User talk:Poopdecktheoverlord

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Molang have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Molang was changed by Poopdecktheoverlord (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861327 on 2024-12-12T21:20:05+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:20, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Notice of incidents noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive editing by LukeJolly3 regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 18:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

March 2025

Information icon Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Roger Craig Smith, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 16:37, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at John Stocker (voice actor), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 13:54, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

April 2025

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ian Hanlin, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 12:20, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Féodor Atkine, you may be blocked from editing. Waxworker (talk) 12:52, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Spliced (TV series). no source for information being officially revealed on twitter Waxworker (talk) 12:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Here's a Wikicookie!

Thanks a lot for taking the time to make that huge copyedit to this page. Appreciated! :) Though for your own good, maybe slow down and stick mainly to copyediting for now? You've got a level four warning recently for adding poor sources. Yelps :/ critique me 17:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. I am a bonafide Sunny Bunnies fan after all (I can't believe I can say a sentence like that). I'll take the advice to not add more poor sources. Poopdecktheoverlord (talk) 22:14, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, @Poopdecktheoverlord: want to collaborate on the Sunny Bunnies page? There's a long list of problems listed on Talk:Sunny Bunnies for the GA review. It's a lot, so I was wondering if you could help! (Also please fill out the edit summaries more often so I can see what you do without having to go into the diffs) Yelps ᘛ⁠⁐̤⁠ᕐ⁠ᐷ critique me 12:21, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
I'd be happy to help! I am a Sunny Bunnies aficionado myself (geez, that sentence). Poopdecktheoverlord (talk) 20:58, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

May 2025

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug & Cat Noir episodes, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Media Mender 📬✍🏻 05:44, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of children's animated television series of the 2010s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 5. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

Information icon Hello, I'm Mellamelina. I noticed that you recently removed content from Anna Cieślak without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mellamelina (talk) 20:39, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Le Petit Nicolas (TV series). - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 23:30, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Control copyright icon Hello Poopdecktheoverlord! Your additions to Pet Alien have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Rescued by adding contents

Thanks for saving the page, Boj (TV series). 2605:59C0:204E:FB08:B434:80A7:2D85:71AC (talk) 22:12, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Can you add episode summaries that leads to the section? 98.97.27.156 (talk) 22:33, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
I would, but I'm more preoccupied with other projects, like the call of the obscure Pet Alien TV show. Poopdecktheoverlord (talk) 22:37, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

August 2025

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Blue's Clues & You!, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 21:03, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

WP:NOTBROKEN

Please stop attempting to 'fix' links like you've recently been doing in edits on Ricky Zoom (and any other articles). Redirect links are perfectly fine to be used and they do not need to be 'fixed' to the actual article title(s). Redirects are created for a reason, and changing redirect links to the actual article title defeats this purpose. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 18:22, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

You are still doing so, in edits such as this. Again, please stop to correct links redirect links to different places. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 03:51, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of children's animated television series of the 1990s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syndication.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Reverting edits

Hello. I’ve noticed you have been reverting edits without unreliable sources. Please stop. Hefty1981 (talk) 03:18, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Oh. Sorry. I thought you were an alt of a user that has been going around and re-aranging categories on this wiki. I apologize. 03:21, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Blue's Clues & You! cancellation

Please see the talk page discussion at Talk:Blue's Clues & You!#Supposed cancellation- we cannot use Josh's post as a source for the show's cancellation. At this point, it's about one month until a year has passed (since the latest episodes' airing), so it's best to wait until then (unless a WP:RS is procured prior to then). Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 03:24, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

I understand. In that case...it's mass reverting time. 03:26, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Adding salted topics to Wikipedia

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at SML, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:59, 4 September 2025 (UTC) I apologize for what I have caused and promise to improve my editing work in the future. 02:03, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of children's animated television series of the 2010s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Disney Channel (Asia).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

Draftification

Hello, Poopdecktheoverlord,

Please read over, carefully WP:DRAFTIFY, our guidelines on when it is appropriate and when it is not appropriate to move an article from main space to draft space. Draftification is only for recently created articles, not for articles that were created years ago. If you have questions on DRAFTIFY, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:41, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Dan Dillabough, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. (Arachnid's userpage | what did I do now) 18:08, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ren Stimpy 2024.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ren Stimpy 2024.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Tasia Valenza edit

I have reverted your addition of an unsourced date of birth to Tasia Valenza. In addition to Wikipedia's basic principle of citing sources (Wikipedia:Citing sources), a special need for citations applies with regard to elements of a biography of a living person (WP:BLPPRIVACY). Feel free to add a date of birth when it is accompanied by a citation to a reliable, published, non-primary source. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:58, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pakdam Pakdai, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Media Mender (talk) 02:30, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Stop icon Your editing history at Zig & Sharko shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. That means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Instead of reverting edits, please stop editing the page and discuss on the talk page to create a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a Third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipediaespecially if you break the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workwhether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each timecounts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warringeven if you do not violate the three-revert rule if it looks like you intend to continue reverting.
Despite the violations that the other user has exhibited in this effort, you also appear to have violated 3RR here. The two of you seriously need to discuss this on the article's Talk page. Jalen Barks (Woof) 20:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of programs broadcast by ABS-CBN
added links pointing to X-Men (TV series), Por ti (telenovela), Trollz, Superbook, Digimon Adventures and Cuidado con el ángel

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Mr. Magoo logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Mr. Magoo logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Marc du Pontavice accolades

Since I couldn't add a table for the accolades that Marc du Pontavice received or was nominated for on his page, and since I also have an online class for my country's national exam in half an hour, could you please add it for me?

Nominated for the César Award for Best Film in 2011, with Gainsbourg: A Heroic Life and won the César Award for Best First Film for the same film in the same year.

Nominated for the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature Film in 2020, with I Lost My Body.

Received the Henri-Langlois Award in 2010 from the International Encounters of Heritage Cinema and Restored Films in Vincennes, the city which Marc currently lives since 1996. The source comes from the city's magazine, Vincennes Info, n° 654 published in March 2010 - https://archive.org/details/manualzilla-id-6414532/

Received the Game-Changer Award from the Animation Magazine Hall of Fame in 2020 - https://www.animationmagazine.net/hall-of-fame-awards-2020/

I've already informed Wax about his involvement in the 2024 series and this year's film of My Life in Versailles, which was reverted along with the information about his recent films from last year such as Meanwhile on Earth and Prodigieuses (Prodigies). MariaSantanaSilva (talk) 15:52, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

@Poopdecktheoverlord Thank you for adding his accolades, which will possibly be updated with his potential winning nomination for the Winsor McCay Award at the 53rd Annie Awards next year (I was the one who nominated Marc du Pontavice and Jan Van Rijsselberge, creator of Robotboy, for the next Winsor McCay Award this year on the form submission page of the Annie Awards Juried Awards). Could you add the English translation of the Early Life, Career, and Personal Life sections based on my translation to his page? Remember to add the sources from the Portuguese page on him here on the English Wikipedia (About he joining the Academy who does the Academy Awards, I reccomend adding from the Animation Magazine website, to save my time, I'm linking from the website's archive on I Lost My Body - https://animationmagazine.net/tag/i-lost-my-body )
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_du_Pontavice
Early life
Born on January 10, 1963, in the 15th arrondissement of Paris, he is the son of academic professor Emmanuel du Pontavice and doctor Anne de Pardieu. Marc comes from the Breton nobility, the du Pontavice family. Marc's parents never worked in French cinema and rarely took him to theaters; his grandmother was the one who took him to the legendary theater in the 7th arrondissement of Paris, La Pagode. When he turned seven, his parents agreed to show him a film they liked, Charlie Chaplin's City Lights. Every Sunday, he watched the program he never missed, Histoires sans paroles on ORTF.
As a child, he suffered childhood trauma due to the sexual abuse he suffered at the hands of his mother, who violently beat him, locked him in the closet, and separated him from his siblings' games, since his parents' marriage was a failure because his mother was homosexual. The abuse ended when she left him and his father in 1986 to move to the USA. He studied at Sciences Po and graduated from the Eco-Fi section in 1989.
Career
Marc began his career at the world's oldest film studio, Gaumont, in 1990, after the studio joined forces with CFC-Groupe Robur to create Gaumont-Robur Télévision, led by Christian Charret, whose goal was to produce high-quality television series for European television channels. Then legal and financial manager of CFC-Groupe Robur from 1989 to 1990, after managing the financial organization and the production of about one hundred hours of fiction at Robur, Marc became secretary-general of the new division. In 1992, after selling its film catalog to UGC, Robur also sold its stake in Gaumont-Robur Télévision to Gaumont, which subsequently renamed it Gaumont Television.
In 1993, encouraged by the success of the Highlander series*, Marc du Pontavice proposed adapting the series into an animated cartoon, co-produced by Gaumont Television in 1994. Convinced by the series delivered in just ten months, Gaumont's general director, Patrice Ledoux, proposed in March 1995 that Marc form his own department, Gaumont Multimédia, to produce cartoons, video games, and internet content. He moved to Luc Besson's former studios in Paris in September 1995, which years later became the headquarters of Xilam. Series such as Space Goofs, followed by Oggy and the Cockroaches, were a great success for the studio. Gaumont Multimédia also produced video games with adaptations of The Visitors in 1997 and The Fifth Element in 1998. He is also the first French producer to sell French cartoons to American television.
However, due to Gaumont's need for funds to develop its Multiplex cinema network, the reorientation of its main business, cinema, and an inability to develop diversification businesses at Gaumont, in addition to the death of his father Emmanuel on December 23 of that year, he left Gaumont on December 10 and was replaced by Stéphane Pathernay at the helm of Gaumont Multimédia on January 1, 1999, until the studio's closure that same year. On the same day as his replacement, Marc announced the creation of an independent animation studio, which was introduced at MIPTV in May 1999. On August 5, 1999, he founded the animation studio Xilam, where the studio's name is an anagram of M-Alix, a declaration of love for his wife, Alix de Maistre, and in December of the same year, Gaumont sold the assets of the former Gaumont Multimédia to Marc du Pontavice for 44 million francs and reintegrated it into Xilam. Also in 1999, he signed a contract with Dargaud and Lucky Comics to purchase the animation rights to Lucky Luke, producing The New Adventures of Lucky Luke for France 3 in 2001 with a budget of €18.4 million.
On April 8, 2009, Marc was elected president of the French Animation Producers Union. He held the position until 2015, when he was succeeded by Philippe Alessandri.
On February 3, 2020, along with 19 shareholders, he bought the longest-running film magazine in France, Cahiers du cinéma, which resulted in the magazine's editorial team resigning collectively after the purchase. In the same year, he was invited by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences to become a member of the academy.
On March 10, 2022, he released his autobiographical book, Destin animé, published by Slatkine et Compagnie, which tells the story of his life as a producer and the history of the Xilam studio. Development of the book began in mid-September 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the book's publisher offered Marc the opportunity to tell his story in an autobiographical book.
Personal life
Marc has been married to director and writer Alix de Maistre since June 23, 1989, with whom he had shared five years since 1984. They have two children, Lou and Ivan. Marc and Alix married in the former French commune of Saint-Martin-du-Mesnil-Oury in Calvados.
The couple's relationship is very loving, as Marc and Alix form a united and fused couple, where her love protects him, also due to her support, both emotional and intellectual, which is one of the conditions for his balance. Without her, his choices would not always be the same. The birth of Marc and Alix's children, Lou in 1992 and Ivan in 1995, brought rebirth to him, who faced sexual abuse from his mother in childhood. Marc has a good relationship with his two children, and also forms a strong bond with his eldest daughter.
He is a fan of recent animations such as Studio Ghibli's The Tale of Princess Kaguya and The Wind Rises, and Disney's Wander Over Yonder, and also admires Brad Bird.
He criticized France Télévisions' decision to close France 4 in an interview with the newspaper Le Figaro in 2018, calling it a profound mistake. In a column sent to Agence France-Presse in 2020, about one hundred representatives, including Marc and the director of I Lost My Body, Jérémy Clapin, who make up the new general assembly of the Academy of Arts and Techniques of Cinema that holds the César ceremony, ruled out a collective resignation and denounced the lack of transparency following the presence of director Roman Polanski among the members.
  • 1992's live-action TV show with Adrian Paul
MariaSantanaSilva (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

I'll try to do it, but I won't make any promises. 19:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Adding the acquired programming

Please do not add "acquired programming" in an article that clearly mentions "Original programming" in the article title. You should discuss in the talk page of the article first, before adding huge chunk of unreferenced/poorly sourced content. Those edits you made are problematic and created numerous issues to the articles you've edited. Also please use your edit summary. Hotwiki (talk) 23:31, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Not using the edit summary

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences Editing Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Hotwiki (talk) 23:34, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ren & Stimpy (upcoming TV series) has been accepted

Ren & Stimpy (upcoming TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Meena • 19:21, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Aw, rats.

Aaaaaaand The Grand Delusion has removed half of the page (including the image, the episode and voice cast lists, and two sources) under the grounds of it being "unsourced". Just what I need. – Poopdecktheoverlord • 22:59, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ren & Stimpy (upcoming TV series)

Warning icon

The page Ren & Stimpy (upcoming TV series) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ren Stimpy 2024.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ren Stimpy 2024.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:22, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

A goat for you!

For adding information at List of Blaze and the Monster Machines episodes

CyborgsWM (talk) 23:56, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

and also overall being a good contributor to Wikipedia CyborgsWM (talk) 02:14, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Poopdecktheoverlord (talk) 03:14, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Poopdecktheoverlord. Thank you for your work on Bakugan season 1. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

please convert this into a disambiguation page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:42, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

Information icon Hello, I'm Wikieditor662. I noticed that you recently removed content from Rugrats (2021 TV series) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikieditor662 (talk) 22:50, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Ah, sorry, it looks like you just shortened the formatting. If this was the case, then my bad! Wikieditor662 (talk) 22:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

I have recently celebrated my 10,000th edit to this wiki (okay, my 10,002th, I edited another page while typing this one, I usually work on several pages at a time)! And in only 9 months' time (technically 13 because I first made this account in October 2024, but I didn't make my first edit until December 2024 and didn't start editing regularly until February 2025, but still)! I am so grateful for the opportunity of joining this wiki and making it a better, more accurate place! Here's to many more years of contributions! Poopdecktheoverlord (talk) 01:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Congratulations! :) Wikieditor662 (talk) 05:29, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

icon Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Adventures of Kid Danger, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury • 20:33, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Adventures of Kid Danger. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 21:34, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Stop icon Your recent editing history at The Adventures of Kid Danger shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipediaespecially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workwhether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each timecounts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warringeven if you do not violate the three-revert rule if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. MPFitz1968 (talk) 00:41, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wacky Floats

A tag has been placed on Wacky Floats requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy Editing -- IAmChaos 17:13, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Wikieditor662 (talk) 00:49, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Episode listings

As I just explained in this edit summary, some shows on Nickelodeon have their episodes' segments originally aired separately, which is why some production codes include the 'A' or 'B' at the end of it. This is the correct listing and should be kept that way- this is done for numerous other Nickelodeon show articles as well. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 02:14, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bossy Bear (TV series) has been accepted

Bossy Bear (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Meena • 11:25, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Page on Alix de Maistre

Since I did a page of Alix de Maistre, Marc du Pontavice's wife on the Portuguese Wikipedia, feel free to create a translated version to this very Wikipedia here, since she's important to Marc du Pontavice, because if wasn't for her, Marc wouldn't get cured from childhood trauma he suffered due to the sexual abuse he suffered at the hands of his doctor mother when he was a child

https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alix_de_Maistre MariaSantanaSilva (talk) 22:22, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Star Wars: Young Jedi Adventures into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s).

When copying within Wikipedia, at a minimum, give attribution in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination.

Please add attribution if no one has done so yet. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Alex_21 TALK 02:19, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Further copy-paste moves without attribution may be reverted, such as this one-way deletion. -- Alex_21 TALK 02:21, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! lp0 on fire () 21:00, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Astroblast! has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or imagesyou must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:20, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sonic X. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 07:03, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Nature Cat

Since The Nature-Tastic Four Movie had a post credit scene with Bad Dog Bart, we do not know if there will be a Nature Cat direct to video film that will serve as a continuation of the series. So I say it needed to be changed from April 3, 2025 to January 2, 2024 on the Nature Cat page on this site. ~2025-42902-03 (talk) 20:04, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

That post-credits cliffhanger could theoretically lead into a sequel where Bart unleashes his revenge on the Nature-Tastic Four... but it could also just as likely be a cliffhanger to which there is no resolution, like Sonic SatAM or Hailey's On It!. So for the time being, let's just keep the end date as April 3, 2025 (oh, and I highly doubt that if we do get a continuation of this plotline, it'll go to DVD). Poopdecktheoverlord (talk) 20:09, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

And if the Nature Cat direct to video film is not happening, then we will just have to move on. ~2025-42902-03 (talk) 23:15, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2026 American animated television series debuts

A tag has been placed on Category:2026 American animated television series debuts indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 06:07, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pokémon Concierge, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Media Mender (chat, stalk) 04:52, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Scott Adams. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Entering an end date '"just to be prepared" for a dying man in a hospital is ghoulish and COMPLETELY inappropriate! Marcus Markup (talk) 07:24, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

icon Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mae Whitman, you may be blocked from editing. Why did you ignore the note, and why do you continue to edit without leaving an edit summary after being asked repeatedly to try to be more diligent about doing so? DonIago (talk) 21:18, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at TaleSpin. Please stop adding unsourced content. DonIago (talk) 14:06, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

icon Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Cedar Cove episodes, you may be blocked from editing. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 16:39, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on The New Adventures of Lucky Luke

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The New Adventures of Lucky Luke, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:08, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Just fixed it. Poopdecktheoverlord (talk) 05:11, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. DonIago (talk) 15:15, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Stop abbreviating years to two digits

Please stop abbreviating years to two digits, as you did at List of Super Why! episodes, per MOS:DATERANGE. The guideline says that four-digit years are preferred over abbreviated years. Also, there are some links (including redirects) that point to specific sections of that list article (e.g., Super Why! season 1Super Why! season 1 points to List of Super Why! episodes#Season 1 (2007–2010)), and we should not be wasting time trying to fix them. GTrang (talk) 18:41, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

About your edits to The Snow Queen (Kernaghan novel)

Hey there, please do not make purely cosmetic edits like this one. These result in no visible change to the article and only add to the workload of editors monitoring changes to the article (you left no edit summary either). Also, in the spirit of MOS:VAR, I would not recommend changing details like this in the wikitext. Let me know if you have any questions. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:39, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 21:44, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

One final message.

Hello everyone.

This post is something I hoped I'd never have to make, because I never thought I'd have the emotional unintelligence and narcissism to cause events to transpire that would culminate in me having having to make it. It is a long, comprehensive realization that my devil-may-care disruptions that are all detailed in this talk page in some form have finally crossed the line, and what I wholeheartedly believe is the first step to reconciling with myself, my emotions, and my drive to improve off this site.

To get it out of the way, do not take this message as an act of publicized self-pity, a shallow attempt to get into enough good graces to be allowed to edit again, a deflective fit of fishing for sympathy, or anything like that. I wholeheartedly admit guilt to my own actions and how they've done nothing but described me as the person I abhor ever becoming: someone who refuses to accept culpability for their own actions, instead pedaling out insincere non-apologies that only serve to satiate my own ego in the moment and make myself come off as a nuisance in the eyes of anyone else who stumbles on them. This is merely a lengthy, wistful overview of my time contributing to this wonderful site: my dizzying highs, my many, many lows, and how I plan to use this experience to better myself, both in my online and offline interactions. Even as I'm typing this right now, I'm contemplating that none of this is guaranteed, that at any point I could relapse and become several times worse. But that's somebody I refuse to be; I aspire to be somebody who accepts their own shortcomings, but tries their damnedest to prevent them from taking over their life.

If you look back at my earliest contributions, you can see that my very first edit under this account was in December 2024. I then took a two-month break to have an internal deliberation with myself on whether or not I should continue with this hobby of mine, but the next year in February, it clicked with me that this was something I enjoyed and enjoyed doing, so I took that shot. However, just looking at the frequencies of my edits will tell you everything on how this evolved (or should I say, devolved) from a fun little side hobby to a constant thought at the back of my brain to a full-blown obsession that eventually cascaded into an addiction of sorts. Before I knew it, I was making additions that went from a few times a day at most to about 50 edits in a single week, 100 edits in a single week, and eventually over 500 edits in a few days' time.

Now, before we move on to when my increasingly damaging blunders started rolling out of my personal life and into this informational database, I'd like to share a bit about myself, specifically a behavioral issue of mine that's plagued my entire life: my inability to recognize the effects of my actions on others, sometimes to the extent of blaming them for feeling angry or upset with me. Reminder that this is not an excuse for my conduct on this site (especially during the last few months of my tenure), but rather an explanation.

Throughout my life, I have frequently done, said, or suggested things that I thought were smart, correct, funny, jokey, or "sticking it to crummy authority figures" – but they were really not. They were nothing short of rude, irritating, inappropriate, and bothersome things that I frankly should have pulled. I never quite realized just how much these actions emotionally hurt people, even when they went up to me and explained in the most diplomatic manner they could that they were hurtful. Unfortunately, even with this in mind, I justified it to myself with excuses like "They just don't get me" or "They should learn to accept who I am", instead of taking the time to validate their feelings. It wasn't until November 2025, when the consequences of my actions got grave enough that I was about to be permanently blocked, therefore losing something that I have only just now recognized as an addiction, that I began to consider that what I'd been doing was wrong.

Things didn't start out so bad; besides a few hiccups like not adding proper citations to the Roger Craig Smith page, my March, May, and to some extent, even my April 2025 edits were mostly very solid, productive and informational, something and someone I always strove to be. I even managed to have the honor of creating full-blown pages, and restoring deleted drafts that I used to plan on working on, but am now uncertain if completion will come for any of them (pages I was working on at the time of my block included ones for Oggy and the Cockroaches, Wow! Wow! Wubbzy!, Donkey Kong Country and drafts for upcoming pages for Amazon Prime Video original Pete the Cat and recently-debuted webtoon Gil Next Door).

In my point of view, trouble started to arise around September 2025, where it seemed like every week, I would endlessly get myself into trouble with patient, excellent contributors like Waxworker, Magitroopa, and Magical Golden Whip, who would send me warnings ordering me to cease this kind of conduct at once, only for me to brush them off and stubbornly refuse to stop my disruptions, and somehow be surprised when they'd come to message me again about even more problems crawling out of the woodwork. This would steadily escalate in my October edits before exploding into seriously asking to be indefinitely blocked for my persistent defiance of their reasonable requests for me to stop in November and December 2025 and January 2026, the last month being my lowest point both as someone trying to "contribute" on Wikipedia and as a general person online.

The gradual chain of events that led to me speeding up my inevitable self-destructive termination began to culminate about a week ago, on January 8, where I made an edit to the Scott Adams page adding dates anticipating the man's death and resting place. This was, is, and will always be my absolute lowest point as a Wikipedia editor, due to the sheer callousness and insensitivity I displayed for a dying man on a hospital bed just to get the go-ahead on when he would pass away. I even recognized myself that putting this out into the world wouldn't do anybody any favors; it would just irreparably damage my own self-worth when it comes to voicing my own opinions, but I did so anyway. In response, a user by the name of Marcus Markup reached out to me on this talk page and understandably cited that doing something like that was extremely inappropriate and ghastly. This was the first time in a long time that I truly started to reflect on what other people were trying to tell me for years. Sadly, in my attempts to rectify the situation and make things right, I failed to go to the root of the issue and issued an act of damage control that was so disingenuous, I honestly don't blame him for prohibiting me from accessing his talk page again unless it was for important matters.

Within hours of that comment, I posted a personalized apology on his talk page, admitting that what I did wasn't just inappropriate, but unacceptable, and acknowledging that he had no reason to accept my apology given how, no matter how guilt-ridden I was, that still would not absolve the gravity of the situation and make what I insinuated okay. At the time, I believed that this would show him that I understood the impact of my actions and was trying to make amends with myself, and, deep down, absolve myself of my own guilt.

Needless to say, I was completely wrong. Reading that post doesn't give the impression of someone who struggles with communication but recognizes their own wrongdoings, it gives the impression that they're intentionally malicious and simply doing this to save their own skin. This is something he rightfully put me on blast for before banning me from his talk page.

The final straw of my Wikipedia journey came on January 14, where I was alerted that my indefinite banning from Wikipedia altogether was being seriously considered due to my disruptive editing, disregard for the previous warnings posted on this talk page, and a myriad of other problems discussed above. Eventually, Blade of the Northern Lights decided to go with blocking me from editing any more pages on this site altogether; it was made official two minutes after its announcement.

As previously stated, I don't want to come across as self-pitying or feeling sorry for myself, but honestly, I'm kind of grateful that Blade of the Northern Lights blocked me when they did. In preparation for constructing this message together, I looked through a bunch of my older edits, and I just can't help but see the negatives outside of ones for Media that I genuinely enjoyed working on like Ruby Gloom or Tom and Jerry: The Golden Era Anthology (another page I created myself). For as efficient as I was with it, that can't compensate for the fact that I prioritized it over important matters, exploited other people's hard work, persistently failed to communicate with my fellow editors even when it was an absolute necessity, made other people's jobs harder, and just contributed as much bad as I did good, probably even moreso. I just associate it with being a screw-up whose opinion shouldn't have been heard and who failed at basic things that people do when they work at anything, Wikipedia-related or not. Other people on this site pulled off what I was trying to do so much better, simply because they succeeded at basic fundamentals, which I failed at.

At the end of the day, I do not claim to be a perfect person, nor do I expect anyone to forgive me. They don't owe me anything. At times, I have difficulties calling myself a good person at all. There's a lot of this that I don't forgive myself for. I am human. I have made mistakes and errors of varying degrees, as has everyone on this planet we call home, and it's inevitable that even as I continue to work on myself, I will slip up and do so again. But the most important thing is that we don't double-down, we level-up; we don't brush it off, we learn from it; and we don't act callous, we take other people's thoughts into consideration. And that is something I will try my very hardest to do as I move on from this chapter of my life. As the old adage goes, "With great power comes great responsibility". I gave myself a position of power and wielded it irresponsibly.

As for one last thing before I leave the site, I appreciate everyone here whose fostered an informational and valuable website, something I myself feel that I feeled at. Thanks for everything you've done. I'm going to enjoy life out in the real world, become a better person, do better, try better, do everything right that I did wrong here. And to anybody who reads this, learn from my errors and try to be the best Wikipedia contributor you can feasibly be.

Sincerely – Poopdecktheoverlord • 04:38, 16 January 2026 (UTC) ❤️

For what it's worth, I took no joy in reporting you to ANI; I simply felt there was no longer any other effective option available given your lack of communication here and your continued problematic editing (as evidenced, at the time I also was unaware you had been reported there previously). As you do seem remorseful and to have a desire to contribute constructively, I'd encourage you to consider Wikipedia:Standard offer in the future. In any event, I hold no animosity toward you. Best wishes for the future! DonIago (talk) 14:38, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
I've thought about it for some time, and I've decided that yeah, I do want another shot at proving myself here through the "standard offer". In any case, I sincerely internally promise to avoid the disruptive and disrespectful behavior that plagued a good deal of my edits before my blocking. All I have to do is wait six months for another shot and sincerely promise to do better... hoo boy this is gonna be rough, but I'll manage.
See you in July... hopefully. Poopdecktheoverlord (talk) 20:08, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
Regarding your saved edits below: If you can you still create subpages of your user page, e.g. User:Poopdecktheoverlord/Donkey Kong Country episodes, you could avoid this mess. But I don't know if that's possible when you're blocked. — Chrisahn (talk) 22:32, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
Regardless of whether you can or not, you should self-revert; that's not an appopriate use of your talk page while blocked. It's in the page history now, so once you're unblocked, you can go back and find it there. EducatedRedneck (talk) 22:35, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
Just did so. Poopdecktheoverlord 23:51, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
And then you went and did it again. Two things: 1) Each time you edit, including this talk page, it resets the timer for WP:SO. 2) The above was clearly intentional, and someone noticed; an ANI report was filed regarding it. EducatedRedneck (talk) 12:00, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
Colour me surprised aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 00:53, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mediawan Kids & Family has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mediawan Kids & Family. Thanks! Earth605talk 10:39, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mediawan Kids & Family has been accepted

Mediawan Kids & Family, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nighfidelity (talk) 12:37, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alix de Maistre (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bravelake was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Bravelake (talk) 02:48, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Poopdecktheoverlord! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bravelake (talk) 02:48, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI