User talk:PogPerson23

Hello, I'm ScrubbedFalcon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mara Jade have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 12:01, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bogosort. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:16, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below this notice. Materialscientist (talk) 17:17, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

PogPerson23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I didn't realise it was a public edit, I've never editted on wikipedia before, I'm really sorry it won't happen again!

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I didn't realise it was a public edit, I've never editted on wikipedia before, I'm really sorry it won't happen again! |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I didn't realise it was a public edit, I've never editted on wikipedia before, I'm really sorry it won't happen again! |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I didn't realise it was a public edit, I've never editted on wikipedia before, I'm really sorry it won't happen again! |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Now that you know everything you do on Wikipedia is public, what constructive contributions do you intend to make? 331dot (talk) 17:41, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Nothing comes to mind specifically, but if I see something I know is misinformation I'd fix it. PogPerson23 (talk) 18:35, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Generally we want people to be working off of what reliable sources say rather than what they know is misinformation. You may want to check out WP:TASK for examples of different areas of editing work to try. All that having been said, Materialscientist, any objections to giving them a second chance as blocking admin? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:52, 24 March 2026 (UTC)