User talk:Preime TH

Hello, Preime TH! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

More information Getting Started, Getting Help ...

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Close

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 16:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi

Constitution of Bulgaria IS NOT Constitution of Greece. In Bulgarian Constitution, since 2023, such PM is officially called caretaker. It is time to stop. Panam2014 (talk) 12:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Please read reliables sources.

See also state-owned news agency.

state radio

state TV

independent newspaper from Bulgaria Panam2014 (talk) 12:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Reuters Panam2014 (talk) 13:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Edwardx. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 09:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pornpetch Wichitcholchai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caretaker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi

Could you explain him that he should stop his changes without sources? Removing sourced content is a vandalism. Panam2014 (talk) 00:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

You could try talking to this administrator. User:ToBeFree Preime TH (talk) 04:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Horus (talk) 07:14, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Horus (talk) 07:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Horus (talk) 07:57, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello. Please could you stop reverting; if you make an edit and it is reverted, you should try and gain consensus for your change on the talk page, in line with WP:BRD. Thanks, Number 57 22:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I think the format of showing the baby political parties is better because in some periods Thailand was in the period of the 2 main party system, namely in the years 1957, 1969 and 2005-2011. Preime TH (talk) 22:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean by "baby" political parties, but in most elections a large number of parties won seats.

The original rationale for changing the infobox to include all the parties was the fact that there was no clear rationale for including or excluding parties (at the time, an editor was regularly adding/removing parties from Thai infoboxes without clear reasoning), particularly given the highly volatile nature of Thai politics. Therefore (IMO) it is easier to just include all of them. What we don't want to end up with is a situation like Indian elections where there is constant edit warring over which parties to include. Cheers, Number 57 22:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

That's why I think it's more reasonable to display data only for the main parties, like the 2019 election. I see that 1 of the 11 political parties is just a political party that is considered to be rounded up from the AMS election system, which votes only for MPs on a constituency basis. Party lists are scored on a district-wise basis. Preime TH (talk) 22:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

That's the whole issue though – the definition of "main parties" is subjective and doesn't create consistency. For example, in 1975 Thai general election, you kept the top six parties – why is a party with 16 seats (Social Nationalist) worthy of inclusion but a party with 15 seats (Socialist Party) not?

As far as I can see, there not a compelling argument and zero benefit in excluding some parties that won seats. Number 57 22:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Social Nationalist Party It is a political party that joins the government and has roles such as the leader of this party holding the positions of Speaker of the House of Representatives and President of the National Assembly. As for the Socialist Party, although it won seats in parliament, it did not play much of a role. Preime TH (talk) 22:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

And this illustrates what I mean about a lack of consistency – you excluded several parties that are government coalition members from the new 2023 infobox. And in the 2019 infobox you included one party than won ten seats but not the other. Doing it like this is a mess and will inevitably lead to endless disputes about which parties are sufficiently "main".

What problem does including all the parties actually create? Number 57 23:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Dear @Preime TH, I see that you recently did many edits in the Cabinet of Thailand article. Thank you for keeping the information up to date.

However, you did not add any new sources. Particularly, I disagree with changing the "Took Office" date of all cabinet members to September 3. First, according to the source provided, the cabinet was approved on September 4. You may need to add another source that confirms the cabinet took office on September 3. Second, many cabinet members remained in their previous offices. Now it appears they just took office, although some have been active in the same position for many more months or even a year. For example, the Anutin Charnvirakul article states that Mr. Anutin assumed office as Minister of Interior on September 1, 2023 and as deputy prime minister in 2019. This now contradicts the information shown in the table. Therefore, I would suggest rectifying the dates to resolve these contradictions. XulF (talk) 16:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

@XulF Hello as well, although the royal command was published on 4 September 2024 the appointment was made on 3 September 2024. Preime TH (talk) 22:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Announced on 3 September B.E. 2567, being the 9th year of the present Reign. Preime TH (talk) 22:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Sure, but there is no source given for it in the article. Also, the other problem remains: Many ministers remained in office, they did not just start on September 3rd. XulF (talk) 08:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi Preime TH. Per MOS:SMALL, smaller font sizes should not be used in infoboxes. Therefore, I've reverted your use of {{small| at Anand Panyarachun. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 12:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited King of Malaysia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page His Majesty.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to King of Malaysia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 01:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

How can you not be creative? I edited it to be true. Yang di Petuan Agong This is the official position title that must come before the informal title according to principle. It may cause people to misunderstand. And another thing, Yang di Petuan Agong does not mean constitutional monarchy, but means Supreme Head of the Federation Preime TH (talk) 02:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

This is an encyclpedia, we're not supposed to be "creative". And none of that explains removing sourced content or adding non-existent files. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 03:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Fair Party, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:08, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Preime TH. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of presidents of provincial administrative organization, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Hey. For the cabinet of Anutin Charnvirakul, you changed the Pheu Thai Party faction from my edit of Charlem Group to Sadka Group, but why? Richie1509 (talk) 11:22, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Watch this news

https://www.matichon.co.th/politics/news_5348546 Preime TH (talk) 11:30, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

I see thanks. But one more thing, what about the number of United Thai Nation Party and Pheu Thai in Anutin's cabinet? In the official cabinet page, it says that the UTN has 18 MPs in the cabinet, but in the House of Representatives, it says 15. And 8 Pheu Thai MPs in the new government, shouldn't it be 9? Richie1509 (talk) 11:39, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Sakda's group has 8 MPs. The number 9 is the number of votes of Pheu Thai Party MPs who voted for Anutin, but Chalerm Yubamrung did not clearly declare that he was on the government's side and in the same group as Sakda. As for group 18, in reality there were already 16 MPs, but yesterday one MP from 18 group resigned, leaving 15 MPs. Preime TH (talk) 11:45, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Oh, now I see. Thanks! Richie1509 (talk) 11:49, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for editing Thailand's information on Confidence and supply. Can you please help me clarify why you changed 492 (number of actual MPs we are having now) to 500 (number of total seats in the Parliament)?

When they are voting for MPs, the majority is towards the current, non-vacant seats, IIRC. ส่องเส้นทางสู่การรวมเสียงให้ถึง 247 ของ "เพื่อไทย" และ "ภูมิใจไทย" เหตุใดยังไม่แน่นอน ? - BBC News ไทย

--Sirakorn (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Preime TH. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021 Thai local elections, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

An article you recently created, 2021 Thai local elections, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 01:19, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Madagascar. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 15:33, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

I heard on the news that President Pavel accepted Babish as PM on 15 December Mrgoodboss (talk) 01:38, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

https://crackittoday.com/current-affairs/andrej-babis-sworn-in-as-czech-republics-new-prime-minister/ Preime TH (talk) 05:07, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

He was appointed on December 9, and the Czech Constitution does not have the concept of 2 prime ministers, the outgoing PM is the acting PM. It's similar in every country. Mrgoodboss (talk) 15:50, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, please stop adding date of appointment to Prime Ministers infobox data. Infobox template uses assumed office which is date of they took office. Thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 00:01, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

@Preime TH Hello, you again reverted prime ministers infobox date of assumption into office without discussion. Please lay any of your justification into the discussion or you your reverts will be undiscussed and removed. Thank you. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 18:50, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

@ThecentreCZ The inauguration date overlaps and setting it to begin on the day the cabinet is sworn in is illogical and contradicts political science principles. The inauguration date should start on the day the prime minister is sworn i and the end of term is the day a new prime minister is appointed even if legally the prime minister is acting in an interim capacity. Adhering too strictly to legal principles leads to a lack of flexibility in the information. Preime TH (talk) 01:40, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

@Preime TH No it doesn't contradicts any principles. Date of the day when the Prime Minister is designated is not when prime minister took office. You can change template of the Prime Ministers infobox and change term: Assumed office and In Office. Otherwise its wrong as multiple users corrected and you then reverted many of these reverts with proper moves. Date of designation of prime minister is not date of person assumed the office. Flexibility of information is nothing we are working in fact based encyclopedia. Thank you. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 19:39, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Nakhon Sawan province when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 15:51, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Just for future reference, regarding the Thai election results table, if a results table does not have all parties listed, the votes parameter should not be used, as otherwise you are creating percentage figures that are wrong (as they are based only on the parties listed) – for example in this version, half the parties are missing and all the percentages are wrong.

The two ways around this are to list all other parties in a single row (as currently done on the Japanese election article) or to use the ivotes parameter, which means no percentage is calculated. Cheers, Number 57 15:19, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestion, but I think this table is fine as it is. Currently, 94 percent of the votes have been counted, according to the Election Commission website. Preime TH (talk) 15:26, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

It's fine now, but it was not fine when you were adding the parties one-by-one – either add them all in one go, or have an 'Other parties' row with the total of all those not listed. Number 57 15:46, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello,
In articles about provinces in Thailand, you have placed a second "infobox settlement" below the original "infobox settlement", which contains information about the provincial administration organization.
You may not have realized that photos placed in the text to the left of the first "infobox settlement" are shifted down to the beginning of the second "infobox settlement".
This effect distorts the article about the province.
Perhaps you could first figure out how to place a second "infobox settlement" without disrupting the article. SietsL (talk) 09:15, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

@Preime TH:
Hello,
The solution to the problem is to "stack" the two infoboxes on top of each other.
Place "Stack begin" on a line above the first line of the first infobox.
Place "Stack end" on a line below the last line of the second infobox.

See for example: Samut Songkhram province. On March 10,2026, PrimeHunter already achieved this.

When placing a second infobox in an article about provinces in Thailand, please place the necessary "Stack begin" and "Stack end" at the beginning and end of the infoboxes. SietsL (talk) 04:24, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Preime TH. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of presidents of provincial administrative organization".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:53, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to 1996 Thai general election; it is considered vandalism. Please see the image use policy for appropriate use of images in Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. The English Wikipedia doesn't use AI upscaling on low res historical photos, per MOS:AIUPSCALE. The low quality File:Chatichai Choonhavan-George Bush meeting (cropped).jpg should not be replaced with the speculative 10x AI magnification File:Chatichai Choonhavan.jpg. See the thread at Talk:Chatichai_Choonhavan#AI_upscaled_image. Belbury (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2026 Thai general election. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 18:59, 28 February 2026 (UTC)