User talk:RPC7778

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Emirates fleet, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 17:02, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

@RPC7778: You're quite correct - please don't ask me how I thought the number was changing… more coffee required! My apologies for the duff revert! Danners430 _{tweaks made} 17:17, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Next time, watch the edit properly first before pointlessly adding warnings!!! RPC7778 (talk) 17:18, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Ok, calm down please. I made a mistake and apologised. I don’t expect a user to shout back. I don’t shout when you make a mistake do I? Danners430 _{tweaks made} 17:19, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to United Airlines, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 02:24, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

@Magical Golden Whip: Care to reply using your own words, instead of using automated templates? See the template above before adding next time! RPC7778 (talk) 02:29, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

@Magical Golden Whip: Next time, please include a proper explanation in the edit summary with your revert instead of forcing me to undo multiple edits!! RPC7778 (talk) 02:33, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 02:47, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

@Magical Golden Whip: Okay, are you lazy enough to resort to using automated templates instead of using your words? RPC7778 (talk) 02:48, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Please take greater care with your edits. If you look at your diff using Visual Editor, you'll notice that you're not just tweaking formatting - you're moving a figure from one column to another, effectively stating that a fleet of aircraft no longer have Premium Economy and instead have Business Class. That's not a formatting change, that's a content change.

And just because you're making a minor edit doesn't mean you should ignore edit summaries - literally in the section above, you're complaining about another editor not using edit summaries... I suggest you take their lead and use summaries too - even for minor edits. FInally, yet another reminder about WP:BRD - if your edits are reverted, you should be initiating discussions instead of starting an edit war. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 11:18, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Ok, I already double checked (triple checked) already and I'm not moving a figure from one column to another. I'm just merging common numbers, which is why it looked like I'm moving a figure. I suggest you check it and compare the diffs again, or you could explain to me more? I don't really understand that part where I'm "stating that a fleet of aircraft no longer have Premium Economy and instead have Business Class". RPC7778 (talk) 11:24, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Forgot to add, but I already used the preview in my initial edit. RPC7778 (talk) 11:26, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

If you look at the diff above, and switch to Visual, you can see 76 crossed out in the Premium Economy column. That's what I'm using here, purely because the source editor is a pain for tables. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 11:34, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

There wasn't even a 76 in the W column to begin with! It's only 56. The only 76 I'm seeing is in the J column. How about you compare the before and after?

Note: Don't use Visual and just compare the table itself. RPC7778 (talk) 11:43, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

I think I've figured it out - it's the visual diff viewer getting confused because one of the cells was blank before your edit. One of these days the visual editor (which that diff view is based on) will be fixed... I'm not holding my breath though. I'll self-rv since that's a pretty obvious case of me being misled by the diff viewer.

Can I ask though, please, that you include edit summaries though for all your edits? As an example the only time I don't include a summary is when I'm reverting obvious vandalism. It makes everyone's life easier because we know what your intention was - if I'd known you were merging cells, I probably would have looked at the diff with a slightly more critical eye, and questioned the visual diff viewer. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 11:52, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

👍 RPC7778 (talk) 12:19, 20 February 2026 (UTC)