User talk:ProsePioneer

I've reverted your edits to Kheri (Peshawari chappal) because you are topic banned from articles related to South Asia. You are clearly aware of this topic ban, because you removed the notice from this talk page. Please don't attempt to make more edits on South Asia-related articles, or you will be blocked from editing altogether. No one wants to see that happen. There's the whole rest of Wikipedia to contribute to, if you want. --AntiDionysius (talk) 11:20, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ProsePioneer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

While I understand that my edits on Kheri were in violation of my topic ban, my intent was only to prevent what I perceived as mass deletion of sourced content. I realize now that I should have raised these concerns on the Talk Page or through Dispute Resolution rather than editing the article directly. I apologize for the disruption. ProsePioneer (talk) 11:58, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See below. asilvering (talk) 00:54, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You really shouldn't use AI to write your appeal, it doesn't understand why you were blocked and has got it completely wrong. Please read WP:LLMAPPEAL. Blue Sonnet (talk) 14:41, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

I m writing this myself, i was just overwhelmed and felt like i couldnt get my point across i realize now that using AI for my previous appeal was a mistake and against WP:LLMAPPEAL i apologize for that

Regarding the block:

1 I admit i edited the kheri article despite my topic ban on south asia. i was helping by stopping mass deletions which was most likely done by a nationalist

2 The multiple accounts were created for same purpose to save that article misinformation

3 I am willing to follow the topic ban strictly i want to contribute to other areas of Wikipedia instead.

I ask that you consider unblocking me or at least giving me a path toward a fresh start.:ProsePioneer (talk) 15:41, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

My advice to you is to re-write your current unblock request, and express your full understanding of the consequences of the topic ban, and not the other, specific topics you'd like to edit. Because as it is, you're saying that you should ahve raised concerns on the talk page or through dispute resolution, but with a topic ban you may not do those things.

The only exceptions for a topic ban are obvious vandalism -- and nothing you've reverted qualifies -- and necessary, legitimate dispute resolution (see WP:BANEX). That means that other than these narrow exceptions, you can not participate in any discussion about South Asian subjects anywhere on English Wikipedia, including on talk pages (even yours) or noticeboards. Until an admin is confident you understand the scope of your topic ban, an unblock will be unlikely; it wouldn't be helpful to the encyclopedia or you personally to unblock you and then immediately have to block you again. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 16:01, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for clarification, CoffeeCrumbs. I realize thatt I completely misunderstood the severity of a topic ban. I thought i could still discuss the content or use dispute resolution but I see now that i am prohibited from even participating

I messed up by creating multiple accounts to bypass this and i apologize for the disruption. If unblocked i will strictly stick to topics unrelated to south asia and will not engage in any discussions regarding that area.ProsePioneer (talk) 16:51, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Is UsernameCheck the only other account that you created? 331dot (talk) 09:03, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes ProsePioneer (talk) 10:28, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

I hope it's ok that I've moved the appeal to the Appeal section & changed the indents so the order of discussion is a bit easier to follow - if you don't like it please let me know and I'll undo it, or you can just undo (revert) it yourself in the page history. Blue Sonnet (talk) 15:13, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

No, that's not true. I'd already blocked LiamTheWriter a month ago. -- asilvering (talk) 00:53, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

This my current account and Liam both were created in same week not with intent of evading ban but I just didn't like this account's name, and no edit was made through that account because i decided to keep this account please check account's edit history before relating both situations. ProsePioneer (talk) 13:33, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Here's the thing: Asilvering asked if UsernameCheck was the only other account that you created, and you replied that UsernameCheck was the only other account that you created. Even though you did not edit with the LiamTheWriter account, you definitely knew that was an account that you created, and complete honesty is necessary for a blocked editor to rebuild trust. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:46, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

When asked if I had created other accounts i focused only on those I had used to edit this was a serious error in judgment i realize now that to rebuild trust i created that account because I was unhappy with my current username but i should have disclosed it immediately when asked ProsePioneer (talk) 15:57, 24 March 2026 (UTC)