please help me with the article about Mark White, and also his band Vice Versa please? They've recently reformed, and are currently working on some new tracks which I'm very happy about! And thank you if so, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 23:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dikran Tulaine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madness. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on New York Women Composers, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Dissident Aggressor 19:56, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

As reviewing administrator, I did not delete the article; I am frankly not entirely sure whether it shows notability, but it does pass the considerably weaker requirement for showing some degree of plausible significance which is all that;s required at Speedy.

I certainly agree with what you said on the article talk page, that women composers,[are} something Wikipedia has too little of; this is most effectively addressed by making the strongest possible articles. Every article strong enough to be kept makes the next one easier to support. Every article weak enough to be deleted, makes the next one harder. I have learned over the years that it is important to never leave an article even for a shrot while with oly minimal sourcing -- when you must do so, use the {{undercompletion}} article tag. For this particular article, it really does need some additional sources--the present ones are a little too much like directory listings.

If you can't find the sourcing, it may be necessary to find some other article in which to put the material--if you think this will be needed, please consult me on this. For example, I think there ought to be scope for a general article on women's peer support groups for composers, though obviously NYC will be the most impt. US city in the field). DGG ( talk ) 05:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

It looks like the information is collecting here. The International Alliance for Women in Music is the international organization. Pkeets (talk) 05:21, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Darlington College

added a link pointing to Penetration

Waterhouses, County Durham

added a link pointing to Penetration

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Carl Craig

added a link pointing to Derrick May

Sarah Gregory (singer)

added a link pointing to Kino

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Helen DeMacque

added a link pointing to Here & Now

Shirlie Holliman

added a link pointing to Here & Now

Tasmin Archer

added a link pointing to Bradford College

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Colin Blunstone page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

The article Gail Leven Pollock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable composer and educator.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Karst (talk) 15:55, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

• Hey, (I know you've been here a while) but I thought to suggest that you bold your recommendations on your preferences over at AfD. Only because I missed it the first time around, but rechecked it after realizing that you had created the article. Cheers! --MurderByDeletionism^"bang!" 20:06, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Andy Pask

added links pointing to Madonna, New College, Bass, The Hobbit (film), Robin Hood (film) and Tom Jones

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Charlie Morgan page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Atkinson (guitarist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Arnold. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frederick Albert Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Offenbach. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Marvin Kaye

added a link pointing to Mercy College

N. K. Jemisin

added a link pointing to SFWA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vox Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Grant. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shèna, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Calypso and Michael Gray. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Joe Vitale was already listed as from Canton in the listing. The Chylds has been added to his listing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.51.161.182 (talk) 16:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

What?Pkeets (talk) 18:41, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Oh, I guess you're talking about the people from Canton OH, listing. Vitale is listed, but the other members of the Chylds aren't. They're not notable enough for individual articles. Pkeets (talk) 18:45, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joe Vitale (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malone College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The B-52's into Fred Schneider. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

What material are you referring to? Pkeets (talk) 16:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Diff of Fred Schneider — Diannaa (talk) 17:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

That's not what the article says now, though. The information mostly comes from the AllMusic biography. I edited both articles and added references for the material. Pkeets (talk) 23:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

If you also wrote the content in the source article, attribution is technically not required. However, it simplifies my checking of the bot reports if you do mention it in your edit summary, and will prevent you from receiving further irrelevant notices. — Diannaa (talk) 19:56, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your addition to Terry Manning has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 23:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amy Upham Thomson McKean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winter Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mick Gallagher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Turnbull. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vox Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John C. Wright. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

In March 2014 you made changes to the article Jean-Baptiste Gail. This included removing the attribution of the text to EB1911 by changing the template {{EB1911}} to the template {{cite EB1911}}. However 65% of the text is a copied from the EB1911 article (see output of the Earwig's Copyvio Detector)

When text is copied from a PD source it must have attribution to meet the requirements of the WP:PLAGIARISM guideline. In the case of EB1911 (of which there are about 11,500 articles) the easiest way to meet this requirement is with {{EB1911}}.

Also before you made your edit the article was inadequately cited because it had a general reference not inline ones. However your change implied that only one line of the text was supported by the {{cite EB1911}}, when in fact every paragraph was. What was needed were inline citations on every paragraph (here).

-- PBS (talk) 08:38, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Did you fix it? Pkeets (talk) 13:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes. -- PBS (talk) 16:17, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks. Pkeets (talk) 16:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Hiya Pkeets, long time no talk... If you get a chance could you please help me with the article Ian Donaldson? Thank you in advance if ya do... Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:08, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

In the far past you made Emmy Wegener, thank you for that. I found some additional data (see the Dutch). She has a double surname "Frensel Wegener", her fathers name was John Frensel Wegener. Heil was the name of her husband between 1926 until 1932; they divorced. She never user it again. She got a serious illness from 1935; in 1950 she had a complete paralysis; a newspaperad mentioned that they were looking for a home for her.Ceescamel (talk) 12:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I found the Dutch. I'll add the data in.Pkeets (talk) 13:00, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I hope that you've been well. I've been working on the Lou Reed for quite some time now, and was wondering if you could please help me out with it?

Thanks, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:34, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

The article O Parvardigar (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources, please......

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 15:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

As much as you are free to remove a PROD, without addressing the reason(s) for nomination, an AfD discussion can be subsequently launched on the same locus, which can't be so easily terminated, without addressing the root causes.Hence, can you please provide some non-trivial coverage of the film in reliable and independent sources, as demanded by our general notability guideline or subject-specific guideline? Best,~ Winged Blades^Godric 01:54, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

You're one of the local bullies, right? You were hoping I wasn't paying attention? It's kind of an old film and I think three are reasonable for a start article of this length.Pkeets (talk) 02:25, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

You are reminded of our fourth pillar.By the way, since you seem to be completely unaware about the definitions of reliability and independence of a source, be notified, that in case of further mis-adventures, I'll seek for your autopatrolled hat to be revoked.Best,~ Winged Blades^Godric 02:54, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article O Parvardigar (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O Parvardigar (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 03:00, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, long time no talk! Ahah. I hope that you're well. Could you please help me with the article Rossendale United F.C.? Best, JV5 Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 23:33, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi, have been busy. Will have a look at it. P.S. Why was it expelled from the league? Do we know? Pkeets (talk) 01:55, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Pkeets,

I have noticed that many of the stub articles on women composers were created by you. I am a new editor on Wikipedia, and am working on women composers. I have started Draft:The Swedish Association of Women Composers and there are many composers in the organization who do not yet have Wikipedia articles. I was wondering if you would be interested in helping me create articles for these women, or if you have any advice for writing good quality stub articles on women composers.

Thanks for all your contributions.

Wekuethe (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

I'm busy with other projects just now and haven't much time to work in Wikipedia, but I can give you some advice. You should begin by entering them into the List of female composers by birth date and the List of female composers by name. There are no requirements to be in these list, and people who want to write articles can research names from the lists for stubs or beginning articles. If these are relatively new or unknown composers, it may be hard to maintain an article for them in Wikipedia, which requires third party references like reviews and books that discuss their accomplishments. Articles in languages other than English are fine. If any of these composers have articles already in other Wikipedia languages, then it will be easy to just translate the articles. I hope this helps! Pkeets (talk) 19:00, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi, could you please help me with the article about the band Kissing the Pink? I'm really passionate about their music at the moment, and I'm not really good at adding original content or working on band articles so could you please help me out if you can? Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Had a quick look. Content was okay, but I added some references. See what you think. :) Pkeets (talk) 16:36, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

You did great, thank you! Could you also please help me with the article about their album Certain Things Are Likely? Which is also worth checking out if you're into very 80s dance music! Ahah Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 19:44, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I'm really terrible at editing and adding relevent content to biography articles so could you please help me out with the Alice Cohen article? Also the Vels' debut album Velocity (1984) is really cool so maybe you'd like to check that out?

Many thanks! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:04, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

HI - I see that you created the page on Charles-Richard Lambert. I would like to create a page on another musician, the Chevalier de Meude-Monpas, but have had little success so far. Could you have a look at my draft, please ? It is here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Chevalier_de_Meude-Monpas#Chevalier_de_Meude-Monpas My IP address changes every day so you can send me a message only today - otherwise I will revisit your user page. Thank you. 2A01:E34:EC68:5C0:8D78:152A:7C61:1C34 (talk) 14:18, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I edited a bit. Have a look and see what you think. Pkeets (talk) 16:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Hope it will be accepted now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:EC68:5C0:8D78:152A:7C61:1C34 (talk) 19:46, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Let me know how it goes. Pkeets (talk) 21:06, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

I see it was accepted. Congrats! Pkeets (talk) 05:29, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 02:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Your edit to Poets Roundtable of Arkansas has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Muse Messenger logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Pegasus cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, New York Poetry Forum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 17:09, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Love Lyrics cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Please join a discussion here regarding whether the terms "First Lady of the United States Designate" and "Second Gentleman of the United States Designate" should be in the infoboxes of Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff, spouses of the president-elect and vice president-elect, respectively. We need to come to a consensus. Thank you for your participation. cookie monster (2020) 755 21:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Content sourced to the Laura Ingraham Show is obviously not reliably sourced. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Well-sourced edits on possible election fraud are being removed by several editors without discussion for consensus. Articles listed for deletion. Personal attacks. Pkeets (talk) 14:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

If you go over 3RR, expect to be blocked. I have reverted your addition as it presents the claims of fraud too favorably. PhilKnight (talk) 15:00, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

That's a consideration? Please reconsider. It wasn't my addition, and removing it removes a nice instance of notability for an athlete. Pkeets (talk) 15:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Try WP:DRN to resolve your content dispute. If there are behavioral issues that require administrator intervention, describe them at WP:ANI. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:12, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Pkeets (talk) 07:52, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources: RfCs have determined that: "There is no consensus on the reliability of Fox News's coverage of politics and science. / Fox News talk shows, including Hannity, Tucker Carlson Tonight, The Ingraham Angle, and Fox & Friends, should not be used for statements of fact but can sometimes be used for attributed opinions." starship.paint (talk) 14:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. IHateAccounts (talk) 22:36, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Pkeets, I think it would be best if you were to participate in the discussion at ANI. I would hate to see a decision made without any input from you. -- MelanieN (talk) 16:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Have been gone for Thanksgiving and working on my phone. Will comment more tonight. Briefly, this group of editors are defending their turf. I happened to surf in and notice serious POV issues in their comnents, rejecting strong mainstream sources on political issues that they disagree with. Wikipedia should provide balanced coverage of subjects rather than picking and choosing sources that create a particular narrative. It would seem more beneficial to have a broader array of exitorial input. I have similar complaints against these editors. They combine forces to edit war without individually exceeding limits on reversions and to keep particular information out of articles. Pkeets (talk) 21:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

P.S. Contested sources include scientific/technical studies and white paper reports. These are normally considered good quality. Pkeets (talk) 23:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Pkeets, pursuant to this discussion I am topic-banning you from the American Politics post-1932 area, for three months. I am sorry, but there is a consensus for it. Please note that I made this shorter than it could have been, and that some of the edits mentioned in that thread were by themselves blockable already. You can, if you like, appeal the sanction at WP:AE. Drmies (talk) 01:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

No skin off my nose. I just wandered in and noticed a really serious POV problem in the articles. You guys really need to consider how you look to a lot of readers that happen by. You just look the worse for this. One more time: a little balance would go a long way. Pkeets (talk) 03:32, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

We‘ve heard this before. Apparently, Wikipedia doesn’t conform to the views of some people. You can contribute to the topic in three months time, and hopefully, this time, you’ll learn to play by the rules. Whatever POV problem doesn’t excuse your offences. starship.paint (talk) 04:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Ha. Just looked at my messages. I've got a bunch of thanks for my recent edits. You're censoring viewpoints and suppressing information. 08:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Fringe theories: a Wikipedia article should not make a fringe theory appear more notable or more widely accepted than it is. Statements about the truth of a theory must be based upon independent reliable sources. starship.paint (talk) 08:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Sexism. Hack job on Sidney Powell. You have to get me out of the way in order to do it. Pkeets (talk) 08:52, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

That (mentioning Powell) is a violation of your topic ban. I suggest you retract it or strike it. I don't want to induce more violations, so I'm off. Good luck. starship.paint (talk) 09:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

You know I wrote the original article, right? Pkeets (talk) 09:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Pkeets, please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. It applies to all Wikipedia pages, including this one. Bishonen | tålk 09:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC).

So what topic(s) is/are banned? How am I supposed to figure out what other people consider politics? Pkeets (talk) 09:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Did you even read WP:TBAN as I suggested? And what Drmies told you above? Any people who are known for their involvement in American politics, such as obviously Sidney Powell, are off limits, for example. If you're still in doubt about what you may do in a particular case, ask an admin, for example Drmies who instituted the ban, or me, before you do it. Bishonen | tålk 18:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC).

Banned from my own articles. You guys are the greatest. Pkeets (talk) 19:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

He is a well known crank to be honest. Most of his alternatives to Wikipedia have failed pretty spectacularly, so I don't think a lot of people here would hold his opinion with any good amount of weight. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 15:56, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Still, I think he's right about the POV issues. Standards have changed a lot since I started editing in Wikipedia. Pkeets (talk) 16:38, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

That's all good and everything, but I just wouldn't expect much to come from invoking his Twitter and blog besides eyerolls. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

What he says in this case is right, tho. :)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pkeets (talk • contribs) 03:34, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Even if true, I'm just letting you know the guy is not a strong authority to cite. He's the equivalent of OP India for people pretty much. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 16:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Ok. Pkeets (talk) 18:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jack Palladino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nassau County. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Pkeets. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:New York Poetry Forum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Pkeets. Thank you. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

• I want to expand a bit on my close of your case at AE. To simplify things, lets just assume the admin are split 50/50 on whether or not you should be topic banned or sanctioned in some way. If you continue the way you are doing things, an admin who feels you are being disruptive can unilaterally impose a topic ban or block. Discretionary sanctions allow this, admin can act without any input from anyone. Your option would then be to live with the sanctions, or appeal it. In the event of an appeal, it is very likely the outcome would also be "no consensus", which means the sanction would stand as given. While I personally think your actions didn't violate policy (but understand why it might be irritating to other editors), that wasn't the basis for my close. AE is NOT a consensus board, as I stated in the close. Any admin can act on their own, even if every other admin disagrees with them. They would likely face an appeal, but policy still allows this. I chose to close as a consensus action because there was so much disagreement, and I wanted to close it in a way that respected the views of all the admin who participated. It isn't a free pass, it is basically saying we will do nothing for now. You really need to change some of your methods in the future, for your own sake, not mine. The behavior is considered edge behavior because not everyone is going to agree on whether it is a violation or not, and again, it only requires ONE admin to think it is disruptive for sanctions to be issued. I would rather not see that happen. Sometimes it is better to be happy than to be right, so again, pick your battles carefully and make sure you include more than a claim; include links to facts, and make sure you don't hammer the point many times over. You are surely aware that most of the time, consensus is going to be against you, but that doesn't mean you can't raise legitimate concerns in a polite way, while understanding this is going to irritate some. You need to go the extra mile in being respectful and noncombative. Sometimes, things at Wikipedia aren't fair, but that is life, so it is better to err on the side of caution. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 11:57, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

The article North Dakota State Poetry Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Enough to avoid a speedy, but a BEFORE turned up only this, which isn't independent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Star Mississippi 00:55, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Dakota State Poetry Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Dakota State Poetry Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Star Mississippi 12:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pkeets. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~TNT (she/they • talk) 14:05, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pkeets (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I do have multiple accounts, but I don't think I've used any of them inappropriately. Please review and explain what was inappropriate.

Decline reason:

Closely connected users may be considered a single user for Wikipedia's purposes if they edit with the same objectives TonyBallioni (talk) 20:20, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Pkeets: Sure thing - let's just start from the top though, are you confirming then that Sooner2020 is one of your "multiple accounts"? ~TNT (she/they • talk) 18:51, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

You can see that from the IP, right? There can be multiple users on this PC, but that account does come from this computer. Pkeets (talk) 18:53, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I have a spouse who steps up to defend me.Pkeets (talk) 19:08, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

I see, so you're aware of the person who uses the Sooner2020 account from your PC? Did you ask them to make this comment to GorillaWarfare per chance? ~TNT (she/they • talk) 18:58, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

No. Pkeets (talk) 19:17, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

I would not support an unblock unless Pkeets accepts conditions:

1. Agree to limit himself to a single Wikipedia account
2. Provide a list of all accounts used by any family members
3. Agree not to make any Wikipedia edits while logged out.
4. Accept an indefinite ban from all pages covered by WP:ARBAP2. EdJohnston (talk) 21:06, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) "I have a spouse who steps up to defend me" is a very, very weird description of a meatpuppet account that pretends to have no connection to Pkeets, but is actually a close family member. I'll leave it to you, EdJohnston and TonyBallioni, since I haven't studied the case in detail, but I'm frankly not sure I'd unblock Pkeets at all if it was me. They don't seem to understand the problem. "I don't think I've used any of them inappropriately", seriously? Bishonen | tålk 21:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC).

There's also the overlap on Covid. And no attempt to name his other accounts. Doug Weller talk 08:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

As far as I know, the Sooner2020 account is the only other one active.Pkeets (talk) 11:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

So you aren't going to name any other accounts because they aren't active at the moment? Or those of family members? That's not helping. Doug Weller talk 12:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

I checked with the kids, but they just shrugged. Pkeets (talk) 02:33, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

• Based on my previous AE closure and other things, there seems to be a history of trying to find the edge of policy and ride it. ie: following the letter but not the intent of policy. That might work in the American legal system, but it doesn't work at Wikipedia because our policies aren't the letter of law, they are a reflection of the consensus of what policy should be. In short, violating the spirit of a policy is the same as breaking the letter. So unless there is full disclosure of all accounts, by you and family members, I don't see this going anywhere. EdJohnston sums it up rather nicely above, and I would only add that full disclosure of previously used accounts is needed. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 17:35, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, it's a family computer and I don't spend much of any time monitoring it. You know how kids are. I suppose if there are any more, they're pretty much abandoned. I can verify Pkeets for me and Sooner 2020 for spouse, and that seems to be all. Pkeets (talk) 02:35, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

If you have a list of suspicious accounts you went me to check, then post the list and I'll ask the family. I would just abandon this account and move on, but there are a couple of issues involved. First, the account is worth rescuing because in putting up the block, you've obscured the list of nearly 1000 articles I've written, mostly about women. Without the list and the links, I'll have a hard time maintaining these articles. Also, it appears you've blocked the IP, so spouse is also blocked on this device, plus kids if they try to establish accounts for school and etc. Pkeets (talk) 08:35, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

It does need to be clear in the record that you know you're blocking a long-time, fairly significant content creator in an area where Wikipedia is criticized for lack of content. This is not a recent nor inconsequential account. Pkeets (talk) 11:49, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

"I would just abandon this account and move on" and "I'll have a hard time maintaining these articles" sounds like you plan to evade the block. As for "you know you're blocking a long-time, fairly significant content creator", Wikipedia does not need you ~TNT (she/they • talk) 14:27, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

• This isn't the warm, fuzzy reply I had hoped for. And I wasn't blocking you, and in fact, the only time we crossed paths, I stuck my neck out to keep you from getting blocked. If you want to get unblocked, you are going to have to step back and try to see things from a different perspective. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

This is the real issue, isn't it? I was identified by the thought police as soon as I wrote a political article, right? You're telling me now I've committed thought crimes and I need to be silenced? 2601:844:4000:F910:19AE:3872:9524:5F46 (talk) 12:25, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Replying while logged out is not helping your case. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

• For the record JoeB2021 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) is related to you. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:2019 Pegasus cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Pkeets. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "New York Poetry Forum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 03:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Ink to Paper cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on The Detours requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 02:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Woof is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Woof until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BilledMammal (talk) 12:40, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice but I'm banned. If you can change that, I'll be happy to join the discussion.I'm not in favor of deleting talented and/or prominentcwomen from Wikipedia. 2601:840:4200:EFA0:3931:95F:BE2C:1B58 (talk) 11:49, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

The article The Wheels on the Bus (video series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:DaltreyBestBits.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

The article Serena Tideman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Iadmc♫^talk  12:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

The article Serena Tideman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable and poorly sourced. Nothing useful in a BEFORE search

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Iadmc♫^talk  12:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J. Greg Miller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Greg Miller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— CactusWriter ^(talk) 00:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Common Threads cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

The article Zana Clarke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lack of notoriety

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

The article Clare Shore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lack of notoriety, and lack of independent references.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

The article Alison Bauld has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirement

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

The article Jessica Suchy-Pilalis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

biography of a living person: substance of article is based primarily on self-published sources by the subject. See WP:BLPSELFPUB and Talk:Jessica_Suchy-Pilalis#c-Exprez135-20260117034200-Under-sourced_and_badly_sourced_page.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 18 January 2026 (UTC)